scholarly journals CTNI-02. TBCRC049: A PHASE II STUDY TO ASSESS THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THE COMBINATION OF TUCATINIB, TRASTUZUMAB AND CAPECITABINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF LEPTOMENINGEAL METASTASIS IN HER2 POSITIVE BR1AST CANCER

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii41-ii41
Author(s):  
Rashmi Murthy ◽  
Barbara O’Brien ◽  
Donald Berry ◽  
Nicholas Navin ◽  
Jason Johnson ◽  
...  

Abstract Treatment options for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC) are limited and prognosis is poor. Tucatinib is an oral, potent, HER2 specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor with good tolerability and combinatory anti-tumor activity, including partial responses in heavily treated patients and those with brain metastases (BM). This is a phase 2 single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy of tucatinib, trastuzumab and capecitabine in HER2+ BC with newly-diagnosed LM. CNS disease will be evaluated at screening and every 6 weeks by neuroaxis MRI, CSF cytology, and neurological assessments per RANO-LMD (adapted) and RANO-BM criteria. Extra-CNS disease will be evaluated at screening and every 12 weeks by CT scan per RECIST criteria. All patients will be followed for survival. Symptom burden and quality of life assessments, as well as correlative blood and CSF samples, will be collected. Eligible patients include adults with HER2+ BC, KPS > 50, and newly-diagnosed, untreated LM (defined as positive CSF cytology and/or radiographic evidence of LM, plus clinical signs/symptoms). Patients with treated or concurrent/new BM are allowed. Patients treated with capecitabine within the last 12 months are excluded. This study has a Gehan-like design with an interim futility analysis and overall intent to estimate OS. For the interim analysis, success is defined as CNS PFS for 12 weeks. Enrollment will end if fewer than two successes are observed in the first 15 patients. Secondary endpoints include safety, CNS PFS at 12 weeks, RR in CNS and extra-CNS, and symptom burden/quality of life. The regimen will be considered worthy of future study if the median OS is > 4.4 months. Fourteen of 30 patients have accrued thus far. The study is active at multiple Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium sites around the country.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1044-1044
Author(s):  
Erica Michelle Stringer-Reasor ◽  
Barbara Jane O'Brien ◽  
Ariel Topletz-Erickson ◽  
Jason B White ◽  
Mina Lobbous ◽  
...  

1044 Background: Tucatinib is a potent and highly selective HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for use in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer (MBC) who have received ≥1 prior HER2-based regimen in the metastatic setting, including patients with brain metastases (BM). TBCRC049 (NCT03501979) is an investigator-initiated phase 2 single-arm study currently enrolling to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tucatinib, trastuzumab and capecitabine in HER2+ BC with newly diagnosed LM. Here, we report the pre-specified pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis for the first 15 patients to determine bioavailability of tucatinib and its predominant metabolite, ONT-993, in the CSF. Methods: Eligible patients included adults with HER2+ MBC, KPS > 50, and newly diagnosed, untreated LM (defined as positive CSF cytology and/or radiographic evidence of LM, plus clinical signs/symptoms). Patients with treated or concurrent/new BM were allowed. The primary endpoint is overall survival with an accrual goal of 30 pts. Parallel PK samples were collected in plasma and CSF via Ommaya reservoir on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2 at 0h (baseline), 2-3h, 5-7h and 24h (optional) following initiation of tucatinib 300 mg BID. Tucatinib and ONT-993 were quantified in plasma (n=15) and CSF (n=13) using validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods. Results: Tucatinib and ONT-993 plasma concentrations were consistent with previous studies and exhibited high interindividual variability. Tucatinib and ONT-993 were detectable in the CSF within 2 hours post tucatinib administration; concentrations ranged from 0.57 to 25 ng/mL for tucatinib (IC50 for tucatinib against HER2 is 3.3 ng/mL) and 0.28 to 4.7 ng/mL for ONT-993. Tucatinib concentrations in the CSF per timepoint were in a similar range to unbound plasma (plasmaub) tucatinib. CSF to plasmaub ratios were generally consistent over time; the steady-state (cycle 2) median tucatinib CSF to plasmaub ratio was 0.83 (0.19 to 2.1). ONT-993 CSF to plasmaub ratios were similar to tucatinib CSF to plasmaub ratios. Conclusions: In patients with LM from HER2+MBC who were treated with tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine, tucatinib and ONT-993 were detectable in the CSF of all patients at median levels similar to plasmaub tucatinib. This is the first documented evidence of tucatinib distributing into the CSF in patients with HER2+MBC. Efficacy and safety of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine in patients with HER2+ LM will be reported upon completion of TBCRC 049 accrual. Clinical trial information: NCT03501979 .


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-286
Author(s):  
Raymond Javan Chan ◽  
Laisa Teleni ◽  
Suzanne McDonald ◽  
Jaimon Kelly ◽  
Jane Mahony ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo examine the effects of nurse-led interventions on the health-related quality of life, symptom burden and self-management/behavioural outcomes in women with breast cancer.MethodsCochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline and Embase databases were searched (January 1999 to May 2019) to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled before-and-after studies of interventions delivered by nurses with oncology experience for women with breast cancer. Risk of bias was evaluated using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. Intervention effects were synthesised by cancer trajectory using The Omaha System Intervention Classification Scheme.ResultsThirty-one RCTs (4651 participants) were included. All studies were at risk of bias mainly due to inherent limitations such as lack of blinding and self-report data. Most studies (71%; n=22) reported at least one superior intervention effect. There were no differences in all outcomes between those who receive nurse-led surveillance care versus those who received physical led or usual discharge care. Compared with control interventions, there were superior teaching, guidance and counselling (63%) and case management (100%) intervention effects on symptom burden during treatment and survivorship. Effects of these interventions on health-related quality of life and symptom self-management/behavioural outcomes were inconsistent.DiscussionThere is consistent evidence from RCTs that nurse-led surveillance interventions are as safe and effective as physician-led care and strong evidence that nurse-led teaching, guidance and counselling and case management interventions are effective for symptom management. Future studies should ensure the incorporation of health-related quality of life and self-management/behavioural outcomes and consider well-designed attentional placebo controls to blind participants for self-report outcomes.Protocol registrationThe International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42020134914).


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa Mayer ◽  
Kathleen Lang ◽  
Sara Hurvitz ◽  
Deepa Lalla ◽  
Victoria Federico ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 2191-2199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Chow ◽  
Natalie Pulenzas ◽  
Liying Zhang ◽  
Christine Ecclestone ◽  
Angela Leahey ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 70-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue-Yueh Cheng ◽  
Yeur-Hur Lai ◽  
Shu-Ching Chen ◽  
Shiow-Ching Shun ◽  
Yuan-Mei Liao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document