Physical Activity and Exercise Interventions in Cancer Survivors

2021 ◽  
pp. 528-534
Author(s):  
Chloe Grimmett ◽  
Rebecca J. Beeken ◽  
Abigail Fisher

The field of exercise oncology has developed such that it is clear that people affected by cancer should be encouraged to be physically active from the point of diagnosis; indeed, this is now a key component of the survivorship care package in many countries. However, there are still gaps in the evidence. The majority of evidence for the benefits of exercise after cancer comes from breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients, usually without metastatic disease. Trials have usually been rated as low to moderate in quality, and although double-blinding will always be an issue in behavioral trials, there is a need to approach exercise studies with the rigor applied to drug trials if it is to be considered an adjuvant cancer therapy. Additionally, there are still gaps around the most appropriate types of exercise for specific cancer sites and how best to implement exercise as part of cancer care, balancing interventions that are likely to reach a large number of patients (e.g., remote, digital) versus those that may have greater benefit (e.g., supervised, face to face). Finally, while observational data are strongly supportive of higher self-reported postdiagnosis physical activity being associated with lower all-cause and cancer-specific mortality, and possibly recurrence, definitive trial data does not yet exist (although a number of trials are underway). Until survival data are generated, caution should be used in how the benefits of exercise are presented to cancer patients, with a focus on the large number of outcomes that have been robustly demonstrated to improve in response to intervention.

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Martyn Queen ◽  
Saul Bloxham ◽  
Phil Brown ◽  
Melissa Coyle ◽  
Ben Jane

Background Pedometers have been shown to improve adherence to exercise programmes. Evidence suggests that PA can improve physical function, wellbeing and reduce the negative impact of some cancer related side-effects. Yet, there are limited PA guidelines for cancer patients in the UK. The aim was to examine the impact of an 8-week exercise programme on sustaining physical activity (PA) at 3-month follow-up. Method A qualitative study with 12 mixed site cancer patients aged 43-70 (10 women, 2 men), involved in an 8-week exercise programme. The Programme took place at a University in the South West of England, UK. Semi-structured interviews with patients took place 3 times over 6 months. A grounded theory approach was used to analyse the data. Results We found that the number of patients perceived to be physically active prior to take-up of the physical activity programme were low (20%). At completion, most patients reported being physically active (84%), sustained but to a lesser extent (67%) at 3-month follow-up. Explanations for sustained PA at follow-up included application of knowledge gained from the Programme in relation to walking technique and use of pedometers and perceived health and fitness gains. Explanations for those not physically active included new diagnosis, reduced mobility following surgery and lack of clear exit route or progression to another structured opportunity. Conclusion Our study has provided valuable insight into how a supervised multi-modal physical activity programme can enable recovering cancer patients to develop a physically active lifestyle.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouk S. Schuit ◽  
Karen Holtmaat ◽  
Valesca van Zwieten ◽  
Eline J. Aukema ◽  
Lotte Gransier ◽  
...  

BackgroundCancer patients often suffer from psychological distress during or after cancer treatment, but the use of psycho-oncological care among cancer patients is limited. One of the reasons might be that the way psycho-oncological care is organized, does not fit patients’ preferences. This study aimed to obtain detailed insight into cancer patients’ preferences regarding the organization of psycho-oncological care.Methods18 semi-structured interviews were conducted among cancer patients. Patients completed psycho-oncological treatment between 2015 and 2020 at the psychology department in a general hospital or a center specialized in psychological cancer care in the Netherlands. The interview comprised questions related to preferences regarding the institute where to receive treatment, the psychologist who provides treatment, and the type of treatment, as well as questions related to experienced barriers and facilitators to receive psycho-oncological care. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed individually by two coders into key issues and themes.ResultsRegarding the institute, easy accessibility and prompt availability of psychol-oncological care were considered important. Regarding the psychologist, most participants had a strong preference to be treated by a psychologist specialized in cancer or other somatic diseases. Individual face-to-face therapy was preferred above other types of treatment. Several barriers were mentioned to receive psycho-oncological treatment, among which poor accessibility to psycho-oncological care, lack of knowledge on the possibilities for psycho-oncological treatment, and stigma. Most frequently mentioned facilitators were being assertive to ask for help, having a good relationship with the healthcare professional, and the integration of psycho-oncological support within medical cancer care.ConclusionFrom the patient’s perspective, the organization of psycho-oncological care for cancer patients should focus on easy accessibility and availability, delivered by specialized psychologists, and integration in medical cancer care. Online and group therapy are acceptable, but individual face-to-face therapy is preferred. It is warranted to increase awareness on psycho-oncological care targeting both patients and healthcare providers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (5S) ◽  
pp. 255-256
Author(s):  
Caroline Himbert ◽  
Biljana Gigic ◽  
Christy A. Warby ◽  
Tengda Lin ◽  
Petra Schrotz-King ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 847-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy L. Carmack Taylor ◽  
Carl deMoor ◽  
Murray A. Smith ◽  
Andrea L. Dunn ◽  
Karen Basen-Engquist ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 334-334
Author(s):  
Richard Viskochil ◽  
Biljana Gigic ◽  
Stephanie Skender ◽  
Jurgen Bohm ◽  
Karen Steindorf ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Xu ◽  
Zong-Hao Huang ◽  
Charlie Zhi-Lin Zheng ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Yu-Qin Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since December 2019, China has experienced a public health emergency from the coronavirus disease, which has become a pandemic and is impacting the care of cancer patients worldwide. This study evaluated the impact of the pandemic on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients at our center and aimed to share the lessons we learned with clinics currently experiencing this impact. Methods We retrospectively collected data on CRC patients admitted between January 1, 2020 and May 3, 2020; the control group comprised patients admitted between January 1, 2019 and May 3, 2019. Results During the pandemic, outpatient volumes decreased significantly, especially those of nonlocal and elderly patients, whereas the number of patients who received chemotherapy and surgery remained the same. During the pandemic, 710 CRC patients underwent curative resection. The proportion of patients who received laparoscopic surgeries was 49.4%, significantly higher than the 39.5% during the same period in 2019. The proportion of major complication during the pandemic was not significantly different from that of the control group. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer than that of the control group. Conclusions CRC patients confirmed to be infection-free can receive routine treatment. Using online medical counseling and appropriate identification, treatment and follow-up can be effectively maintained. Adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy should not be discontinued. Endoscopic polypectomy, elective, palliative, and multidisciplinary surgeries can be postponed, while curative surgery should proceed as usual. For elderly CRC patients, endoscopic surgery and neoadjuvant radiotherapy are recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document