Grazing diverse combinations of tanniferous and non-tanniferous legumes: Implications for foraging behavior, performance, and hair cortisol in beef cattle

Author(s):  
Sebastian Lagrange ◽  
Jennifer W MacAdam ◽  
Bryan Stegelmeier ◽  
Juan J Villalba

Abstract A diversity of forages with different types and concentrations of nutrients and plant secondary compounds may lead to complementary relationships that enhance cattle performance and welfare. We determined whether grazing combinations of tanniferous legumes (Lotus corniculatus, birdsfoot trefoil [BFT], Onobrychis viciifolia, sainfoin [SF]), and alfalfa [ALF] (Medicago sativa) influence foraging behavior, performance, and hair cortisol concentration in beef cattle compared with grazing the same legumes as monocultures. Twenty-one pairs of heifers grazed 3 spatial replications of seven treatments: monocultures of BFT, SF, or ALF, and all possible 2- and 3-way choices among strips of these legumes: SF-BFT, ALF-BFT, ALF-SF, and ALF-SF-BFT in 2 periods of 25 d each (adaptation phase + experimental period) during two consecutive years. The lowest incidence of grazing events occurred in the BFT treatment (42.0% of the total scans recorded; P < 0.10), with the rest of the treatments ranging between 47.8 (SF-BFT) and 52.6% (ALF-SF) of the total scans recorded. Heifers selected a varied diet, preferring sainfoin over birdsfoot trefoil or alfalfa in a 46:27:27 ratio for the 3-way choice, and in a 70:30 ratio for both 2-way choices. Heifers preferred birdsfoot trefoil over alfalfa (62:38 ratio) in a 2-way choice. All treatments followed similar daily grazing patterns (P > 0.10), with two major grazing events (1 hour after sunrise and 3 hours before dark). No differences among treatments were observed for the number of steps taken by heifers on a daily basis, motion index, or the percentage of time heifers spent standing (1599, 5356, and 45.3%, respectively; P > 0.10), suggesting that heifers on choice treatments did not invest extra time in walking, searching or patch switching activities relative to heifers grazing monocultures. Heifers grazing the 3-way choice gained more BW (1.27 Kg/d) than the average gains observed for animals grazing in all legume monocultures (1.00 kg/d; P = 0.014) or 2-way choices (0.97 kg/d; P = 0.007), suggesting a synergism among pasture species for the treatment with the highest diversity. No differences in hair cortisol concentration were observed among treatments, with values ranging between 1.4 (BFT) and 2.12 ng/g (3-way choice) (P > 0.10). Thus, forage diversity has the potential to enhance animal performance without affecting grazing efficiency, likely explained by the spatial arrangement of the forage species presented in the study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 215-216
Author(s):  
Sebastian Lagrange ◽  
Jennifer MacAdam ◽  
Juan J Villalba

Abstract We tested the effect of increasingly diverse combinations of tanniferous legumes (birdsfoot trefoil-BFT, sainfoin-SF) and alfalfa (ALF) on cattle foraging behavior, performance and hair cortisol concentration. Pairs of heifers (401 ± 49.6 kg) grazed three spatial replications of seven treatments (n = 3/treatment): monocultures (BFT, SF, ALF) and all possible 2- and 3-way choices among strips of these legumes in a completely randomized block design in two 25-d periods during 2 consecutive years. The fewest grazing events occurred in BFT (42.0% of the total scans recorded; P < 0.10), with other treatments ranging between 47.8 (SF-BFT) and 52.6% (ALF-SF) of the total scans recorded. Heifers selected a varied diet, preferring SF over BFT or ALF in 46:27:27 and 70:30 ratios (3- and 2-way choice, respectively) and preferred BFT over ALF (62:38 ratio). All treatments followed similar daily grazing patterns (P >0.10), with two major grazing events (1 hour after sunrise and 3 hours before sunset). No differences among treatments were observed for the number of steps taken, motion index, or percentage of time spent standing (1,600, 5,356, and 45.3%, respectively; P >0.10), suggesting that heifers in choice treatments did not invest extra time in walking, searching or patch-switching activities relative to monoculture treatments. Heifers in the 3-way choice gained more BW (1.27 Kg/d) than in monocultures (1.00 kg/d; P = 0.014), or 2-way choices (0.97 kg/d; P = 0.007), suggesting nutritional synergism among legumes in the treatment of greatest diversity. No differences in hair cortisol concentration were observed among treatments, with values ranging between 1.40 (BFT) and 2.12 ng/g (3-way choice) (P >0.10). Thus, forage diversity enhanced animal performance, likely driven by interactions among condensed tannins and dietary protein, without affecting hair cortisol levels or grazing efficiency, explained by the spatial arrangement (strips) of the forage species presented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Jancy Jeffus ◽  
Ryan R Reuter ◽  
Kevin Wagner ◽  
Laura Goodman ◽  
Todd Parker

Abstract Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of virtual fencing on stress in beef cattle. In both experiments, cattle were contained by either physical, 2-strand electric fencing or by use of a proprietary, GPS-based virtual fencing collar, with no physical interior fencing. In both studies, hair from the tail switch was collected at the end of the experiment, and analyzed for cortisol concentration to measure the accumulated stress experienced by the cattle. Additionally, a subset of cattle were fitted with pedometers to measure behavior responses. In the initial pilot experiment, 55 heifers were grazed for 28 d in either 1 physically-fenced pasture or 1 virtually-fenced pasture. In the second experiment, 59 mature cows and heifers were grazed for 56 d in 1 of 2 physically-fenced or 1 of 2 virtually-fenced pastures (4 pastures total). In the second experiment, blood samples were also collected and NEFA and lactate were quantified in plasma. Only descriptive statistics were summarized for the pilot experiment, which indicated that hair cortisol concentrations were within published ranges for both fence types (0.39 ± 0.32 and 0.37 ± 0.15 pg/mg for physically- or virtually-fenced animals, respectively), and step count and motion index appeared elevated in the first few days of adaptation to virtual fence. The second experiment was analyzed with analysis of variance as a completely random design with pasture as the experimental unit. No effect of fence type was found for behavior (number of steps, standing time, lying bouts, or motion index; P > 0.16). Further, no difference was observed in cortisol, lactate nor NEFA (P > 0.14) concentrations due to fence type. None of this data suggests that virtual fencing is different from physical fencing in the effects on cattle stress and behavior, indicating further research and development of virtual fencing technology are warranted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 100047
Author(s):  
Tiffany Yip ◽  
Paul Smith ◽  
Michael Tynes ◽  
Sheena Mirpuri ◽  
Ashley Weems ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Paula Maarit Mustonen ◽  
Linnea Karlsson ◽  
Ana João Rodrigues ◽  
Noora Mikaela Scheinin ◽  
Susanna Kortesluoma ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Cavestany ◽  
N. Negrin ◽  
R. Negrin ◽  
J. F. Groth

AbstractThe objective was to evaluate different oestrous synchronization schemes in beef cattle under range conditions. In experiment 1, 202 heifers averaging 26 months of age were assigned randomly to three treatments: (a) GnRH-PG. (no. = 44) day 0 (D0): injection of GnRH; D7: injection of PGF2α; D0 to D25 oestrous detection (OD) and artificial insemination (AI); (b) OD-PG. (no. = 45) D0 to D4; OD + AI; D5: injection of PGF2α; D5 to D25 OD + AI; and (c)Ovsynch. (no. = 113) D0: injection of GnRH; D7: injection of PGF2α; D9: injection of GnRH and 16 h later AI at fixed time. In experiment 2, 318 non-suckling cows were assigned randomly to three treatments: (a) GnRH-PG. (no. = 106) D0: injection of GnRH; D7: injection of PGF2α; D0 to D25 OD + AI; (b) GnRH-MAP-PG. (no. = 106) D0: injection of a GnRH analogue and insertion of an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 250 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate; D7: injection of PGF2α and sponge withdrawal; D0 to D25 OD + AI; (c) controls. (no. = 106) OD and AI. The experimental period lasted 25 days and, with exception of the Ovsynch treatment, oestrous detection was carried out twice a day (a.m./p.m.) and inseminations performed 12 h later. The pregnancy rates assessed by ultrasonography 30 days after AI were: experiment 1: (a) 30·0%; (b) 28·6% and (c) 62·3% (P < 0·05); experiment 2: (a) 60·2%; (b) 57·8% and (c) 45·5% (P < 0·05). It is concluded that in heifers and non-suckling cows, oestrous synchronization treatments result in higher pregnancy rates. In non-suckling cows, the addition of a progestagen did not improve the response.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. cou026-cou026 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cattet ◽  
B. J. Macbeth ◽  
D. M. Janz ◽  
A. Zedrosser ◽  
J. E. Swenson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Alexi Moehlenpah ◽  
David L Lalman

Abstract The Smith–Lever Act of 1914 established a system of cooperative extension services to connect the land-grant universities to the people. Agricultural extension educators serve as the “front door” to the University, providing research-based information in a wide variety of agricultural topics such as livestock, crops, entomology, natural resources, etc. A bachelor’s degree in agriculture is a requirement for employment as an agricultural extension educator in most states. Generally, most new hires are knowledgeable in one or more areas and perhaps possess a degree focused in the same area. However, many educators are not fluent in all the agriculture sectors they are required to address on a daily basis. Our objective is to gradually develop an online in-service program specifically designed to strengthen educators’ knowledge and proficiency in basic beef cattle production. These courses will consist of five to ten modules each with an estimated five hours of course work per subject. The courses will include reading material, listening and visual material, interactive activities, and quizzes to aid in learning the basics. The Introduction to Beef Cattle Nutrition course is intended to enhance extension educators’ knowledge of the nutrient requirements of beef cattle, body condition scoring, ration calculation, etc. Extension educators will be expected to pass quizzes at the end of each module with an eighty percent or higher. Oklahoma extension educators will enroll in the Introduction to Beef Cattle Nutrition course during the 2020 calendar year and complete over a ten-week period. A survey at the end of each module will allow the authors to see how effective the course was, and if the representative feels more confident in discussing and helping producers with their herd nutrition upon completion.


2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. e22879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley A. Phillips ◽  
Alyson N. Tukan ◽  
Anna D. Rigodanzo ◽  
Ryan T. Reusch ◽  
Kathleen M. Brasky ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document