scholarly journals 143 Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Skull Base Meningiomas: 20-year Long-Term Outcomes With Volumetric Analysis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Mohana Rao Patibandla ◽  
Cheng-Chia Lee ◽  
Gokul C Addagada ◽  
Jason P Sheehan
2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 1249-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohana Rao Patibandla ◽  
Cheng-chia Lee ◽  
Athreya Tata ◽  
Gokul Chowdary Addagada ◽  
Jason P. Sheehan

OBJECTIVEResearch over the past 2 decades has been characterizing the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of benign intracranial tumors, including meningiomas. However, few studies have examined the long-term outcomes of SRS treatment for posterior fossa meningiomas (PFMs). Furthermore, previous studies have typically used single diameter measurements when reporting outcomes, which can yield misleading results. The authors describe the use of SRS in the treatment of benign WHO grade I PFMs and correlate volumetric analysis with long-term outcomes.METHODSThis study is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of WHO grade I PFM with subsequent treatment via single-session SRS and a minimum of 3 follow-up MRI studies available. Volumetric analysis was performed on the radiosurgical scan and each subsequently available follow-up scan by using slice-by-slice area calculations of the meningioma and numerical integration with the trapezoid rule.RESULTSThe final cohort consisted of 120 patients, 76.6% (92) of whom were female, with a median age of 61 years (12–88 years). Stereotactic radiosurgery was the primary treatment for 65% (78) of the patients, whereas 28.3% (34) had 1 resection before SRS treatment and 6.7% (8) had 2 or more resections before SRS. One patient had prior radiotherapy. Tumor characteristics included a median volume of 4.0 cm3 (0.4–40.9 cm3) at treatment with a median margin dose of 15 Gy (8–20 Gy). The median clinical and imaging follow-ups were 79.5 (15–224) and 72 (6–213) months, respectively. For patients treated with a margin dose ≥ 16 Gy, actuarial progression-free survival rates during the period 2–10 years post-SRS were 100%. In patients treated with a margin dose of 13–15 Gy, the actuarial progression-free survival rates at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 years were 97.5%, 97.5%, 93.4%, 93.4%, and 93.4%, respectively. Those who were treated with ≤ 12 Gy had actuarial progression-free survival rates of 95.8%, 82.9%, 73.2%, 56.9%, and 56.9% at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 years, respectively. The overall tumor control rate was 89.2% (107 patients). Post-SRS improvement in neurological symptoms occurred in 23.3% (28 patients), whereas symptoms were stable in 70.8% (85 patients) and worsened in 5.8% (7 patients). Volumetric analysis demonstrated that a change in tumor volume at 3 years after SRS reliably predicted a volumetric change and tumor control at 5 years (R2 = 0.756) with a p < 0.001 and at 10 years (R2 = 0.421) with a p = 0.001. The authors also noted that the 1- to 5-year tumor response is predictive of the 5- to 10-year tumor response (R2 = 0.636, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSStereotactic radiosurgery, as an either upfront or adjuvant treatment, is a durable therapeutic option for WHO grade I PFMs, with high tumor control and a low incidence of post-SRS neurological deficits compared with those obtained using alternate treatment modalities. Lesion volumetric response at the short-term follow-up of 3 years is predictive of the long-term response at 5 and 10 years.


Author(s):  
Motoyuki Umekawa ◽  
Yuki Shinya ◽  
Hirotaka Hasegawa ◽  
Masahiro Shin ◽  
Mariko Kawashima ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
George H. Tse ◽  
Feng Y. Jiang ◽  
Matthias W. R. Radatz ◽  
Saurabh Sinha ◽  
Hesham Zaki

Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are an uncommon entity predominantly encountered in the pediatric population. The skull is rarely involved, but these cysts have been reported to arise in the skull base. Traditional treatment has been with surgery alone; however, there is a gathering body of literature that reports alternative treatments that can achieve long-term disease-free survival. However, these therapies are predominantly directed at peripheral skeletal lesions. To the authors’ knowledge, this report is the first to describe long-term follow-up of the efficacy of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of ABC residuum in the skull base that resulted in long-term patient stability and likely ABC obliteration.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3569
Author(s):  
Alfredo Conti ◽  
Antonio Pontoriero ◽  
Giuseppe Iatì ◽  
Salvatore M. Cardali ◽  
Anna Brogna ◽  
...  

Background: The efficacy of single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) for the treatment of intracranial meningioma is widely recognized. However, sSRS is not always feasible in cases of large tumors and those lying close to critically radiation-sensitive structures. When surgery is not recommended, multi-session stereotactic radiosurgery (mSRS) can be applied. Even so, the efficacy and best treatment schedule of mSRS are not yet established. The aim of this study is to validate the role of mSRS in the treatment of skull base meningiomas. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with skull base meningiomas treated with mSRS (two to five fractions) at the University of Messina, Italy, from 2008 to 2018, was conducted. Results: 156 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period was 36.2 ± 29.3 months. Progression-free survival at 2-, 5-, and 10- years was 95%, 90%, and 80.8%, respectively. There were no new visual or motor deficits, nor cranial nerves impairments, excluding trigeminal neuralgia, which was reported by 5.7% of patients. One patient reported carotid occlusion and one developed brain edema. Conclusion: Multisession radiosurgery is an effective approach for skull base meningiomas. The long-term control is comparable to that obtained with conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy, while the toxicity rate is very limited.


1995 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Pendl ◽  
O. Schröttner ◽  
G.M. Friehs ◽  
H. Feichtinger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document