scholarly journals Perspectives of Persons With Dementia, Family, and Healthcare Providers on an Advance Care Planning Decision Aid

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 787-787
Author(s):  
Lisa Geshell ◽  
Jung Kwak

Abstract Few evidence-based interventions to engage persons living with dementia in advance care planning (ACP) exist. We developed and explored the acceptability and appropriateness of an ACP decision aid for PLWD/family caregiver dyads living in the U.S. We conducted a mixed-methods study with 10 persons with dementia-caregiver dyads, and 4 healthcare providers. Content analysis and descriptive analysis were conducted. Major and subthemes included: (1) the role of caregivers during ACP discussion: clarifier, guide, and proxy; (2) decisional needs of persons with dementia for ACP: lack of knowledge and decisional conflict; and (3) perceptions of the decision aid: lack of clarity between advance directive types, a need to remove any questions that may be conceptually different, but appear similar to users, and need to include summary of decision-support needs. Findings provide implications for how healthcare providers can use a decision aid to facilitate ACP conversations with persons with dementia and caregivers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-247
Author(s):  
Jarred V. Gallegos ◽  
Barry Edelstein ◽  
Alvin H. Moss

Background/Objectives: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) is recommended as a preferred practice for advance care planning with seriously ill patients. Decision aids can assist patients in advance care planning, but there are limited studies on their use for POLST decisions. We hypothesized that after viewing a POLST video, decision aid participants would demonstrate increased knowledge and satisfaction and decreased decisional conflict. Design: Pre-and postintervention with no control group. Setting/Participants: Fifty community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older asked to complete a POLST based on a hypothetical condition. Interventions: Video decision aid for Sections A and B of the POLST form. Measurements: Pre- and postintervention participant knowledge, decisional satisfaction, decisional conflict, and acceptability of video decision aid. Results: Use of the video decision aid increased knowledge scores from 11.24 ± 2.77 to 14.32 ± 2.89, P < .001, improved decisional satisfaction 10.14 ± 3.73 to 8.70 ± 3.00, P = .001, and decreased decisional conflict 12 ± 9.42 to 8.15 ± 9.13, P < .001. All participants reported that they were comfortable using the video decision aid, that they would recommend it to others, and that it clarified POLST decisions. Conclusions: Participants endorsed the use of a POLST video decision aid, which increased their knowledge of POLST form options and satisfaction with their decisions, and decreased their decisional conflict in POLST completion. This pilot study provides preliminary support for the use of video decision aids for POLST decision-making. Future research should evaluate a decision aid for the entire POLST form and identify patient preferences for implementing POLST decision aids into clinical practice.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Bosisio ◽  
Anca Sterie ◽  
Eve Rubli Truchard ◽  
Ralf J. Jox

Abstract Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is particularly appropriate for persons with dementia (PWD) since it fosters conversation about dementia-specific illness scenarios, addresses inconsistencies between advance directives and patients’ observed behaviour, emphasises prospective and relational autonomy, and may be generally consistent to elderly’s decision-making needs. However, despite the evidence of its benefits, ACP is yet to become widely used among PWD. In this paper, we present results regarding the feasibility and acceptability of a pilot intervention designed to foster ACP among PWD and their relative and explore future outcome measures in prevision of a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In order to assess pre-post variations, we used qualitative interviews and four psychometric scales: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Questionnaire of Psychological Autonomy, Decisional conflict scale, and Zarit burden scale. We added two visual analog scales for perceived control over and perceived involvement in healthcare decisions, as well as two hypothetic scenarios to test concordance between PWD’s and surrogate’s decisions.Results: Five main challenges in terms of feasibility were 1) to locate eligible patients, 2) to tailor recruitment procedures to recruitment locations, 3) to adapt inclusion criteria to meet clinical routines, 4) to engage PWD and their relatives in ACP, and 5) to choose outcome criteria that do not burden PWD. Alongside with those expected challenges, we discuss substantial unanticipated gatekeeping by the research ethics committee and healthcare professionals. Despite the setbacks, the intervention was well received by PWD and their relatives that expressed satisfaction with the procedure, especially in regard to the opportunity to discuss a sensitive topic with the help of a facilitator. Relatives’ perceived control over healthcare decisions increased, as well as concordance between PWD’s preferences and relatives’ decision. Conclusion: Misconceptions about dementia and ACP, both in the patient, relatives, and healthcare providers, combined with structural institutional challenges, have the power to impede research and implementation of ACP in dementia care. For this reason, we advocate for a systemic approach of ACP and for the use of ACP tools and research adapted to PWD cognitive capacities.Trial registration: This trial was registered in the database clinicaltrial.gov with the number NCT03615027


Author(s):  
Shigeko Izumi

Many patients and their families arrive at critical end-of-life decision-making ill-prepared, without any prior conversations about what the patient wants. Advance care planning is a process by which to reflect on and discuss a person’s life values and goals and to communicate preferences regarding future healthcare. The purpose is to ensure that people receive care that is consistent with their values, goals, and preferences at the end of their lives. The role of healthcare professionals is to support and encourage persons at any age or stage of health to begin these conversations to share their values and preferences with their families, friends, and healthcare providers so that their end-of-life care wishes are honored.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 175.1-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
BH Levi ◽  
A Brothers ◽  
M Whitehead ◽  
Z Simmons ◽  
E Farace ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1528-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared Chiarchiaro ◽  
Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk ◽  
Robert M. Arnold ◽  
Douglas B. White

2021 ◽  
pp. 60-76
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Myers

Physician assistant (PA) training is rooted in treating the whole patient and developing a trusting and collaborative partnership with patients and their families. This foundation is critical in the advance care planning (ACP) process for patients who are seriously or terminally ill. Understanding the ACP process, the components and reasons behind them, and the tools for successful discussions and decision-making is a key skill set for all healthcare providers, including PAs. This chapter examines the components of ACP, including advance directives, the POLST paradigm, decision-makers, prognostication, documentation, and legacy planning. ACP is key in capturing what is most important to our patients in terms of their health, their life, and their goals related to both.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document