Can Strengthening Training for School Principals Improve Their Performance? Udik Budi Wibowo, Wiwik Wijayanti, Cepi Safruddin Abdul Jabar, R

The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of a principal strengthening training program. Data were collected using a survey, and the sample consisted of 380 school principals in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, who were training participants in 2019. The trends in the performance of the school principals were examined through descriptive statistics. The study found that the average principal’s performance was moderate, which meant that the strengthening training had a positive impact on their performance, but this effect was not significant. This may be because individuals participated in the training to fulfill duty obligations, not because of an intrinsic motivation to increase their competence. In addition, it is suspected that the initial appointment as school principal was not an independent choice, but at the insistence of another party. Therefore, the credibility of the process of recruiting school principals needs to be improved so that personnel who have real motivation and enthusiasm to increase school quality are chosen. Keywords: principal strengthening training, principal performance

P-O09 Development of a non face-to-face pre-operative assessment pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background The Covid-19 pandemic has led to markedly reduced capacity in almost all areas of normal face-to-face activity in our hospitals. Prior to the pandemic, the standard pre-operative pathway for all patients included an initial appointment in the outpatients clinic and formal examination before recommending surgery. With the reality of limited clinic capacity, our unit developed a non face-to-face assessment pathway alongside a parallel green operating area in our local Independent Sector (IS) hospitals for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study describes and methodology and outcomes of this approach Methods A non face-to-face (telephone) proforma for all new referrals for consideration of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was prepared in April 2020 with the first operations carried out in June 2020. All consultations were carried out by consultant surgeons and included thorough history, careful documentation of previous surgery and duration of symptoms and, where appropriate, patients were told to send images of their abdominal wall if they were unable to describe their scars. The first stage of the consent process was completed at initial appointment and all patients were sent written information about surgery. Patients who had BMI<40, uncomplicated biliary disease (biliary colic, mild cholecystitis, ERCP for CBD stones) and ASA of 1/2 were deemed suitable for surgery in the IS and sent across accordingly. A telephone pre-assessment was completed by the hospital and patients were sent blood tests forms in the post, as well as a Covid test to be completed at home followed by a period of self isolation before surgery. All patients were examined on the day of surgery by the operating surgeon and formal consent taken on the day. Primary outcomes that were recorded were cancellation on the day, transfer to the NHS hospital after surgery and complications. Results From June 2020 to December 2020, when the contract with the IS changed, 218 patients attended the IS hospitals for planned elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Four patients (2%) did not have surgery (one cancelled as inappropriate for the Independent Sector, two patients whose Covid swab result was not complete and one patient who no longer wished to have surgery). Three patients required transfer to the NHS hospital for post-operative care (drains inserted after unanticipated difficult surgery). All patients were given details of the surgical SDEC unit at the NHS hospital to allow ease of admission in the event of any problems or complications. 28 patients (13%) attended SDEC within 30 days after surgery; most had blood tests and clinical assessment alone. One patient (<1%) required re-laparoscopy for abdominal pain three days after their initial surgery (washout alone) and 5 patients developed umbilical wound infections after surgery (antibiotics alone). Two patients were found to have CBD stones on MRCP. The waiting time from initial assessment to surgery for patients on this pathway was less than 18 weeks for 168 patients though patients who were not suitable for the Independent Sector have had waiting times that are considerably longer. Conclusions These results demonstrate that it is possible to plan surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy without a face-to-face appointment at all which has considerable implications for resource allocation in the future; indeed, this approach has been continued within our unit even as clinic capacity has increased and been rolled out to patients with inguinal or para-umbilical hernia. Use of a green site away from the acute NHS hospital allowed elective surgery for non-urgent pathology to continue with acceptable waiting times even during the worst of the Covid-19 pandemic though patients who were not suitable have had markedly worse experiences and waiting times.

EP.WE.197Feasibility of a remotely supervised exercise programme

Aim To assess feasibility of a novel remotely-supervised exercise programme at a vascular hub during the COVID-19 lockdown. Methods Participants with arterial claudication (ABPI <0.90) who were able to walk 50m were enrolled into a 3-month programme by a vascular specialist nurse. The initial appointment addressed smoking cessation and best medical therapy. Baseline walking distance, ABPI and quality of life (QoL) were measured using the Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire. Following this, up to 8 WhatsApp video calls with a vascular specialist physiotherapist were undertaken to provide a tailored exercise programme. The Mapmywalk© App, or a pedometer, were used to monitor walking distances. Participants were instructed to record their daily longest walk and email results to their physiotherapist before each consultation. Results 12 participants were enrolled, of these 2 participants were unsuitable. Median age was 63 years and 2 (20%) were female. Baseline median ABPI was 0.7 (IQR 0.5-0.8), median baseline absolute walking distance was 75m (IQR 50-140) and median baseline QoL was 51/80 (IQR 15-79). 7 participants (70%) successfully completed the programme and were discharged. Their median daily longest walk was 2000m (IQR 200-4000) and QoL scores improved to 6/80 (IQR 2-20) (p = 0.02). Remaining 3 participants required revascularisation for disease progression. Reimbursement tariffs for the supervised exercise programme were £700 per patient, whereas for revascularisation were £2000 - £5000. Conclusion Remotely supervised exercise was feasible and improved walking distance and quality of life in 70% of participants. Approximately £3000 per patient was saved from a reduction in revascularisation procedures in our unit.

1544 The Doctor Will Call You Now – Patients’ Perspective of The Implementation of Telephone Clinics in the COVID-19 Era

Aim During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical guidelines advised the implementation of remote consultations with the aim of preventing viral transmission. Guidance included the introduction of telephone clinics and in March 2020, these were initiated for General Surgery at our rural DGH. The aim of this study was to review patients’ perspectives of these remote consultations. Method Using telephone clinic schedules, the first 100 patients of the telephone clinics were retrospectively identified. A survey was created using Google forms and questions covered patient demographics, as well as patients’ opinions on the organisation and efficacy of the clinic. The survey was completed via a telephone conversation with each patient between June to August 2020. Results 72 patients consented to participate (age range: 24-80 years; 65% female). 44% of consultations were follow up, with 23% of patients having their initial appointment remotely. Although 82% of patients were able to discuss all concerns, nearly half of patients (43%) felt not having a face-to-face appointment affected their consultation. 78% of patients preferred remote consultations during the pandemic, but beyond this specific situation, 53% felt that in the future they would still prefer a face-to-face consultation. 57.6% of patients rated the newly implemented telephone consultations as 10/10. Conclusions The majority of patient feedback was positive. However, outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, our patients would prefer the traditional face-to-face consultation format. This outcome has been demonstrated in other similar studies worldwide, as it enables patients to be examined by and meet their surgeon prior to potential surgery.

Telemedicine in Spine Surgery: Global Perspectives and Practices

Study Design: Cross-sectional, anonymous, international survey. Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the rapid adoption of telemedicine in spine surgery. This study sought to determine the extent of adoption and global perspectives on telemedicine in spine surgery. Methods: All members of AO Spine International were emailed an anonymous survey covering the participant’s experiences with and perceptions of telemedicine. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses. Responses were compared among regions. Results: 485 spine surgeons participated in the survey. Telemedicine usage rose from <10.0% to >39.0% of all visits. A majority of providers (60.5%) performed at least one telemedicine visit. The format of “telemedicine” varied widely by region: European (50.0%) and African (45.2%) surgeons were more likely to use phone calls, whereas North (66.7%) and South American (77.0%) surgeons more commonly used video ( P < 0.001). North American providers used telemedicine the most during COVID-19 (>60.0% of all visits). 81.9% of all providers “agreed/strongly agreed” telemedicine was easy to use. Respondents tended to “agree” that imaging review, the initial appointment, and postoperative care could be performed using telemedicine. Almost all (95.4%) surgeons preferred at least one in-person visit prior to the day of surgery. Conclusion: Our study noted significant geographical differences in the rate of telemedicine adoption and the platform of telemedicine utilized. The results suggest a significant increase in telemedicine utilization, particularly in North America. Spine surgeons found telemedicine feasible for imaging review, initial visits, and follow-up visits although the vast majority still preferred at least one in-person preoperative visit.

The importance of casting an eye beyond the dental arch: A case report

Study models are frequently used in orthodontics and are a key part of both initial assessment and treatment planning. They are an important part of comprehensive orthodontic records; furthermore, study models are an essential diagnostic aid that can be studied in detail without the patient being present. We present a case of a 14-year-old boy with an abnormal palatal swelling detected by his specialist orthodontist after review of study models taken at the initial appointment. At the assessment alone, the significance of the abnormality was not recognised and without the help of study models, diagnosis and treatment of his fibrous dysplasia may have been significantly delayed.

The diagnosis and management of adult ADHD in HMP Elmley, a Category B remand prison

AimsAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent disorder in young adult prisoners. This audit aimed to identify how many residents are prescribed medication treatment for ADHD in HMP Elmley and whether those seen by the prison psychiatrists have been managed in line with NICE guidelines. We also audited waiting times and time to follow-up appointments. This was done with the overall aim to identify potential areas for development.MethodWe performed a spot audit of all residents in HMP Elmley who were prescribed ADHD medication on 4th November 2019, using their electronic patient records. Appointments with the psychiatrists were then subdivided into initial assessments and follow-up appointments for the purpose of analysis. Performance was measured against NICE Guideline [NG87]: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management. We also calculated the waiting times for initial appointment and follow-up appointment.ResultWe found that 33 of residents were on ADHD medication at the time of the audit, approximately 3% of the prison population. 64% of those had a pre-existing diagnosis and 36% had been given a new diagnosis at HMP Elmley. Of those newly diagnosed 100% had undergone a Diagnostic Interview for Adults in ADHD (DIVA) assessment for diagnosis.Baseline physical health checks had been performed in 68% of patients prior to starting medication and a cardiovascular examination had occurred in 9%. At follow-up 100% of patients had their physical observations and weight checked and their symptoms reviewed.91% of patients were started on methylphenidate or lisdexamfetamine as first line treatment, with the rest started on atomoxetine and the reason for this documented.100% patients were offered general psychological support.There was a mean 22 day wait for an initial appointment (range 0-65) and a mean 20 day wait from starting medication to a psychiatric follow-up appointment (range 8-37)ConclusionThe number of residents treated for ADHD in HMP Elmley is relatively low (3%) compared to the estimated prevalence in prison population.The key areas for improvement are in baseline cardiovascular examinations and physical health evaluations. The waiting time between initial psychiatric appointment and follow-up is another area where improvement is needed and this will form the basis of a quality improvement project.Future steps include setting up a specific ADHD clinic with an allocated nurse practitioner to support, producing a template for ADHD assessments and follow-ups, producing a local policy on ADHD and developing specific resources for ADHD psychoeducation.

Assessing DNA rates for new referrals in older adults

AimsTo assess DNA rates for initial assessment medical appointments offered for new referrals within an Older Adults CMHT.To establish any correlation between waiting time and DNA rates.To establish if the initial appointments offered were in keeping with the National guidelines (18 weeks) and our local Trust policy (1-4 weeks).BackgroundIn the Uk 15% of adults 60 and above suffer from a mental disorder. Despite the increasing mental health burden, analysis indicate that a quarter of mental health trust received less investment from 2017 to 2018. Financial pressures have also increased appointment waiting time. The NHS has stated that by 2023 there will be a 4-week waiting time for older adult mental health services. Current national guidelines state that initial referrals should be seen within 18 weeks.MethodThis is a retrospective audit looking at all first time referrals to an Older Adult CMHT in East Birmingham. 110 patients were included in this audit. Factors recorded included age, gender, reason for referral, waiting time for appointment, and whether this complies with guidelines.Electronic patients' notes (RIO) were used for data collection.ResultOut of 110 new referrals 11 were not offered any appointments. Out of the remaining 99, 13 cancelled and 8 did not attend.In total, 78 attended the initial appointment offered, out of which 77 were seen within 18 weeks as per national guidelines. 43 patients were seen within the 4-week period (trust policy). 1 patient was offered an appointment at 19 weeks and 3 days from the referral date. The patients who did not attend their appointments were followed up except for one, to find out the reasons of the DNA. This included 2 (physically unwell), 1 (unaware of appointment), 1 (refused), 1 (forgot), 1 (couldn't get to clinic), 1 (asthma attack). Another appointment was offered to those who could attend.ConclusionThere was no significant correlation between a longer waiting time and an increased DNA rate for first appointments. Even though the time for an initial appointment was within the NHS guidelines, only 56% of the appointments met our Trust's policy of a 4 week wait.When discussing the results with the relevant team it was clear that a number of factors affected the waiting time including: number of available clinicians and a large catchment area.

Our experience in the surgical treatment of congenital cataract

Aim. To present our experience and evaluate the results of surgical treatment of congenital cataracts. Methods. A clinical analysis of the results of congenital cataract aspiration in 16 children (22 eyes) aged 2 months to 5 years is performed. Bilateral cataract was determined in 6 children, unilateral – in 10. Preoperative examination of children aged 3–5 years was carried out in a standard way. Children younger than 3 years of age at the initial appointment underwent non-contact examination methods, the remaining studies were performed under general anesthesia in the operating room immediately before surgery. Congenital cataract phacoaspiration was performed under general anesthesia using the Stellaris microsurgical system (Bausch and Lomb, USA) through a 1.2-mm paracentesis in the lens irrigation-aspiration regime. Hydrophobic IOL models were implanted. The posterior lens capsule was preserved in all cases. Mandatory was the appointment of cycloplegics in drops in the early postoperative period. Results. An increase in visual acuity (from 0.03 to 0.7) occurred in all cases. However, presence of obscuration amblyopia of varying degrees required regular courses of pleoptic treatment. Conclusions. The effectiveness of congenital cataracts phacoaspiration is ensured by the fulfillment of federal clinical recommendations, however, sutureless surgery allows achieving high functional results in the treatment of this pathology. Key words: congenital cataract; phacoaspiration; intraocular lens.

Patients’ perception about the outcomes of prosthetic treatment in Southern Brazil

Aim: this study assessed the patients’ perception of the outcomes of prosthetic treatment in a University of Southern Brazil. Methods: patients seeking for prosthetic treatment were invited to answer a questionnaire with 41 items about the potential risks, benefits, and consequences of no treatment. Answers were obtained according to a five-item Likert-scale varying from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Sociodemographic data was included in the comparison. Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis (95%) compared data depending on the variable. Results: two-hundred twenty-five patients answered the questionnaire. Median age of participants was 45-54 years. The potential benefits were similar among participants irrespective of the variable adopted. The perception of risks was significant influenced by variables gender, age, education level, type of edentulous space, prior treatment with prosthodontics, type of prosthodontics, and prosthodontics usage in years. Consequences of no treatment were affected by age, prior treatment with prosthodontics, and prosthodontics usage in years. Conclusions: the study showed the fundamental importance of correct elucidation about the potential risks (negative perception) in the initial appointment for the studied population. Elucidation about the consequences of no treatment are relevant because some differences were seen into the variables. Prosthodontics patients from the city of Passo Fundo seem well informed about the benefits of the prosthetic treatment, besides the significant influence of some sociodemographic and prosthetic conditions.