scholarly journals Phase I trial of intranasal NEO100, highly purified perillyl alcohol, in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel H Schönthal ◽  
David M Peereboom ◽  
Naveed Wagle ◽  
Rose Lai ◽  
Anna J Mathew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Perillyl Alcohol ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Intranasal Delivery ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract Background Better treatments for glioblastoma (GBM) patients, in particular in the recurrent setting, are urgently needed. Clinical trials performed in Brazil indicated that intranasal delivery of perillyl alcohol (POH) might be effective in this patient group. NEO100, a highly purified version of POH, was current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) manufactured to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this novel approach in a Phase I/IIa clinical trial in the United States. Methods A total of 12 patients with recurrent GBM were enrolled into Phase I of this trial. NEO100 was administered by intranasal delivery using a nebulizer and nasal mask. Dosing was 4 times a day, every day. Four cohorts of 3 patients received the following dosages: 96 mg/dose (384 mg/day), 144 mg/dose (576 mg/day), 192 mg/dose (768 mg/day), and 288 mg/dose (1152 mg/day). Completion of 28 days of treatment was recorded as 1 cycle. Adverse events were documented, and radiographic response via Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria was evaluated every 2 months. Progression-free and overall survival were determined after 6 and 12 months, respectively (progression-free survival-6 [PFS-6], overall survival-12 [OS-12]). Results Intranasal NEO100 was well tolerated at all dose levels and no severe adverse events were reported. PFS-6 was 33%, OS-12 was 55%, and median OS was 15 months. Four patients (33%), all of them with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1)-mutant tumors, survived >24 months. Conclusion Intranasal glioma therapy with NEO100 was well tolerated. It correlated with improved survival when compared to historical controls, pointing to the possibility that this novel intranasal approach could become useful for the treatment of recurrent GBM.

Phase I/II dose-escalation study of VB-111, an antiangiogenic gene therapy, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2102-TPS2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Jacob Brenner ◽  
Yael Cohen ◽  
James J Vredenburgh ◽  
Katherine B. Peters ◽  
Eyal Breitbart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

TPS2102 Background: VB-111 is an anti-angiogenic agent consisting of a non-replicating adenovirus vector (Ad-5) with a modified murine pre-proendothelin promoter leading to apoptosis of tumor vasculature by expressing a fas-chimera transgene in angiogenic endothelial cells. In a phase I/II dose-escalation study, safety and efficacy of VB-111 in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) were evaluated. Methods: VB-111 was administered as a single intravenous infusion at escalating doses from 1x1012 to 3x1012 viral particles (VPs), followed by repeat doses of 3x1012 or 1x1013every 2 months. Assessments included safety, pharmacokinetics, tumor response (RANO criteria) and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty eight patients aged 26 – 74 years at 3 medical centers in the US received up to 8 repeat doses of VB-111. The median OS was 360 [range: 70-574] and 266 days [range: 28-664] for patients receiving at least one dose of 1x1013VPs (high dose) vs. subjects who received lower doses, respectively (p NS). Progression free survival was 87 vs 55 days for patients who received high dose and for lower doses, respectively (p = 0.01). Median follow-up was 232 days. Three patients had a partial response (PR) at 82, 86 and 408 days post initial VB-111 dosing. Twenty one of the patients who progressed on VB-111 treatment received bevacizumab off study; 7 of the 15 evaluable patients (47%) had a PR compared to 30% expected according to literature. VB-111 was safe and well tolerated, 53 adverse events were reported, 14 were classified as possibly related to VB-111. All events were of CTCAE grade 1-2 except one grade 3 pulmonary embolism. There were no study related deaths. One patient developed peri-tumoral edema, which resolved with corticosteroid therapy. Events occurring in > 10% of the patients included headache and fatigue. Conclusions: VB-111 was safe and well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM with repeat doses of up to 1x1013 VPs. Tumor responses were seen. Overall survival was about 3 months longer than historical data in recurrent GBM, including standard of care anti-angiogenic agents. Data suggests that VB-111 potentiates the response to bevacizumab given at further progression. Clinical trial information: NCT01260506.

scholarly journals ACTR-68. FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE EMULATE THERAPEUTICS™ VOYAGER SYSTEM IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi29-vi29
Author(s):  
Garni Barkhoudarian ◽  
Michael Badruddoja ◽  
Nicholas Blondin ◽  
Ricky Chen ◽  
Sajeel Chowdhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Radio Frequency Energy ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract BACKGROUND The EMulate Therapeutics Voyager system is an investigational non-sterile, non-invasive, non-thermal, non-ionizing, portable, home-use medical device that uses a specific, localized ultra-low radio frequency energy (ulRFE®) cognate for the treatment of brain cancer. METHODS This ongoing, open-label, multi-center study (NAT-101) is being conducted in the US and Australia in patients with recurrent GBM. There are 3 treatment groups: 32 patients treated with Voyager alone, 43 patients treated with Voyager + Investigator’s choice of anti-cancer therapy, and 21 patients treated with Voyager+lomustine+/-bevacizumab. The objective of the study is to assess if the Voyager is a safe and feasible treatment for recurrent GBM. The primary outcome measure is safety, assessed by the incidence and evaluation of adverse events (AEs) associated with the Voyager. The secondary outcome measures are progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS Enrollment is closed, and long-term treatment and follow-up is ongoing. 96 patients were enrolled and treated. 82 patients reported at least one AE, and 18 AEs were assessed as device-related (mild-moderate; 12 headache, 2 vomiting, 1 nausea, 1 confusion, 1 insomnia, and 1 skin irritation). 31 patients reported at least one serious AE, and none were assessed as device-related. 33% of patients treated with Voyager alone and 36% of patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy were progression-free after 6 months. 58% of patients treated with Voyager alone and 60% of patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy remained alive after 6 months; median overall survival is 7 months (95% CI=4.4±14.3) in patients treated with Voyager alone and 10 months (95% CI=6.7±11.5) in patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The Voyager system appears to be safe and feasible for the treatment of recurrent GBM. Given that therapy is delivered non-invasively and no device-related serious adverse events were reported, further prospective study of the investigational device is planned.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of the Mutant IDH1 Inhibitor Ivosidenib: Safety and Clinical Activity in Patients With Advanced Chondrosarcoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15) ◽  
pp. 1693-1701 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Tap ◽  
Victor M. Villalobos ◽  
Gregory M. Cote ◽  
Howard Burris ◽  
Filip Janku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Mutant Idh1

PURPOSE Surgery is the primary therapy for localized chondrosarcoma; for locally advanced and/or metastatic disease, no known effective systemic therapy exists. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) enzymes occur in up to 65% of chondrosarcomas, resulting in accumulation of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). Ivosidenib (AG-120) is a selective inhibitor of mutant IDH1 approved in the United States for specific cases of acute myeloid leukemia. We report outcomes of patients with advanced chondrosarcoma in an ongoing study exploring ivosidenib treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase I multicenter open-label dose-escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib monotherapy enrolled patients with mutant IDH1 advanced solid tumors, including chondrosarcoma. Ivosidenib was administered orally (100 mg twice daily to 1,200 mg once daily) in continuous 28-day cycles. Responses were assessed every other cycle using RECIST (version 1.1). RESULTS Twenty-one patients (escalation, n = 12; expansion, n = 9) with advanced chondrosarcoma received ivosidenib (women, n = 8; median age, 55 years; range, 30-88 years; 11 had received prior systemic therapy). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mostly grade 1 or 2. Twelve patients experienced grade ≥ 3 AEs; only one event was judged treatment related (hypophosphatemia, n = 1). Plasma 2-HG levels decreased substantially in all patients (range, 14%-94.2%), to levels seen in healthy individuals. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 7.4 months); the PFS rate at 6 months was 39.5%. Eleven (52%) of 21 patients experienced stable disease. CONCLUSION In patients with chondrosarcoma, ivosidenib showed minimal toxicity, substantial 2-HG reduction, and durable disease control. Future studies of ivosidenib monotherapy or rational combination approaches should be considered in patients with advanced mutant IDH1 chondrosarcoma.

Accelerated BEP for metastatic germ cell tumors: Combined analysis of Australian and U.K. phase I/II trials.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4531-4531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Grimison ◽  
Mark D. Chatfield ◽  
Danish Mazhar ◽  
Guy C. Toner ◽  
John D. Chester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Good Risk

4531 Background: Standard chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumors is 3-weekly BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin). 5-year overall survival is > 90% in good risk disease, but only ~80% in intermediate and ~ 60% in poor risk disease. Accelerated versions of standard regimens have proven more effective in other malignancies. We aimed to determine tolerability and activity of accelerated (2-weekly) BEP by combining data from two single arm, multi-center, phase I/II trials. Methods: The UK trial (n=16) included patients with intermediate and poor risk metastatic germ cell tumours. The Australian trial (n=45) also included patients with radiologically measurable good risk disease. BEP chemotherapy was repeated every 2 weeks for 4 cycles (3 cycles for good risk). The Australian and UK regimens differed for cisplatin (20mg/m2 D1-5; 50mg/m2 D1-2), etoposide (100mg/m2 D1-5; 165mg/m2 D1-3), bleomycin (30kIU weekly x 12 or 9; 30kIU at 4-6 day intervals x 12), and pegylated G-CSF (6mg D6; 6mg D4) respectively. Primary endpoint for combined analysis was 2-year progression-free survival. Results: 61 patients were enrolled from 2004-09 (UK) and 2008-10 (Australia). 17 had poor risk, 28 intermediate risk, 16 good risk disease. Median follow-up is 27 months (range 6 to 81). Adverse events are presented in the table. 45 of 61 patients (74%) achieved a complete response to chemotherapy +/- surgery (9 of 17 poor risk (53%), 20 of 28 intermediate risk (71%), 16 of 16 good risk disease (100%)). 11 of 61 patients have relapsed. 2 patients have died of disease (both intermediate risk). 2 year overall survival is 98%. 2 year progression-free survival is 65% for poor risk, 86% for intermediate risk, and 92% for good risk disease. Conclusions: Efficacy data are promising, particularly for intermediate and poor risk disease. Adverse events appear comparable to standard BEP. These results provide the rationale for an international trial randomised trial comparing accelerated and standard versions of BEP. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals ACTR-26. SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BEVACIZUMAB PLUS TTFIELDS IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM): DATA FROM A PHASE II CLINICAL TRIAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi18-vi18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaleh Fallah ◽  
Rekha Chaudhary ◽  
Lisa Rogers ◽  
Wei (Auston) Wei ◽  
Cathy Brewer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Muscle Weakness ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Phase 2 Clinical Trial ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract BACKGROUND Studies of bevacizumab monotherapy and TTFields monotherapy have shown activity but limited clinical benefit in patients with recurrent GBM. In an open label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial, the safety and efficacy of the combination of bevacizumab and TTFields was studied in patients with recurrent GBM. METHOD Bevacizumab-naïve patients with histologically confirmed GBM or other grade IV glioma, with recurrent disease after radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy, were eligible. Bevacizumab dose was 10mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks and TTFields was worn at least 18 hours daily. The primary endpoint was safety, progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and overall survival at 12 months (OS12). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related adverse events were reported according to CTCAE, v4.0 criteria. RESULTS 25 patients were enrolled and 23 were eligible for data analysis: 18 (78%) men and 5 (22%) women, median age 60 years (range 17–78). 21 patients were Caucasian, 1 was African American and 1 of unknown race. Median follow-up was 6.0 months (range 2.4–22). Seven patients (30 %) had disease progression. Median PFS was 9.9 (95% CI: 6.7-NA) months. PFS rate at 6 months (PFS6) was 71% (95% CI: 0.54–0.94). Median overall survival was 9.9 (95%CI 7.3-NA) months. OS rate at 12 months (OS12) was 42% (95%CI 0.24–0.74). 7 patients (30%) had grade 3 toxicity (cough, dysphagia, muscle weakness, hyperglycemia, hypertension, psychosis, seizure, lymphopenia, transaminitis). 1 patient developed grade 4 muscle weakness in the lower extremities. CONCLUSION Treatment with the combination of bevacizumab and TTFields in patients with recurrent GBM is safe and feasible and has shown clinical efficacy.

Vorinostat, temozolomide, and bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma: A phase I/II trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2027-2027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine B. Peters ◽  
James J. Vredenburgh ◽  
Annick Desjardins ◽  
Henry S. Friedman ◽  
James Emmett Herndon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

2027 Background: Prognosis for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor with median survival between 3 to 6 months. Use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor, bevacizumab (BEV), has advanced this area of research, but continued studies have focused on whether the addition of other chemotherapies can improve efficacy in recurrent GBM. Vorinostat, a small molecule inhibitor of histone deactylase (HDAC), has anti-tumor activity directly through HDAC inhibition and indirectly by promoting anti-angiogenesis. Its good oral bioavailability and favorable toxicity profile make it a promising additive agent to standard therapy. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy of vorinostat in combination with BEV and daily temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent GBM. Methods: This was a phase I/II open-label, single arm study in recurrent GBM patients. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety/tolerability, radiographic response, PFS, and overall survival of recurrent GBM patients treated with BEV plus daily TMZ and vorinostat. Chief eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18 years, KPS ≥ 70, time interval ≥ four weeks from previous treatment, and maximum of 2 prior progressions. Dosing regimen was as follows: BEV 10 mg/kg IV every two weeks, TMZ 50 mg/m2 po daily, and vorinostat 400 mg po for 7 days on then 7 days off in a 28 day cycle. Results: 46 recurrent GBM patients were enrolled with 42 of those patients receiving a vorinostat dose of 400 mg. Most common grade 2 and above toxicities were leukopenia (36%), neutropenia (29%), fatigue (24%), and thrombocytopenia (19%). Serious toxicities included 4 grade 4 toxicities (grade 4 hyperglycemia, pulmonary embolism, bowel perforation and intracranial hematoma) and 1 patient expired on day of informed consent due to pulmonary embolism (grade 5). With a median follow-up of 11.3 months (95% CI: 10.1, 13.1 months), the 6-month PFS was 52.4% (95% CI: 36.4%, 66.1%). Best radiographic responses were 2 complete responses, 17 partial responses, 20 stable responses, and 1 radiographic progression. Conclusions: In summary, combination of BEV, daily TMZ, and vorinostat has promising efficacy on recurrent GBM with reasonable toxicity/safety.

Interim analysis of a phase I/II study of panobinostat in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2013-2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eudocia Quant Lee ◽  
David A. Reardon ◽  
David Schiff ◽  
Jan Drappatz ◽  
Alona Muzikansky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Deacetylase Inhibitor ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

2013 Background: Bevacizumab is frequently used to treat recurrent GBM, but responses are generally not durable. Panobinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with anti-neoplastic and anti-angiogenic effects in GBM and may work synergistically with bevacizumab. We conducted a multicenter phase I/II trial of panobinostat in combination with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent GBM. Methods: In the phase II trial, patients with recurrent GBM were treated with oral panobinostat 30 mg three times per week, every other week, in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every other week. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) and the study was powered to discriminate between a 35% and 55% PFS6 rate (85% power at an alpha level of 0.07). A planned interim analysis specified suspension of accrual and careful data review if 12 or more of the first 21 patients accrued to the study progress within 6 months of initiating treatment. Patients with recurrent GBM enrolled in the phase I study at the maximum tolerated dose (which is the phase II dose) were eligible for inclusion in the interim analysis. Results: Thirteen of the first 21 patients accrued to the GBM arm of the study had progressed within 6 months of initiating study treatment. The study was closed to further accrual and a planned interim analysis was performed. Median age was 53 (range 22-66) and median KPS was 80% (60%-100%). PFS6 rate was 33.9% [95% CI 12.8, 56.5), median was PFS 5 months [95% CI 3 months, NR], and median OS was 342 days [95% CI 203 days, NR]. Five patients (23.8%) achieved partial responses. Conclusions: Although reasonably well-tolerated, this phase I/II study of panobinostat and bevacizumab in recurrent GBM did not meet criteria for continued accrual and the study was closed. Updated outcome and safety data will be presented at the meeting. Study Supported by: Novartis and Genentech Clinical trial information: NCT00859222.

scholarly journals Machine-Learning-Based Radiomics MRI Model for Survival Prediction of Recurrent Glioblastomas Treated with Bevacizumab

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1263
Author(s):  
Samy Ammari ◽  
Raoul Sallé de Chou ◽  
Tarek Assi ◽  
Mehdi Touat ◽  
Emilie Chouzenoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Binary Classification ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Survival Prediction ◽  
Classification Models ◽  
Angiogenic Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Anti-angiogenic therapy with bevacizumab is a widely used therapeutic option for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Nevertheless, the therapeutic response remains highly heterogeneous among GBM patients with discordant outcomes. Recent data have shown that radiomics, an advanced recent imaging analysis method, can help to predict both prognosis and therapy in a multitude of solid tumours. The objective of this study was to identify novel biomarkers, extracted from MRI and clinical data, which could predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in GBM patients treated with bevacizumab using machine-learning algorithms. In a cohort of 194 recurrent GBM patients (age range 18–80), radiomics data from pre-treatment T2 FLAIR and gadolinium-injected MRI images along with clinical features were analysed. Binary classification models for OS at 9, 12, and 15 months were evaluated. Our classification models successfully stratified the OS. The AUCs were equal to 0.78, 0.85, and 0.76 on the test sets (0.79, 0.82, and 0.87 on the training sets) for the 9-, 12-, and 15-month endpoints, respectively. Regressions yielded a C-index of 0.64 (0.74) for OS and 0.57 (0.69) for PFS. These results suggest that radiomics could assist in the elaboration of a predictive model for treatment selection in recurrent GBM patients.

scholarly journals SURG-13. LASER INTERSTITIAL THERMAL THERAPY FOR RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: A REVIEW OF SURVIVAL OUTCOMES COMPARED TO A MATCHED SURGICAL COHORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii206-ii206
Author(s):  
Hassan Fadel ◽  
Sameah Haider ◽  
Jacob Pawloski ◽  
Hesham Zakaria ◽  
Farhan Chaudhry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Thermal Therapy ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Repeat Surgery ◽  
Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is uniformly associated with a poor prognosis and inevitable recurrence. Management of recurrent GBM remains unclear, with repeat surgery often employed with varying degrees of success. We evaluated the efficacy of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) for recurrent GBM when compared to a carefully matched cohort of patients treated with repeat surgical resection. METHODS A retrospective single-institution database was used to identify patients who underwent LITT or surgical resection of recurrent GBM between 2014-2019. LITT patients were matched with surgical resection patients according to baseline demographics, comorbidities, tumor location, and eloquence. Subgroup analysis matching similar patients for tumor volume was also completed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoints. RESULTS A LITT cohort of 20 patients was matched to 50 similar patients who underwent repeat surgical resection. Baseline characteristics were similar between both cohorts apart from tumor volume, which was larger in the surgical cohort (17.5 cc vs. 4.7 cc, p< 0.01). On long-term follow-up, there was no difference in OS (HR, 0.72; 95%CI, 0.36-1.45) or PFS (HR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.29-1.53) between the LITT and surgical cohorts when controlling for tumor volume. Subgroup analysis of 23 LITT patients matched according to tumor volume with 23 surgical patients with similar clinical characteristics also found no difference in OS (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.33-1.30) or PFS (HR, 0.58; 95%CI, 0.90-1.05) between the cohorts. LITT patients had shorter length of stays (1 vs. 4 days, p< 0.001) and a higher rate of home discharge (84% vs. 67%, p=0.172) compared to the surgical cohort. CONCLUSION After matching for demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics, there was no difference in outcomes between patients undergoing LITT compared to surgical resection for recurrent GBM. LITT patients had similar survival outcomes yet shorter hospital stays and more favorable dispositions, potentially mitigating post-treatment complications.

637 Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may indicate a favorable prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A672-A673
Author(s):  
Dylan Martini ◽  
Sean Evans ◽  
Subir Goyal ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
T Anders Olsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Emory University

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become an increasingly utilized treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although they have a favorable toxicity profile, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can have a significant impact on patients‘ quality of life. It is not well understood whether irAEs are associated with improved clinical outcomes. We investigated the relationship between irAEs and clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with ICI.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 200 patients with mRCC who received ICI at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University from 2015–2020. Clinical outcomes were measured by overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinical benefit (CB). OS and PFS were calculated from ICI-initiation to date of death and radiographic or clinical progression, respectively. CB was defined as a best radiographic response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for >6 months per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Toxicity data was collected from clinic notes and laboratory values. The association with OS and PFS was modeled by Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan-Meier curves were created for survival estimates.ResultsMost patients were males (71%), and 78% had clear-cell RCC (ccRCC). Most patients (58%) received anti-PD-1 monotherapy. The majority were international mRCC database consortium (IMDC) intermediate (57%) or poor-risk (26%). Anti-PD-1 monotherapy was the most common (58%) treatment regimen and most patients received ICI as first (38%) or second-line (42%) treatment. One-third of patients (33%) experienced an irAE, with the most common being endocrine (13%), gastrointestinal (11%), and dermatologic (10%). Patients who experienced irAEs had significantly longer OS (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32–0.87, p=0.013), higher chance of CB (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.11–4.00, p=0.023) and showed a trend towards longer PFS (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.49–1.02, p=0.065) in MVA (table 1). Patients who had thyroid irAEs had significantly longer OS, PFS, and higher chance of CB in MVA (table 1). The objective response rate was higher for patients who experienced irAEs (34% vs. 18%). Patients who experienced irAEs had significantly longer median OS (44.5 vs. 18.2 months, p=0.005) and PFS (7.5 vs 3.6 months, p=0.0028) compared to patients who did not (figure 1).Abstract 637 Table 1MVA* of association between irAEs and clinical outcomesAbstract 637 Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves of association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and overall survival (OS, top panel) and progression-free survival (PFS, bottom panel)ConclusionsWe showed that mRCC patients who experienced irAEs, particularly thyroid irAEs, had improved clinical outcomes. This suggests that irAEs may be prognostic of favorable outcomes in mRCC patients treated with ICI. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.AcknowledgementsResearch reported in this publication was supported in part by the Breen Foundation and the Biostatistics Shared Resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under award number P30CA138292. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Trial RegistrationNot applicableEthics ApprovalThis retrospective study was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board.ConsentNot applicableReferencesNot applicable

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document