scholarly journals Surgical embolectomy for intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
Sébastien Champion ◽  
Eric Braunberger
F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
Amyn Bhamani ◽  
Joanna Pepke-Zaba ◽  
Karen Sheares

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a disease frequently encountered in clinical practice. While the management of haemodynamically stable, low risk patients with acute PE is well established, managing intermediate disease often presents a therapeutic dilemma. In this review, we discuss the various therapeutic options available in this patient group. This includes thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy and catheter directed techniques. We have also explored the role of specialist PE response teams in the management of such patients. ​


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Panholzer ◽  
H. Gravert ◽  
K. Huenges ◽  
A. Haneya ◽  
J. Cremer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanyu Mu ◽  
Feixue Li ◽  
Xiaolin Chen ◽  
Bo Zhao ◽  
Guangping Li ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAcute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a life-threatening disease with nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is crucial for the clinical management of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. A new recommended echocardiography view may be of further help in the diagnosis, evaluate the change of the thrombosis and treatment effect.Case presentationWe report a case of a 74-year-old man with a 12-day history of decreased exercise capacity and dyspnoea. The patient was diagnosed intermediate-risk APE as several pulmonary emboli in pulmonary artery were seen in multidetector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography with normal blood pressure and echocardiographic right ventricular overload. And we found a pulmonary artery clot in the right pulmonary artery through transthoracic echocardiography. After 11-days anticoagulation, the patient underwent a reassessment, showed decrease in RV diameter and pulmonary artery thrombus. ConclusionThis case highlights the significant role that echocardiography played in a patient who presented pulmonary embolism with a stable hemodynamic situation and normal blood pressure. The new echocardiographic view could provide correct diagnoses by identifying the clot size and location visually. Knowledge of the echocardiography results of APE would aid the diagnosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. S126-S127
Author(s):  
E. Percy ◽  
R. Shah ◽  
S. Hirji ◽  
F. Yazdchi ◽  
T. Kaneko ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 859-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Tu ◽  
Catalin Toma ◽  
Victor F. Tapson ◽  
Christopher Adams ◽  
Wissam A. Jaber ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (13) ◽  
pp. 2054
Author(s):  
Timothy Lee ◽  
Shinobu Itagaki ◽  
Karan Omidvari ◽  
Joanna Chikwe ◽  
Natalia Egorova

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maninder Singh ◽  
Austin Quimby ◽  
Vladimir Lakhter ◽  
Mohamad Al-Otaibi ◽  
Parth M. Rali ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
pp. e403-e404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Audo ◽  
Valeria Bonato ◽  
Corrado Cavozza ◽  
Giulia Maj ◽  
Gianfranco Pistis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Becattini ◽  
L A Cimini ◽  
M Lankeit ◽  
P Pruszczyk ◽  
S Vanni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Whether early oral anticoagulant treatment is appropriate for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) regardless of PE severity is undefined. The aim of this study in patients with acute PE at intermediate risk of death were: I) to assess the determinants for the use of early vs delayed vs no oral anticoagulants in patients with acute PE and II) to assess the association between timing of oral anticoagulation and in-hospital mortality. Methods Prospective cohorts of patients with acute PE at intermediate risk of death according to the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines 2014 were merged in a collaborative database. The initiation of oral anticoagulation was classified as early (≤3 days) or delayed (between day 3 and 10 from diagnosis). Patients treated with parenteral anticoagulants for longer than 10 days were also included. In-hospital death was the primary study outcome. Results Overall, 557 patients were included in the study, 23 received thrombolytic treatment during the hospital stay. The mean duration of parenteral anticoagulation was 7±8 days (5 median), 348 patients were initiated on a direct oral anticoagulant and 79 on a vitamin K antagonist during the hospital stay. Initiation of oral anticoagulants occurred early or delayed in 209 (37%) and 218 (39%) patients, respectively and never occurred during the first 30 days in 130 (23%). Intermediate-low risk patients more commonly received early and intermediate high delayed oral anticoagulation. Simplified PESI score of zero (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3–2.7) was independently associated with early oral anticoagulation; among sPESI components absence of cancer (OR 5.9, 95% CI 3.3–10) and heart rate <110 (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.01–3.16) were independent predictors of early initiation of oral anticoagulants. The presence of both right ventricle dysfunction and injury was associated with delayed initiation of oral anticoagulants. The incidence of death was 5.5%. Death occurred in 32 patients and was not related to the duration of parenteral anticoagulation (OR 1.01 per day, 95% CI 0.98–1.06) nor to right ventricle dysfunction but to sPESI 1 (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.14–9.66). These results were partially confirmed in the 435 intermediate risk patients without cancer (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99–1.08 for days of parenteral treatment; OR 4.17, 95% CI 0.95–18 for sPESI 1). Conclusion The clinical severity of PE and not the timing of initiation of oral anticoagulants are associated with in-hospital death in patients with intermediate risk PE. Randomized studies are needed to definitively assess the role of heparin lead-in in patients with PE at intermediate risk for death.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (02) ◽  
pp. 98-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Engelberger ◽  
Nils Kucher

AbstractDue to the manifold treatment options for the management of acute pulmonary embolism, state-of-the-art management requires risk stratification for choosing the adapted treatment for each patient. Reperfusion therapy is an integral part of therapy for patients with pulmonary embolism at high risk for mortality, but its role in patients with intermediate risk pulmonary embolism is more debated. The largest amount of evidence exists for systemic thrombolysis, which is an efficient therapy, but at the prize of an increased bleeding risk. In recent years, various types of catheter-based reperfusion therapies have been introduced, and evidence is growing that this therapy is as efficient as systemic thrombolysis, but with a more favourable safety profile. Surgical embolectomy remains a good alternative for unstable patients, especially for those with absolute contraindications for thrombolysis or after failed systemic thrombolysis. While the early benefits of reperfusion therapy are well documented, evidence for long-term benefit is still scarce. The scope of this review is to summarize the evidence for the currently available reperfusion therapies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document