scholarly journals Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess the Effect of Retapamulin for Nasal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriers

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raveena Singh ◽  
Adrijana Gombosev ◽  
Tabitha Dutciuc ◽  
Kaye Evans ◽  
Lena M. Portillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Double Blinded

Tolerability of a probiotic in subjects with a history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Warrack ◽  
P. Panjikar ◽  
M. Duster ◽  
N. Safdar
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Public Health Importance ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
History Of ◽  
Study Population

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a pathogen of major public health importance. Colonisation precedes infection; thus reducing MRSA carriage may be of benefit for reducing infection. Probiotics represent a novel approach to reducing MRSA carriage. We undertook a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of the tolerability and acceptability of probiotics for reducing nasal and intestinal carriage of MRSA. In addition, subjects were screened for vancomycin-resistant enterocococci (VRE). Subjects with a history of MRSA were recruited from a large, academic medical center and randomised to take either a placebo or probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001). Subjects returned to the clinic after four weeks for further testing to determine adherence to the probiotic regimen and colonisation of MRSA. 48 subjects were enrolled and randomised. Nearly 25% were transplant recipients and 30% had diabetes. The probiotic was well tolerated in the study population though minor side effects, such as nausea and bloating, were observed. A majority of the subjects randomised to HN001 had good adherence to the regimen. At the four week time point among subjects randomised to the probiotic, MRSA was detected in 67 and 50% of subjects colonised in the nares and the gastrointestinal tract, respectively. Three subjects who initially tested positive for VRE were negative after four weeks of probiotic exposure. Probiotics were well tolerated in our study population of largely immunocompromised subjects with multiple comorbidities. Adherence to the intervention was good. Probiotics should be studied further for their potential to reduce colonisation by multidrug resistant bacteria.

scholarly journals 204. Clinical Outcomes with Ceftaroline Monotherapy versus Daptomycin-Ceftaroline Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S209-S210
Author(s):  
Gabriela Andonie ◽  
Elizabeth O Hand ◽  
Kelly R Reveles ◽  
Kristi A Traugott
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is associated with poor outcomes and increased mortality. Daptomycin (DAP) and ceftaroline (CPT) in combination has been explored as a potential treatment option and showed improved outcomes compared to vancomycin/standard therapy. CPT monotherapy has been evaluated as salvage therapy for MRSA bacteremia but, to our knowledge, not as a comparator to DAP-CPT combination therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of DAP and CPT combination therapy to CPT monotherapy in the setting of MRSA bacteremia. Methods A retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) admitted to University Health from January 2017 to December 2020 with a diagnosis of MRSA bacteremia was performed. Patients received either CPT monotherapy or DAP-CPT combination therapy for a minimum of 48 hours during their course of therapy. Results Thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Primary source of infection was pulmonary in the CPT monotherapy group (n=7/24; 29.2%) and osteomyelitis in the DAP-CPT combination group (n= 4/8; 50.0%). Median duration of bacteremia was 8 days and 9 days in the CPT monotherapy and DAP-CPT combination group, respectively. Microbiological cure was achieved in 95.8% (n=23/24) of patients in the CPT monotherapy and 100% (n=8/8) of patients in the DAP-CPT combination group. Bacteremia relapse (30 day, p=0.62; 60 day, p=0.63), readmission rates (30 day, p=0.62; 60 day, p=0.63), and mortality rates (30 day, p=0.70; 90 day, p=0.85) were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in safety parameters, including incidence of acute kidney injury (p=1.00) and creatine kinase elevations (p=1.00). Bone marrow suppression after at least 72 hours of therapy, including anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia, was also not statistically significant between groups. Conclusion This study was unable to find a statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between patients receiving CPT monotherapy or DAP-CPT combination therapy. A large prospective, randomized controlled trial to assess CPT monotherapy and DAP-CPT combination therapy for the treatment of persistent MRSA bacteremia is warranted. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document