scholarly journals Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert I Griffiths ◽  
Nancy L Keating ◽  
Clare R Bankhead
Author(s):  
Joanna Mitri ◽  
Takehiro Sugiyama ◽  
Hirokazu Tanaka ◽  
Mitsuru Ohsugi ◽  
Robert A. Gabbay

Diabetes Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 760-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ricci-Cabello ◽  
I. Ruiz-Perez ◽  
A. Nevot-Cordero ◽  
M. Rodriguez-Barranco ◽  
L. Sordo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110008
Author(s):  
Alexander Turchin ◽  
Luisa F. Florez Builes

Background: Real-world evidence research plays an increasingly important role in diabetes care. However, a large fraction of real-world data are “locked” in narrative format. Natural language processing (NLP) technology offers a solution for analysis of narrative electronic data. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies of NLP technology focused on diabetes. Articles published prior to June 2020 were included. Results: We included 38 studies in the analysis. The majority (24; 63.2%) described only development of NLP tools; the remainder used NLP tools to conduct clinical research. A large fraction (17; 44.7%) of studies focused on identification of patients with diabetes; the rest covered a broad range of subjects that included hypoglycemia, lifestyle counseling, diabetic kidney disease, insulin therapy and others. The mean F1 score for all studies where it was available was 0.882. It tended to be lower (0.817) in studies of more linguistically complex concepts. Seven studies reported findings with potential implications for improving delivery of diabetes care. Conclusion: Research in NLP technology to study diabetes is growing quickly, although challenges (e.g. in analysis of more linguistically complex concepts) remain. Its potential to deliver evidence on treatment and improving quality of diabetes care is demonstrated by a number of studies. Further growth in this area would be aided by deeper collaboration between developers and end-users of natural language processing tools as well as by broader sharing of the tools themselves and related resources.


2015 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roopa Shivashankar ◽  
Katy Kirk ◽  
Woon Cho Kim ◽  
Chaturia Rouse ◽  
Nikhil Tandon ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (14) ◽  
pp. 58-59
Author(s):  
MICHELE G. SULLIVAN

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyun Liang ◽  
Jacob Etches ◽  
Bogdan Pinzaru ◽  
Karen Tu ◽  
Liisa Jaakkimainen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Kim ◽  
W. Neil Steers ◽  
William H. Herman ◽  
Carol M. Mangione ◽  
K. M. Venkat Narayan ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. e001387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kornelis J J van Hateren ◽  
Iefke Drion ◽  
Nanne Kleefstra ◽  
Klaas H Groenier ◽  
Sebastiaan T Houweling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document