scholarly journals Analysis of Memory B-Cell Responses Reveals Suboptimal Dosing Schedule of a Licensed Vaccine

2017 ◽  
Vol 217 (4) ◽  
pp. 572-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin M Scherer ◽  
Robin A Smith ◽  
Joseph J Carter ◽  
Gregory C Wipf ◽  
Daniel F Gallego ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leire de Campos‐Mata ◽  
Sonia Tejedor Vaquero ◽  
Roser Tachó‐Piñot ◽  
Janet Piñero ◽  
Emilie K Grasset ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 517
Author(s):  
Maheshi Ramasamy ◽  
Elizabeth Clutterbuck ◽  
Jaclyn Bowman ◽  
Matthew D. Snape ◽  
Mushiya Mpelembue ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyawan Kochayoo ◽  
Natthapon Kittisenachai ◽  
Siriruk Changrob ◽  
Kittikorn Wangriatisak ◽  
Fauzi Muh ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3382-3382
Author(s):  
Peter Allacher ◽  
Christina Hausl ◽  
Aniko Ginta Pordes ◽  
Rafi Uddin Ahmad ◽  
Hartmut J Ehrlich ◽  
...  

Abstract Memory B cells are essential for maintaining long-term antibody responses. They can persist for years even in the absence of antigen and are rapidly re-stimulated to differentiate into antibody-producing plasma cells when they encounter their specific antigen. Previously we demonstrated that ligands for TLR 7 and 9 amplify the differentiation of FVIII-specific memory B cells into anti-FVIII antibody-producing plasma cells at low concentrations of FVIII and prevent the inhibition of memory-B-cell differentiation at high concentrations of FVIII. The modulation of FVIII-specific memory-B-cell responses by agonists for TLR is highly relevant for the design of new immunotherapeutic approaches in patients with FVIII inhibitors because TLR are activated by a range of different viral and bacterial components. Specifically, TLR 7 is triggered by single-stranded RNA derived from viruses and TLR 9 is triggered by bacterial DNA containing unmethylated CpG motifs. We further explored the modulation of FVIII-specific memory-B-cell responses by agonists for TLRs by studying a broad range of concentrations of CpG DNA, a ligand for TLR 9, both in vitro and in vivo using the murine E17 model of hemophilia A. We used CpG-DNA in concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10,000 ng/ml to study the modulation of FVIII-specific memory-B-cell responses in vitro and verified the specificity of the effects observed by including a blocking agent for TLR 9 and GpC-DNA, a non-stimulating negative control for CpG DNA. Furthermore, we used doses of CpG DNA ranging from 10 to 50,000 ng per dose to study the modulation of FVIII-specific memory-B-cell responses in vivo. E17 hemophilic mice were treated with a single intravenous dose of 200 ng FVIII to stimulate the generation of FVIII-specific memory B cells and were subsequently treated with another dose of FVIII that was given together with CpG DNA. We analyzed titers of anti-FVIII antibodies in the circulation of these mice one week after the second dose of FVIII. Previously we had shown that a single dose of 200 ng FVIII, given intravenously to E17 hemophilic mice, stimulates the formation of FVIII-specific memory B cells but is not sufficient to induce anti-FVIII antibodies that would be detectable in the circulation. Our results demonstrate a biphasic effect of CpG DNA on the re-stimulation of FVIII-specific memory B cells and their differentiation into antibody-producing plasma cells. Both in vitro and in vivo studies show that CpG DNA at high doses inhibits the re-stimulation and differentiation of FVIII-specific memory B cells. However, CpG DNA at low doses amplifies these processes. Amplification and inhibition of memory-B-cell responses are due to specific interactions of CpG DNA with TLR 9. Both effects are blocked by addition of a blocking agent for TLR 9 in vitro. We conclude that triggering of TLR 9 by bacterial DNA has a substantial influence on FVIII-specific memory-B-cell responses. The consequence of TLR 9 triggering can be inhibitory or stimulatory, depending on the actual concentration of the bacterial DNA. Our findings demonstrate the potential modulatory effects of bacterial infections on the regulation of FVIII inhibitor development.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fribourg ◽  
J. Ni ◽  
F. Nina Papavasiliou ◽  
Z. Yue ◽  
P. S. Heeger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Aklima Akter ◽  
Meagan Kelly ◽  
Richelle C. Charles ◽  
Jason B. Harris ◽  
Stephen B. Calderwood ◽  
...  

Oral cholera vaccination protects against cholera; however, responses in young children are low and of short duration. The best current correlates of protection against cholera target Vibrio cholerae O-specific polysaccharide (anti-OSP), including vibriocidal responses. A cholera conjugate vaccine has been developed that induces anti-OSP immune responses, including memory B-cell responses. To address whether cholera conjugate vaccine would boost immune responses following oral cholera vaccination, we immunized mice with oral cholera vaccine Inaba CVD 103-HgR or buffer only (placebo) on day 0, followed by parenteral boosting immunizations on days 14, 42, and 70 with cholera conjugate vaccine Inaba OSP: recombinant tetanus toxoid heavy chain fragment or PBS/placebo. Compared with responses in mice immunized with oral vaccine alone or intramuscular cholera conjugate vaccine alone, mice receiving combination vaccination developed significantly higher vibriocidal, IgM OSP-specific serum responses and OSP-specific IgM memory B-cell responses. A combined vaccination approach, which includes oral cholera vaccination followed by parenteral cholera conjugate vaccine boosting, results in increased immune responses that have been associated with protection against cholera. These results suggest that such an approach should be evaluated in humans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document