Total Nitrogen Methods—Applicable to All Fertilizer Samples

1970 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-456
Author(s):  
Paul R Rexroad ◽  
Gary F Krause
Keyword(s):  
Salicylic Acid ◽  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Chromium Powder ◽  
Powder Method ◽  
New Methods

Abstract An extensive collaborative study was conducted to evaluate a comprehensive nitrogen method and a Raney powder method for acceptance as official methods. Twenty-nine laboratories participated; 10 samples were used and the new methods were compared to the official method, 2.045 (sulfuric-salicylic acid). Evaluation of the data and overall consideration lead to the recommendation that both new methods be adopted as official. It is recommended that 2.047 (reduced iron) and 2.049 (chromium powder) be deleted as official methods.

Total Nitrogen in Fertilizer: Collaborative Study

1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-306
Author(s):  
Paul R Rexroad ◽  
Gary F Krause
Keyword(s):  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Oxidation Catalyst ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Probability Level ◽  
Sulfate Sulfur ◽  
Powder Method ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Cent Nitrogen

Abstract A modified comprehensive nitrogen method, using 0.4 g C11SO4 as catalyst, is presented. This method plus a modified Raney powder method (mercury-free) with no metallic oxidation catalyst are compared with the AOAC comprehensive nitrogen method. Results from 19 collaborating laboratories for 11 samples are evaluated. The modified Raney method gave significantly low results on 2 samples: 21-7-14 (nitric phosphates-non-sulfate sulfur) and tryptophan. The results for the average per cent nitrogen for 11 samples from the modified comprehensive nitrogen method were comparable to those from the official method at the 95 % probability level; the overall pooled standard deviations were also similar. In this collaborative study, the modified method (with copper) was equal in accuracy and precision to the official method (with mercury). The modified comprehensive nitrogen method has been adopted as official first action.

Total Nitrogen in Fertilizers

1968 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 851-857
Author(s):  
Paul R Rexroad ◽  
Gary F Krause
Keyword(s):  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
New Method ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Powder Method ◽  
Catalyst Powder

Abstract A three-laboratory collaborative study was made of the comprehensive nitrogen method and the new Raney catalyst powder method for total nitrogen in fertilizers. Both methods worked quite well and, with minor modifications, they should provide the basis for a broader collaborative stvidy to provide an official method for total nitrogen in fertilizer applicable to all samples. The limitations of method 2.045 are reviewed and a rephrasing of the official applications of the method is recommended. Further work is recommended toward adoption of a new method and possible deletions or change of status in current official methods.

Determination of Total Nitrogen in Fertilizers

1965 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-406
Author(s):  
H A Davis ◽  
W E Urban
Keyword(s):  
Nickel Catalyst ◽  
Raney Nickel ◽  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Chromium Powder ◽  
Powder Method ◽  
Raney Nickel Catalyst ◽  
Catalyst Powder ◽  
Iron Chromium

Abstract Five methods, AOAC 2.037, 2.039, modified reduced iron, chromium powder, and Raney nickel catalyst powder for the determination of total nitrogen in fertilizers, were submitted to collaborators for study. Twelve laboratories participated and completed the work. No one method was “best.” The modified reduced iron, chromium powder, and Raney nickel catalyst powder methods gave essentially equal results, but the chromium powder method is favored for case of operation and time required. However, if considerable organic matter and nitrate are present in a sample, satisfactory results may not be obtained. The analyst should select the official method best suited to the makeup of the sample. It is recommended that the chromium powder method he adopted as official, first action, and that study be continued with the modified reduced iron and Raney nickel catalyst methods, including helpful proposals in developing a method that may be applicable to all fertilizers.

How Rugged Are Our Nitrogen Methods?

1965 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-507
Author(s):  
W G Burgh ◽  
J A Brabson
Keyword(s):  
Salicylic Acid ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Reduction Method ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Powder Method ◽  
Catalyst Powder ◽  
Time Of Reaction

Abstract Youden’s ruggedness test was made of two official methods and four more recent methods for the determination of total nitrogen in fertilizers containing nitrates. Among the variables tested were amounts of nitrogen and reductant, effect of chloride, and time of reaction of reductant. Official method 2.039 (reduced-iron) failed the test. In order of increasing standard deviation, the five methods that passed the test were the chromous reduction method, Raney-catalyst-powder method, official method 2.037 (salicylic acid), improved reduced-iron method, and the chromiumpowder method.

An Unforeseen Problem in the Use of Kel-Paks

1968 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1290-1295
Author(s):  
T C Woodis ◽  
J A Brabson ◽  
W G Burch
Keyword(s):  
Salicylic Acid ◽  
Nicotinic Acid ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Ammoniacal Nitrogen ◽  
Powder Method ◽  
Catalyst Powder ◽  
Possible Cause ◽  
Digestion Step

Abstract In Kjeldahl methods for the determination of nitrogen in fertilizers, the digestion temperature must be above 370°C to mineralize the nitrogen in refractory organic compounds such as nicotinic acid. In total nitrogen determinations by the Raney catalyst powder method, temperatures during the digestion step were investigated as a possible cause of occasional low results. Decomposition of the polyethylene envelopes of Kel-Paks in the presence of salts of metallic reductants caused rapid fluctuations and excessive rise in temperature with consequent loss of ammoniacal nitrogen. Complete Kel-Paks can be used without difficulty in methods such as 2.044 (for nitrate-free samples) or 2.045 (salicylic acid) that do not use metallic reductants, but only the contents of the Kel-Paks without the envelopes should be used when Raney catalyst or chromium powders have been used to reduce nitrates.

Nitrogen in Fertilizers: 1962 AOAC Collaborative Study

1963 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-599
Author(s):  
H A Davis ◽  
Owen B Durgin
Keyword(s):  
Reduction Method ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Organic N ◽  
Liquid Sample ◽  
Chromium Powder ◽  
Powder Method ◽  
Individual Laboratory ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Studies were continued on methods for determining nitrogen in fertilizers: (1) the reduced iron method, 2.039; (2) the modified reduced iron method of Gehrke, et ah; (3) the chromous reduction method of Nelson; and (4) the chromium powder method of Perrin. Eight collaborators were provided with a 7—7—7 liquid sample, four of the same stock as 1961 samples (Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 6 ) , and a sample of reagent grade KNOs . Collaborative results indicated no "best" method; each method will give equally reliable results from an over-all standpoint. Personal likes or familiarity with a particular technique may produce more consistent results with one method than with another in the individual laboratory; no uniform preference was indicated. Studies of these methods should be continued, and certain editorial changes in terms relating to "organic N" are recommended.

Collaborative Study of the Quantitative Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Fusel Oil and Other Components in Whisky

1972 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-556
Author(s):  
J H Kahn ◽  
E T Blessinger
Keyword(s):  
Ethyl Acetate ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Chromatographic Determination ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Fusel Oil ◽  
Fusel Alcohols ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic Determination ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic

Abstract Fifteen chemists participated in a collaborative study for the quantitative pas-liquid chromatographic determination of the individual fusel alcohols and ethyl acetate in whisky. Two levels of congeners represented by 4 coded samples of whisky were analyzed by using t h e proposed method, employing a glycerol-1,2,6-hexanetriol column, and the official AOAC method, 9.063-9.065. Since isobutyl and the atnyl alcohols comprise by far the greatest part of fusel oil, their determination is of major importance to the total fusel oil content . Statistical analyses show that the proposed method is superior to the AOAC method for the determination of these alcohols, whereas the official method is superior for the determination of ethyl acetate and n-propyl alcohol. In general, collaborators employing modern instrumentation preferred the proposed method over the AOAC method. The former method also separates and permits the quantitative measurement of active amyl and isoamyl alcohols. The proposed method has been adopted as official first action as an alternative to 9.063–9.065 for the determination of higher alcohols and ethyl acetate in whisky.

scholarly journals Determination of Fish Flesh Content in Frozen Coated Fish Products (Modification of AOAC Official Method 971.13): Collaborative Study

1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 1235-1271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E Fox Dobson ◽  
Foster D McClure ◽  
Alvin P Rainosek ◽  
K Dashiell ◽  
J Fox Dobson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Processing System ◽  
Test Sample ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Fish Products ◽  
Fish Flesh ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
Fully Cooked ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract An intralaboratory1collaborative study evaluated a modified version of AOAC Official Method 971.13 for determining the fish flesh content (FFC) in frozen coated fish products by comparing it with the on-line method. Eleven collaborators analyzed 36 products (a total of 6336 test samples). Each product targeted one of 4 percent fish flesh (PFF) levels (35,50,65, and 80). Products were manufactured from one of 3 raw materials (fillet blocks, minced blocks, and natural fillets) and processed in one of 4 forms (sticks, portions, formed portions, and fillets) and one of 4 styles (raw breaded, batter-dipped, precooked, and fully cooked). Each “official” test sample was tracked through the processing system and weighed (1) before battering and/or breading and, depending on product style, before frying; and (2) after battering and/or breading and, depending on product style, after frying; so that it served as its own control.

scholarly journals Comparison of Babcock and Ether Extraction Methods for Determination of Fat Content of Cream: Collaborative Study

1996 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 907-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna M Lynch ◽  
David M Barbano ◽  
J Richard Fleming
Keyword(s):  
Extraction Method ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Fat Content ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Ether Extraction ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract A modified Mojonnier ether extraction method for determination of the fat content of cream was developed based on the method for milk (AOAC Official Method 989.05). The cream Babcock method (AOAC Official Method 920.111 B-C) was modified to harmonize with the milk Babcock method (AOAC Official Method 989.04) and to clarify procedural details. Using the AOAC collaborative study format, 10 laboratories tested 9 pairs of blind duplicate heat-treated cream samples with a fat range of 30-45% using both methods. The statistical performance (invalid and outlier data removed) was as follows: mean % fat = 37.932, sr = 0.125, sR = 0.151, RSDr = 0.330, RSDR = 0.398, r = 0.354, and R = 0.427 for the ether extraction method. For the Babcock method, mean % fat = 38.209, sr = 0.209, SR = 0.272, RSDr = 0.548, RSDR = 0.712, r = 0.592, and R = 0.769. Average test results for fat from the Babcock method were 0.277% (absolute fat) greater than for the Mojonnier ether extraction method. The difference between methods, as a percentage of the average fat content of the samples, was 0.73%. This agrees with differences observed between the 2 methods for milk when 10 to 17 laboratories tested 7 milk samples in blind duplicate at bimonthly intervals over a 4-year period (average difference 0.029% fat, 0.78% as a percentage of average fat content). The Mojonnier ether extraction and Babcock methods for fat in cream have been adopted by AOAC INTERNATIONAL. The new Babcock method replaced the AOAC Official Method 920.111 B-C.

Collaborative Study of an Automated Method for Phosphorus in Fertilizers

1972 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 979-983
Author(s):  
Frank J Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Available Phosphorus ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Matched Pairs ◽  
F Test ◽  
Automated Method

Abstract A collaborative study was made of an automated method for total and direct available phosphorus (P2O5) in comparison with the official gravimetric quimociac method, 2.023–2.025. Eight laboratories participated in the analysis of the 13 sample solutions, and the results were evaluated by the technique of closely matched pairs. The fc-test showed no difference in the means of the results of the 2 methods. The estimates of the random, systematic, and total errors of the automated method all differed significantly from those of the official method when evaluated by the F-test. Further study of the automated method for P2O5 in fertilizers is recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document