Pain Management for Pediatric Burns in the Outpatient Setting: A Changing Paradigm?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 814-819
Author(s):  
Niti Shahi ◽  
Maxene Meier ◽  
Ryan Phillips ◽  
Gabrielle Shirek ◽  
Adam Goldsmith ◽  
...  

Abstract Childhood burns are common and distressing for children and their parents. Pain is the most common complaint and often thought to be undertreated, which can negatively influence the child’s care and increase the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder. There is limited literature on the role of opioids and multimodal therapy in the treatment of pediatric outpatient burns. We sought to evaluate the current use of opioids (including the use of multimodal therapies), storage, and disposal of opioids in this patient population. Parents of burn-injured children 8 months to 18 years old, who were seen in an outpatient setting within 2 weeks of their burn injury, were queried from April to December 2019 regarding their child’s pain control, opioid medication use, over-the-counter pain medication use, opioid storage, and disposal. A total of 142 parents of burn-injured children and their parents were surveyed. The median age of the burn-injured children was 2.7 years old and the majority (54.2%; 77/142) were male. The mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 1.8% and half sustained burn injuries to one or both hands. The most frequently used regimens for constant and/or breakthrough pain control were acetaminophen (62.7%) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 68.3%). Less than one fifth (26/142;18%) of patients were prescribed opioids and 88% filled their prescription. The median number of doses of opioids prescribed was eight doses, with a median of four doses of opioids unused. Only three patients used all of their prescribed opioids and no patient ≥12 years old used their entire prescription. Burns greater than 3% TBSA, irrespective of burn injury location, were associated with opioid prescription (P = .003). Approximately 40% (10/26) of parents who filled their child’s opioid prescription stored the opioid in a locked area. Fewer than one third (7/26) of patients were educated on how to dispose of excess opioid pain medication. Overall, most pediatric outpatient burn injuries can be successfully managed with over-the-counter medications. Providers, who care for burn-injured children ≤ 12 years old with burns that cover ≥3% TBSA in the outpatient setting, should consider no more than four opioid doses for initial pain control. This guideline, coupled with family and provider-centered education on multimodal therapy at the time of initial presentation and safe use of opioids, are important first steps to minimizing the use of opioids in the management of small area burns in children.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S273-S274
Author(s):  
Niti Shahi ◽  
Maxene Meier ◽  
Ryan Phillips ◽  
Gabrielle Shirek ◽  
Ashley Banks ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Childhood burns are extremely common and distressing for children and their parents. Pain is the most common complaint and often thought to be undertreated, disrupting care and increasing the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder. There is limited literature on the role of opioids and multimodal therapy in the treatment of burns in pediatric patients. We sought to evaluate the current use of multimodal therapy as well as the use, storage, and disposal of opioids in this patient population. Methods We prospectively surveyed parents of pediatric burn patients (0–18 years old) who presented to the burn clinic within two weeks of burn injury. Parents were surveyed regarding over-the-counter pain medication use and opioid medication use, storage, and disposal in the treatment of their child. Medians and interquartile ranges were used to describe continuous variables and frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables. Results A total of 92 parents of burn-injured children were surveyed at a single institution in the outpatient burn clinic. The median age of burn-injured children was 3.1 years old, and 50% of patients were male. The majority had a TBSA of 1%. The hand was the most frequently burned location (45.7%). Acetaminophen (58.7%) and ibuprofen (69.6%) were the most common treatments for both constant and breakthrough pain. Approximately 28% (26/92) of patients were prescribed opioids, of which 18.5% (17/92) filled their prescription. Only 29% of patients (5/17) consumed their entire prescription, and a median of 3 doses of opioids remained for those who did not finish the entire prescription. Parents most commonly decided to give their children opioid pain medications because “my child is in severe pain” or “I give my child pain medications as scheduled (written on prescription).” Approximately 40% (7/17) of patients who filled opioid prescriptions stored them in a locked area, and only 35.3% (6/17) were educated on how to dispose of excess opioid pain medication. Conclusions Presently, multimodal therapy with over-the-counter pain medications is used to treat the majority of pediatric burns. This study demonstrates an increased need for education on opioid administration, storage, and disposal for parents of burn-injured children. Applicability of Research to Practice We aimed to evaluate what current trends in opioid use are in pediatric burn patients and areas for improvement in parent education for over-the-counter pain medication use, opioid use, opioid storage, and disposal. From the study, we were able to glean that the majority of patients are successfully managed with over-the-counter pain medications. However, parents and patients managed with opioids need additional education on appropriate administration of opioid pain medications, safe locked storage of opioids, and opioid disposal. This demonstrates an area for quality improvement inpatient and outpatient.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S141-S142
Author(s):  
Victoria Owens ◽  
Kathleen S Romanowski ◽  
Tina L Palmieri ◽  
David G Greenhalgh ◽  
Soman Sen

Abstract Introduction Opioids are frequently prescribed after burn injury. Prolonged use of opioids can increase dependence and potential for life threatening complications. For burn-injured children, optimizing opioid prescriptions in the outpatient setting can reduce these risks. Our aim for this study was to assess and analyze the outpatient opioid prescription use in children with burn injuries. Methods After approval from the institutional review board, pediatric patients admitted to our institution with £20% total body surface area (TBSA) burn were included. Data collected included age, gender, % TBSA burn, mechanism of injury, length of stay, surgical procedures, total morphine milligram equivalent (MME) given in last 24 hours prior to discharge and discharge pain prescriptions. 7 days after discharge, families tracked and provided daily usage of prescription opioids, acetaminophen, and ibuprofen, as well as daily pain scores. Families were given a follow up questionnaire about whether a prescription opioid was prescribed and filled, daily medication needs, pain scores, storage of opioids, quantity of medications remaining, and disposal of any remaining opioids. All mean values are mean±standard deviation, all median values are median(interquartile range). Results Twenty-nine patients were enrolled with a mean age of 7±5.8 years and mean TBSA of 10±6%. Daily outpatient pain scores ranged from 0–2. 18 patients underwent skin graft surgery (SUR) and 11 did not (NOSUR). The mean % of opioids that were not used was 50%±38% and 52% of families kept the left-over opioids for future use. For the SUR group, a median % of opioids that were not used was 64(14–90)% and for the NOSUR the median was 35(17.5–56)% and 56% of SUR families and 45% of NOSUR families kept the left-over opioids for future use. Conclusions For pediatric burn patients, opioids prescribed at discharge may be overestimating pain needs. In our study, half of the opioids were not used, and this was even more pronounced in patients who underwent surgery. More concerning is that the majority of families did not dispose the opioids and instead kept the medication for future use. We recommend optimizing opioid prescribing practices to reduce over-prescribing opioids to burn injured children and educating families on the need for proper disposal of left-over opioids.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
Manish Devkota ◽  
Samit Sharma ◽  
Sangam Rayamajhi ◽  
Jayan M Shrestha ◽  
Ishwar Lohani

Introduction Burn injuries are associated with higher morbidity and mortality especially in middle and low-income countries. The objective of the study is to assess the outcome of acute burn injuries in a tertiary care center of Kathmandu, Nepal. MethodsThis is a descriptive cross-sectional study of the clinical data of acute burn patients admitted from January 2016-December 2018. ResultsOut of 124 patients with burn injuries, there were more females (n=65, 52.4 %) than males (n=59, 47.6%). Flame burn was the most common mode of injury (n=71,57.3 %) followed by scald (n=22,17.7 %). Thirty-eight (30.6%) patients arrived to hospital on the same day of injury. The average time required to reach our hospital was 24 hours. The most frequently involved site was lower extremities (n=40, 32.26%) followed by upper extremities (n=33, 26.62%). Total body surface area (TBSA) involved in the burn injury ranges from 10% to 50% with a median of 15%. Hospital stay was 14 to 58 days with a median of 17 days. Partial thickness burn was seen in 114 (91.94%) patients whereas 10 (8.06%) patients had full thickness burn. Surgical intervention was needed in 71 (57.26%) patients. Among 71 patients, 12 patients underwent surgery twice. Fifty-two (41.94%) patients were managed conservatively. The mortality rate was 4.03%. ConclusionAdult female population is at high risk for burn injuries mostly due to flame burn. Delay in reaching care has also contributed for poor outcome of burn injuries. Majority of burn injury patients needed surgical intervention and hence improvement in surgical aspects can lead to better outcome of burn injuries.Keywords:


Author(s):  
Brandon T. Nokes ◽  
Ayan Sen

Burn injuries may cause morbidity and death, and patients may have widely variable presentations and outcomes. This chapter focuses on the critical care aspects of burn injury and management issues of burn and electrical injuries. Burns are classified according to the amount of total body surface area (TBSA) affected, the depth of burn, and the type of exposure associated with the burn. More specifically, burns can be chemical, electrical, or thermal. Burn severity is determined by the depth of involvement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S67-S67
Author(s):  
Tina L Palmieri ◽  
Kathleen S Romanowski ◽  
Soman Sen ◽  
David G Greenhalgh

Abstract Introduction Climate change, the encroachment of populations into wilderness, and carelessness have combined to increase the incidence of wildfire injuries. With the increased incidence has come an increase in the number of burn injuries. Prolonged extrication, delays in resuscitation, and the extreme fire and toxic air environment in a wildfire has the potential to cause more severe burn injury. The purpose of this study is to examine the demographics and outcomes of wildfire injuries and compare those outcomes to non-wildfire injuries. Methods Charts of patients admitted to a regional burn center during a massive wildfire in 2018 were reviewed for demographic, treatment, and outcome. We then obtained age, gender, and burn size matched controls from within 2 years of the incident, analyzed the same measures, and compared treatment and outcomes between the two groups. Results A total of 20 patients, 10 wildfire (WF) burns and 10 non-wildfire (NWF) burns, were included in the study. Age (59.6±7.8 WF vs. 59.4±7.4 years), total body surface area burn (TBSA) (14.9±4.7 WF vs. 17.2±0.9 NWF) and inhalation injury incidence (2 WF and 2 NWF) were similar between groups. Days on mechanical ventilation (24.3±19.4 WF vs. 9.4±9.8 NWF), length of stay (49.9±21.8 WF vs. 28.2±11.7 days) and ICU length of stay (43.0±25.6 WF vs 24.4±11.2 NWF) were higher in the WF group. WF patients required twice the number of operations. Mortality was similar in both groups (1 death/group). Conclusions Wildfire burn injuries, when compared to age, inhalation injury, and burn size matched controls, require more ventilatory support and have more operations. As a result, they have longer lengths of stay and have a prolonged ICU course. Burn centers should be prepared for the increased resource utilization that accompanies wildfire injuries. Applicability of Research to Practice All burn centers must be prepared for the possibility of wildfires and the increased resource utilzation that accompanies mass casualty events.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S194-S195
Author(s):  
Lisa C Vitale ◽  
Jennifer Livingston ◽  
Erica Curtis ◽  
Katherine Oag ◽  
Christina M Shanti ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction For children who have suffered a burn injury one of the greatest challenges is managing pain with an adequate yet practical burn wound dressing that will ultimately be managed at home. Medical product companies have created a variety of wound care products available on the market. These products are advertised to be more superior over one another in categories such as decrease in wound infections, minimization of pain, ease of dressing application, increased dressing wear time, and better wound healing. With all the options for burn wound care there are many factors to consider when choosing a burn dressing such as cost, ease of dressing for families at home, comfort, and efficacy. At our ten year verified pediatric burn center we have tried many different burn wound care products, however we have found Xeroform and bacitracin to be the most practical and easy to use for our patient population. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed from 2016–2018 of all cascading scald injuries to children 0–5 years of age treated at our verified pediatric burn center. 179 patients were included in this review. Of those patients a total of 52 patients were excluded, 28 patients had no follow up, 21 patients received alternate dressings, and 3 patients had full thickness injuries requiring a split thickness skin graft (STSG). Charts were reviewed for total body surface area (TBSA), length of stay (LOS), discharge dressing type, complications, and time to healing. All patients included routinely received consistent application of the Xeroform and bacitracin. Results 127 patients discharged with Xeroform dressings were included in this study with an average age of 1.4 years old (range 0–5 years) and average TBSA of 2.5% (range 0.25–13%). The average LOS was 1.6 days (range 1–10 days). In this sample 32 (25%) patients were healed within 7 days. 77 (61%) patients were healed within 7–14 days. 11 (9%) patients were healed within 14–21 days. 7 (5%) patients were healed in greater than 21 days. There were no wound complications identified within this study group. Conclusions Using Xeroform as our standard of practice has streamlined the care provided to our patients. We have demonstrated consistent effective re-epithelization, protection from infection, and ease of dressings for families and burn providers. In our experience Xeroform has provided a versatile way to care for partial thickness burn injuries. Applicability of Research to Practice We suggest Xeroform and bacitracin dressings be used for partial thickness burn injuries in patients under 5 years of age. This dressing may be superior to other products because it allows for bathing while providing good wound epithelization and is easy to use.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 744
Author(s):  
Herman Yosef Limpat Wihastyoko ◽  
Arviansyah Arviansyah ◽  
Erdo Puncak Sidarta

Work from home (WFH) mandate is one of the major changes known during this pandemic, aimed as a preventive way to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 virus. This study aimed to observe the characteristics of pediatric burn injury during COVID-19 pandemic and WFH mandate's impact on pediatric burn injury admission at some Hospital burn centers in Malang. Every patient’s age, gender, clinical characteristics, parent's background, and other variables such as the possession of siblings, response time using our burn registry form, and comparative analysis of the incident in WFH housewife mother were assessed. The majority were in the group age of under five years old group age (70%) with a mean of 5.5 years. The most frequent part of the burn injured is extremity 36.7%, and hot liquid dominates as the cause of the injury 73.3% with the total body surface area of burn injury group >10% is the most common 56.7%. The burn injury incident happened more frequently in mothers with children less than two in both groups. This study showed that the increase in increasement of the pediatric burn injury during COVID-19 pandemic between housewife mother and WFH mother has no significant difference also showed that parent especially mother unable to supervise the children during WFH. Strategies to mitigate pediatric burn injuries during WFH should be thoughtfully implemented.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Galloway ◽  
Maryann Chimhanda ◽  
Jayme Sloan ◽  
Charles Anderson ◽  
James Sinacore ◽  
...  

Objective. To compare Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores with overall postoperative pain medication requirements including cumulative dose and patterns of medication utilization and to determine whether VAS scores predict pain medication utilization. Methods. VAS scores and pain medication data were collected from participants in a randomized trial of the utility of phenazopyridine for improved pain control following gynecologic surgery. Results. The mean age of the 219 participants was 54 (range19 to 94). We did not detect any association between VAS and pain medication utilization for patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) or RN administered (intravenous or oral) medications. We also did not detect any association between the number of VAS scores recorded and mean pain scores. Conclusion. Postoperative VAS scores do not predict pain medication use in catheterized women inpatients following gynecologic surgery. Increased pain severity, as reflected by higher VAS scores, is not associated with an increase in pain assessment. Our findings suggest that VAS scores are of limited utility for optimal pain control. Alternative or complimentary methods may improve pain management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S246-S247
Author(s):  
Brielle Weinstein ◽  
Dominique Pagnozzi ◽  
Alexa Abitabilo ◽  
Lilla Kis ◽  
Madeline Carney ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction There is a growing concern regarding the unprecedented increase in morbidity and mortality related to the use of opioids. Prescription opioid abuse has been increasing dramatically in recent years. Prescription opioids have been shown to be favorable in perioperative management, however, their impact on chronic usage remains unclear. As an effort to help reduce opioid consumption following hospitalization for burn injuries, we look to evaluate the outpatient opioid consumption following hospital discharge at our institution. Methods After IRB approval, we obtained demographics, medical history, inpatient and outpatient opioid usage, treatment, and length of hospital stay of patients admitted with burn injuries who met study inclusion criteria (age ≥ 12 years and no history of opioid abuse prior to hospitalization) from January 1, 2011 to January 1, 2018. Data was analyzed using SAS v9.4. Results Our preliminary data included 210 patients with average age of 58 years, 75% non-Hispanic Caucasians and average total burn surface area of 18%. Medical histories observed included: hypertension (40%), diabetes (15%), hyperlipidemia (11%), depression (7%), and bipolar disorder (3%) among many others. 79% of patients had surgical intervention including excision and grafting, of which 32% had autografting procedures. All patients were treated with opioids during hospitalization, which included: fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxycodone-acetaminophen, morphine and oxycodone. 6% of patients had pain management consultation during hospitalization. 79% of patients were discharged with an opioid prescription, of which 21% had their opioid refilled during follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in discharge opioid prescriptions (79% had surgical intervention versus 76% had no surgical intervention, p=0.69) and outpatient opioid prescription refills (17% had surgical intervention versus 17% had no surgical intervention, p=0.99) between patients who had surgical intervention for burn injuries versus those who did not. Conclusions This evaluation shows that there is no statistical difference in opioid usage between patients who had surgical intervention and those who did not for their burn injury treatments. Therefore, prescription opioids may not be necessary in postoperative care following hospital discharge. Applicability of Research to Practice With further research, we hope to evaluate the need for outpatient opioid prescriptions this treatment modality in effort of decreasing the order and use of opioids following hospital discharge in burn patients.


Author(s):  
Kayhan Gurbuz ◽  
Mete Demir ◽  
Abdulkadir Basaran ◽  
Koray Das

Abstract Amputations are un-common surgical procedures in patients with severe burn injuries. However, these patients often face extreme physical and psychological challenges that result in social stigmatization and inadequate rehabilitation facilities. A retrospective cohort study was designed for the patients admitted to the Burn Center of Adana City Training and Research Hospital (ACTRH). During the study period, a total of 2007 patients aged 0.5 to 92 years were hospitalized and treated at the burn center from January 2016 to June 2020. The incidence of amputation observed among inpatient burn injuries regardless of the etiology was 1.9%, and 87.2% were male. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect the most prominent factors contributing to burn injury-related amputations. The cause of burns appears to be one of the main factors in the past research, and in this context, the electrical burns stand out, likewise, the fire-flame-related burns, full-thickness burns, the existence of infection, male gender, patients aged within the 18 to 64 age group, and the burn extent within the total body surface area (TBSA) range of 10 to <50% were found to be the most leading factors of amputations among patients having severe burns. Although they are rare, amputations related to burns commonly cause a decrease in quality of life. Therefore, besides increasing occupational health and safety methods for these risk groups, especially for adults of working age; also, it is essential to increase the importance and awareness of the precautions to be taken in daily life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document