scholarly journals Development of a Critical Care Air Transport Team “Go Bag”: Slimming Down ICU Capability to Augment Pararescue or Civilian Contract Medical Evacuation Personnel

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig D Nowadly ◽  
Kyle E Foley ◽  
Maxwell L Davis ◽  
Erik J Hebert ◽  
Gabe A Corey

ABSTRACT Introduction Critical Care Air Transport Team (CCATT) is a three-person United States Air Force (USAF) medical asset, typically providing intercontinental medical evacuation on large military aircraft. The CCATT equipment Allowance Standard (AS) weighs approximately 272 kg (600 lbs). In austere locations, CCATT teams may augment contract medical evacuation (CME) personnel or Pararescue (PJ) in small aircraft with limited space for medical equipment. It was unknown what deployed PJ and CME carry within their packouts. We sought to design a packout or “Go Bag,” weighing less than 22.7 kg (50 lbs) and sourced from the CCATT AS, that a CCATT member could use to complement CME or PJ equipment to provide a higher level of care while limiting redundancy. Materials and Methods Equipment lists were obtained from a CME and PJs from two separate USAF squadrons. The equipment lists were combined to provide a reference for development of a CCATT Go Bag. Three members of a deployed CCATT team independently generated a list of necessary equipment from the CCATT AS. The list was peer reviewed by a separate, deployed CCATT team. Results A Go Bag was developed with the supplies and equipment necessary for video laryngoscopy, ventilation, invasive pressure monitoring, basic laboratory capability, chest tube placement, ultrasound, and advanced pharmacologic interventions. The Go Bag weighed 18.3 kg (40.4 lbs). A separate respiratory bag weighing 1.1 kg (2.4 lbs) was attached directly to a ventilator. Intravenous pumps and cardiac monitoring equipment were notable ICU equipment excluded from the Go Bag. Conclusion Major components of the CCATT AS can be reduced into a Go Bag and accompanying Ventilator Accessory Bag. This may benefit CCATT teams required to augment PJs or CME in small aircraft during prolonged field care scenarios.

CHEST Journal ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 28S ◽  
Author(s):  
William Beninati ◽  
Julio Lairet ◽  
James King ◽  
Leslie Vojta ◽  
Michael McCarthy ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Lairet ◽  
James King ◽  
Leslie Vojta ◽  
William Beninati

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Serres ◽  
Susan Dukes ◽  
Bruce Wright ◽  
III Dodson ◽  
Parham-Bruce William ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan F. Dukes ◽  
Genny M. Maupin ◽  
Marilyn E. Thomas ◽  
Darcy L. Mortimer

BACKGROUNDThe US Air Force transports critically ill patients from all over the world, with transport times commonly ranging from 6 to 11 hours. Few outcome measures have been tracked for these patients. Traditional methods to prevent pressure injuries in civilian hospitals are often not feasible in the military transport environment.OBJECTIVESThe incidence rate and risk factors are described of en route–related pressure injuries for patients overseen by the Critical Care Air Transport Team.METHODSThis retrospective, case-control, medical records review investigated risk factors for pressure injury in patients who developed a pressure injury after their transport flight compared with those with no documented pressure injuries.RESULTSThe pressure injury rate was 4.9%. Between 2008 and 2012, 141 patients in whom pressure injuries developed and who had received care by the team were matched with 141 patients cared for by the team but did not have pressure injury. According to regression analysis, body mass index and 2 or more Critical Care Air Transport Team transports per patient were associated with pressure injury development.CONCLUSIONAlthough the pressure injury rate of 4.9% in this cohort of patients is consistent with that reported by civilian critical care units, the rate must be interpreted with caution, because civilian study data frequently represent the entire intensive care unit length of stay. Targeted interventions for patients with increased body mass index and 2 or more critical care air transports per patient may help decrease the development of pressure injury in these patients.


2019 ◽  
pp. 591-598

This chapter describes pain management during casualty transport based on experiences of the United States Air Force during war.


2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph K. Maddry ◽  
Alejandra G. Mora ◽  
Shelia C. Savell ◽  
Crystal A. Perez ◽  
Phillip E. Mason ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 181 (10) ◽  
pp. 1357-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter L. Jernigan ◽  
Matthew C. Wallace ◽  
Christine S. Novak ◽  
Travis W. Gerlach ◽  
Dennis J. Hanseman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document