P3349RHAPSODY: a pivotal phase 3 trial to assess efficacy and safety of rilonacept, an interleukin 1 alpha and beta blocker, in patients with recurrent pericarditis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Imazio ◽  
A Klein ◽  
A Brucato ◽  
P Cremer ◽  
M Lewinter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is managed with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids (CS), and colchicine; up to 15% of pericarditis patients experience multiple recurrences. Interleukin 1 (IL-1) is an important cytokine in the pathophysiology of RP. Rilonacept (KPL-914) is a recombinant fusion protein which binds IL-1α and IL-1β. An ongoing Phase 2 study of rilonacept demonstrated improvements in RP symptoms and inflammation. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) rilonacept in patients with RP in a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Methods RHAPSODY is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial; ∼50 patients will be enrolled (Figure). Patients (≥12 y) must present with at least a third pericarditis episode (all etiologies except infectious and malignant) characterized by a pain score ≥4 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1 mg/dL at screening. Patients may be receiving stable doses of analgesics, NSAIDs, colchicine, and/or CS. After a loading dose (320 mg SC in adults and 4.4 mg/kg SC in children), all patients will receive weekly rilonacept (160 mg SC in adults and 2.2 mg/kg SC in children) during the run-in period. Patients able to taper and discontinue concomitant pericarditis medications and achieve clinical response (mean daily NRS score ≤2.0 during the 7 days before randomization and CRP level ≤0.5 mg/dL) will be randomized 1:1 in a blinded fashion to continued rilonacept or matching placebo weekly SC injections. Investigators may choose different treatments for pericarditis recurrences based on patient clinical status, including bailout rilonacept, while maintaining the blind to prior treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint is time to pericarditis recurrence (adjudicated by an independent committee) in the randomized-withdrawal portion of the study. Secondary efficacy endpoints are the proportion of patients maintaining a clinical response, percentage of days with NRS pain score ≤1, and percentage of patients with no-to-minimal pericarditis symptoms based on patient global assessment. Safety evaluations include adverse events monitoring, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Figure 1 Conclusions RHAPSODY is a pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilonacept in patients with RP using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal design. The results of this study may inform the management of RP. Acknowledgement/Funding This study is sponsored by Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-178
Author(s):  
Azmi Nasser ◽  
Janet K. Johnson ◽  
Toyin Adewole ◽  
Tesfaye Liranso ◽  
Ronald Marcus

AbstractStudy ObjectivesAlthough stimulants are commonly used for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), 10–30% of patients have an inadequate response, adverse events, or comorbidities preventing use. Thus, there is a need for safe, effective nonstimulant options. Extended-release viloxazine (SPN-812), a nonstimulant, is currently in development for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. SPN-812 is a structurally distinct, bicyclic norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with selective serotonergic activity. Results of the Phase 2 program demonstrated efficacy (improved mean ADHD Rating Scale-IV total score) and safety of SPN-812 in children (6–12 years), as well as an onset of action within 1–2 weeks.MethodFour ongoing Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, outpatient, US studies are investigating the efficacy and safety of once-daily SPN-812 for ADHD in children (ages 6–11; 100–400mg) and adolescents (ages 12–17; 200–600mg). Two studies are enrolling children and two are enrolling adolescents. Eligible subjects are required to have minimum baseline scores of ≥28 for ADHD-RS-5 and ≥4 for Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S). These studies will randomize ∼1200 subjects, with ∼800 subjects receiving SPN-812 over a 1–3-week titration and 5-week maintenance period. The primary endpoint in all studies is mean change from baseline to end of study (EOS) in ADHD-RS-5 total score for SPN-812 vs. placebo. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline to EOS in 30% responder rate (% change: ADHD RS 5); Hyperactivity/Impulsivity and Inattention ADHD-RS-5 subscale scores; Conners 3 Rating Scale (parent and self-report); CGI-S/CGI-I (Improvement); Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (parent report); Parenting Stress Index (children); and Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (adolescents) after 6–8 weeks of treatment. Safety is assessed via adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms, physical examinations, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Phase 3 completers are offered the option of enrolling in an open-label extension study (OLE; up to 3 years) with a starting dose of 100/200mg (children/adolescents). Data will be summarized with descriptive statistics and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.ResultsAs of August 2018, enrollment in 1 child study is complete, and the other 3 trials are at ∼89%; rollover into the OLE is ∼90%.ConclusionsThere is an unmet need for nonstimulant ADHD treatment for children and adolescents that is effective, long-acting, and well tolerated. SPN-812 is being investigated in four Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled studies for the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD, based on demonstrated efficacy and safety in the Phase 2 program.This study is an encore of a poster presentation at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology (ASCP).Funding Acknowledgements: Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


2021 ◽  
pp. 204589402110249
Author(s):  
David D Ivy ◽  
Damien Bonnet ◽  
Rolf MF Berger ◽  
Gisela Meyer ◽  
Simin Baygani ◽  
...  

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: This phase-3, international, randomized, multicenter (24 weeks double-blind placebo controlled period; 2-year, open-labelled extension period), add-on (patient’s current endothelin receptor antagonist therapy) study included pediatric patients aged <18 years with PAH. Patients received tadalafil 20 mg or 40 mg based on their weight (Heavy-weight: ≥40 kg; Middle-weight: ≥25—<40 kg) or placebo orally QD for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in 6-minute walk (6MW) distance in patients aged ≥6 years at Week 24. Sample size was amended from 134 to ≥34 patients, due to serious recruitment challenges. Therefore, statistical significance testing was not performed between treatment groups. Results: Patient demographics and baseline characteristics (N=35; tadalafil=17; placebo=18) were comparable between treatment groups; median age was 14.2 years (6.2 to 17.9 years) and majority (71.4%, n=25) of patients were in HW cohort. Least square mean (SE) changes from baseline in 6MW distance at Week 24 was numerically greater with tadalafil versus placebo (60.48 [20.41] vs 36.60 [20.78] meters; placebo-adjusted mean difference [SD] 23.88 [29.11]). Safety of tadalafil treatment was as expected without any new safety concerns. During study period 1, two patients (1 in each group) discontinued due to investigator’s reported clinical worsening, and no deaths were reported. Conclusions: The statistical significance testing was not performed between the treatment groups due to low sample size, however, the study results show positive trend in improvement in non invasive measurements, commonly utilized by clinicians to evaluate the disease status for children with PAH. Safety of tadalafil treatment was as expected without any new safety signals.


2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Yiannakou ◽  
Michel Bouchoucha ◽  
Ingolf Schiefke ◽  
Hubert Piessevaux ◽  
Rafal Filip ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A323.2-A324
Author(s):  
Y Yiannakou ◽  
M Bouchoucha ◽  
I Schiefke ◽  
H Piessevaux ◽  
R Filip ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document