scholarly journals Real-world experience with the insertion of a new implantable cardiac monitor

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Deneke ◽  
J Mariani ◽  
P Cabanas ◽  
D Lau ◽  
T Gaspar ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Biotronik SE & Co.KG OnBehalf BIO|CONCEPT.BIOMONITOR III study group, BIO|MASTER.BIOMONITOR III study group, BIO|STREAM-ICM study group Background Implantable Cardiac Monitors (ICM) provide continuous long-term heart rhythm monitoring. The new ICM BIOMONITOR III / IIIm (BM III) is provided with a single-step insertion tool. Purpose To report on the insertion procedure of the BM III in a large real-world patient population. Methods The BM III combines a low cross-section (4.5 x 8.5 mm) with an extended ICM length (77 mm, including flexible antenna). It is inserted into subcutaneous tissue with an ‘injection’ tool that forms the pocket and delivers the device in a single step. We report results of the insertion procedure from a pooled data set from the BIO|CONCEPT BM III (completed) and the BIO|MASTER BM III and BIO|STREAM-ICM (ongoing) studies. Results From 54 investigational sites in 11 countries, 455 insertions were reported (including 39 BM IIIm). The patients were 63 ± 16 years old, had a BMI of 27.6 ± 5.4, and 43% were women. The indications were syncope or pre-syncope (57%), cryptogenic stroke (23%), management of AF (11%) or other (9%). Insertions took 1.7 ± 1.8 minutes until removal of the insertion tool, 4.7 ± 3.4 minutes until wound closure, and 7.1 ± 5.6 minutes including wound cleaning. The wound was sutured (79%) or closed with staples (10%) or adhesive strips (10%). General anaesthesia was used in 8% of the patients and antibiotic prophylaxis in 50% (44% systemic and 6% local). Insertions took place in the catheter laboratory (62%), operating theatre (22%) or in a consultation room (16%) without specific precautional equipment. The insertion site was parallel to the heart"s long axis (56%), parasternal (39%), in the 2nd/3rd intercostal space (3.5%), axillary (0.9%) or at the clavicula (0.7%). The device was repositioned in one case (0.2%). 13 adverse events were reported in connection to the insertion procedure. 5 cases of device pocket bleeding or hematoma occurred. In 5 further cases, the device migrated, posing the risk of extrusion, or actually extruded. Three of these cases used only adhesive strips or no wound closure at all. In two cases, an incorrect usage of the incision tool and substantial subcutaneous fatty tissue may have contributed. One device was damaged by a 200 J defibrillation shock with a shock electrode placed over the device. One patient suffered from dyspnoea, possibly due to psychogenic hyperventilation. One patient had a vasovagal syncope due to pain after an insertion with insufficient local anaesthesia. No infections were reported until the day of analysis, which was more than 30 days after insertion in 92% of all cases. Conclusion The new BM III was inserted in typically less than 5 minutes until wound closure. A relevant number of insertions took place in a consultation room. Prophylactic antibiotics may be unnecessary, because no pocket infections were reported, although no antibiotic prophylaxis was used in one half of all cases (N = 229). In summary, the insertion with the new tool is fast and has a low risk of complications.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Woodward ◽  
A McCourt ◽  
C Dockerill ◽  
L Ayres ◽  
D Augustine ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Stress echocardiography is a widely used, non-invasive imaging modality used to identify prognostically significant coronary artery disease. High levels of accuracy have been reported, however this is highly dependent on operator training and image quality. There are currently limited data available on the accuracy of stress echo in every day clinical practice. Purpose The EVAREST study links stress echo clinics in 30 NHS Hospital Trusts in England and therefore provides data to evaluate the performance and diagnostic accuracy of stress echo in “real-world” clinical practice. Methods Analysis was performed on the first 7415 patients recruited prospectively between 2015 and January 2020. Participants are included if they have undergone stress echo to investigate for ischaemic heart disease. Data is collected on medical history and stress echo performance. Participants are followed up for 12 months through health records and patient phone call, with all outcomes undergoing expert adjudication. A positive cardiac outcome is defined as initiation of anti-anginal medications, ≥70% stenosis on coronary angiography, revascularisation, confirmed acute coronary syndrome or cardiac-related death. Results Mean age of patients undergoing stress echo is 65±12.3 years and 56% are male. Average BMI is 28.9±5.6 kg/m2. 71.4% undergo dobutamine stress (DSE) and 28.4% exercise with <1% having a pacemaker-mediated stress. Contrast was used in 71.4% of studies. Stress echos were interpreted at time of clinic visit as positive for inducible ischaemia in 18.2% of patients. One-year outcome data is currently available for 1892 participants. Sensitivity and specificity for clinician prediction of a positive cardiac outcome was 88.7% and 94.4%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive value of stress echo was 76.4% and 97.6%, respectively. Conclusion EVAREST provides unprecedented, large-scale information on the “real world” use and accuracy of stress echo across different healthcare settings in the UK, demonstrating performance consistent with best practice. Ongoing data collection will be used to evaluate sources of heterogeneity in the predictive accuracy of stress echo and identify optimal approaches to further improve performance. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Ultromics Ltd., Lantheus Ltd.


Haematologica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 1228-1228
Author(s):  
Meral Beksac ◽  
Guldane Cengiz Seval ◽  
Nicholas Kanellias ◽  
Daniel Coriu ◽  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S127-S128
Author(s):  
Kari Lenita Falck Moore ◽  
Cecilie Hveding Blimark ◽  
Annette Juul Vangsted ◽  
Ingemar Turesson ◽  
Tobias Klausen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (6) ◽  
pp. 854-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pau Abrisqueta ◽  
Julio Delgado ◽  
Miguel Alcoceba ◽  
Ana Carla Oliveira ◽  
Javier Loscertales ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document