scholarly journals 794. The Role of the Environment in Healthcare-associated Transmission of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus: A Proof of Concept Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S493-S493
Author(s):  
Amber L Linkneheld-Struk ◽  
Victoria R Williams ◽  
Lorraine Maze Dit Mieusement ◽  
Natasha Salt ◽  
Adrienne Chan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transmission of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) from environment to patient and patient to patient can both occur in healthcare settings. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a cohort of exposed patients on an inpatient unit with an extensive VRE outbreak needed to switch physical locations with a non-exposed patient population. By comparing outcomes of both cohorts, we aimed to determine the role of the physical environment (both direct and indirect contact) as compared to the patient population, in ongoing VRE transmission. Methods From 10 March to 21 April 2021, 41 new nosocomial acquisitions of VRE were detected as part of a VRE outbreak on a 34-bed acute care unit. Prior to the switch of units, extensive cleaning of the unit was conducted including electrostatic adjuncts to standard cleaning and environmental swabbing for VRE yielded no positive surfaces. The exposed cohort included 3 of 30 patients with VRE while the non-exposed cohort had 0 of 28 VRE positive patients based on prevalence testing on 21 April 2021. Following the physical relocation of both cohorts on 22 April, 2021, prospective VRE screening was performed on both units for one month including on admission, discharge and weekly prevalence screening. Hand hygiene compliance rates on both units was measured using group electronic monitoring. Results Figure 1 depicts the timeline and number of VRE cases before and after the unit switch. Following relocation of the VRE exposed cohort to the new unit, no further VRE transmission was detected (0/235 VRE screens; 0 VRE cases per 1000 patient days). Conversely, there were new VRE transmissions (3/99 VRE screens, 5 VRE cases per 1000 patient days) in the non-exposed cohort. When the units resumed their original location, one additional case of VRE was identified in the exposed cohort upon return to their original location. These transmissions occurred despite HH compliance of 94% (141,610/150,706) during the entire study period on the outbreak unit, which was consistently higher than on the non-outbreak unit (141,589/227,136, 62%).Figure 1. Conclusion The environmental reservoir for VRE may be more important in transmission than the patient reservoir. These findings underscore the importance of environmental cleaning to contain VRE outbreaks. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 970-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S Morgan ◽  
Patrick J Brennan ◽  
Neil O Fishman

Objective To review the appropriateness of vancomycin therapy, changes in vancomycin use, and the incidence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) after implementation of a limited restriction policy requiring approval from the Infectious Diseases Approval service to continue vancomycin therapy beyond 72 hours. Design A prospective chart review was conducted in April 1995. Pharmacy billing data and infection control data were compared before and after policy implementation. Setting A 725-bed university teaching institution. Patients All patients receiving vancomycin during April 1995. Main outcome Measures Appropriateness of use was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for prudent vancomycin use. Results A total of 333 courses of vancomycin therapy were reviewed. Vancomycin use was appropriate in 219 (66%) courses. Of the 114 courses that did not meet the CDC guidelines, 76 (67%) were for empiric use, 35 (31%) were for prophylactic use, and 3 (3%) were for therapeutic use. Overall, the total number of grams used decreased 9%, grams per 1000 patient-days decreased by 10, and the total number of patients exposed to vancomycin decreased 0.5%. Several services had large decreases in vancomycin use. Vancomycin expenditures decreased by $15 788 for the 7-month time period. The incidence of VRE remained unchanged, at 30% of all enterococcal isolates 2 years after policy implementation. Conclusions The limited restriction policy was effective in decreasing the total grams of vancomycin used. However, one-third of vancomycin therapy was inappropriate and the incidence of VRE was unchanged. A more stringent restriction policy could potentially increase appropriate use, further decrease the amount of vancomycin used, and decrease the incidence of VRE.


2006 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1552-1560 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. K. Hayden ◽  
M. J. M. Bonten ◽  
D. W. Blom ◽  
E. A. Lyle ◽  
D. A. M. C. van de Vijver ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. e27-e29
Author(s):  
Consuelo G. Tinajero ◽  
Miriam Bobadilla-Del Valle ◽  
Jose A. Alvarez ◽  
Juan L. Mosqueda ◽  
Alfredo Ponce De Leon ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
Bruna G. Cabral ◽  
Yamê M. Davies ◽  
Márcia Cristina Menão ◽  
Andre B.S. Saidenberg ◽  
Vasco Túlio M. Gomes ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT: Enterococcus are recognized worldwide as significant nosocomial agents that have been continuously envolving to adapt to different niches and acquire resistance to several antibiotic classes. Vancomycin and gentamicin-resistant strains of E. faecalis and E. faecium have been associated with nosocomial human infections. Some epidemiological studies suggest the participation of pets as reservoirs of vancomycin and gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus strains. However, the role of companion birds as reservoirs of these strains has been poorly studied. In this study, 126 psittacine birds were evaluated and 26.9% carried Enterococcus spp., including the species E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. hirae, E. phoeniculicola, E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. The antibiotic resistance profile showed four high-level gentamicin-resistance (HLGR) strains. In addition, two strains presented intermediate levels of vancomycin resistance. Resistant strains were isolated from fecal and oropharynx samples of sick and clinically healthy birds, suggesting that psittacine birds may act as reservoirs of HLGR Enterococcus spp. However, sick birds appear to be more implicated in the enterococci transmission than healthy birds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document