scholarly journals 2738. Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy Among Mothers of Infants with Acute Respiratory Illness, United States, 2016–2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S963-S964
Author(s):  
Constance E Ogokeh ◽  
Manish Patel ◽  
Joana Y Lively ◽  
Mary A Staat ◽  
Geoffrey A Weinberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Influenza vaccination has been shown to reduce influenza risk in pregnant women and their infants who are not yet age-eligible for vaccine. Ascertainment of vaccination history is important for vaccine safety and effectiveness evaluations. Our goals were to (a) determine coverage, location, and timing of maternal influenza vaccination and (b) compare a subset of self-reported influenza vaccinations with documented vaccine records. Methods We enrolled children < 18 years. with acute respiratory illness in 7 pediatric hospitals and emergency departments in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network from December 1, 2016 to October 31, 2018. We interviewed all mothers of enrolled infants < 1 year, and obtained mother’s influenza vaccine information while pregnant. As an option, sites obtained maternal influenza vaccine records from reported sources (e.g., registries, provider records, pharmacies). Results Among 5,458 mothers, 2,944 (54%) self-reported receiving influenza vaccine during pregnancy (57% in 2016–2017; 51% in 2017–2018), varying from 49% to 74% by site. Among self-reported vaccinees, 17%, 36%, and 47% received vaccine during their first, second, and third trimester, respectively. Most women (76%) were vaccinated at their OB/GYN or midwife office, 7% at their primary care provider, 7% at their workplace, and 5% at a retail pharmacy. Among 1,338 infants < 6 months. during early influenza season (i.e., born from June to August) and thus ineligible for vaccination, only 46% of mothers reported receiving vaccine during pregnancy (42% reported not receiving it, 12% were unsure). Of 2,242 women for whom vaccine verification was attempted, 1,491 (67%) self-reported receiving influenza vaccine during pregnancy; of those, documentation of vaccine receipt was found for 901 (60%). Conclusion Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women was suboptimal, potentially increasing the risk of influenza in unvaccinated pregnant women. Infants born to unvaccinated women, particularly those born from June to August, may also be at higher risk since they are not age-eligible to receive vaccine before influenza season. The optimal approach to ascertainment of maternal vaccination history with accuracy and completeness merits further investigation. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung Soo Kang ◽  
San Ha Lee ◽  
Woo Jeng Kim ◽  
Jeong Ha Wie ◽  
In Yang Park ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundOur objective was to investigate: (1) the proportion of influenza vaccination, attitudes, and barriers among pregnant women, (2) the proportion of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) doctors who routinely recommend influenza vaccination in pregnant women, and (3) the influencing factors in Korea, during the flu season of 2019-2020, following the introduction of free influenza vaccination program for pregnant women.MethodsTwo separate anonymized questionnaires were developed for pregnant or postpartum women and physicians, and distributed to public or private healthcare centers and clinics, in South Korea. The proportions of women who received influenza vaccination during pregnancy and OBGYN doctors who routinely recommend influenza vaccine for pregnant women were analyzed. Independent influencing factors of influenza vaccination and OBGYN doctors’ routine recommendation for pregnant women were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis, respectively.Result The self-reported proportion of influenza vaccination during pregnancy among 522 women was 63.2%. Independent factors influencing maternal influenza vaccination were ‘(ever) received information about influenza vaccination during pregnancy’, ‘information obtained from OBGYN doctors’, and ‘2nd/3rd trimester or postpartum period’ (OR 8.988, 95% CI 4.21–19.188, p < 0.001, OR 2.611, 95% CI 1.705-3.998, p < 0.001 and OR 3.082, 95% CI 1.508–6.297, p < 0.001, respectively).In 372 OBGYN doctors, the proportion of doctors with the routine recommendation of influenza vaccine for pregnant women was 76.9%. Independent factors affecting the routine recommendation were: 1) affiliation with private hospital or clinic (OR 4.508, 95% CI 2.225–9.133, p<0.001); 2) awareness of guidelines (OR 3.153, 95% CI 1.118–8.894, p=0.03); (3) awareness of 2019 National free influenza vaccination program for pregnant women (OR 4.955, 95%CI 2.377–10.329, p<0.001). For a future recommendation of influenza vaccine for pregnant women, the guidelines proposed by the government or public health care [108 (46%)] and academic committees [59 (25%)] were most commonly chosen by OBGYN doctors.Conclusion This study demonstrated that providing information about maternal influenza vaccination and the recommendation by OBGYN doctors are crucial for increasing the vaccination coverage in pregnant women.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titilope Oduyebo ◽  
Katie Kortsmit ◽  
Regina Simeone ◽  
Katherine Kahn ◽  
Hilda Razzaghi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Influenza and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines is recommended for pregnant women to protect themselves and their infants from adverse health outcomes. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of maternal influenza and Tdap vaccination and determine factors associated with receipt of these vaccines. Methods We analyzed 2019 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, from 43 jurisdictions. We estimated the overall prevalence of women reporting receipt of a healthcare provider offer or recommendation for influenza vaccine (n=44,528), and influenza vaccine during the 12 months before delivery (n=44,213). We also estimated Tdap vaccine receipt during pregnancy from the 21 jurisdictions (n=22,972). Maternal influenza and Tdap vaccination were examined by selected maternal characteristics and by jurisdiction. Results Overall, 86.4% of women reported being offered or recommended an influenza vaccination, and 60.8% of women reported receiving an influenza vaccination in the 12 months prior to their delivery, ranging from 36.0% in Puerto Rico to 82.1% in Rhode Island. Tdap receipt during pregnancy was 73.7%, ranging from 52.2% in Mississippi to 85.1% in Vermont. Prevalence of influenza vaccination was lower among women aged 18–24 years (52.2%), who are non-Hispanic black (44.5%), with a high school diploma or less education (51.3%), with no prenatal insurance (43.2%), having no (42.0%) prenatal care, with ≥3 previous live births (49.3%) and not offered or recommended the influenza vaccine by a healthcare provider (20.0%). Tdap vaccination also varied by all characteristics examined and was lower among similar groups of women observed to have lower influenza vaccination uptake. Conclusion In 2019, influenza and Tdap vaccination were suboptimal among women with a recent live birth. It is important that U.S. jurisdictions provide equitable access to these vaccines during pregnancy. These results may also inform efforts for vaccination for other infectious diseases among pregnant women.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S918-S919
Author(s):  
Kristina Betz ◽  
Matthew Fenchel ◽  
Mark C Steinhoff ◽  
Elizabeth P Schlaudecker

Abstract Background Maternal influenza vaccination has been demonstrated to reduce influenza infections in infants. Influenza infections generally peak during the winter season, and several studies support the association between low levels of vitamin D during winter months and an increase in respiratory infections, including influenza. We examined the effects of vitamin D and maternal influenza vaccination status on laboratory confirmed influenza infections in infants less than 6 months of age. Methods Pregnant Bangladeshi mothers were randomized to receive influenza vaccine or pneumococcal vaccine as part of the Mother’s Gift study. Mothers reported breastfeeding frequency, along with episodes of infant respiratory illness with fever, every week for the first 6 months of life. If a respiratory illness with fever was reported, nasal swabs were obtained from the infant and tested with a commercial rapid influenza test. Infants with confirmed influenza disease were matched with four controls by birth month and sex, for a total of 84 controls. We measured 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels from cord blood in all cases and controls. A conditional logistic regression was performed to test the effect of vitamin D on the odds of laboratory confirmed influenza while controlling for birth weight, gestational age, crowding, number of siblings, and socioeconomic status score. Results A total of 21 infants had laboratory confirmed influenza disease. There were no significant differences in birth weight, crowding, family size, gestational age, socioeconomic status score, infant gender, and smokers in the home between cases and controls (Table 1). Frequency of maternal influenza vaccine was lower in cases when compared with controls (23.81% vs. 58.33%). Serum vitamin D was lower in cases than in controls (8.73 ± 3.34 vs. 10.67 ± 4.08, Table 2). Conclusion Both vitamin D levels and maternal vaccination status have medically relevant, and statistically significant, independent effects on the odds of infants contracting influenza. Although the vitamin D levels in the infants at birth were low, there was a significant association of lower levels at birth with an increased risk of influenza virus infection. Further study with a larger sample-size is needed to explore these effects. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Author(s):  
Constance E Ogokeh ◽  
Angela P Campbell ◽  
Leora R Feldstein ◽  
Geoffrey A Weinberg ◽  
Mary A Staat ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Parent-reported influenza vaccination history may be valuable clinically and in influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies. Few studies have assessed the validity of parental report among hospitalized children. Methods Parents of 2597 hospitalized children 6 months–17 years old were interviewed from November 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, regarding their child’s sociodemographic and influenza vaccination history. Parent-reported 2015–2016 influenza vaccination history was compared with documented vaccination records (considered the gold standard for analysis) obtained from medical records, immunization information systems, and providers. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine potential factors associated with discordance between the 2 sources of vaccination history. Using a test-negative design, we estimated VE using vaccination history obtained through parental report and documented records. Results According to parental report, 1718 (66%) children received the 2015–2016 influenza vaccine, and of those, 1432 (83%) had documentation of vaccine receipt. Percent agreement was 87%, with a sensitivity of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95%–97%) and a specificity of 74% (95% CI, 72%–77%). In the multivariable logistic regression, study site and child’s age 5–8 years were significant predictors of discordance. Adjusted VE among children who received ≥1 dose of the 2015–2016 influenza vaccine per parental report was 61% (95% CI, 43%–74%), whereas VE using documented records was 55% (95% CI, 33%–69%). Conclusions Parental report of influenza vaccination was sensitive but not as specific compared with documented records. However, VE against influenza-associated hospitalizations using either source of vaccination history did not differ substantially. Parental report is valuable for timely influenza VE studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S35-S35
Author(s):  
Joanna Kimball ◽  
Yuwei Zhu ◽  
Dayna Wyatt ◽  
Helen Talbot

Abstract Background Despite influenza vaccination, some patients develop illness and require hospitalization. Many factors contribute to vaccine failure, including mismatch of the vaccine and circulating strains, waning immunity, timing of influenza season, age and patient comorbidities such as immune function. This study compared vaccinated, hospitalized patients with and without influenza. Methods This study used 2015–2019 Tennessee data from the US Hospitalized Adult Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network database. Enrolled patients were ≥ 18 years vaccinated for the current influenza season and admitted with an acute respiratory illness. Patient or surrogate interviews and medical chart abstractions were performed, and influenza vaccinations were confirmed by vaccine providers. Influenza PCR testing was performed in a research lab. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA and R using Pearson’s chi-squared, Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and multivariate logistic regression. Results 1236 patients met study criteria, and 235 (19%) tested positive for influenza. Demographics, vaccines and comorbidities were similar between the two groups (Table 1) except for morbid obesity, which was more common in influenza negative patients (13% vs 8%, p = 0.04), and immunosuppression, which was more common in the influenza positive (63% vs 54%, p = 0.01). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated older patients (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03–2.10) and immunosuppressed patients (OR 1.56, 1.15–2.12) were at increased risk for influenza (Table 2 and Figure 1). Immunosuppression also increased the risk for influenza A/H3N2 (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.25–2.75). A sensitivity analysis was performed on patients who self-reported influenza vaccination for the current season without vaccine verification and demonstrated increased risk of influenza in older adults (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.16–2.39). Table 1: Demographics of influenza positive versus influenza negative patients in influenza vaccinated, hospitalized patients. Table 2: Logistic regression analyses of vaccinated, hospitalized influenza positive patients; vaccinated, hospitalized patients with influenza A subtypes and self-reported vaccinated, hospitalized influenza positive patients. Figure 1: Predicted Probability of Hospitalization with Influenza, Influenza A/H1N1 and Influenza A/H3N2 in Vaccinated Patients by Age. Conclusion Our study demonstrated an increased risk of influenza vaccine failure in older patients and immunosuppressed patients. These groups are also at increased risk for influenza complications. To improve protection of these patients against future influenza illnesses, more effective vaccines are needed, and more research on ring vaccination should be pursued. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
pp. 003335492110267
Author(s):  
Kai Hong ◽  
Megan C. Lindley ◽  
Fangjun Zhou

Objective Pregnant women are at increased risk of serious complications from influenza and are recommended to receive an influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to assess trends, timing patterns, and associated factors of influenza vaccination among pregnant women. Methods We used 2010-2018 MarketScan data on 1 286 749 pregnant women aged 15-49 who were privately insured to examine trends and timing patterns of influenza vaccination coverage. We examined descriptive statistics and identified factors associated with vaccination uptake by using multivariate log-binomial and Cox proportional hazard models. Results In-plan influenza vaccination coverage before delivery increased from 22.0% during the 2010-2011 influenza season to 33.2% during the 2017-2018 influenza season. About two-thirds of vaccinated women received the vaccine in September or October during each influenza season. For women who delivered in September through May, influenza vaccination coverage increased rapidly at the beginning of influenza season and flattened after October. For women who delivered in June through August, influenza vaccination coverage increased gradually until February and flattened thereafter. Most vaccinated women who delivered before January received the vaccine in the third trimester. Increased likelihood of being vaccinated was associated with age 31-40, living in a metropolitan statistical area, living outside the South, enrollment in a consumer-driven or high-deductible health plan, being spouses or dependents of policy holders, and delivery in November through January. Conclusions Despite increases during the past several years, vaccination uptake is still suboptimal, particularly after October. Health care provider education on timing of vaccination and recommendations throughout influenza seasons are needed to improve influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women.


Author(s):  
Mark W Tenforde ◽  
H Keipp Talbot ◽  
Christopher H Trabue ◽  
Manjusha Gaglani ◽  
Tresa M McNeal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Influenza causes significant morbidity and mortality and stresses hospital resources during periods of increased circulation. We evaluated the effectiveness of the 2019-2020 influenza vaccine against influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. Methods We included adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness at 14 hospitals and tested for influenza viruses by reserve transcription polymerase chain reaction. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated by comparing the odds of current-season influenza vaccination in test-positive influenza cases versus test-negative controls, adjusting for confounders. VE was stratified by age and major circulating influenza types along with A(H1N1)pdm09 genetic subgroups. Results 3116 participants were included, including 18% (553) influenza-positive cases. Median age was 63 years. Sixty-seven percent (2079) received vaccination. Overall adjusted VE against influenza viruses was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27-52). VE against A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses was 40% (95% CI: 24-53) and 33% against B viruses (95% CI: 0-56). Of the two major A(H1N1)pdm09 subgroups (representing 90% of sequenced H1N1 viruses), VE against one group (5A+187A,189E) was 59% (95% CI: 34-75) whereas no significant VE was observed against the other group (5A+156K) [-1%, 95% CI: -61-37]. Conclusions In a primarily older population, influenza vaccination was associated with a 41% reduction in risk of hospitalized influenza illness.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung Soo Kang ◽  
San Ha Lee ◽  
Woo Jeng Kim ◽  
Jeong Ha Wie ◽  
In Yang Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although the World Health Organization and health authorities in most countries recommend that pregnant women receive inactivated influenza virus vaccines, coverage remains low. This study aimed to investigate (1) the proportion of pregnant women who received an influenza vaccination and influencing factors and (2) the proportion of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) doctors who routinely recommend influenza vaccination to pregnant women and influencing factors. Methods Two separate, anonymized questionnaires were developed for physicians and pregnant and postpartum women and were distributed to multicenters and clinics in South Korea. The proportions of women who received influenza vaccination during pregnancy and OBGYN doctors who routinely recommend the influenza vaccine to pregnant women were analyzed. Independent influencing factors for both maternal influenza vaccination and OBGYN doctors’ routine recommendations to pregnant women were analyzed using log-binomial regression analysis. Results The proportion of self-reported influenza vaccination during pregnancy among 522 women was 63.2%. Pregnancy-related independent factors influencing maternal influenza vaccination were “(ever) received information about influenza vaccination during pregnancy” (OR 8.9, 95% CI 4.17–19.01), “received vaccine information about from OBGYN doctors” (OR 11.44, 95% CI 5.46–24.00), “information obtained from other sources” (OR 4.38, 95% CI 2.01–9.55), and “second/third trimester” (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.21–4.82).. Among 372 OBGYN doctors, 76.9% routinely recommended vaccination for pregnant women. Independent factors effecting routine recommendation were “working at a private clinic or hospital” (OR 5.33, 95% CI 2.44–11.65), “awareness of KCDC guidelines” (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.11–8.73), and “awareness of the 2019 national free influenza vaccination program for pregnant women” (OR 4.88, 95% CI 2.34–10.17). OBGYN doctors most commonly chose ‘guidelines proposed by the government or public health (108, 46%) and academic committees (59, 25%), as a factor which expect to affect the future recommendation Conclusion This study showed that providing information about maternal influenza vaccination, especially by OBGYN doctors, is crucial for increasing vaccination coverage in pregnant women. Closer cooperation between the government and OBGYN academic societies to educate OBGYN doctors might enhance routine recommendations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 277-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Kujawski ◽  
Claire M. Midgley ◽  
Brian Rha ◽  
Joana Y. Lively ◽  
W. Allan Nix ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document