scholarly journals Polygenic risk scores and the prediction of common diseases

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Mika Ala-Korpela ◽  
Michael V Holmes
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isotta Landi ◽  
Deepak Kaji ◽  
Liam Cotter ◽  
Tielman Van Vleck ◽  
Gillian Belbin ◽  
...  

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is the archetypal severe mental illness and one of the most deeply characterized human genetic traits. Like most common diseases SCZ is highly polygenic, and as such its genetic liability can be summarized at the individual level by a polygenic risk score (PRS). Polygenic risk scores are a cornerstone of the precision medicine vision, as it is widely anticipated they will come to serve as biomarkers of disease and poor outcomes in real-world clinical practice. However, to date, few studies have assessed their actual prognostic value relative to current standards-of-care. SCZ is an ideal test case towards this end because the predictive power of the SCZ PRS exceeds that of most other common diseases. Here, we analyzed clinical and genetic data from two multi-ethnic cohorts totaling 8,541 adults with SCZ and related psychotic disorders, assessing whether the SCZ PRS improves poor outcome prediction relative to clinical features captured in a standard psychiatric interview. For all outcomes investigated, the SCZ PRS did not improve the performance of predictive models, an observation that was generally robust to divergent case definitions and ancestral backgrounds of study participants. These findings demonstrate the limited potential of even the most powerful contemporary polygenic risk scores as a tool for individualized outcome prediction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (R2) ◽  
pp. R133-R142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel A Lambert ◽  
Gad Abraham ◽  
Michael Inouye

Abstract Prediction of disease risk is an essential part of preventative medicine, often guiding clinical management. Risk prediction typically includes risk factors such as age, sex, family history of disease and lifestyle (e.g. smoking status); however, in recent years, there has been increasing interest to include genomic information into risk models. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) aggregate the effects of many genetic variants across the human genome into a single score and have recently been shown to have predictive value for multiple common diseases. In this review, we summarize the potential use cases for seven common diseases (breast cancer, prostate cancer, coronary artery disease, obesity, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease) where PRS has or could have clinical utility. PRS analysis for these diseases frequently revolved around (i) risk prediction performance of a PRS alone and in combination with other non-genetic risk factors, (ii) estimation of lifetime risk trajectories, (iii) the independent information of PRS and family history of disease or monogenic mutations and (iv) estimation of the value of adding a PRS to specific clinical risk prediction scenarios. We summarize open questions regarding PRS usability, ancestry bias and transferability, emphasizing the need for the next wave of studies to focus on the implementation and health-economic value of PRS testing. In conclusion, it is becoming clear that PRS have value in disease risk prediction and there are multiple areas where this may have clinical utility.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Vassy ◽  
Limin Hao ◽  
Peter Kraft ◽  
Gabriel Berriz ◽  
Elizabeth Hynes ◽  
...  

Abstract Implementation of polygenic risk scores (PRS) may improve disease prevention and management but requires the construction and validation of clinical assays, interpretation, and reporting pipelines. We developed a clinical genotype array-based assay for published PRS for 6 common diseases. First, we calculated PRS for 36,423 Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB) participants. Finding significant variation in the PRS distributions by race, we implemented adjustment for population structure with ancestry-informative principal components. We replicated published thresholds for odds ratio (OR)>2 in MGBB overall [ranging from 1.75 (1.57, 1.95) for Type 2 diabetes to 2.38 (2.07, 2.73) for breast cancer]. After confirming the high performance and robustness of the pipeline for use as a clinical assay, we analyzed the first 141 prospective samples from the Genomic Medicine at VA Study; frequency of PRS corresponding to published OR>2 ranged from 5/141 (3.6%) for colorectal cancer to 8/48 (16.7%) for breast cancer. Our development of a clinical PRS assay for multiple conditions illustrates the generalizability of this process and necessary technical and reporting decisions for meaningful clinical PRS implementation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document