Contemporary Dimensions of Criminal Disenfranchisement

Author(s):  
Milena Tripkovic

This chapter examines European disenfranchisement policies, aiming to uncover their characteristics and use them as models for the normative discussion. It considers the legislation in 43 European countries along four dimensions: the prevalence of restrictions; dominant notions of “disenfranchise-able” offender; extent of restrictions; and timing, length, and manner of imposition of restrictions. The analysis uncovers a great deal of diversity across Europe: while the rights of many criminal offenders remain intact, most countries nevertheless believe that some instances of criminal offending warrant restrictions. The chapter finds that three-quarters of European countries impose some restrictions, one-third disenfranchise all prisoners, one-half restrict both active and passive electoral rights, one-third employ post-penal disenfranchisement, while one-quarter permit a permanent ban. Comparing these data to the US states—which are often considered incomparably strict—the chapter suggests that the difference is only in the degree of restrictions and not in the kind of existing policies.

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Fang ◽  
Cara McDaniel

AbstractUsing data from the Multinational Time Use Study, this paper documents the trend and level of time allocation, with a focus on home hours, for the US and European countries. Three patterns emerge. First, home hours per person have declined in both the US and European countries over the past 50 years. Second, female time allocation contributes more to the difference in time allocation per person between the US and European countries than does male time allocation. Third, the time allocation between the US and European countries is more similar for prime-age individuals than for young and old individuals.


1990 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. James

SummaryDuring the first half of this century, the seasonal pattern of births in European countries showed a major peak in the spring and a minor peak in the autumn. In contrast, the pattern in the US was of a minor peak in spring and a major peak in autumn. Over the last 20 years, the pattern in England and Wales has changed to resemble the US pattern, and the same seems to be true of several other European countries. A hypothesis is offered to account for the difference between the European and the US patterns and for the change from one to the other in some countries.The magnitude of seasonality correlates positively with latitude: it is suggested that this is partially consequent on variation in luminosity.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Präg ◽  
SV Subramanian

The US show a distinct health disadvantage when compared to other high-income nations. A potential lever to reduce this disadvantage is to improve the health situation of lower socioeconomic groups. Our objective is to explore how the considerable within-US variation in health inequalities compares to the health inequalities across other Western countries. Representative survey data from 45 European countries and the US federal states were obtained from the fourth wave of the European Values Study (EVS, 2008) and the 2008 wave of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Using binary logistic regression, we analyze different forms of educational inequalities in self-rated health (SRH), adjusted for age and sex. The extent of educational inequalities in SRH varies considerably over European countries and US states; with US states in general showing greater inequality, however differences between US states and European countries are less clear than commonly assumed. The US have considerable differences in educational inequalities in SRH across geographic locations. To understand the reasons for the US health disadvantage, comparative research has to take into account the vast variation in health inequalities within the US.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Präg ◽  
SV Subramanian

The US shows a distinct health disadvantage when compared to other high-income nations. A potential lever to reduce this disadvantage is to improve the health situation of lower socioeconomic groups. Our objective is to explore how the considerable within-US variation in health inequalities compares to the health inequalities across other Western countries. Methods: Representative survey data from 44 European countries and the US federal states were obtained from the fourth wave of the European Values Study (EVS) and the 2008 wave of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Using binary logistic regression, we analyze different forms of educational inequalities in self-rated health (SRH), adjusted for age and sex. Results: The extent of educational inequalities in SRH varies considerably over European countries and US states; with US states in general showing greater inequality, however, differences between US states and European countries are less clear than commonly assumed. Conclusions: The US has considerable differences in educational inequalities in SRH across geographic locations. To understand the reasons for the US health disadvantage, comparative research has to take into account the vast variation in health inequalities within the US.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nubia Muñoz

It is too early to know which will be the final death toll from the Covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2 virus epidemy in Latin America since the epidemy is still active and we will not know when it will end. The curve for new infections and deaths has not reached yet a peak (Figure 1). In addition, we know little about the epidemiology of this new virus. The daily litany of the number of people infected with the number of admissions to hospitals and intensive care units and the number of deaths guides health authorities to plan health services and politicians to gauge the degree of confinement necessary to control the transmission of the virus, but it says little about the magnitude of the problem if we do not relate it to the population at risk. At the end of the pandemic, we will be able to estimate age-standardized death rates for the different countries, but until then the crude death rates will provide a first glance or snapshot of the death toll and impact of the pandemic from March to May 2020. These rates are well below those estimated in other countries in Europe and North America: Belgium (82.6), Spain (58.0), the United Kingdom (57.5), Italy (55.0), France (42.9), Sweden (41.4), and the US (30.7). (Johns Hopkins CSSE, May 30, 2020). However, in the European countries and the US the number of deaths has reached a peak, while this is not the case in Latin American countries. (Figure 1). It should be taken into account that the above rates are crude and therefore, some of the differences could be due to the fact that European countries have a larger proportion of the population over 70 years of age in whom higher mortality rates have been reported.


2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 848-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Clemente ◽  
Luis Lanaspa ◽  
Antonio Montañés
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anca Munteanu ◽  
Angela Filip ◽  
Andreea Pece

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (05) ◽  
pp. 1385-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
KITAE SOHN ◽  
ILLOONG KWON

Trust was found to promote entrepreneurship in the US. We investigated whether this was true in a developing country, Indonesia. We failed to replicate this; this failure was true whether trust was estimated at the individual or community level or whether ordinary least squares (OLS) or two stage least squares (2SLS) was employed. We reconciled the difference between our results and those for the US by arguing that the weak enforcement of property rights in developing countries and the consequent hold-up problem make it more efficient for entrepreneurs to produce generic goods than relationship-specific goods—producing generic goods does not depend on trust.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document