8. Transfer of shares

Author(s):  
Derek French ◽  
Stephen W. Mayson ◽  
Christopher L. Ryan

This chapter discusses some of the procedures to be followed when transferring some or all of a company member’s shares to another person, and the three important factors on which such procedures depend: whether or not the transfer occurs via sale on the London Stock Exchange; whether the whole or only part of the member’s holding is being transferred; and whether the shares are certificated or uncertificated. After describing share certificates and uncertificated shares, the chapter considers the provisions of Section 544(1) of the Companies Act 2006 regarding share transfer, along with the problem of who should bear the loss when a forged or fraudulent transfer of shares is committed. It also explores transmission of shares on death or bankruptcy and the abolition of bearer share warrants. Finally, it tackles takeovers of public companies and compulsory acquisition of remaining shares.

Author(s):  
Derek French

This chapter discusses some of the procedures to be followed when transferring some or all of a company member’s shares to another person, for sales on and off the London Stock Exchange, transfers of all or a part of a member’s holding and transfers of certificated and uncertificated shares. After describing share certificates and uncertificated shares, the chapter considers the problem of who should bear the loss when a transfer of shares is forged or fraudulent. It also explores transmission of shares on death or bankruptcy. Transferring shares may result in a change of control of a company. The chapter considers takeovers, the City Code and compulsory acquisition of remaining shares. There is full discussion of the provisions for disclosure of significant holdings both to warn of potential takeover moves and to disclose in the public interest who has significant control of a company.


Author(s):  
Derek French

This chapter discusses some of the procedures to be followed when transferring some or all of a company member’s shares to another person, for sales on and off the London Stock Exchange, transfers of all or a part of a member’s holding and transfers of certificated and uncertificated shares. After describing share certificates and uncertificated shares, the chapter considers the problem of who should bear the loss when a transfer of shares is forged or fraudulent. It also explores transmission of shares on death or bankruptcy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-130
Author(s):  
Supriyati - ◽  
Gunasti Hudiwinarsih

Corporate value is a quality measure that indicates the consistency and sustainability of a company. Good corporate value can only be attained if the company has consistent financial performance, and that value will be used by decision makers inside or outside the company as the guide before making action. Attaining good corporate value should need comprehensive strategies integrated with company operation. Among those strategies is non-financial activity or social responsibility. This research expects that the disclosure of social responsibility by the company will adorn corporate image and give good impact on profitability and corporate value. This research is aimed to examine the effect of social responsibility disclosure on profitability and corporate value. Data testing was conducted using robust regression test and applied on 1306 data of public companies that are listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange on period 2015-2018. Result of the test shows that social responsibility affects profitability and corporate value.  


Author(s):  
Derek French

This chapter discusses some of the procedures to be followed when transferring some or all of a company member’s shares to another person, for sales on and off the London Stock Exchange, transfers of all or a part of a member’s holding and transfers of certificated and uncertificated shares. After describing share certificates and uncertificated shares, the chapter considers the problem of who should bear the loss when a transfer of shares is forged or fraudulent. It also explores transmission of shares on death or bankruptcy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-99
Author(s):  
Marko S. Hermawan ◽  
Junius Tirok ◽  
Dharma S. Dawis

This research is purposed to analyze the degree of vulnerability of a company’s performance. From the financial report produced, investor will analyze the level of its performance. There are several variables of defining the performances, in which they are used to distinguish the degree of vulnerability. This level of degree affects investor’s decision on company’s performance. The object of this research, after taking relevant data from years 2006- 2008 published annual financial reports, there are 184 public companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange that are qualified in the analysis procedure. The Altman (1993) model of Z-score formula is used to define variables reflecting in a company performance, in which is classified into three-zone index (safe zone, grey zone and distress zone). This research has found that more companies lie in the grey and distress zone. Amongst the safe zone companies are Mining Industry and the lowest degree is the Infrastructure Industry. Also, a trend of decreasing performance occurred during 2008. There are possible reasons that might result in the performance of the industries. This result of research will benefit for investors in considering investing in Indonesian companies.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-143
Author(s):  
Yan Noviar Nasution ◽  
Herdiyana Herdiyana

This Research is entitled The Analysis of the Financial Performance Companies which Included in groupan index to LQ 45 And JII by using ROE and ROAat IndonesiaStock Exchange in the Year of 2010. As for target of this research to know the difference between the mean of Return Equity on ( ROE) and Return On Assets ( ROA)of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have large asset and LQ 45 which have small asset, of the public companies is merged into go to group of JII whichhave large asset and JII which have small asset, and of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have large asset and JII whichhave large asset and also of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have small asset and JII whichhave small asset and of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have large asset and JII whichhave smallasset and also of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have small asset and JII whichhave large asset .The research method used is case study of the public companies which is merged into go to group of LQ 45 and JII ( Jakarta Islamic Index ) which are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Analysis of the different test using the criteria of asset ownership, meaning the companies split in two groups of assets, the company went public that beraset beraset small and large. Where restrictions on the size of a company, obtained from the calculation of the average assets held by the sample firms went public in each group of assets While companies taken as sample is companies which enlist in two period of the announcement of Indonesia Stock Exchange or one fullyear of (2010) and data used in this research is data of secondary in Web IDX.Based on the hypothesis test results concluded that there are significant differences between the ROA average of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have large asset withthe average ROA of the public companies is merged into go to group of JII whichhave large asset or which have small asset. As well as that there are significant difference between the average the ROA of the public companies is merged into go to group of JII whichhave large asset with the average the ROA of the public companies is merged into go to group of JII whichhave small asset.While for the group of LQ45 indexthere is no significant difference between the ROA average of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have large asset with the ROA average of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have small asset. Meanwhile, for the ROE average in general there is no significant difference between of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45orthe group ofJII, except between the ROE average of the public companies is merged into go to group of LQ 45 which have large asset withthe average ROE of the public companies is merged into go to group of JII whichhave large asset.


2021 ◽  
pp. 207-221
Author(s):  
Derek French

This chapter discusses an essential feature of registered companies: that their shares are transferable. The discussion covers some of the procedures to be followed when transferring some or all of a company member’s shares to another person, for sales on and off the London Stock Exchange, transfers of all or a part of a member’s holding and transfers of certificated and uncertificated shares. After describing share certificates and uncertificated shares, the chapter considers the problem of who should bear the loss when a transfer of shares is forged or fraudulent. It also explores transmission of shares on death or bankruptcy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Mohammad Belayet Hossain

Nowadays, it is common for the loans to be aggregated as a lump sum, which is then advanced to the company by the trustees. In this situation, the lenders subscribe for debenture stock, sometimes called loan stock, out of the fund. As with shares, such stock forms part of the company’s securities, which can be traded in the Stock Exchange. The lenders might require security for their loans. In this situation, a company will charge its property to secure the loan. In light of the Companies Act 2006 of the United Kingdom, this paper will analyze the various mechanisms whereby public companies raise money through debentures and the regulatory consequences of doing so. The companies legislation requires certain particulars of the charge to be registered. Therefore, this paper aims to reflect on: (a) how public companies borrow its capital through debentures or debenture stock; (b) what types of charge the public companies could issue to lenders as security; (c) how to differentiate between fixed and floating charges. This paper will also examine the question of priority among competing creditors and inconsistent decisions of the court regarding fixed and floating charges. The objectives of this paper are to: describe the meaning of ‘debenture', discuss the dispute relating granting a fixed charge over book debts, sketch the priority of charges and the statutory listing system, describe the meaning of book debts,  explain the character of and the differences between floating and fixed charges. This paper will provide recommendations that could be taken into consideration for future amendments of the Companies Act 2006.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document