scholarly journals Palliative Care Knowledge and Planning in U.S. Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 778-779
Author(s):  
Amy Albright ◽  
Rebecca Allen

Abstract Palliative care knowledge and health literacy are frequently underestimated in American adults; for example, as measured by the Newest Vital Sign (Weiss et al., 2005), 79.2% (n = 247) of participants within a Geriatrics Clinic sample displayed “adequate” functional health literacy, while 11.8% (n = 37) scored within the “possibly limited” range, and 9.0% (n = 28) scored within the “highly limited” range. There was additionally a significant association between health literacy and age (r = .15, p < .01) within this sample. The Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS; Kozlov et al., 2018) was administered to participants, and higher scores indicated a greater knowledge of palliative care. This construct is particularly important to measure, as racial/ethnic disparities exist within this domain; for example, African Americans may have lower overall knowledge of palliative care services and advance care planning than non-Hispanic Whites (Noh et al., 2018). In the current study, knowledge of palliative care was measured using the PaCKS (Kozlov et al., 2018), and scores represented the widest possible range of 0 to 13 (M = 7.68, SD = 4.08). There was a significant correlation between age and PaCKS score (r = .12, p < .05), as palliative care knowledge increased with age. Females scored significantly higher (M = 8.29, SD = 3.91) than males (M = 6.81, SD = 4.18), t(309) = 3.18, p < .001. There was no main effect of race on palliative care knowledge, and post-hoc analysis using Tukey HSD did not demonstrate significant differences between groups.

Author(s):  
Kimberly S. Johnson ◽  
Ramona L. Rhodes

This chapter examines how race or ethnicity affects access to, and the quality of, palliative care by focusing on the experience of African Americans and Hispanics. More specifically, it considers how cultural beliefs, values, and preferences may influence care. It begins by looking at racial and ethnic disparities that exist throughout the health-care continuum, from disease prevention, early diagnosis, and curative treatment, to communication and pain management, lower rates of advance care planning, and lower utilization of hospice and palliative care services. It then explores the preferences of African Americans and Hispanics when it comes to end-of-life care, as well as the role of spirituality and faith in how they cope with illness. The chapter concludes by suggesting strategies and future directions for health-care providers, organizations, policymakers, and researchers on how to improve care for patients of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 788-788
Author(s):  
Daniel David ◽  
Abraham Brody ◽  
Tina Sadarangani ◽  
Bei Wu ◽  
Tara Cortez

Abstract Many residents of Assisted Living (AL) confront serious illness and therefore might benefit from greater access to Palliative Care Services to improve quality of life. We surveyed resident records and AL nursing staff to identify patients in need of Palliative Care. Preliminary findings showed that nurses predicted 23% would not be alive and 49% would no longer live in AL. A majority of residents were over the age of 90, yet 30% did not have a reported code status. These findings suggest that a substantial portion of AL residents may have unmet needs with respect to palliative care. Future interventions are needed to support advance care planning conversations and make palliative care more accessible to this population.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Sellars ◽  
William Silvester ◽  
Malcolm Masso ◽  
Claire E. Johnson

Objective To identify the attitudes, knowledge and practices regarding advance care planning (ACP) in palliative care. Methods A nationwide online survey was distributed to Australian palliative care services associated with the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (n = 105). Seventy-three health professionals (HPs) and 59 service managers completed the survey. Results Regarding ACP, 51% of service managers reported relevant policies and procedures were in place in their service and 44% included ACP in job descriptions. Most HPs were confident in undertaking ACP, including initiating discussions with patients and complying with documents; however, only 44% reported receiving ACP specific training. Although 58% of HPs reported having conversations about ACP with more than 11 patients in the past 6 months, only 44% of managers report that it is offered to most patients. Thirty per cent of HPs were aware of others not adhering to patient wishes in the past 6 months and only 43% of HPs (and 37% of managers) believed ACP is done well within their service. Conclusions This first national survey examining ACP in palliative care services demonstrates there is a need to improve systems to support ACP and to understand circumstances in which ACP wishes are not followed. What is known about the topic? ACP is increasingly recognised as an important part of care of people in hospital and community settings. However, currently there is no empirical evidence about the national uptake and quality of ACP in palliative care settings specifically. What does this paper add? This nationwide survey shows improvements on past small-scale research showing that ACP is supported by palliative care health professionals; however, the organisational ACP processes and systems did not support best practice in this regard. What are the implications for practitioners? Palliative care organisations should incorporate ACP systems (including greater access to ACP policies and guidelines) that support health professionals to complete ACP with clients who want to. Greater access to support, such as ACP training and resources, would assist with development of ACP documentation and adherence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-146
Author(s):  
Suchira Chaiviboontham ◽  
Piyawan Pokpalagon

Background: Thailand has few hospices and a limited range of palliative care services. Aims: To explore palliative care models in Thailand. Methods: A convergent mixed-methods study design using purposive sampling to select three levels of healthcare services and one religious organisation. Findings: The quantitative data revealed that the structures of palliative care accessibility, referral systems, and continuity of care were in place at all levels of healthcare services. The qualitative data revealed the themes of the structure of palliative care, processes and outcomes. Conclusion: The variety of palliative care structures identified in Thailand are suitable for the context in which palliative care is provided. The problems that need solving are referral systems, patient access to opioids, inequitites in care distribution and medicine dispensing and palliative care outcome evaluation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget Whitehead ◽  
Mary R O’Brien ◽  
Barbara A Jack ◽  
Douglas Mitchell

Objectives: to explore the experiences of people with Motor Neurone Disease (MND), current and bereaved carers in the final stages of the disease and bereavement period. Methods: a qualitative study using narrative interviews was used to elicit accounts from 24 people with MND and 18 current family carers and 10 former family carers. Results: the needs of patients and carers are not being adequately met in the final stages of MND and there appears a need for increased, co-ordinated support from palliative care services. The use of advance care planning tools is regarded as beneficial for patients and carers, but health professionals demonstrate a limited understanding of them. Anxiety and distress in patients, carers and bereaved carers is heightened during this period. Carer burden is excessive and may exacerbate patient distress and desire for hastening death. Conclusion: this study has identified a number of issues people with MND and their carers face in the final stages of the illness, indicating some ways in which health, social and palliative care services could be improved or co-operate more effectively in order to better meet their needs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire E. Johnson ◽  
Rachel Singer ◽  
Malcolm Masso ◽  
Marcus Sellars ◽  
William Silvester

Objective To explore the health professionals’ (HPs) perceptions and experiences of advance care directives (ACDs) and advance care planning in Australian palliative care services. Methods A nationwide survey of 105 palliative care services was conducted, with two HPs from each service invited to participate. A qualitative analysis of open responses about advance care planning was undertaken. Results Sixty questionnaires were returned with open responses. Most responders were nurses (75%), aged ≥40 years (80%) and with a mean of 12 years palliative care experience. Data were grouped into four key themes: (1) the ACD; (2) the process of developing ACDs; (3) the process of using ACDs; and (4) the consequences of having ACDs. Participants were positive about advance care planning, commenting that ongoing communication about end-of-life care ensures mutual understanding between patients, family and HPs. Provision of care was considered easier and more efficient with an ACD in place. ACDs were perceived to reduce distrust and conflict between family, friends and HPs, and promote communication. Suboptimal documentation, clarity and explicitness limited the usefulness of ACDs when they were available. Conclusions Advance care planning benefits HPs, patients and their family. To maximise these benefits, ACDs need to be clear, comprehensive, medically relevant and transportable documents. What is known about the topic? Ideally, advance care planning encompasses the identification and documentation of a person’s preferences for future medical treatments and care in preparation for an occasion when the person cannot express their values and wishes. The uptake and practice of advance care planning is inconsistent, and the extent to which it is used by health professionals and patients is variable. Many people are cared for at the end of life in specialist palliative care services, but the intersection between palliative care and advance care planning remains under-researched. What does this paper adds? ACDs facilitate communication and advance care planning; help establish trust between health professionals, patients and their families; and make multiple aspects of care easier for HPs. Processes surrounding ACDs, particularly inadequate documentation, limit adherence and application. What are the implications for practitioners? Clear communication is necessary for effective ACD development and application. The presence of an ACD makes communication and advance care planning easier, and improves trust between HPs, patients and their family. To be useful, ACDs must be clear, comprehensive, medically relevant, transportable documents.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Bradshaw ◽  
L. Dunleavy ◽  
C. Walshe ◽  
N. Preston ◽  
R. Cripps ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, specialist palliative care services have an important role to play conducting high-quality and individualised Advance Care Planning discussions. Little is known about the challenges to Advance Care Planning in this context, or the changes services have made in adapting to them.AimTo describe the challenges experienced, and changes made to support, Advance Care Planning at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignCross-sectional on-line survey of UK palliative and hospice services’ response to COVID-19. Closed-ended responses are reported descriptively. Open-ended responses were analysed using a thematic Framework approach.Respondents277 UK palliative and hospice care services.Results37.9% of services provided more Advance Care Planning directly. 58.5% provided more support to others. Some challenges to Advance Care Planning pre-dated the pandemic, whilst other were COVID-19 specific or exacerbated by COVID-19. Six themes demonstrated challenges at different levels of the Social Ecological Model, including: complex decision making in the face of a new disease; maintaining a personalised approach; COVID-specific communication difficulties; workload and pressure; sharing information; and national context of fear and uncertainty. Two themes demonstrate changes made to support Advance Care Planning, including: adapting local processes and adapting local structures.ConclusionsProfessionals and healthcare providers need to ensure Advance Care Planning is individualised by tailoring it to the values, priorities, and ethnic, cultural, and religious context of each person. Policymakers need to consider carefully how high-quality, person-centred Advance Care Planning can be resourced as a part of standard healthcare ahead of future pandemic waves.Key StatementsWhat is already known about the topic?–An important part of palliative care’s response to COVID-19 is ensuring that Advance Care Planning discussions occur with patients and their care networks–High quality Advance Care Planning is viewed as a process that adopts a holistic, collaborative, and individualised approach–Prior to COVID-19, challenges to Advance Care Planning included time constraints, lack of training, fears of taking away hope, limited resources, and insufficient knowledgeWhat this paper adds?–The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated already-existing challenges to conducting high-quality, individualised Advance Care Planning, including the ability to maintain a personalised approach and sharing information between services–COVID-specific challenges to Advance Care Planning exist, including the complexities of decision-making for a novel disease, communication issues, and workload pressures–In responding to these challenges, services adapted local processes (prioritising specific components, normalisation and integration into everyday practice) and structures (using technology, shifting resources, collaboration) of careImplications for practice, theory or policy–COVID-19 has provided an opportunity to re-think Advance Care Planning in which the starting point to any discussion is always the values and priorities of patients themselves–Providers and policymakers need to urgently consider how high-quality Advance Care Planning can be resourced and normalised as a part of standard care across the health sector, ahead of future or recurrent pandemic waves and in routine care more generally–We provide questions for health professionals, services, and policy makers to consider in working towards this


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1687-1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumeng Wen ◽  
Changchuan Jiang ◽  
Holly M. Koncicki ◽  
Carol R. Horowitz ◽  
Richard S. Cooper ◽  
...  

BackgroundStudy findings show that although palliative care decreases symptom burden, it is still underused in patients with ESKD. Little is known about disparity in use of palliative care services in such patients in the inpatient setting.MethodsTo investigate the use of palliative care consultation in patients with ESKD in the inpatient setting, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2006 to 2014 to identify admitted patients with ESKD requiring maintenance dialysis. We compared palliative care use among minority groups (black, Hispanic, and Asian) and white patients, adjusting for patient and hospital variables.ResultsWe identified 5,230,865 hospitalizations of such patients from 2006 through 2014, of which 76,659 (1.5%) involved palliative care. The palliative care referral rate increased significantly, from 0.24% in 2006 to 2.70% in 2014 (P<0.01). Black and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely than white patients to receive palliative care services (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.61 to 0.84, P<0.01 for blacks and aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.68, P<0.01 for Hispanics). These disparities spanned across all hospital subtypes, including those with higher proportions of minorities. Minority patients with lower socioeconomic status (lower level of income and nonprivate health insurance) were also less likely to receive palliative care.ConclusionsDespite a clear increase during the study period in provision of palliative care for inpatients with ESKD, significant racial disparities occurred and persisted across all hospital subtypes. Further investigation into causes of racial and ethnic disparities is necessary to improve access to palliative care services for the vulnerable ESKD population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117822421882350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Pearse ◽  
Florin Oprescu ◽  
John Endacott ◽  
Sarah Goodman ◽  
Mervyn Hyde ◽  
...  

Background: A Rapid Response Team can respond to critically ill patients in hospital to prevent further deterioration and unexpected deaths. However, approximately one-third of reviews involve a patient approaching the end-of-life. It is not well understood whether patients have pre-existing advance care plans at the time of significant clinical deterioration requiring Rapid Response Team review. Nor is it understood whether such critical events prompt patients, their families and treating teams to discuss advance care planning and consider referral to specialist palliative care services. Aim and design: This systematic review examined advance care planning with patients who experience significant clinical deterioration in hospital and require Rapid Response Team review. The prevalence of pre-existing advance directives, whether this event prompts end-of-life discussions, the provision of broader advance care planning and referral to specialist palliative care services was examined. Data sources: Three electronic databases up to August 2017 were searched, and a manual review of article reference lists conducted. Quality of studies was appraised by the first and fourth authors. Results: Of the 324 articles identified through database searching, 31 met the inclusion criteria, generating data from 47,850 patients. There was a low prevalence of resuscitation orders and formal advance directives prior to Rapid Response Team review, with subsequent increases in resuscitation and limitations of medical treatment orders, but not advance directives. There was high short- and long-term mortality following review, and low rates of palliative care referral. Conclusions: The failure of patients, their families and medical teams to engage in advance care planning may result in inappropriate Rapid Response Team review that is not in line with patient and family priorities and preferences. Earlier engagement in advance care planning may result in improved person-centred care and referral to specialist palliative care services for ongoing management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document