Evidence for intrinsic differences in the formation of chromatin domains in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1063-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
C P Bishop
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
The Other ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Compaction Process ◽  
Chromatin Domains ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Reporter Systems

Abstract The results of an investigation into intrinsic differences in the formation of two different heterochromatic domains are presented. The study utilized two different position effect variegation mutants in Drosophila melanogaster for investigating the process of compacting different stretches of DNA into heterochromatin. Each stretch of DNA encodes for a gene that affects different aspects of bristle morphology. The expression of each gene is prevented when it is compacted into heterochromatin thus the genes serve as effective reporter systems to monitor the spread of heterochromatin. Both variegating mutants are scored in the same cell such that environmental and genetic background differences are unambiguously eliminated. Any differences observed in the repression of the two genes must therefore be the result of intrinsic differences in the heterochromatic compaction process for the two stretches of DNA. Studies of the effects different enhancers of variegation have upon the compaction of the two genes indicate each compaction event occurs independently of the other, and that different components are involved in the two processes. These results are discussed with regard to spreading heterochromatin and the role this process may play in regulating gene expression.

Genetic factors controlling white gene expression of the transposon AR4-24 at a telomere in Drosophila melanogaster

Genome ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
M L Balasov
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Genetic Factors ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Restricted Pattern

The position effect of the AR 4-24 P[white, rosy] transposon was studied at cytological position 60F. Three copies of the transposon (within ~50-kb region) resulted in a spatially restricted pattern of white variegation. This pattern was modified by temperature and by removal of the Y chromosome, suggesting that it was due to classical heterochromatin-induced position effect variegation (PEV). In contrast with classical PEV, extra dose of the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) suppressed white variegation and one dose enhanced it. The effect of Pc-G, trx-G, and other PEV suppressors was also tested. It was found that E(Pc)1, TrlR85, and mutations of Su(z)2C relieve AR 4-24- silencing and z1 enhances it. To explain the results obtained with these modifiers, it is proposed that PEV and telomeric position effect can counteract each other at this particular cytological site.Key words: position effect variegation, heterochromatin protein 1, Drosophila melanogaster.

scholarly journals Weakener of white (Wow), a gene that modifies the expression of the white eye color locus and that suppresses position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 1057-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Birchler ◽  
U Bhadra ◽  
L Rabinow ◽  
R Linsk ◽  
A T Nguyen-Huynh
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Northern Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Eye Color ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Modifying Effect ◽  
Color Gene

Abstract A locus is described in Drosophila melanogaster that modifies the expression of the white eye color gene. This trans-acting modifier reduces the expression of the white gene in the eye, but elevates the expression in other adult tissues. Because of the eye phenotype in which the expression of white is lessened but not eliminated, the newly described locus is called the Weakener of white (Wow). Northern analysis reveals that Wow can exert an inverse or direct modifying effect depending upon the developmental stage. Two related genes, brown and scarlet, that are coordinately expressed with white, are also affected by Wow. In addition, Wow modulates the steady state RNA level of the retrotransposon, copia. When tested with a white promoter-Alcohol dehydrogenase reporter. Wow confers the modifying effect to the reporter, suggesting a requirement of the white regulatory sequences for mediating the response. In addition to being a dosage sensitive regulator of white, brown, scarlet and copia, Wow acts as a suppressor of position effect variegation. There are many dosage sensitive suppressors of position effect variegation and many dosage-sensitive modifiers of gene expression. The Wow mutations provide evidence for an overlap between the two types of modifiers.

scholarly journals MATERNAL-ZYGOTIC LETHAL INTERACTIONS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: THE EFFECTS OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE ZESTE-WHITE REGION OF THE X CHROMOSOME

Genetics ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard G Robbins
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Gene Activity ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
White Region ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Zygotic Gene ◽  
Maternal Gene

ABSTRACT The possibility that essential loci in the zeste-white region of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome are expressed both maternally and zygotically has been tested. Maternal gene activity was varied by altering gene dose, and zygotic gene activity was manipulated by use of position-effect variegation of a duplication. Viability is affected when both maternal and zygotic gene activity are reduced, but not when either maternal or zygotic gene activity is normal. Tests of a set of overlapping deficiencies demonstrate that at least three sections of the zeste-white region yield maternal zygotic lethal interactions. Single-cistron mutations at two loci in one of these segments have been tested, and maternal heterozygosity for mutations at both loci give lethal responses of mutant-duplication zygotes. Thus, at least four of the 13 essential functions coded in the zeste-white region are active both maternally and zygotically, suggesting that a substantial fraction of the genome may function at both stages. The normal survival of zygotes when either maternal gene expression or zygotic gene expression is normal, and their inviability when both are depressed, suggests that a developmental stage exists when maternally determined functions and zygotically coded functions are both in use.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of a Histone Deacetylase in Drosophila melanogaster: Missense Mutations Suppress Gene Silencing Associated With Position Effect Variegation

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Mottus ◽  
Richard E Sobel ◽  
Thomas A Grigliatti
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Transcriptional Regulator ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
New Mutations

Abstract For many years it has been noted that there is a correlation between acetylation of histones and an increase in transcriptional activity. One prediction, based on this correlation, is that hypomorphic or null mutations in histone deacetylase genes should lead to increased levels of histone acetylation and result in increased levels of transcription. It was therefore surprising when it was reported, in both yeast and fruit flies, that mutations that reduced or eliminated a histone deacetylase resulted in transcriptional silencing of genes subject to telomeric and heterochromatic position effect variegation (PEV). Here we report the first mutational analysis of a histone deacetylase in a multicellular eukaryote by examining six new mutations in HDAC1 of Drosophila melanogaster. We observed a suite of phenotypes accompanying the mutations consistent with the notion that HDAC1 acts as a global transcriptional regulator. However, in contrast to recent findings, here we report that specific missense mutations in the structural gene of HDAC1 suppress the silencing of genes subject to PEV. We propose that the missense mutations reported here are acting as antimorphic mutations that “poison” the deacetylase complex and propose a model that accounts for the various phenotypes associated with lesions in the deacetylase locus.

scholarly journals Competition Between Different Variegating Rearrangements for Limited Heterochromatic Factors in Drosophila melanogaster

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 945-959
Author(s):  
Vett K Lloyd ◽  
Donald A Sinclair ◽  
Thomas A Grigliatti
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Chromosome Rearrangement ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Euchromatic Region ◽  
Single Chromosome ◽  
Mosaic Expression ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Protein Components

Position effect variegation (PEV) results from the juxtaposition of a euchromatic gene to heterochromatin. In its new position the gene is inactivated in some cells and not in others. This mosaic expression is consistent with variability in the spread of heterochromatin from cell to cell. As many components of heterochromatin are likely to be produced in limited amounts, the spread of heterochromatin into a normally euchromatic region should be accompanied by a concomitant loss or redistribution of the protein components from other heterochromatic regions. We have shown that this is the case by simultaneously monitoring variegation of a euchromatic and a heterochromatic gene associated with a single chromosome rearrangement. Secondly, if several heterochromatic regions of the genome share limited components of heterochromatin, then some variegating rearrangements should compete for these components. We have examined this hypothesis by testing flies with combinations of two or more different variegating rearrangements. Of the nine combinations of pairs of variegating rearrangements we studied, seven showed nonreciprocal interactions. These results imply that many components of heterochromatin are both shared and present in limited amounts and that they can transfer between chromosomal sites. Consequently, even nonvariegation portions of the genome will be disrupted by re-allocation of heterochromatic proteins associated with PEV. These results have implications for models of PEV.

scholarly journals Interactions Among Dosage-Dependent Trans-Acting Modifiers of Gene Expression and Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Utpal Bhadra ◽  
Manika Pal Bhadra ◽  
James A Birchler
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Quantitative Traits ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Developmental Transitions ◽  
Eye Color ◽  
Dosage Effects ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Hierarchical Manner ◽  
Color Gene

Abstract We have investigated the effect of dosage-dependent trans-acting regulators of the white eye color gene in combinations to understand their interaction properties. The consequences of the interactions will aid in an understanding of aneuploid syndromes, position-effect variegation (PEV), quantitative traits, and dosage compensation, all of which are affected by dosage-dependent modifiers. Various combinations modulate two functionally related transcripts, white and scarlet, differently. The overall trend is that multiple modifiers are noncumulative or epistatic to each other. In some combinations, developmental transitions from larvae to pupae to adults act as a switch for whether the effect is positive or negative. With position-effect variegation, similar responses were found as with gene expression. The highly multigenic nature of dosage-sensitive modulation of both gene expression and PEV suggests that dosage effects can be progressively transduced through a series of steps in a hierarchical manner.

scholarly journals Mutation in P0, a Dual Function Ribosomal Protein/Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease, Modifies Gene Expression and Position Effect Variegation in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. 1487-1495
Author(s):  
Maxim V Frolov ◽  
James A Birchler
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
P Element ◽  
Dual Function ◽  
Insertion Mutant ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Element Insertion ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Ribosomal Protein P0

Abstract In a search for modifiers of gene expression with the white eye color gene as a target, a third chromosomal P-element insertion mutant l(3)01544 has been identified that exhibits a strong pigment increase in a white-apricot background. Molecular analysis shows that the P-element insertion is found in the first intron of the gene surrounding the insertion site. Sequencing both the cDNA and genomic fragments revealed that the identified gene is identical to one encoding ribosomal protein P0/apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease. The P-element-induced mutation, l(3)01544, affects the steady-state level of white transcripts and transcripts of some other genes. In addition, l(3)01544 suppresses the variegated phenotypes of In(1)wm4h and In(1)y3P, suggesting a potential involvement of the P0 protein in modifying position effect variegation. The revertant generated by the precise excision of the P element has lost all mutant phenotypes. Recent work revealed that Drosophila ribosomal protein P0 contains an apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease activity. Our results suggest that this multifunctional protein is also involved in regulation of gene expression in Drosophila.

scholarly journals The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney H. Wang ◽  
Sarah C. R. Elgin
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Inbred Lines ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Fourth Chromosome ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Chromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is silenced in some cells as a consequence of juxtaposition with heterochromatin. High levels of variation in PEV phenotypes are commonly observed in reporter stocks. To ascertain whether background mutations are the major contributors to this variation, we asked how much of the variation is determined by genetic variants segregating in the population, examining both the level and pattern of expression using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as the model. Results Using selective breeding of a fourth chromosome PEV reporter line, 39C-12, we isolated two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in the degree of variegation: 90% of the variation between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype. Further analyses suggest that this result reflects the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter scored across the whole fly. Further, the pattern of variegation becomes almost identical within each inbred line; significant pigment enrichment in the same quadrant of the eye was found for both A1 and D1 lines despite different degrees of expression. Conclusions The results indicate that background genetic variants play the major role in determining the variable degrees of PEV commonly observed in laboratory stocks. Interestingly, not only does the degree of variegation become consistent in inbred lines, the patterns of variegation also appear similar. Combining these observations with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV in which the genetic background drives the overall level of silencing, working with the cell lineage-specific regulatory environment to determine the on/off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell type-specific events in the context of broader genetic impacts on heterochromatin formation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document