scholarly journals Pneumonia Management and Outcomes in a Medical Intensive Care Unit Pre-and Post-Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Lehr ◽  
Jihye Kim ◽  
Michael Katzman
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1137-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nneka I. Nzegwu ◽  
Michelle R. Rychalsky ◽  
Loren A. Nallu ◽  
Xuemei Song ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVETo evaluate antimicrobial utilization and prescription practices in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP).DESIGNQuasi-experimental, interrupted time-series study.SETTINGA 54-bed, level IV NICU in a regional academic and tertiary referral center.PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTSAll neonates prescribed antimicrobials from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2016, were eligible for inclusion.INTERVENTIONImplementation of a NICU-specific ASP beginning July 2012.METHODSWe convened a multidisciplinary team and developed guidelines for common infections, with a focus on prescriber audit and feedback. We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate the effects of our ASP. Our primary outcome measure was days of antibiotic therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days for all and for select antimicrobials. Secondary outcomes included provider-specific antimicrobial prescription events for suspected late-onset sepsis (blood or cerebrospinal fluid infection at >72 hours of life) and guideline compliance.RESULTSAntibiotic utilization decreased by 14.7 DOT per 1,000 patient days during the stewardship period, although this decrease was not statistically significant (P=.669). Use of ampicillin, the most commonly antimicrobial prescribed in our NICU, decreased significantly, declining by 22.5 DOT per 1,000 patient days (P=.037). Late-onset sepsis evaluation and prescription events per 100 NICU days of clinical service decreased significantly (P<.0001), with an average reduction of 2.65 evaluations per year per provider. Clinical guidelines were adhered to 98.75% of the time.CONCLUSIONSImplementation of a NICU-specific antimicrobial stewardship program is feasible and can improve antibiotic prescribing practices.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1137–1143


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S269-S269
Author(s):  
Fouzia Naeem ◽  
Mohammad Nael Mhaissen ◽  
Brenik Kuzmic ◽  
Ashley Clark ◽  
Michelle Ruiz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s470-s470
Author(s):  
Aline Le ◽  
Le Kang ◽  
Andrew Noda ◽  
Emily Godbout ◽  
John Daniel Markley ◽  
...  

Background: In this study, we assessed whether meropenem restriction led to delays in administration for patients in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) at a large tertiary-care urban teaching hospital. Methods: The antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) requires approval for restricted antimicrobial orders placed between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. Between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. (daytime), authorized approvers include ASP and infectious diseases (ID) physicians. From 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. (evening) orders are approved by ID fellows. Orders were entered as Stat, Now, and Routine. Between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. (night), patients receive doses without approval. Meropenem restriction began in mid-January 2018. Pre- and postmeropenem restriction periods were defined as February–December 2017 and February–December 2018. Meropenem use data were compared for adult patients in the MICU. A multivariable Cox regression model was implemented to compare (1) time from order entry to approval; (2) time from order approval to patient administration; (3) total time from order entry to patient administration, adjusting for order priority, approver (ASP, ID consult, ID fellow, pharmacy); and (4) time of day of order placement (day, eve, night). The analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Result: Time from order approval to patient administration was significantly decreased in the postrestriction period (HR, 1.840; P < .001) (Table 1). Stat orders were faster compared to routine orders for order entry to approval (HR, 1.735; P < .001), approval to administration (HR, 2.610; P < .001), and total time from order entry to administration (HR, 2.812; P < .001). No significant differences were found in time to approval by approving service. Time from order entry to approval was faster for nighttime orders than for daytime orders (HR, 1.399; P = .037). Conclusions: Our data indicate that the time from order entry to administration decreased following meropenem restriction in our MICU. More research is needed to identify the reason for this finding, but we postulate that this is due to an effect on drug administration prioritization within nursing workflow. These data will inform our local meropenem restriction efforts.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Michelle Doll reports a research grant from Molnlycke Healthcare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document