P878Prevalence and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: a nationwide registry based study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Janosi ◽  
T Ferenci ◽  
P Andreka
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Population Level ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Abstract Background There are conflicting data about the proportion and prognosis of patients (pts) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Purpose To define the incidence and prognosis of MINOCA pts in different types of AMI. Methods The Hungarian Myocardial Infarction Registry (HUMIR) is a nationwide, mandatory database in which the clinical and demographic informations of patients with AMI are recorded. Between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2018, a total of 45,223 AMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) n=22,469) pts were registered. After excluding pts with previous AMI, PCI, CABG, and congestive heart failure, 2003 MINOCA pts were found (MINOCA group), while 43,220 AMI pts had obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD group). Results The proportion of pts with MINOCA disease was 4.4% among the total pts with AMI. The prevalence was higher in the non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) group (n=1546, 6.8%) than in the STEMI (n=457, 2.0%) group. The pts with MINOCA disease were slightly younger compared to the pts with MI-CAD (mean age 64.0±14.4 vs. 65.5±12.2 years respectively). The proportion of women was higher in the MINOCA group than in the MI-CAD group (55.7% vs. 36.5%). At discharge, pts with MINOCA disease were less likely to be prescribed certain drugs compared to the pts with MI-CAD. These include aspirin (85.4% vs. 95.6%), RAAS blockers (83.8% vs. 90.4%), statins (86.2% vs. 94.7%), β-blockers (86.8% vs. 89.8%) for the MINOCA and MI-CAD groups respetively. At the 1-year follow-up, the incidence of new AMI events was 1.6% in the MINOCA group compared with 5.0% in the MI-CAD group (HR=2.79). All-cause mortality was higher among the pts with MI-CAD compared to the pts with MINOCA disease. In the MINOCA group, among the pts with NSTEMI, men and women had similar outcomes at 30 days, but men had somewhat higher mortality at one and two years. In contrast, in the STEMI group, women had higher mortality compared to men at all time points during the study (Table 1). Mortality among MINOCA and MI-CAD pts Mortality MINOCA (n=2003) MI-CAD (n=43,220) MINOCA – STEMI MINOCA – NSTEMI Men (n=218) Women (n=239) Men (n=669) Womenr (n=877) 30-day 5.9% [4.9–7.0] 8.4% [8.1–8.7] 8.7% [4.9–12.4] 13.4% [9–17.6] 4.3% [2.8–5.9] 4.4% [3.1–5.8] 1-year 12.5% [11.0–14.0] 15.6% [15.3–16.0] 12.1% [7.6–16.4] 20.3% [15–25.2] 12.2% [9.6–14.7] 10.8% [8.7–12.8] 2-year 16.7% [14.9–18.5] 19.9% [19.5–20.3] 18.2% [12.4–23.6] 23.6% [17.8–29] 16.9% [13.8–20] 14.3% [11.7–16.7] 95% confidence interval in brackets. Conclusion The population-level incidence of MINOCA disease was 4.4% in AMI; the incidence was higher in the NSTEMI group compared to the STEMI group (6.8% vs. 2.0%). Despite the benign anatomy, the long-term prognosis is poor, especially in women after STEMI: 1 out of 4 pts died at the two-year follow up. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals Long-term prognosis after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Heemelaar ◽  
E A S Polomski ◽  
B J A Mertens ◽  
J W Jukema ◽  
M J Schalij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Abstract Purpose To assess survival trends after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with a prior cancer diagnosis and to evaluate the drivers of prognosis over a follow-up period of five years. Methods Patients with a known cancer diagnosis, admitted with STEMI between 2004–2014 and treated with primary PCI were recruited from the STEMI-clinical registry of our institution. Detailed information on cancer diagnosis, -stage, and treatment regimen were collected from the institutional and national cancer registry system and all patients were followed prospectively. Results In the 215 included patients the cumulative incidence of all-cause death after 5 years of follow-up was 38.2% (N=61). The cause of death was predominantly malignancy-related (N=29, 47.4% of deaths) and only 9 patients (14.8% of deaths) died of a cardiovascular cause. After correcting for age and sex – a recent cancer diagnosis (<1yr relative to >10 yr, HR 3.405 [95% CI: 1.552–7.470], p=0.002), distant metastasis at presentation (HR 2.603 [1.236–5.481], p=0.012), ongoing cancer treatment at presentation (HR 1.878 [1.015–3.475], p=0.045) and natural logarithm of maximum creatinine kinase level (HR 1.345 [1.044–1.733], p=0.022) were significant predictors of long-term mortality. While prevalent renal insufficiency showed significant association with all-cause mortality (HR 2.302 [1.289–4.111], p=0.005), other known determinants of long-term prognosis after STEMI – a history of diabetes mellitus (HR 1.250 [0.566–2.761], p=0.581), hypertension (HR 0.623 [0.393–1.085], p=0.150), and culprit vessel left anterior descending artery or left main artery (HR 1.066 [0.641–1.771], p=0.806) were not significantly associated with survival at 5-years follow-up. Conclusion Cancer patients admitted with STEMI have a poor survival with one third of patients died at 5 year follow up. Cancer was the most common cause of death and malignancy-related factors made a significant impact on prognosis, while most of the established cardiovascular determinants of prognosis were not significantly associated with long-term survival. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Cumulative incidence curve

scholarly journals Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Prognosis between ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
Frédéric Bouisset ◽  
Jean-Bernard Ruidavets ◽  
Jean Dallongeville ◽  
Marie Moitry ◽  
Michele Montaye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Confounding Factors ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Probability Of Death ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Background: Available data comparing long-term prognosis according to the type of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are scarce, contradictory, and outdated. Our aim was to compare short- and long-term mortality in ST-elevated (STEMI) and non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) ACS patients. Methods: Patients presenting with an inaugural ACS during the year 2006 and living in one of the three areas in France covered by the Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) registry were included. Results: A total of 1822 patients with a first ACS—1121 (61.5%) STEMI and 701 (38.5%) non-STEMI—were included in the study. At the 28-day follow-up, the mortality rates were 6.7% and 4.7% (p = 0.09) for STEMI and non-STEMI patients, respectively, and after adjustment of potential confounding factors, the 28-day probability of death was significantly lower for non-STEMI ACS patients (Odds Ratio = 0.58 (0.36–0.94), p = 0.03). At the 10-year follow-up, the death rates were 19.6% and 22.8% (p = 0.11) for STEMI and non-STEMI patients, respectively, and after adjustment of potential confounding factors, the 10-year probability of death did not significantly differ between non-STEMI and STEMI events (OR = 1.07 (0.83–1.38), p = 0.59). Over the first year, the mortality rate was 7.2%; it then decreased and stabilized at 1.7% per year between the 2nd and 10th year following ACS. Conclusion: STEMI patients have a worse vital prognosis than non-STEMI patients within 28 days following ACS. However, at the 10-year follow-up, STEMI and non-STEMI patients have a similar vital prognosis. From the 2nd year onwards following the occurrence of a first ACS, the patients become stable coronary artery disease patients with an annual mortality rate in the 2% range, regardless of the type of ACS they initially present with.

Novel biomarker of Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Cyr61) predicts long-term outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Xiang ◽  
Min Mao ◽  
Ping Tang ◽  
Jun Gu ◽  
Kanghua Ma
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background: Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Cyr61) is a matricellular protein participating in the angiogenesis, inflammation, and fibrotic tissue repair. Previous study has proven its value in diagnosing and risk stratification of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there is no study focusing on Cyr61 and the long-term outcome of STEMI. Methods: A total of 426 patients diagnosed with STEMI were enrolled in this study. Blood sample was acquired 24 hours after the admission. The patients were required long-term follow-up after the discharge, when primary endpoint of all-cause death and secondary endpoint of cardiac complications were observed. Cox hazard ratio model and survival analysis were used to compare the risk of patients with higher level and lower level of Cyr61. Results: We conducted an average of (48.4 ± 17.8) months of follow-up, during which a total of 28 deaths happened (6.6%), while 106 episodes of secondary endpoints occurred (24.9%). Patients with higher quartile (Q4) Cyr61 were at higher risk of death [HR 3.404 95%CI (1.574-7.360), P<0.001] when compared with lower three quartiles (Q1-Q3) Cyr61. In terms of secondary endpoints, patients with Q4 Cyr61 were subject to 4.718 [95%CI (3.189-6.978) , P<0.001] times of risk compared with Q1-Q3 Cyr61. Conclusions: For STEMI Patients, those with increased Cyr61 have higher risk of all-cause death and cardiac complications. Therefore, Cyr61 may be a useful tool in predicting the long-term prognosis of STEMI.

scholarly journals INFARCT HEALING DURING LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AFTER ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. A1652
Author(s):  
Christina Tiller ◽  
Hans-Josef Feistritzer ◽  
Gert Klug ◽  
Sebastian Reinstadler ◽  
Martin Reindl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Infarct Healing ◽  
St Elevation

P6404Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: does aspirin have a place in the treatment of this entity?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Ferreira ◽  
F Freitas ◽  
V Goncalves ◽  
C Ferreira ◽  
J Milner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is still a clinical enigma that is being increasingly recognised, as the number of coronary angiographies we perform in our centres also increase. However, the treatment for this entity is still a matter of important debate, not only due to the different causative mechanisms of this disease but also because there are no major trials regarding MINOCA treatment. Purpose To determine the association between acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use after discharge and mortality after discharge in MINOCA patients admitted to a coronary care unit (CCU). Methods We analyzed data from 370 (11.7% of the global sample) patients admitted with MINOCA in our CCU. Patients with other final diagnoses, missing mortality data, previous acute myocardial infarction, contra-indications to aspirin and known heart failure before admission were excluded. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography and coronary angiography at any point during hospitalisation. After adjusting data for relevant comorbidities we then compared mortality after hospital discharge between the ASA group and the no-ASA group. Results Of all MINOCA patients admitted in our CCU, 84 (22.7%) were diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 286 (77.3%) with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). 296 (80%) patients received ASA after discharge. Both groups were homogeneous as we did not find any significant differences between groups regarding age (p=0.106), left ventricle ejection fraction (p=0.100), GRACE score at hospitalisation (p=0.150), Killip-Kimball class at hospitalisation (p=0.604), incidence of acute kidney injury (p=0.450), maximum c-reactive protein during stay (p=0.804) and low-density lipoprotein levels at hospitalization (p=0.055). There was also no difference in the incidence of diabetes (p=0.350), exposure to daily stress (p=0.767), active smoking (p=0.569), dyslipidemia (p=0.229), hypertension (p=0.057) and type of myocardial infarction (STEMI vs NSTEMI – p=0.215). In this MINOCA cohort (5 years follow-up) a total of 47 patients died (12.7%). ASA vs. no-ASA 1-month (3.1% vs. 0.0%, p=0.214), 6-month (4.5% vs. 1.4%, p=0.317), 1-year (5.9% vs 5.6%, p=0.900), 3-year (10.5% vs. 8.3%, p=0.668) and 5-year (13.3% vs. 12.5%, p=0.860) all-cause mortality was not significantly different. The same non-significant trend towards higher mortality with ASA was obtained when survival curves were taken into account. Conclusions MINOCA remains a challenging entity. In our study, the systematic use of ASA in all patients following MINOCA was not associated with better survival after long-term follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document