Comorbidities of rheumatic disease

Author(s):  
Tuulikki Sokka ◽  
Kari Puolakka ◽  
Carl Turesson

All other diseases that coexist with a disease of interest are called comorbidities. Comorbidities in inflammatory rheumatic diseases may be associated with persistent inflammatory activity or disease-related organ damage, or may be related to medications. Lifestyle choices such as smoking or physical inactivity contribute to comorbidity. Patients with rheumatic diseases meet health professionals regularly and are more often tested for osteoporosis or cholesterol levels than individuals without rheumatic disease, which may contribute to a higher prevalence of some comorbidities. Comorbidities can also be unrelated to rheumatic diseases or their treatments. In this chapter, we discuss the impact of comorbidities to the patient. We emphasize the importance to review and manage comorbidities in usual daily rheumatology clinic, to improve outcomes of patients with rheumatic diseases.

Author(s):  
Tuulikki Sokka ◽  
Kari Puolakka ◽  
Carl Turesson

All other diseases that coexist with a disease of interest are called comorbidities. Comorbidities in inflammatory rheumatic diseases may be associated with persistent inflammatory activity or disease-related organ damage, or may be related to medications. Lifestyle choices such as smoking or physical inactivity contribute to comorbidity. Patients with rheumatic diseases meet health professionals regularly and are more often tested for osteoporosis or cholesterol levels than individuals without rheumatic disease, which may contribute to a higher prevalence of some comorbidities. Comorbidities can also be unrelated to rheumatic diseases or their treatments. In this chapter, we discuss the impact of comorbidities to the patient. We emphasize the importance to review and manage comorbidities in usual daily rheumatology clinic, to improve outcomes of patients with rheumatic diseases.


Author(s):  
Tuulikki Sokka ◽  
Kari Puolakka ◽  
Carl Turesson

All other diseases that coexist with a disease of interest are called comorbidities. Comorbidities in inflammatory rheumatic diseases may be associated with persistent inflammatory activity or disease-related organ damage, or may be related to medications. Lifestyle choices such as smoking or physical inactivity contribute to comorbidity. Patients with rheumatic diseases meet health professionals regularly and are more often tested for osteoporosis or cholesterol levels than individuals without rheumatic disease, which may contribute to a higher prevalence of some comorbidities. Comorbidities can also be unrelated to rheumatic diseases or their treatments. The concept of ‘multimorbidity’ is being used increasingly, shifting the focus from the index disease to two or more chronic diseases that exist in the same individual. In this chapter, we discuss the impact of multi/comorbidities. We emphasize the importance to review and manage comorbidities in usual daily rheumatology clinic, to improve outcomes of patients with rheumatic diseases.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. CMAMD.S40361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Feuchtenberger ◽  
Axel Philipp Nigg ◽  
Michael Rupert Kraus ◽  
Arne Schäfer

The prognostic significance of early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention in inflammatory rheumatic diseases has been well documented. However, a shortage of rheumatologists often impedes this approach in clinical practice. Therefore, it is of importance to identify those patients referred for diagnosis who would benefit most from a specialist's care. We applied a telephone-based triage for appointment allocation during routine care. This retrospective, monocentric analysis evaluated the efficacy of our triage to identify patients with rheumatic disease with special regard to initial appointment category (elective, early arthritis clinic (EAC), or emergency appointment). Of the 1,782 patients assessed, 718 (40.3%) presented with an inflammatory rheumatic disease, and there were significant discrepancies between the appointment categories: elective 26.2%, EAC 49.2% ( P < 0.001) and emergency appointment 56.6% ( P < 0.001). We found that 61.2% of patients were allocated to the correct diagnostic category (inflammatory or noninflammatory) solely based on the telephone-based triage and 67.1% based on the combination of triage and C-reactive protein (CRP) count.


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E Bennett ◽  
Emma Dures ◽  
Celia Almeida ◽  
Eva-Maria Bachmair ◽  
Karina Lovell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Aims  There is evidence for non-pharmacological interventions to support patients to self-manage fatigue, however implementation in clinical practice is a challenge. LIFT (Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a randomised Trial) is a multi-centre three-arm randomised trial using a remotely delivered cognitive-behavioural approach (CBA) or personalized exercise programme (PEP) interventions, in addition to usual care, compared to normal care alone. Interventions were delivered to patients by rheumatology health professionals using a manual, after training. The aim of this nested qualitative evaluation was to understand their perspectives of delivering the interventions. Methods  A subgroup of rheumatology healthcare professionals who had delivered the CBA and PEP interventions took part in semi-structured telephone interviews to explore their experiences of training and delivery, the challenges and benefits of learning new skills, and the barriers and facilitators to supporting patients remotely (mainly by telephone) using the LIFT manual. Results  A total of 17 rheumatology healthcare professionals (13 women, 4 men) from the CBA (n = 9) and PEP (n = 8) arms contributed. SB conducted an inductive thematic analysis of the data set. ED, CA, AW and KL reviewed a sub-set of transcripts. Five main themes were identified: The benefits of informative, structured training: Rheumatology healthcare professionals reflected how training, including role-play, helped them to practice their skills, even though this could feel uncomfortable. Those allocated shorter four-hour training sessions would have liked more time to practice. Many felt anxious before meeting patients for the first time but liked the manual to refer to. Getting into the swing of it: Practice gave rheumatology healthcare professionals the confidence to tailor content to individual patients’ requirements. Clinical supervision in the PEP and CBA arm supported rheumatology healthcare professionals to query their own practice, gain valuable feedback, and request assistance where needed. Benefits of telephone delivery: The initial face-to-face session enabled rheumatology healthcare professionals to build rapport with patients. Thereafter, patients seemed engaged and valued the opportunity to address their fatigue and challenge their own beliefs via the telephone. Some patients not ready to change: Rheumatology healthcare professionals struggled to work collaboratively with a minority of patients who were not willing to make changes, lacked motivation to complete tasks or stopped engaging with the intervention. LIFT developing clinical skills: Rheumatology healthcare professionals were confident that they were doing the ‘right thing’ for patients with fatigue and gained professional satisfaction seeing patients’ fatigue improve. Many felt that the skills they acquired and their experiences of remote delivery were helping them to respond to the current COVID-19 related changes in service provision. Conclusion  Findings support the value of skills training for rheumatology health professionals to deliver fatigue management interventions remotely. These insights can inform service provision and clinical practice. Disclosure  S.E. Bennett: None. E. Dures: None. C. Almeida: None. E. Bachmair: None. K. Lovell: None. L. Paul: None. A. Wearden: None. G.J. Macfarlane: None. N. Basu: None.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 53.2-54
Author(s):  
M. Lisbona Muñoz ◽  
P. León ◽  
G. Lopez Antequera ◽  
E. Rubio-Romero

Background:Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive bacteria that cause the invasive disease listeriosis. Human clinical syndromes are infrequent, mostly appearing in immunosuppressed individuals, newborns, the elderly, pregnant women, and occasionally healthy patients.Objectives:We describe and analyze Listeria-related demographics and clinical features to determine the predisposing conditions for severe infections in an immunodepressed population by rheumatic diseases.Methods:Descriptive Observational Study. A retrospective analysis of 143 patients were performed affected by listeriosis, with positive isolation of Listeria monocytogenes from blood, treated in the H.U. Virgen del Rocío (Seville- Spain) between 2003-2019. Of them 9 were rheumatic patients. The type of clinical manifestation was analyzed, paying special attention to the characteristics associated with patients with neurological complications or unfavorable outcome (death and / or abortion in pregnant women), immunosuppression (associated with cancer or rheumatic disease) was assessed as independent variables, chronic diseases (Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, dyslipidemia, COPD, Renal Insufficiency and Ischemic Heart Disease) as well as other baseline characteristics of the patient. (age, sex, pregnancy) and their toxic habits (tobacco and alcohol).Results:The sample includes a similar proportion of men (70 cases) and women (73 cases), of all ages. Of the total patients, most (85%) required hospital admission, with a duration median (non-parametric data) of 11 days. 78% of the cases admitted showed a favorable evolution. However, 15.4% resulted in death and 5.6% in abortion. This percentage of abortions represented 29% of the total pregnant women admitted Of all the patients admitted, a third (33%) were immunocompromised, including patiets with cancer (79%) and rheumatic diseases (21%). Include lupus (33%), RA (22%), APs (11%), polymyalgia rheumatica (11%), panuveitis (11%) and ANCA vasculitis MPO specificity (11%). All of them required admission although the majority showed a favorable evolution, except one of the patient. which resulted in death, in which case in addition to lupus he presented with prostate cancer. Regarding the baseline treatment of these patients, 7 underwent treatment with synthetic DMARDs and three with biological DMARDs (1 Adalimumab, 1 Infliximab and 1 Rituximab) As a result of the listeria infection, most of them had fever or digestive symptoms and two of they experienced neurological manifestations (meningoencephalitis) None of these last two (with lupus and RA) had biological DMARDs.Conclusion:Listeriosis is an uncommon but potentially serious infection usually in older people, pregnant women and immunocompromised patients. In our sample, 33% of the patients were immunocompromised. Of the 9 patients. affected by listeria with rheumatic disease we find a death for meningoencephalitis. Given the impact of this infection in immunosuppressed patients should pay attention in our patients with fever and neurological manifestations.Reference:[1]Eleftherios Mylonakis et al. A Case Series and Review of 222 Cases. Medicine 2002; 81: 260-269.[2]Alcoba Lez M et al.Meningitis por Listeria monocytogenes en el adulto en España. Presentación de 10 casos y revisión de la literatura. Rev Clin Esp 2002; 202 (12): 638-643.[3]Eleftherios Mylonakis et al. Central Nervous Sistem Infection with Listeria monocytogenes. 33 Years’ Experience at a General Hospital and Review of 776 Episodes from tha Literature. Medicine 1998; 77: 313-336.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire T. Deakin ◽  
Georgina H. Cornish ◽  
Kevin W. Ng ◽  
Nikhil Faulkner ◽  
William Bolland ◽  
...  

AbstractDifferences in humoral immunity to coronaviruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), between children and adults remain unexplained and the impact of underlying immune dysfunction or suppression unknown. Here, we examined the antibody immune competence of children and adolescents with prevalent inflammatory rheumatic diseases, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE), against the seasonal human coronavirus (HCoV)-OC43 that frequently infects this age group. Despite immune dysfunction and immunosuppressive treatment, JIA, JDM and JSLE patients mounted comparable or stronger responses than healthier peers, dominated by IgG antibodies to HCoV-OC43 spike, and harboured IgG antibodies that cross-reacted with SARS-CoV-2 spike. In contrast, responses to HCoV-OC43 and SARS-CoV-2 nucleoproteins exhibited delayed age-dependent class-switching and were not elevated in JIA, JDM and JSLE patients, arguing against increased exposure. Consequently, autoimmune rheumatic diseases and their treatment were associated with a favourable ratio of spike to nucleoprotein antibodies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 879.1-879
Author(s):  
E. Pelechas ◽  
E. Kaltsonoudis ◽  
M. Migos ◽  
P. Karagianni ◽  
A. Kavvadias ◽  
...  

Background:COVID-19 has been shown to significantly affect the vulnerable population [1,2]. Among them, patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatic diseases, and especially the immunosuppressed [3].Objectives:to assess the effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the course and the treatment of rheumatic inflammatory diseases.Methods:from February to December 2020, 46 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were included (32 female) that got infected with the SARS-CoV-2. Mean age was 65 years old, 17 were smokers, 12 had arterial hypertension, 8 diabetes mellitus, and 3 hypothyroidism. Most of them had their comorbidities well-controlled and their rheumatic disease was in remission. More specifically, 24 patients had rheumatoid arthritis, 13 psoriatic arthritis, and 9 ankylosing spondylitis. All patients were under treatment with conventional synthetic (cs) and/or biological (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), while 7 of them were also on treatment with glucocorticoids (GC) (<5mg/day). Twenty-eight patients were on tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (19 as monotherapy), 4 on anti- interleukin (IL)-6 monotherapy, 3 on Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors plus on low dose methotrexate (MTX), and the rest (11 patients) were on a csDMARD with or without GCs.Results:positive patients with the SARS-CoV-2, instructed to discontinue their immunosuppressive treatment, except GCs that were adjusted for their disease. Most patients (37 out of 46) had a mild disease course and their symptomatology was nothing more than a simple flu-like syndrome. Furthermore, on 9 of them olfactory dysfunction and gastrointestinal manifestations as well as low grade fever were noted but without the need of a hospital admission. On the other hand, only 5 patients needed hospitalization (2 on MTX monotherapy and 3 on combination therapy) due to dyspnea with low oxygen saturation (hypoxemia) and high fever. From those 5, 3 had a short in-hospital stay, while 2 developed pneumonia and a longer in-hospital stay was required in order to get the appropriate treatment. None of the patients did not require an intensive care unit admission. Finally, in 14 patients that got infected from February to May 2020, viral antibodies had been measured. All patients had high titres of IgG antibodies in their serum for as long as six months after their infection. Of note, none of the infected patients were smokers.Conclusion:patients with rheumatic diseases that are in remission using low doses of GCs and DMARDs, have almost the same chances with the general population to have a serious course of their infection with the SARS-Cov-2. In addition, in these patients, the immune response appears to be adequate, both in the production and maintenance of antibodies, which appear to be maintained for at least 6 months after infection.References:[1]Patel JA, Nielsen FBH, Badiani AA, Assi S, Unadkat VA, Patel B, et al. Poverty, inequality and COVID-19: the forgotten vulnerable. Public Health. 2020;183:110-111. Doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.006.[2]Poteat T, Millet GA, Nelson LE, Beyrer C. Understanding COVID-19 risks and vulnerabilities among black communities in America: the lethal force of syndemics. Ann Epidemiol. 2020;47:1-3. Doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.004.[3]Gianfrancesco MA, Hyrich KL, Gossec L, Strangfeld A, Carmona L, Mateus EF, et al. Rheumatic disease and COVID-19: initial data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance provider registries. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2(5):e250-e253. Doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30095-3.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1472.3-1473
Author(s):  
T. El Joumani ◽  
H. Rkain ◽  
T. Fatima Zahrae ◽  
H. Kenza ◽  
A. Radouan ◽  
...  

Background:The Coronavirus pandemic caused many consequences on well being, access to care and therapeutic maintenance in patients with chronic diseases.Objectives:To assess the impact of COVID-19 on therapeutic maintenance of patients with Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases (CIRD) and to identify related factors to difficulties in access to rheumatologist care during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with rheumatic diseases using a questionnaire providing information on patients and disease characteristics, impact of COVID-19 on access to rheumatologist care and therapeutic maintenance during the confinement. Reasons of therapeutic interruption and of diificulties in access to healthcare were precised.Results:We received answers from 350 patients (female sex of 68%, mean age of 46,1 ± 14,4 years) suffering from Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases (CIRD):rheumatic arthritis (RA) (62.3%), spondyloarthropathies (34.3%), and undifferentiated CIRD (3.4%). The global average disease evolution was 12,1 ± 9,7 years.The patients were treated with conventional Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and biologic Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in respectively 67.4% and 30.6% of cases. Corticosteroids and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatories (NSAIDs) intake was noted in 39.1 and 33.7% of patients.Difficulties to access to rheumatologist care appointments were reported in 82.9% of the participants. Reasons of thoses difficulties are summurized in Figure 1.Figure 1.Causes of difficulties of access to Rheumatologist care during COVID-19 pandemic.Half of patients declared that the pandemic had affected their therapeutic compliance. Discontinued drugs were in decreasing order: Synthetic antimalarials (68.4%), NSAIDs (45.8%), Methotrexate (43.8%), bDMARDs (25.2%), Sulfasalazine (18.2%) and Corticosteroids (10,2%).Causes of treatments interruption are summarized in Table I.Table 1.Causes of treatments interuption in patients with CIRDDrugsNot found in pharmaciesThe pharmacy refuses to give me the treatment without a recent prescriptionTo avoid the decrease in immunity and therefore to avoid catching Covid-19I stopped the follow-up, and so I stopped the treatment...Other reasonsNSAIDS027.874.144.427.8Corticosteroids014.392.957.150Methotrexate70.1310.416.422.4Sulfasalazine012.52575100Synthetic antimalarial69.20023.161.5Leflunomide00000bDMARDs07.440.744.451.9Conclusion:The COVID-19 pandemic impacted heavly on therapeutic maintenance in CIRD patients in our country. Patients expressed many difficulties in access to appropiate management. Facing to all thoses consequences, we need to devolopp as soon as possible adequate solutions adapted in such health crisis, especially therapeutic education and telemedecine.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-155
Author(s):  
Mihaela Daniela BALTA ◽  
◽  
Dumitru MATEI ◽  
Mihaela MILICESCU ◽  
Teodora ŞERBAN ◽  
...  

Aim. The main objective of this study is represented by a clinical and epidemiological evaluation of the impact that biologic therapy exerts on patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Material and methods. We have performed a study on a lot made up of 92 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, treated and accounted for inside the Rheumatology Clinic of Cantacuzino Hospital Bucharest, where they underwent biologic therapy, and we have analyzed the epidemiological, clinical and paraclinical data, establishing correlations with the received therapy. Results. Results show that the lot was predominantly made up of patients from urban areas, with an average education level. Men have presented higher percentages of highly seropositive forms, whereas women had higher DAS 28 and increased ESR levels, as well as more frequently associated cardiovascular pathology, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus. A connection between the evolution of the disease and the number of births could not be confirmed. Smokers have recorded different responses to biologic therapy. Dyslipidemia was present in 69.6% of the patients, but cholesterol levels did not positively correlate with inflammation markers and were not influenced by treatment in order to establish a statistical significance, although patients treated with etanercept presented decreased levels of cholesterol. 89.1% of patients with dyslipidemia already had statins included in their therapy. The evolution of DAS 28 and ESR in the studied lot was in favor of patients treated with adalimumab and rituximab. Conclusions. An urban lifestyle, the level of education (an average level), gender, menopause, and smoking as well as intensely positive serology have all represented factors which determined the onset and evolution of rheumatoid arthritis. Smokers exhibited decreased responses to biologic therapy.


RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e001925
Author(s):  
Jose María Álvaro Gracia ◽  
Carlos Sanchez-Piedra ◽  
Javier Manero ◽  
María Ester Ruiz-Lucea ◽  
Laura López-Vives ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo analyse the effect of targeted therapies, either biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs and other factors (demographics, comorbidities or COVID-19 symptoms) on the risk of COVID-19 related hospitalisation in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.MethodsThe COVIDSER study is an observational cohort including 7782 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs of hospitalisation. Antirheumatic medication taken immediately prior to infection, demographic characteristics, rheumatic disease diagnosis, comorbidities and COVID-19 symptoms were analysed.ResultsA total of 426 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 from 1 March 2020 to 13 April 2021 were included in the analyses: 106 (24.9%) were hospitalised and 19 (4.4%) died. In multivariate-adjusted models, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs in combination were not associated with hospitalisation compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.25 of b/tsDMARDs, p=0.15). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-i) were associated with a reduced likelihood of hospitalisation (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.82, p=0.018), whereas rituximab showed a tendency to an increased risk of hospitalisation (OR 4.85, 95% CI 0.86 to 27.2). Glucocorticoid use was not associated with hospitalisation (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.55). A mix of sociodemographic factors, comorbidities and COVID-19 symptoms contribute to patients’ hospitalisation.ConclusionsThe use of targeted therapies as a group is not associated with COVID-19 severity, except for rituximab, which shows a trend towards an increased risk of hospitalisation, while TNF-i was associated with decreased odds of hospitalisation in patients with rheumatic disease. Other factors like age, male gender, comorbidities and COVID-19 symptoms do play a role.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document