The Ideal Donor Site Dressing: A Comparison of a Chitosan Based Gelling Dressing to Traditional Dressings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nkemjika Uke ◽  
Simran Singh ◽  
Grant E Sorensen ◽  
Joshua Frost ◽  
Amanda Venable ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Application Rate ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Wound Management ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Thickness Skin

Abstract Introduction Donor site wound management is critical in split-thickness skin graft surgeries. These sites typically recover in 7-14 days due to the dermal-imbedded keratinocytes that promote skin regeneration. An ideal donor site dressing can help to mitigate pain, reduce infection risk, promote hemostasis, and accelerate healing times. Additionally, this dressing would be easy to apply in the operating room, easily managed, and cost-effective. Chitosan-based gelling dressings (CBGD) possess many of these qualities that make an ideal donor site dressing. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received CBGD as part of their post-operative wound care plan. We collected data on infections, hemostasis, dressing failure, and hospital course over a 14-month period where CBGD was used as the donor site dressing. Results One hundred and fourteen patients were evaluated. We found an infection rate of 7%, a bleed-through rate of 1.8%, and a re-application rate of 9.6%. The average CBGD cost per patient was $75.15. Conclusions CBGD has acceptable infection rates, and pain scores as traditional donor site dressings. However, it possesses several qualities of a suitable donor site dressing notably swift healing rates, impressive hemostatic property, and low cost. Our study supports the idea that CBGD is a suitable donor site dressing for split-thickness skin graft surgeries.

Advances in the use of electrospun nanofibrous polymeric matrix for dermal healing at the donor site after the split-thickness skin graft excision: a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Haik ◽  
Yehuda Ullman ◽  
Eyal Gur ◽  
Dean Ad-El ◽  
Dana Egozi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
And Control

Abstract Dressings used to manage donor site wounds have up to 40% of patients experiencing complications that may cause suboptimal scarring. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a portable electrospun nanofibrous matrix that provides contactless management of donor site wounds compared with standard dressing techniques. This study included adult patients who underwent an excised split-thickness skin graft with a donor site wound area of 10-200 cm 2. Patients were allocated into two groups; i.e., the nanofiber group managed with a nanofibrous polymer-based matrix, and the control group managed using the standard of care such as Jelonet® or Biatain® Ibu dressing. Primary outcomes were postoperative dermal healing efficacy assessed by Draize scores. The time to complete re-epithelialization was also recorded. Secondary outcomes included postoperative adverse events, pain, and infections during the first 21-days and extended 12-month follow-up. The itching and scarring were recorded during the extended follow-up (months 1,3,6,9,12) using Numerical-Analogue-Score and Vancouver scores, respectively. The nanofiber and control groups included 21 and 20 patients, respectively. The Draize dermal irritation scores were significantly lower in the nanofiber vs. control group (Z=-2.509; P=0.028) on the first postoperative day but became similar afterward (Z≥-1.62; P≥0.198). In addition, the average time to re-epithelialization was similar in the nanofiber (17.9±4.4 days) and control group (18.3±4.5 days) (Z=-0.299; P=0.764), so were postoperative adverse events, pain, and infection incidence, itching and scarring. The safety and efficacy of electrospun nanofibrous matrix are similar to standard wound care allowing its use as an alternative donor site dressing following the split-thickness skin graft excision.

Improving Outcomes in Anterolateral Thigh Flap Donor-Site Reconstruction Using Propeller Flaps: A Retrospective Comparative Study with Skin Grafting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Pagliara ◽  
Maria Lucia Mangialardi ◽  
Stefano Vitagliano ◽  
Valentina Pino ◽  
Marzia Salgarello
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Tactile Sensitivity ◽  
Aesthetic Outcome ◽  
Propeller Flap ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh ◽  
Alt Flap

Abstract Background After anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap harvesting, skin graft of the donor site is commonly performed. When the defect width exceeds 8 cm or 16% of thigh circumference, it can determine lower limb function impairment and poor aesthetic outcomes. In our comparative study, we assessed the functional and aesthetic outcomes related to ALT donor-site closure with split-thickness skin graft compared with thigh propeller flap. Methods We enrolled 60 patients with ALT flap donor sites. We considered two groups of ALT donor-site reconstructions: graft group (30 patients) with split-thickness skin graft and flap group (30 patients) with local perforator-based propeller flap. We assessed for each patient the range of motion (ROM) at the hip and knee, tension, numbness, paresthesia, tactile sensitivity, and gait. Regarding the impact on daily life activities, patients completed the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) questionnaire. Patient satisfaction for aesthetic outcome was obtained with a 5-point Likert scale (from very poor to excellent). Results In the propeller flap group, the ROMs of hip and knee and the LEFS score were significantly higher. At 12-month follow-up, in the graft group, 23 patients reported tension, 19 numbness, 16 paresthesia, 22 reduction of tactile sensitivity, and 5 alteration of gait versus only 5 patients experienced paresthesia and 7 reduction of tactile sensitivity in the propeller flap group. The satisfaction for aesthetic outcome was significantly higher in the propeller flap group. Conclusion In high-tension ALT donor-site closure, the propeller perforator flap should always be considered to avoid split-thickness skin graft with related functional and aesthetic poor results.

scholarly journals Reconstruction of a secondary scalp defect using the crane principle and a split-thickness skin graft

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Lu ◽  
Ke-Chung Chang ◽  
Che-Ning Chang ◽  
Dun-Hao Chang
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Primary Defect ◽  
Scalp Defects ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Scalp Defect ◽  
Secondary Defect

Abstract Background Scalp reconstruction is a common challenge for surgeons, and there are many different treatment choices. The “crane principle” is a technique that temporarily transfers a scalp flap to the defect to deposit subcutaneous tissue. The flap is then returned to its original location, leaving behind a layer of soft tissue that is used to nourish a skin graft. Decades ago, it was commonly used for forehead scalp defects, but this useful technique has been seldom reported on in recent years due to the improvement of microsurgical techniques. Previous reports mainly used the crane principle for the primary defects, and here we present a case with its coincidental application to deal with a complication of a secondary defect. Case report We present a case of a 75-year-old female patient with a temporoparietal scalp squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). After tumor excision, the primary defect was reconstructed using a transposition flap and the donor site was covered by a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Postoperatively, the occipital skin graft was partially lost resulting in skull bone exposure. For this secondary defect, we applied the crane principle to the previously rotated flap as a salvage procedure and skin grafting to the original tumor location covered by a viable galea fascia in 1.5 months. Both the flap and skin graft healed uneventfully. Conclusions Currently, the crane principle is a little-used technique because of the familiarity of microsurgery. Nevertheless, the concept is still useful in selected cases, especially for the management of previous flap complications.

scholarly journals Split-thickness skin graft donor-site morbidity: A systematic literature review

Burns ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malachy Asuku ◽  
Tzy-Chyi Yu ◽  
Qi Yan ◽  
Elaine Böing ◽  
Helen Hahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Graft Donor

Use of Honey as an Adjunct in the Healing of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-172
Author(s):  
AYKUT MISIRLIOGLU ◽  
SINEM EROGLU ◽  
NACI KARACAOGLAN ◽  
MITHAT AKAN ◽  
TAYFUN AKOZ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Graft Donor

scholarly journals Immediate Regrafting of the Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Assists Healing

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Bradow ◽  
Geoffrey G. Hallock ◽  
Samuel P. Wilcock
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Graft Donor

scholarly journals CICAFAST: comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
Pierre Perrot ◽  
Judith Lorant ◽  
Olivier Nerrière ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Fetal Fibroblasts ◽  
Biological Dressing ◽  
Graft Donor

Abstract Background Wound repair is one of the most complex biological processes of human life. Allogeneic cell-based engineered skin substitutes provide off-the-shelf temporary wound coverage and act as biologically active dressings, releasing growth factors, cytokines and extracellular matrix components essential for proper wound healing. However, they are susceptible to immune rejection and this is their major weakness. Thanks to their low immunogenicity and high effectiveness in regeneration, fetal skin cells represent an attractive alternative to the commonly used autologous and allogeneic skin grafts. Methods/design We developed a new dressing comprising a collagen matrix seeded with a specific ratio of active fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes. These produce a variety of healing growth factors and cytokines which will increase the speed of wound healing and induce an immunotolerant state, with a slight inflammatory reaction and a reduction in pain. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the use of this biological dressing for wound healing at the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site, reduces the time to healing, decreases other co-morbidities, such as pain, and improves the appearance of the scar. This investigation will be conducted as part of a randomized study comparing our new biological dressing with a conventional treatment in a single patient, thus avoiding the factors that may influence the healing of a graft donor site. Discussion This clinical trial should enable the development of a new strategy for STSG donor-wound healing based on a regenerative dressing. The pain experienced in the first few days of STSG healing is well known due to the exposure of sensory nerve endings. Reducing this pain will also reduce analgesic drug intake and the duration of sick leave. Our biological dressing will meet the essential need of surgeons to “re-crop” from existing donor sites, e.g., for thermal-burn patients. By accelerating healing, improving the appearance of the scar and reducing pain, we hope to improve the conditions of treatment for skin grafts. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03334656. Registered on 7 November 2017.

Effect of Subcutaneous Epinephrine/Saline/Local Anesthetic Versus Saline-Only Injection on Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Perfusion, Healing, and Pain

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. e80-e86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrid Blome-Eberwein ◽  
Michael Abboud ◽  
Daniel D. Lozano ◽  
Rohit Sharma ◽  
Sherrine Eid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Graft Donor

Suprafascial Harvest of the Radial Forearm Free Flap Decreases the Risk of Postoperative Tendon Exposure

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Shonka ◽  
Nikita V. Kohli ◽  
Benjamin M. Milam ◽  
Mark J. Jameson
Keyword(s):  
Free Flap ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Radial Forearm Free Flap ◽  
Tourniquet Time ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Harvest Technique ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Radial Forearm

Objective: To determine if suprafascial harvest of the radial forearm free flap improves postoperative donor site outcomes compared to subfascial harvest. Methods: Retrospective chart review. Results: Forty-six patients underwent reconstruction of a head and neck defect with a radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Subfascial harvest of the RFFF was performed in 25 (53%) patients and suprafascial harvest performed in 22 (47%) patients. All donor sites were covered with a split thickness skin graft and a bolster that remained in place for 6 days. Postoperative tendon exposure at the donor site occurred in 5 (20%) of the patients in the subfascial group and in 0 (0%) of the patients in the suprafascial group ( P = .05; Fisher’s exact test). Average tourniquet time was 117 minutes in the subfascial group and 102 minutes in the suprafascial group. Hematoma formation occurred at the donor site in 2 (8%) and 1 (5%) patients in the subfascial and suprafascial groups, respectively. There were no complete or partial flap losses in either group. Conclusions: Suprafascial harvest of the RFFF decreases the risk of postoperative tendon exposure. The suprafascial harvest technique does not increase harvest time or donor site complications, nor does it negatively impact flap vascularity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document