8. Defences to negligence

2021 ◽  
pp. 197-222
Author(s):  
Christian Witting

This chapter examines several defences in negligence cases, including contributory negligence (failing to take care of your own interests), voluntary assumption of risk, express exclusion or limitation of liability, and illegality (a plea by the defendant that the claimant should not be able to make a claim because the claim requires reference to the claimant’s own illegal acts). It explains that the plea of voluntary assumption of risk and the defences of express exclusion of liability and illegality can help the defendant reduce liability or avoid liability altogether. The chapter notes that contributory negligence is by far the most important of these defences in practical terms.

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (19) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
S.Y. TAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-146
Author(s):  
Andrzej Adamczyk

One of the most important legal problems discussed in the 19th century by German lawyers was that of state liability due to damages resulting from illegal acts of its officials. An influential forum of exchange of ideas was the German Association of German Jurists which organized all-German congresses to solve legal questions in order to promote German unity. Although the problem of state responsibility was discussed at some of the Association congresses in the 19th century, the most interesting was that held in Kiel in 1905. It was due to the fact that many German states had at that time legal regulations concerning state liability, but they were quite different. That generated many complications, making realization of a legal unity within the German Reich difficult. Two proposals for solving this situation were presented at the Congress in Kiel by Otto von Gierke and Rudolf von Herrnritt. Their ideas constituted bases for the discussion which followed. The paper presents the discussion on the state liability, which took place at the Congress in Kiel.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
К. А. Pisenkо ◽  

The article is devoted to defining the main approaches to classifying acts as violations of аntimonopoly legislation. On administrative and judicial practice discusses current issues and problems of definition of illegal acts, both from the point of view of antimonopoly regulation, and the delineation of antimonopoly violations and violations of other mandatory requirements established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document