scholarly journals Motivating Low Socioeconomic Status Smokers to Accept Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment: A Brief Intervention for the Community Agency Setting

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 1002-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Christiansen ◽  
Kevin M. Reeder ◽  
Erin G. TerBeek ◽  
Michael C. Fiore ◽  
Timothy B. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Brief Intervention ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Community Agency ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Cessation Treatment

scholarly journals Electronic cigarettes in standard smoking cessation treatment by tobacco counselors in Flanders: E-cigarette users show similar if not higher quit rates as those using commonly recommended smoking cessation aids

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolien Adriaens ◽  
Eline Belmans ◽  
Dinska Van Gucht ◽  
Frank Baeyens
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Electronic Cigarettes ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Smoking Abstinence ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
Point Prevalence Abstinence

Abstract Background This interventional-cohort study tried to answer if people who smoke and choose an e-cigarette in the context of smoking cessation treatment by tobacco counselors in Flanders are achieving smoking abstinence and how they compare to clients who opt for commonly recommended (or no) aids (nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation medication). Methods Participants were recruited by tobacco counselors. They followed smoking cessation treatment (in group) for 2 months. At several times during treatment and 7 months after quit date, participants were asked to fill out questionnaires and to perform eCO measurements. Results One third of all participants (n = 244) achieved smoking abstinence 7 months after the quit date, with e-cigarette users having higher chances to be smoking abstinent at the final session compared to NRT users. Point prevalence abstinence rates across all follow-up measurements, however, as well as continuous and prolonged smoking abstinence, were similar in e-cigarette users and in clients having chosen a commonly recommended (or no) smoking cessation aid. No differences were obtained between smoking cessation aids with respect to product use and experiences. Conclusions People who smoke and choose e-cigarettes in the context of smoking cessation treatment by tobacco counselors show similar if not higher smoking cessation rates compared to those choosing other evidence-based (or no) smoking cessation aids.

scholarly journals Care-paradigm shift promoting smoking cessation treatment among cancer center patients via a low-burden strategy, Electronic Health Record-Enabled Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex T Ramsey ◽  
Ami Chiu ◽  
Timothy Baker ◽  
Nina Smock ◽  
Jingling Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Tobacco smoking is an important risk factor for cancer incidence, an effect modifier for cancer treatment, and a negative prognostic factor for disease outcomes. Inadequate implementation of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment in cancer centers, a consequence of numerous patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers, contributes to tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. This study provides data for a paradigm shift from a frequently used specialist referral model to a point-of-care treatment model for tobacco use assessment and cessation treatment for outpatients at a large cancer center. The point-of-care model is enabled by a low-burden strategy, the Electronic Health Record-Enabled Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment program, which was implemented in the cancer center clinics on June 2, 2018. Five-month pre- and post-implementation data from the electronic health record (EHR) were analyzed. The percentage of cancer patients assessed for tobacco use significantly increased from 48% to 90% (z = 126.57, p < .001), the percentage of smokers referred for cessation counseling increased from 0.72% to 1.91% (z = 3.81, p < .001), and the percentage of smokers with cessation medication significantly increased from 3% to 17% (z = 17.20, p < .001). EHR functionalities may significantly address barriers to point-of-care treatment delivery, improving its consistent implementation and thereby increasing access to and quality of smoking cessation care for cancer center patients.

scholarly journals Medicaid Coverage of Smoking Cessation Counseling and Medication Is Underutilized for Pregnant Women

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 656-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taneisha S. Scheuermann ◽  
Kimber P. Richter ◽  
Lisette T. Jacobson ◽  
Theresa I. Shireman
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Nicotine Replacement Therapy ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Smoking Cessation Counseling ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Pregnant Smokers ◽  
Cessation Treatment

Abstract Introduction: Policies to promote smoking cessation among Medicaid-insured pregnant women have the potential to assist a significant proportion of pregnant smokers. In 2010, Kansas Medicaid began covering smoking cessation counseling for pregnant smokers. Our aim was to evaluate the use of smoking cessation benefits provided to pregnant women as a result of the Kansas Medicaid policy change that provided reimbursement for physician-provided smoking cessation counseling. Methods: We examined Kansas Medicaid claims data to estimate rates of delivery of smoking cessation treatment to Medicaid-insured pregnant women in Kansas from fiscal year 2010 through 2013. We analyzed the number of pregnant women who received physician-provided smoking cessation counseling indicated by procedure billing codes (ie, G0436 and G0437) and medication (ie, nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, or varenicline) located in outpatient managed care encounter and fee-for-service claims data. We estimated the number of Medicaid-insured pregnant smokers using the national smoking prevalence (14%) in this population and the number of live births reported in Kansas. Results: Annually from 2010 to 2013, approximately 27.2%–31.6% of pregnant smokers had claims for nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, or varenicline. Excluding claims for bupropion, a medication commonly prescribed to treat depression, claims ranged from 9.3% to 11.1%. Following implementation of Medicaid coverage for smoking cessation counseling, less than 1% of estimated smokers had claims for counseling. Conclusions: This low claims rate suggests that simply changing policy is not sufficient to ensure use of newly implemented benefits, and that there probably remain critical gaps in smoking cessation treatment. Implications: This study evaluates the use of Medicaid reimbursement for smoking cessation counseling among low-income pregnant women in Kansas. We describe the Medicaid claims rates of physician-provided smoking cessation counseling for pregnant women, an evidence-based and universally recommended treatment approach for smoking cessation in this population. Our findings show that claims rates for smoking cessation benefits in this population are very low, even after policy changes to support provision of cessation assistance were implemented. Additional studies are needed to determine whether reimbursement is functioning as intended and identify potential gaps between policy and implementation of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment.

scholarly journals Smoking Cessation Treatment among Rural Individuals

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Steven S. Coughlin ◽  
Steven S. Coughlin
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
Poor Access ◽  
Access To Primary Care ◽  
Out Of Pocket Expenses

Rural population in the U.S. have higher smoking prevalence rates and consume a higher number of cigarettes per day. Socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers, such as those who reside in rural areas, are less likely to use and have access to evidence-based tobacco cessation treatments than the general population of smokers. Randomized controlled studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions among rural residents. Of particular interest are interventions that overcome barriers to smoking cessation treatment such as poor access to primary care, travel, time, lack of health insurance, an inability to pay out-of-pocket expenses for pharmacotherapy, and communal norms that influence smoking cessation.

Implementing evidence-based smoking cessation treatment in psychosocial care units (CAPS) in Brazil

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 669-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia ◽  
Nilson R da Silva ◽  
Marta RD Campos ◽  
Helena F Moura ◽  
Gustavo Zabert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Psychosocial Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment

scholarly journals Understanding the relationship between socioeconomic status, smoking cessation services provided by the health system and smoking cessation behavior in Brazil

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Salem Szklo ◽  
James F. Thrasher ◽  
Cristina Perez ◽  
Valeska Carvalho Figueiredo ◽  
Geoffrey Fong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
P Value ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Quit Smoking ◽  
Quit Attempts ◽  
And Gender ◽  
To Receive ◽  
The Relationship

Increasing the effectiveness of smoking cessation policies requires greater consideration of the cultural and socioeconomic complexities of smoking. The purpose of this paper is to explore the association between socioeconomic status and "selected midpoints" linked to smoking cessation in Brazil. Data was collected from a representative sample of urban adult smokers as part of the ITC-Brazil Survey (2009, N = 1,215). After controlling for age and gender, there were no statistically significant differences quit attempts in the last six months between individuals with different socioeconomic status. However, smokers with high socioeconomic status visited a doctor 1.54 times more often than those with low socioeconomic status (p-value = 0.017), and were also 1.65 times more likely to receive advice to quit smoking (p-value = 0.025). Our results demonstrate that disparities in health and socioeconomic status are still a major challenge for policymakers to increase the population impact of tabacco control actions worldwide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document