scholarly journals Examination of a mutable system affecting the components of the segregation distorter meiotic drive system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-76
Author(s):  
K G Golic
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Transposable Element ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Segregation Distortion ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
Drive System ◽  
Partial Loss ◽  
Segregation Distorter ◽  
Relationship Of

Abstract Segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster is the result of an interaction between the genetic elements Sd, a Rsp sensitive to Sd, and an array of modifiers, that results in the death of sperm carrying Rsp. A stock (designated M-5; cn bw) has been constructed which has the property of inducing the partial loss of sensitivity from previously sensitive cn bw chromosomes, the partial loss of distorting ability from SD chromosomes, and a concomitant acquisition of modifiers on the X chromosome and possibly also on the autosomes. By several criteria the changes exhibited under the influence of M-5; cn bw are characteristic of the transposable-element systems which produce hybrid dysgenesis. In the first place, the magnitude of these effects depends on the nature of the crosses performed. The analogy is further strengthened by the observation that the changes induced by M-5; cn bw share other stigmata of Drosophila transposable-element systems, including high sterility among the progeny of outcrosses, and the production of chromosomal rearrangements. The possible relationship of this system to the P, I and hobo transposable element systems is discussed, as well as its bearing on aspects of the Segregation Distorter phenomenon which have yet to be explained.

scholarly journals Transposition of the Responder element (Rsp) of the Segregation distorter system (SD) to the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
E S Walker ◽  
T W Lyttle ◽  
J C Lucchesi
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
Genetic System ◽  
Drive System ◽  
Potential Utility ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Segregation Distorter

Abstract In order to test whether the meiotic drive system Segregation distorter (SD) can operate on the X chromosome to exclude it from functional sperm, we have transposed the Responder locus (Rsp) to this element. This was accomplished by inducing detachments of a compound-X chromosome in females carrying a Y chromosome bearing a Rsps allele. Six Responder-sensitive-bearing X chromosomes, with kappa values ranging from 0.90 to 1.00, were established as permanent lines. Two of these have been characterized more extensively with respect to various parameters affecting meiotic drive. SD males with a Responder-sensitive X chromosome produce almost exclusively male embryos, while those with a Rsp-Y chromosome produce almost exclusively female embryos. This provides a genetic system of great potential utility for the study of early sex-specific differentiation events as it allows the collection of large numbers of embryos of a given sex.

scholarly journals Distinct spermiogenic phenotypes underlie sperm elimination in the Segregation Distorter meiotic drive system

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. e1009662
Author(s):  
Marion Herbette ◽  
Xiaolu Wei ◽  
Ching-Ho Chang ◽  
Amanda M. Larracuente ◽  
Benjamin Loppin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Satellite Dna ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
Drive System ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Segregation Distorter ◽  
Sperm Nuclei ◽  
Very High

Segregation Distorter (SD) is a male meiotic drive system in Drosophila melanogaster. Males heterozygous for a selfish SD chromosome rarely transmit the homologous SD+ chromosome. It is well established that distortion results from an interaction between Sd, the primary distorting locus on the SD chromosome and its target, a satellite DNA called Rsp, on the SD+ chromosome. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms leading to post-meiotic SD+ sperm elimination remain unclear. Here we show that SD/SD+ males of different genotypes but with similarly strong degrees of distortion have distinct spermiogenic phenotypes. In some genotypes, SD+ spermatids fail to fully incorporate protamines after the removal of histones, and degenerate during the individualization stage of spermiogenesis. In contrast, in other SD/SD+ genotypes, protamine incorporation appears less disturbed, yet spermatid nuclei are abnormally compacted, and mature sperm nuclei are eventually released in the seminal vesicle. Our analyses of different SD+ chromosomes suggest that the severity of the spermiogenic defects associates with the copy number of the Rsp satellite. We propose that when Rsp copy number is very high (> 2000), spermatid nuclear compaction defects reach a threshold that triggers a checkpoint controlling sperm chromatin quality to eliminate abnormal spermatids during individualization.

scholarly journals ON THE COMPONENTS OF SEGREGATION DISTORTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. III. NATURE OF ENHANCER OF SD

Genetics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-434
Author(s):  
John G Brittnacher ◽  
Barry Ganetzky
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Segregation Distortion ◽  
Allelic Variation ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Segregation Distorter ◽  
In Cis ◽  
General Component

ABSTRACT Analysis of X-ray-induced deletions in the Segregation Distorter (SD) chromosome, SD-5, revealed that this chromosome had a gene proximal to lt in the centric heterochromatin of 2L that strongly enhanced the meiotic drive caused by the SD chromosome. This Enhancer of Segregation Distortion [E(SD)] locus had not been characterized in earlier studies of SD chromosomes because it cannot be readily separated by recombination from the Responder (Rsp) locus in the proximal heterochromatin of 2R.—To determine whether E(SD) is a general component of all SD chromosomes and to examine further its effects on distortion, we produced deletions of E(SD) in three additional SD chromosomes. Analysis of these deletions leads to the following conclusions: (1) along with Sd and Rsp, E(SD) is common to all SD chromosomes; (2) the E(SD) allele on each SD chromosome enhances distortion by the same amount, which indicates that allelic variation at the E(SD) locus is not responsible for the different drive strengths seen among SD chromosomes; (3) E(SD) causes very little or no distortion by itself in the absence of Sd; (4) E(SD), like Sd, acts in a dosage-dependent manner; (5) E(SD) exerts its effect in cis or trans to Sd; and (6) if E(SD)  + exists, its function is not related to SD.

scholarly journals Distinct spermiogenic phenotypes underlie sperm elimination in the Segregation Distorter meiotic drive system

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Herbette ◽  
Xiaolu Wei ◽  
Ching-Ho Chang ◽  
Amanda M Larracuente ◽  
Benjamin Loppin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Satellite Dna ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
Drive System ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Segregation Distorter ◽  
Sperm Nuclei ◽  
Very High

Segregation Distorter (SD) is a male meiotic drive system in Drosophila melanogaster. Males heterozygous for a selfish SD chromosome rarely transmit the homologous SD+ chromosome. It is well established that distortion results from an interaction between Sd, the primary distorting locus on the SD chromosome and its target, a satellite DNA called Rsp, on the SD+ chromosome. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms leading to post-meiotic SD+ sperm elimination remain unclear. Here we show that SD/SD+ males of different genotypes but with similarly strong degrees of distortion have distinct spermiogenic phenotypes. In some genotypes, SD+ spermatids fail to fully incorporate protamines after the removal of histones, and degenerate during the individualization stage of spermiogenesis. In contrast, in other SD/SD+ genotypes, protamine incorporation appears less disturbed, yet spermatid nuclei are abnormally compacted, and mature sperm nuclei are eventually released in the seminal vesicle. Our analyses of different SD+ chromosomes suggest that the severity of the spermiogenic defects associates with the copy number of the Rsp satellite. We propose that when Rsp copy number is very high (> 2000), spermatid nuclear compaction defects reach a threshold that triggers a checkpoint controlling sperm chromatin quality to eliminate abnormal spermatids during individualization.

scholarly journals ON THE COMPONENTS OF SEGREGATION DISTORTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Genetics ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-355
Author(s):  
Barry Ganetzky
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Segregation Distortion ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
Chromosome 2 ◽  
Induced Mutations ◽  
Distorted Segregation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Segregation Distorter

ABSTRACT The segregation distorter (SD) complex is a naturally occurring meiotic drive system with the property that males heterozygous for an SD-bearing chromosome 2 and an SD  +-bearing homolog transmit the SD-bearing chromosome almost exclusively. This distorted segregation is the consequence of an induced dysfunction of those sperm that receive the SD  + homolog. From previous studies, two loci have been implicated in this phenomenon: the Sd locus which is required to produce distortion, and the Responder (Rsp) locus that is the site at which Sd acts. There are two allelic alternatives of Rsp—sensitive (Rspsens) and insensitive (Rspins); a chromosome carrying Rspins is not distorted by SD. In the present study, the function and location of each of these elements was examined by a genetic and cytological characterization of X-ray-induced mutations at each locus. The results indicate the following: (1) the Rsp locus is located in the proximal heterochromatin of 2R; (2) a deletion for the Rsp locus renders a chromosome insensitive to distortion; (3) the Sd locus is located to the left of pr(2-54.5), in the region from 37D2-D7 to 38A6-B2 of the salivary chromosome map; (4) an SD chromosome deleted for Sd loses its ability to distort; (5) there is another important component of the SD system, E(SD), in or near the proximal heterochromatin of 2L, that behaves as a strong enhancer of distortion. The results of these studies allow a reinterpretation of results from earlier analyses of the SD system and serve to limit the possible mechanisms to account for segregation distortion.

Linkage and segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster

Genome ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 840-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecil B. Sharp ◽  
Arthur J. Hilliker
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Segregation Distortion ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
Major Effect ◽  
Chromosome 2 ◽  
Genetic Elements ◽  
Segregation Distorter ◽  
Per Se

Segregation distortion is caused by a group of genetic elements in and near the centric heterochromatin of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster. These elements promote their preferential recovery in heterozygous males by rendering sperm bearing the homologous chromosome dysfunctional. Previous work has shown that numerous Y–autosome translocations are associated with the suppression of the segregation distorter phenotype. The present study examined the effects of translocations between the major autosomes upon the expression of segregation distortion. Autosomal translocations involving either the segregation distorter chromosome or its sensitive homologue had no significant effect upon the expression of segregation distortion. These results argue that linkage arrangement per se may not have a major effect on segregation distortion. The suppression of SD by specific Y–autosomal translocations may be due to the disruption of elements on the Y chromosome that are important for the expression of SD.Key words: segregation distortion, meiotic drive, translocations, Drosophila melanogaster.

scholarly journals An SD (Segregation Distribution) – MR (Male Recombination) chromosome isolated from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster

1984 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-158
Author(s):  
Gábor Bencze ◽  
Barton E. Slatko
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Natural Population ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Segregation Distortion ◽  
Reciprocal Cross ◽  
Centromeric Region ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
Recombination Activity ◽  
Male Recombination ◽  
Lines Of Evidence

SUMMARYA second chromosome line of Drosophila melanogaster (S-90), isolated from a northern California natural population, is able to induce (1) an increased frequency of X-chromosome visible mutations, (2) male recombination activity subject to reciprocal cross suppression, and (3) strong meiotic drive from heterozygous males. Based upon several lines of evidence (including the response to suppressor chromosomes of both systems) we conclude that S-90 contains both SD (Segregation Distortion) and MR (P or I) chromosome activity. The two systems appear to behave independently and simultaneously, and a small centromeric region of the S-90 chromosome appears to contain the major genetic elements of both systems.

scholarly journals MULTIPLE MEIOTIC DRIVE SYSTEMS IN THE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER MALE

Genetics ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-115
Author(s):  
George L Gabor Miklos ◽  
Armon F Yanders ◽  
W J Peacock
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Survival Probability ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Meiotic Drive ◽  
The Other ◽  
Segregation Distorter ◽  
Two Systems ◽  
Combined Action ◽  
Drive Systems

ABSTRACT The behaviour of two "meiotic drive" systems, Segregation-Distorter (SD) and the sex chromosome sc4sc8 has been examined in the same meiocyte. It has been found that the two systems interact in a specific way. When the distorting effects of SD and sc4sc8 are against each other, there is no detectable interaction. Each system is apparently oblivious to the presence of the other, gametes being produced according to independence expectations. However when the affected chromosomes are at the same meiotic pole an interaction occurs; the survival probability of the gamete containing both distorted chromosomal products is increased, rather than being decreased by the combined action of two systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document