P5514Impact of pro-inflammatory conditions on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Lopez Pais ◽  
M J Espinosa Pascual ◽  
B Izquierdo Coronel ◽  
D Galan Gil ◽  
B Alcon Duran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Connective Tissue Diseases ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Despite all the recent publications, including new guidelines, myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is still a controversy “working diagnosis”. MINOCA patients have a characteristic risk profile, with a lower prevalence of classical risk factors (CVRF). The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between known proinflammatory conditions and MINOCA. Methods Analytical and observational study developed in a University Hospital, which covers 220.000 individuals. We analyzed data of 109 consecutive MINOCA patients admitted to our center during a 3 years period (2016–2018). We used the definitions and the clinical management of the 2016 European Society of Cardiology Working Group Position Paper on MINOCA. The composite of proinflammatory conditions (PIC) includes vasculitis and other autoimmune pathologies; connective tissue diseases, the presence of active cancer and the fact of presenting the myocardial infarction as a complication during admission for a non-cardiovascular pathology. Follow up analysis included death from any cause and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Survival analysis is based on Cox regression and represented by Kaplan Meier curves. Median follow up was 17 months. Results Around one-third of the MINOCA patients had PIC (34.8%). They tended to be older (67.9±14 vs 62.8±15, p 0.08), with no differences in rate of female sex (55.3 vs 49.3%, p 0.55) neither in traditional CVRF: Tobacco (40.5 vs 42.6%), diabetes (18.4 vs 26.8%), dyslipidaemia (39.5 vs 48.6%) or hypertension (55.3 vs 64.8%). Patients with PIC had a higher proportion of ischemic ECG at presentation (75.7 vs 53.5%, p 0.03), a tendency to worse ejection fraction (45.9 vs 28.2%, p 0.07) and higher in-hospital mortality (2.6 vs 0.0%, p 0.17). Levels of troponin were similar (4.0±6.0 vs 6.6±10.4, p 0.2) During follow-up (Figure 1), PIC was related to a higher all-cause-mortality (16.2 vs 1.5%, Hazard Ratio (HR) 10.7 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.3–89.0, p 0.03). Patients with PIC also showed a non-significant higher cardiovascular mortality (5.3 vs 1.4%, HR 3.5 [CI: 0.3–38.5], p 0.3) and higher rate of MACE (13.5 vs 9.2%, HR 1.6 [CI: 0.5–5.1], p 0.4). Conclusion In this study, MINOCA patients had a high prevalence of PIC, being present in more than one-third of them. They are linked to worse prognosis, with higher all-cause mortality and a non-significant increase in cardiovascular mortality and MACE, which could be significant with the appropriate number of patients.

P817Shall takotsubo syndrome be tear apart from the working diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Lopez Pais ◽  
B Izquierdo Coronel ◽  
D Galan Gil ◽  
B Alcon Duran ◽  
M J Espinosa Pascual ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Takotsubo Syndrome ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background There is controversy to whether Takotsubo Syndrome (TTS) should be classified as a Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA). The aim of this study is to compare the clinical profile and prognosis of TTS with non-TTS MINOCA patients. Methods Analytical and observational study developed in a University Hospital, which covers 220.000 individual. We analyzed the clinical data of all consecutive MINOCA patients admitted to our center during a 3 years period (2016–2018). We used the definitions and the clinical management of 2016 ESC Working Group Position Paper on MINOCA, which considers TTS as a MINOCA. Follow up analysis included death from any cause and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Survival analysis is based on Cox regression. Median follow-up was 17 months. Results Twenty-six out of 109 patients (24%) classified as MINOCA where TTS. Patients with TTS were older (72.2±11.5 vs 62.3±14.9, p<0.01) and the female proportion was higher (72.0 vs 43.9%, p 0.01) than in the non-TTS MINOCA group. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, there were no significant differences: Hypertension (56.0 vs 63.4%), Dyslipidemia (48.9 vs 45.7%), smoking rate (41.7 vs 41.8%) and diabetes (32.0 vs 22.0%,). The antecedent of atrial fibrillation tended to be higher in TTS group (4.0 vs 18.3%, p 0.08). TTS patients at admission referred angina as the main symptom in fewer cases (56.0 vs 78.0%, p 0.03), but they had an electrocardiogram suggesting ischemia more frequently (87.5 vs 53.7%, p<0.01). TTS presented more frequently with Killip class worse than II (24.9 vs 1.2%, p<0.01) and with more systolic dysfunction (92.0 vs 15.9%m p<0.01) than non-TTS MINOCA. There was no significant difference in the peak of troponin (5.7±9.7 vs 5.6±8.8). Levels of hemoglobin at the admission were lower in the TTS group (12.4±2.2 vs 13.8±2.0, p<0.01). The proportion of in-hospital complications (recovered cardiac arrest, shock, pulmonary edema, ictus, re-infarction) were higher in the TTS group (40.0 vs 6.1%, p<0.01). TTS was an intercurrent complication during admission for a non-cardiovascular pathology in more occasions than non-TTS MINOCA (16 vs 4.9%, p 0.06). During follow-up, TTS showed worse prognosis, with higher all-cause mortality: 16.0 vs 4.0%, Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.49 (Confidence Interval [CI] 1.01–20.10, p<0.05); a tendency to more cardiovascular mortality: 8.0 vs 1.2%, p 0.07, HR 6.7 (CI 0.61–74.35, p 0.12) and to an excess of MACE: 20.0 vs 8.0%, p 0.1, HR 3.1 (CI 0.92–9.98, p 0.07). Conclusion There are differences in the clinical profile and prognosis of TTS patients compared to the rest of non-TTS MINOCA, being TTS a more aggressive entity. We think these data are in line with the recently released 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, where TTS should be considered apart from the rest causes of “myocardial injury” or “myocardial infarction”, being an entity with its own characteristics and prognosis.

scholarly journals Insomnia incidence in myocardial infarction with and without obstructive coronary arteries

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Izquierdo ◽  
R Olsen ◽  
R Abad ◽  
D Nieto ◽  
C Perela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emotional Disorders ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Insomnia Severity Index ◽  
Insomnia Severity

Abstract Background Insomnia can either be a primary problem or it may be associated with other psychological conditions, ranging from anxiety to depression. Some studies have reported that pts with MINOCA (myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries) have more emotional disorders than the rest of pts with myocardial infarction (MI). However, a relationship with insomnia has not been yet described. The aim of this study is to compare insomnia levels between patients with MINOCA and the rest of MI patients using a validated scale: Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) (Figure 1). Methods We performed an analytical and observational study in which all consecutive MI pts from July 2017 to December 2020 were recruited. We used the latest definitions of MINOCA according to the 2020 ESC Guidelines. A group of experts reviewed all MINOCA cases in order to exclude those who did not fulfil criteria. Therefore, takotsubo syndrome and pts with myocarditis were excluded. ISI questionnaire was completed by each patient during admission. Total score ranges from 0 to 28 points. Depending on the final score, pts could have no clinically significant insomnia (0–7 points), subthreshold insomnia (8–14 points), clinical insomnia of moderate severity (15–21 points) and severe clinical insomnia (22–28 points). Follow up analysis included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular readmission, myocardial reinfarction, stroke and death from any cause). Survival analysis is based on Cox regression. Median follow-up was 25±23 months. Results From a total of 413 consecutive MI pts, 244 (59%) completed the questionnaire. Of them, 32 (13%) were MINOCA pts. There were no statistically significant differences in insomnia levels between both groups (Table 1). Even in absolute terms, both groups presented same mean levels: MINOCA mean value 7.6±6 points vs rest of MI 7.7±6 points, p=0.8. When separated by sex, women in the MI group had higher punctuation levels than men (24% of moderate clinical insomnia in women vs 8.9% of men, p=0.03). Punctuation in ISI questionnaire showed no significant differences in MACE in MINOCA pts (HR 0.9, CI 95% (0.7–1.2)), nor in the rest of MI pts (HR 0.9, CI 95% (0.9–1.03)). Conclusions Levels of insomnia were similar in MINOCA pts than in the rest of MI pts. Follow up showed no differences in MACE between both groups regarding insomnia according to ISI. Women had higher punctuation levels than men, with more clinical insomnia in a moderate grade. Subjective emotions could lead to mistaken findings, making it necessary to use ISI questionnaire or other objective validated scales to correctly study some disorders and their distribution in different populations. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Spanish Society of Cardiology Table 1. Insomnia severity index Figure 1. ISI Questionnaire

P5714Impact on the prognosis of treatment administrated in the daily clinical practice to patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Lopez Pais ◽  
L Alvarez Rodriguez ◽  
B Izquierdo Coronel ◽  
M Pedreira Perez ◽  
R Agra Bermejo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Diagnostic Study

Abstract Background Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) remains a challenge in cardiology clinical practice. 2016 European Society of Cardiology Working Group position paper (ESC-WGPP) recommend to treat them as the rest of myocardial infarctions, mainly with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT), beta blockers, Angiotensin Converter Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI), and statins. The aim of this study is to analyse the use of optimal medical treatment (OMT) of ischemic heart disease (IHD) treatment on this group of patients and its implication in their prognosis. Methods Analytical and observational study based on a retrospective cohort of MINOCA (according to the definitions of ESC-WGPP) extracted from the myocardial infarction registries of three University Hospitals during the period from 2003–2018 (N: 9371). We analysed data about the treatment of all consecutive MINOCA. Treatment prescribed was the one considered by their responsible doctors. We recorded specific information about treatment prescribed after hospitalization. Follow up analysis based on Cox regression included death from any cause and major adverse cardiovascular events ([MACE], a composite of a recurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack or death from any cardiovascular cause) Median follow up was 52.6±32.5 months. Results Of 9371 patients initially admitted for acute myocardial infarction, 620 were classified as MINOCA (incidence 6.6%). Median age was 64.2 years old, and 40.7% were women. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, 25.1% were smokers, 19.0% had diabetes, 42.3 had dyslipidemia and 57.7% hypertension. At discharge, 18.2% had ventricular dysfunction. DAT was prescribed in 32.4% of MINOCA patients, beta blockers in 59.5%, ACEI in 54.8% and statins in 71.9%. Statins showed impact on MINOCAs prognosis, with a significant reduction in total mortality Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.60 (95%Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.38–0.94) p 0.03. DAT had a non-significant reduction in total mortality (HR 0.64 [CI: 0.37–1.13] p 0.12). The rest of the OMT of IHD showed no significant impact on total mortality: beta blockers (HR 0.84 [CI: 0.54–1.31] p 0.45) and ACEI (1.30 [CI: 0.83–2.03] p 0.25) None of the OMT had impact on MACE after MINOCA: DAT (HR 0.97 [CI: 0.70–1.35] p 0.87), beta blockers (HR 0.92 [CI: 0.69–1.23] p 0.57), ACEI (1.13 [CI: 0.85–1.51] p 0.40) and statins (0.94 [CI: 0.69–1.30] p 0.74). Figure 1 Conclusion This study suggests that statins may be liked with a better prognosis in MINOCA, whereas the rest of conventional IHD treatments showed no difference in the course of the illness. This could be due to the heterogeneity of physiopathological mechanisms underlying the working diagnosis of MINOCA. So, following the 2016 ESC-WGPP on MINOCA recommendations, a deep diagnostic study must be performed in order to individualize the treatment.

Myocardial infarction with non obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) according to definitions of 2020 ESC Guidelines: clinical profile and prognosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Nieto Ibanez ◽  
A Fraile Sanz ◽  
B Izquierdo Coronel ◽  
C Perela Alvarez ◽  
R Olsen Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Coronary Spasm ◽  
Connective Tissue Diseases ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Esc Guidelines

Abstract Background MINOCA's physiopathology, treatment and prognosis are yet to be completely understood. The aim of this study is to compare baseline characteristics and prognosis of MINOCA patients and those of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and obstructive coronary arteries. Methods We analysed all consecutive patients with MI who underwent coronary angiography admitted in a University Hospital covering a population of 220.000 people during a period of 60 months. The database and the all the patient's angiographies were revised by a group of experts in order to adequate MINOCA to 2020 ESC Guidelines definition and the American Heart Association position paper. Results 680 patients, 68 of whom were MINOCA (10%) with a median of follow up of 31±16 months were analysed (see table 1). We found no differences in both groups' age. Female gender was more prevalent among MINOCA patients. The underlying mechanism in MINOCA was coronary spasm (17.6%), plaque rupture (13.2%), coronary embolism (7.4%), coronary dissection (2.9%), type II infarction (19.1%) or unknown (39.7%). Coronary arteries in MINOCA patients had no obstructions at all in 57.4%, and 30–50% obstruction in 42.6% of the cases. MINOCA patients didn't have higher prevalence of cancer, autoimmune or psychiatric diseases, dyslipidaemia, hypertension or inflammatory analytical parameters. However, we found significant differences in atrial fibrillation, migraine, connective tissue diseases, tobacco use and diabetes. We found no effect of stress in the development of MINOCA (measured with validated STAI and DS-14 scales). Symptoms at admission didn't differ between the two groups, but those with MINOCA had normal ECG more frequently. Prognosis showed relevant differences, as MINOCA patients had less major cardiovascular complications, such as inotropic requirements (0% Vs 4.8%, p=0.04), shock (0% vs 6.6%, p=0.013) and left ventricular dysfunction (11.8 vs 30.2, p=0.015). Furthermore, myocardial injury biomarkers' levels were, significantly lower in MINOCA patients. Death rates tend to be lower both in hospital (0% vs 3.1%, p=0.131) and during follow up (9.1% vs 11.5%, p=0.369). Conclusion Analysing MINOCA patients' clinical profile might help us understanding the underlying physiopathology, prognosis and treatment targets. In these patients, classic cardiovascular risk factors don't appear to be as important as in obstructive patients. At admission, we found no clinical differences that could help making an early diagnosis, even if those with normal ECG and lower levels of myocardial injury biomarkers are more likely to have non-obstructive coronary arteries. These patients seem to have better prognosis and lower myocardial injury than those with obstructive coronary arteries. Further research is needed to provide more evidence on the accurate treatment of these patients. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Anxiety in MINOCA patients according to latest definitions

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Izquierdo ◽  
J Lopez Pais ◽  
A Fraile Sanz ◽  
R Olsen ◽  
R Abad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emotional Disorders ◽  
Trait Anxiety ◽  
State Anxiety ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Anxiety Levels

Abstract Background Anxiety is a global public health problem affecting the lives of large numbers of patients (pts) and their families. Some studies suggest that pts with MINOCA (myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries) have more anxiety levels than the rest of pts with myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of this study is to compare anxiety levels between pts with MINOCA and the rest of MI pts using a validated scale: The State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Methods An analytical and observational study was developed in a University Hospital. We analysed the clinical data of all consecutive MI pts admitted to our centre from July 2017 to December 2020. Inclusion criteria were determined by the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction and the latest definitions of MINOCA according to the 2020 ESC Guidelines. A group of experts reviewed all MINOCA cases in order to exclude those who did not fulfil the selection standards and takotsubo syndrome and myocarditis pts were excluded. STAI questionnaire was completed by each patient during admission. Data collected included “trait anxiety”, that refers to relatively stable individual differences in anxiety-proneness, whereas “state anxiety” is a temporary emotion due to a particular situation (hospitalization in this case). Total score in each subgroup ranges from 0 to 60 points, where a higher score correlates with major anxiety levels. Follow up analysis included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular readmission, myocardial reinfarction, stroke and death from any cause). Survival analysis is based on Cox regression. Median follow-up was 25±23 months. Results From a total of 413 consecutive MI pts, 243 (58.8%) completed the questionnaire. Of them, 32 (13%) were MINOCA pts. There were no significant differences in trait anxiety between both groups (MINOCA mean value 21±14 points vs rest of MI 19±10 points, p=0.9), nor in state anxiety (20±14 vs 19±10 points, p=0.8). There were also no significant differences when data were analysed by percentiles: 37.5% of MINOCA pts were below P25 and 28% of the rest of MI were also in this percentile. At the other end of the scale, 31.3% of MINOCA pts were above P75, as well as 22.7% of the rest of MI pts (table 1). During follow up, punctuation in trait anxiety in MINOCA pts showed no differences in MACE (HR 1.01, CI 95% (0.9–1.07)), nor did punctuation in state anxiety (HR 1.01, CI 95% (0.9–1.06)). This was also observed in the rest of MI pts: trait anxiety HR 1.01, CI 95% (0.9–1.04) and state anxiety HR 0.9, CI 95% (0.9–1.01). Conclusion In this study, there were no significant differences in anxiety levels between MINOCA pts and the rest of MI pts. The lack of takotsubo pts in this study reflect real data from MINOCA according to the latest definitions. Subjective emotions could lead to mistaken findings, making it necessary to determine emotional disorders with validated and objective tools. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): European Society of Cardiology Table 1. Percentile values of STAI.

scholarly journals Expanded cardiac rehabilitation in socially vulnerable patients with myocardial infarction: a 10-year follow-up study focusing on mortality and non-fatal events

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e019307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrine Hald ◽  
Kirsten Melgaard Nielsen ◽  
Claus Vinther Nielsen ◽  
Lucette Kirsten Meillier ◽  
Finn Breinholt Larsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Recurrent Events ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Vulnerable Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectiveCardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk. A research project performed at a university hospital in Denmark offered an expanded CR intervention to socially vulnerable patients. One-year follow-up showed significant improvements concerning medicine compliance, lipid profile, blood pressure and body mass index when compared with socially vulnerable patients receiving standard CR. The aim of the study was to perform a long-term follow-up on the socially differentiated CR intervention and examine the impact of the intervention on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal recurrent events and major cardiac events (MACE) 10 years after.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingThe cardiac ward at a university hospital in Denmark from 2000 to 2004.Participants379 patients aged <70 years admitted with first episode myocardial infarction (MI). The patients were defined as socially vulnerable or non-socially vulnerable according to their educational level and their social network. A complete follow-up was achieved.InterventionA socially differentiated CR intervention. The intervention consisted of standard CR and additionally a longer phase II course, more consultations, telephone follow-up and a better handover to phase III CR in the municipal sector, in general practice and in the patient association.Main outcome measuresAll-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal recurrent events and MACE.ResultsThere was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (OR: 1.29, 95% CI 0.58 to 2,89), cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.09), non-fatal recurrent events (OR:1.62, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.92) or MACE (OR: 1.31, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.42) measured at 10-year follow-up when comparing the expanded CR intervention to standard CR.ConclusionsDespite the significant results of the socially differentiated CR intervention at 1-year follow-up, no long-term effects were seen regarding the main outcome measures at 10-year follow-up. Future research should focus on why it is not possible to lower the mortality and morbidity significantly among socially vulnerable patients admitted with first episode MI.

Shall be takotsubo tear apart from working diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Lopez-Pais ◽  
B Izquierdo Coronel ◽  
S Raposeiras-Roubin ◽  
L Alvarez Rodriguez ◽  
O Vedia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Distinct Entity ◽  
Prognostic Variables ◽  
Cardiovascular Prognosis

Abstract Aims Whether Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) should be classified within myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is still controversial. The aim of this work is to evaluate main differences between TTS and non-TTS MINOCA. Methods and results A cohort study based on two prospective registries: TTS from the RETAKO registry (N:1055) and non-TTS MINOCA patients from contemporary records of acute myocardial infarction from 5 national centres (N:1080). Definitions and management recommended by the ESC were used. Survival analysis was based on Cox regression; propensity score matching was created to adjust prognostic variables. TTS were more often women (85.9% vs. 51.9%; p&lt;0.001) and older (69.4±12.5 vs. 64.5±14.1 years; p&lt;0.001). Atrial fibrillation was more frequent in non-TTS MINOCA (10.4% vs. 14.4%; p 0.007). Psychiatric disorders were more prevalent in TTS (15.5% vs. 10.2%, p&lt;0.001). In-hospital mortality and complications were higher in TTS: 3.4 vs 1.8%, (p 0.015) and 25.8% vs. 11.5%, (p&lt;0.001). Median follow-up was 32.4 months; TTS had less major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.83. There were no differences in total mortality (HR 0.87; CI: 0.64 to 1.19), but TTS had lower cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.58; CI: 0.35 to 0.98). Conclusions TTS has a different patient's profile and a more aggressive acute phase than the rest of MINOCA. However, its long-term cardiovascular prognosis is better. These results support that TTS should be considered a distinct entity with unique characteristics and prognosis. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Predicting long-term cardiovascular outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction using soluble ST2

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Umut Somuncu ◽  
Belma Kalayci ◽  
Ahmet Avci ◽  
Tunahan Akgun ◽  
Huseyin Karakurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
High Serum ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Lower Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Killip Class ◽  
Target Vessel Revascularization

AbstractBackgroundThe increase in soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) both in the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure is well established; however, existing data regarding sST2 values as the prognostic marker after myocardial infarction (MI) are limited and have been conflicting. This study aimed to assess the clinical significance of sST2 in predicting 1-year adverse cardiovascular (CV) events in MI patients.Materials and methodsIn this prospective study, 380 MI patients were included. Participants were grouped into low sST2 (n = 264, mean age: 60.0 ± 12.1 years) and high sST2 groups (n = 116, mean age: 60.5 ± 11.6 years), and all study populations were followed up for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which are composed of CV mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR), non-fatal reinfarction, stroke and heart failure.ResultsDuring a 12-month follow-up, 68 (17.8%) patients had MACE. CV mortality and heart failure were significantly higher in the high sST2 group compared to the low sST2 group (15.5% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.001 and 8.6% vs. 3.4% p = 0.032, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis concluded that high serum sST2 independently predicted 1-year CV mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.263, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.124–4.557, p = 0.022)]. Besides, older age, Killip class >1, left anterior descending (LAD) as the culprit artery and lower systolic blood pressure were the other independent risk factors for 1-year CV mortality.ConclusionsHigh sST2 levels are an important predictor of MACE, including CV mortality and heart failure in a 1-year follow-up period in MI patients.

scholarly journals Living alone is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: 32 years of follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus T Jensen ◽  
Jacob L Marott ◽  
Andreas Holtermann ◽  
Finn Gyntelberg
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Urban Life ◽  
Living Alone ◽  
Policy Initiatives ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Number Of Individuals

Abstract Aims As a consequence of modern urban life, an increasing number of individuals are living alone. Living alone may have potential adverse health implications. The long-term relationship between living alone and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, however, remains unclear. Methods and results Participants from The Copenhagen Male Study were included in 1985–86 and information about conventional behavioural, psychosocial, and environmental risk factors were collected. Socioeconomic position (SEP) was categorized into four groups. Multivariable Cox-regression models were performed with follow-up through the Danish National Registries. A total of 3346 men were included, mean (standard deviation) age 62.9 (5.2) years. During 32.2 years of follow-up, 89.4% of the population died and 38.9% of cardiovascular causes. Living alone (9.6%) was a significant predictor of mortality. Multivariable risk estimates were [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)] 1.23 (1.09–1.39), P = 0.001 for all-cause mortality and 1.36 (1.13–1.63), P = 0.001 for cardiovascular mortality. Mortality risk was modified by SEP. Thus, there was no association in the highest SEP but for all other SEP categories, e.g. highest SEP for all-cause mortality 1.01 (0.7–1.39), P = 0.91 and 0.94 (0.6–1.56), P = 0.80 for cardiovascular mortality; lowest SEP 1.58 (1.16–2.19), P = 0.004 for all-cause mortality and 1.87 (1.20–2.90), P = 0.005 for cardiovascular mortality. Excluding participants dying within 5 years of inclusion (n = 274) did not change estimates, suggesting a minimal influence of reverse causation. Conclusions Living alone was an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality with more than three decades of follow-up. Individuals in middle- and lower SEPs were at particular risk. Health policy initiatives should target these high-risk individuals.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of PCSK9 inhibitors, statins and ezetimibe with or without statins for cardiovascular outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 844-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safi U Khan ◽  
Swapna Talluri ◽  
Haris Riaz ◽  
Hammad Rahman ◽  
Fahad Nasir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Bayesian Network ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Credible Interval ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Pcsk9 Inhibitors ◽  
Adverse Cardiovascular Event ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background The comparative effects of statins, ezetimibe with or without statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors remain unassessed. Design Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare treatment groups. Methods Thirty-nine randomized controlled trials were selected using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (inception – September 2017). Results In network meta-analysis of 189,116 patients, PCSK9 inhibitors were ranked as the best treatment for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (Surface Under Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA), 85%), myocardial infarction (SUCRA, 84%) and stroke (SUCRA, 80%). PCSK9 inhibitors reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with ezetimibe + statin (odds ratio (OR): 0.72; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.55–0.95; Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria: moderate), statin (OR: 0.78; 95% CrI: 0.62–0.97; GRADE: moderate) and placebo (OR: 0.63; 95% CrI: 0.49–0.79; GRADE: high). The PCSK9 inhibitors were consistently superior to groups for major adverse cardiovascular event reduction in secondary prevention trials (SUCRA, 95%). Statins had the highest probability of having lowest rates of all-cause mortality (SUCRA, 82%) and cardiovascular mortality (SUCRA, 84%). Compared with placebo, statins reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CrI: 0.83–0.94; GRADE: moderate) and cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.84; 95% CrI: 0.77–0.90; GRADE: high). For cardiovascular mortality, PCSK9 inhibitors were ranked as the second best treatment (SUCRA, 78%) followed by ezetimibe + statin (SUCRA, 50%). Conclusion PCSK9 inhibitors were ranked as the most effective treatment for reducing major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction and stroke, without having major safety concerns. Statins were ranked as the most effective therapy for reducing mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document