scholarly journals 2 Acute phase response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in beef steers supplemented with prebiotic blends

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 38-39
Author(s):  
Nicole C Burdick Sanchez ◽  
Paul R Broadway ◽  
Jeffery A Carroll ◽  
Devan M Paulus Compart ◽  
J C Forcherio
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Acute Phase Response ◽  
Sickness Behavior ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Phase Response ◽  
Energy Utilization ◽  
Beef Steers ◽  
Lps Challenge ◽  
Complete Blood Counts ◽  
Metabolic Biomarkers

Abstract A study was conducted to determine the effects of two prebiotic blends on the acute phase response (APR) following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in steers. Crossbred steers (n = 36; 273±4 kg) were fed for 21d on three different treatments: 1) Control, fed a standard receiving ration; 2) Control ration supplemented with a Prebiotic/Probiotic blend (28.4 g/hd/d; PMI); and 3) Control ration supplemented with a DFM/Prebiotic blend (19.0 g/hd/d; PMI). On d20, calves were fitted with indwelling rectal temperature (RT) monitors and jugular catheters and moved into individual stanchions in a covered barn. On d21, blood samples were collected, and sickness behavior scores recorded at 0.5-h intervals from -2 to 8h and again at 24h relative to an i.v. challenge with 0.25 µg/kg BW LPS. Serum was isolated and stored until analyzed for pro-inflammatory cytokines, cortisol and glucose concentrations. Complete blood counts were measured every 2h from -2 to 8h and again at 24h. Pre-challenge RT measured for 18h prior to the challenge tended (P = 0.10) to be affected by treatment such that calves fed the Prebiotic/Probiotic blend had greater RT than Control and tended to be greater than calves fed the DFM/Prebiotic blend (38.9, 39.2, and 39.0±0.1oC, respectively). Post-challenge RT increased 0.8–1.0oC on average but did not differ between treatments (P = 0.53). Sickness behavior scores were not different between treatments (P = 0.14). There were no differences in white blood cell or differential counts between treatments (P ≥ 0.25). Serum concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ increased in response to the challenge (P < 0.01) but were not different between treatments (P ≥ 0.26). Serum cortisol and glucose concentrations were reduced in both supplemented groups compared to Control steers (P ≤ 0.006). Therefore, the data suggest that the effects of the prebiotic blends during an immune challenge were limited to alterations in metabolic biomarkers and energy utilization.

scholarly journals In utero exposure to LPS alters the postnatal acute-phase response in beef heifers

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffery A Carroll ◽  
Nicole C Burdick Sanchez ◽  
John D Arthingon ◽  
Corwin D Nelson ◽  
Aimee L Benjamin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Acute Phase Response ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Sickness Behavior ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Phase Response ◽  
In Utero Exposure ◽  
Lps Challenge ◽  
Time Interaction ◽  
Vaginal Temperature

The potential effect of prenatal LPS exposure on the postnatal acute phase response (APR) to an LPS challenge in heifers was determined. Pregnant crossbred cows were separated into prenatal immune stimulation (PIS) and saline groups (Control). From these treatments, heifer calves were identified at weaning to subsequently receive an exogenous LPS challenge. Sickness behavior scores (SBS) were recorded and blood samples were collected at 30-min intervals from −2 to 8 h and again at 24 h relative to the LPS challenge. There was a treatment × time interaction for the change in vaginal temperature (VT) such that the change in VT was greater in Control than PIS from 150 to 250 min, yet it was greater in PIS than Control from 355 to 440 min and from 570 to 1145 min. There was also a treatment × time interaction for SBS such that scores were greater in Control than PIS at 0.5 h, yet were greater in PIS than Control from 2.5 to 4 h post-LPS. There was a tendency for a treatment × time interaction for serum concentrations of IL-6, which were greater in PIS than Control heifers from 5.5 to 6 h and from 7 to 8 h post-challenge. Thus, a single exposure to LPS during gestation can alter the postnatal APR to LPS in heifer calves.

scholarly journals 233 NaturSafe® supplementation mitigates some aspects of the acute phase immune response to a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in weaned beef calves

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Nicole C Burdick Sanchez ◽  
Jeffery A Carroll ◽  
Paul R Broadway ◽  
Tom S Edrington ◽  
Ilkyu Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Sickness Behavior ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Post Challenge ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Lps Challenge ◽  
Time Interaction ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Monitoring Devices

Abstract This study was conducted to determine if feeding calves NaturSafe would reduce the acute phase response (APR) to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge. Crossbred steers (n=32; 274±2 kg) were randomly allotted to two treatment diets: 1) Control, fed a standard receiving ration, and 2) NaturSafe, fed the Control ration supplemented with NaturSafe at 12 g/hd/d (NaturSafe®, Diamond V). On d22, steers were fitted with indwelling jugular catheters and rectal temperature monitoring devices and placed in individual stalls. On d23, steers were challenged i.v. with 0.25 µg/kg BW LPS. Serum samples were collected and sickness behavior scores (SBS) recorded at 0.5-h intervals from -2 to 8h and at 24h relative to LPS challenge. Rectal temperatures were greater (P=0.01) in NaturSafe compared to Control steers for the following time intervals following LPS challenge: 6 to 11h, 13h, 15 to 20h, and 22 to 24h. Additionally, SBS were reduced (P< 0.01) in NaturSafe compared to Control steers. White blood cell concentrations were greater (P=0.05) in NaturSafe compared to Control steers prior to the LPS challenge, yet the response to LPS did not differ between treatments (P >0.05). A treatment × time interaction for serum cortisol concentrations (P< 0.01) showed an increase at 0.5 and 2h post-challenge but a reduction at 3h in NaturSafe compared to Control steers. Additionally, fibrinogen was greater (P< 0.01) in NaturSafe compared to Control steers. There was a treatment × time interaction (P< 0.01) for TNF-α where concentrations were reduced from 1 to 2h post-challenge in NaturSafe compared to Control steers. Serum IL-6 tended (P=0.09) to show a reduction in serum concentrations in NaturSafe compared to Control steers. There was a tendency (P=0.07) for a treatment × time interaction for IFN-γ. Overall these data suggest a priming effect of NaturSafe on the innate immune system of steers, resulting in an attenuated APR to the LPS challenge.

scholarly journals Carotenoids buffer the acute phase response on fever, sickness behavior and rapid bill color change in zebra finches

2017 ◽  
Vol 220 (16) ◽  
pp. 2957-2964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna B. George ◽  
Brent C. Schneider ◽  
Kevin J. McGraw ◽  
Daniel R. Ardia
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Acute Phase Response ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Sickness Behavior ◽  
Phase Response ◽  
Zebra Finches

Glycoprotein biosynthesis during the acute-phase response to inflammation

1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 1041-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Jamieson ◽  
H. A. Kaplan ◽  
B. M. R. N. J. Woloski ◽  
M. Hellman ◽  
K. Ham
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Acute Phase Response ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Acute Phase Reactant ◽  
Phase Response ◽  
Acute Phase Reactants ◽  
Acid Glycoprotein ◽  
Phase Reactant

Inflammation results in an increase in the levels of a variety of glycoproteins in serum. The glycoproteins that respond in this way are usually referred to as acute-phase reactants. Studies on the acute-phase response of rat α1-acid glycoprotein showed that there was an increase in the liver levels of this glycoprotein at 12 h after turpentine inflammation. This was followed by increased serum levels at 48–72 h after inflammation, suggesting a precursor–product relationship between liver and serum α1-acid glycoprotein. Incorporation studies coupled with measurements of synthesis rates of α1-acid glycoprotein showed that increased synthesis was responsible for the acute-phase response of this protein to inflammation. These studies also showed that albumin was a negative acute-phase reactant. The acute-phase response of α1-acid glycoprotein was accompanied by increased liver pools of UDP–N-acetylglucosamine (UDP–GlcNAc) and UDP–N-acetylgalactosamine (UDP–GalNAc) and increased liver activities of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase and UDP–GlcNAc 2-epimerase. Activities of galactosyl and sialyl transferases in liver were also elevated and serum sialyl transferase was increased substantially in inflammation, suggesting that it may also be an acute-phase reactant. Liver activities of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase and β-galactosidase declined by about 50% at 24 h after inflammation; there was evidence that serum levels of these enzymes increased at 24–72 h after inflammation, suggesting that the lysosomal glycosidases may be released from liver during inflammation. Inflammation resulted in elevated serum Cortisol, insulin, and adrenocorticotropic hormone and induced increased glycogenosis; liver cAMP levels were also increased during inflammation. Preliminary studies are presented to show that leukocyte-derived factors may be involved in the acute-phase response of α1-acid glycoprotein to inflammation.

Acute phase response in zebrafish embryo/larva with special emphasis on LPS-induced changes in expression pattern of acute phase protein genes

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 1569-1580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwei Sun ◽  
Zongyao Li ◽  
Shicui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Acute Phase Response ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Acute Phase Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
Yolk Sac ◽  
Phase Response ◽  
Lps Challenge ◽  
Genes Encoding

Acute phase response (APR) in developing embryos/larvae remains poorly studied in fish, and information regarding the expression and role of acute phase proteins (APPs) in developing embryos/larvae is rather limited in teleosts. In this study we investigated the APR in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos/larvae challenged with LPS by examining the expression of APP genes encoding CRP, SAA, LECT2, HAMP and HP and APP inducer genes encoding IL-1β and TNF-α. Expression of all the seven genes was up-regulated in embryos/larvae after challenge with LPS as revealed by q-RT-PCR. Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) showed that all the genes displayed strong maternal expression in the cleavage and blastula stages, and ubiquitous expression in the gastrula and segmentation stage embryos, and then they were expressed differently in specific tissues in later developmental stages. Interestingly, challenge with LPS resulted in de novo expression of the SAA gene in the yolk sac and intestine, the LECT2 gene in the yolk sac, and the IL-1β gene in the yolk sac and the dispersed neutrophils of caudal vein, and visible enhanced expression of the LECT2 gene in the yolk sac. These are the first such data reported in teleosts, showing that LPS challenge is able to modify the expression patterns of APP and APP inducer genes. Altogether, these data suggest that zebrafish embryos/larvae are able to respond to acute infection though their immune system remains in a developing and immature state.

Increased Ratio of Serum Cortisol to Cortisone in Acute-Phase Response

2002 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vogeser ◽  
R. Zachoval ◽  
T.W. Felbinger ◽  
K. Jacob
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Acute Phase Response ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Phase Response

PSXIV-20 Ovine circulatory markers regulating the acute-phase response of variable stress responding sheep to LPS challenge

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 494-495
Author(s):  
Ankita Sharma ◽  
Umesh K Shandilya ◽  
Tianna Sullivan ◽  
Danielle Naylor ◽  
Angela Cánovas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Acute Phase Response ◽  
Phase Response ◽  
Receptor Interaction ◽  
Lps Challenge ◽  
Cytokines And Chemokines ◽  
Response To Stress ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Stress Responding ◽  
As Stress

Abstract Pathogens induce neuroendocrine-immune interactions in their hosts, which are a basis to overcome the microbial stressor. These interactions result in individual variation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response and could contribute to variable stress resiliency. In present study, a comprehensive set of circulatory markers was assessed in variable stress responding lambs selected from a population (n = 112) and categorized based on cortisol levels as high (HSR, 336.2 ±27.9 nmol/L, n =12), middle (MSR, 147.3 ±9.5 nmol/L, n =12) and low (LSR, 32.1 ±10.4 nmol/L, n =12) responding phenotypes post LPS challenge (400 ng/kg iv). Blood was collected from the jugular vein at 0 (pre-) and 4 hrs post-LPS challenge to monitor changes in serum with a panel of 15 pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and 84 miRNAs, and white blood cell (WBC) populations. The HSR had the strongest fever and pro-inflammatory IL-6, IFN-γ cytokine responses compared to MSR and LSR. HSR and MSR had stronger anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokine and CCL2 chemokine responses than LSR. WBC counts changed between 0 and 4 hrs; however, no differences were detected among the variable stress response groups. Three miRNAs, oar-miR-485-5p (+3.82 folds), oar-miR-1193-5p (+2.43 folds) and oar-miR-3957-5p (+3.14 folds) were significantly (P < 0.05) upregulated, and seven miRNAs, oar-miR-376b-3p (-6.6 fold), oar-miR-376c-3p (3.5 folds), oar-miR-411b-5p (-11.69 folds), (oar-miR-376a-3p (-2.28 fold), oar-miR-376b-3p (-6.08 folds), oar-miR-376c-3p (-2.62 folds), oar-miR-381-3p (-3.85 folds) were downregulated (P < 0.05) in HSR compared to LSR and MSR. Functional analysis of miRNAs revealed their roles in activating TGF-beta signalling, Cytokine receptor interaction and Thyroid signalling pathways in HSR phenotypes indicating a hyper-induced acute-phase response. In summary, these results indicate variation in the acute-phase response to stress, and some of these markers could be used as stress biomarkers. Further investigation is warranted to understand the plausible association of cortisol phenotype with other important traits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document