scholarly journals Setting Priorities in the Pursuit of Universal Health Coverage

Author(s):  
Trygve Ottersen ◽  
Ole F. Norheim

Priority-setting is fundamental to the fair and efficient pursuit of universal health coverage (UHC). This chapter addresses the key choices in selecting services for UHC and the alternative criteria, tools, and processes to guide these choices. The authors first describe the choices decision-makers have to make on the path to UHC and the recommendations by the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage for how these choices can be made. Using Thailand as a case study, the authors examine how the Thai government has set priorities in its pursuit of UHC. Against this background, the authors discuss alternative criteria, tools, and processes for guiding service selection and the design of benefit packages for UHC. When doing this, the authors consider past experiences in Thailand and other countries and examine how recent developments and the insights from the preceding chapters in this volume can provide directions for the future.

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amare Worku Tadesse ◽  
Kassu Ketema Gurmu ◽  
Selamawit Tesfaye Kebede ◽  
Mahlet Kifle Habtemariam

Abstract Background Evidence exists about synergies among universal health coverage, health security and health promotion. Uniting these three global agendas has brought success to the country’s health sector. This study aimed to document the efforts Ethiopia has made to apply nationally synergistic approaches uniting these three global health agendas. Our study is part of the Lancet Commission on synergies between these global agendas. Methods We employed a case study design to describe the synergistic process in the Ethiopian health system based on a review of national strategies and policy documents, and key informant interviews with current and former policymakers, and academics. We analyzed the “hardware” (using the World Health Organization’s building blocks) and the “software” (ideas, interests, and power relations) of the Ethiopian health system according to the aforementioned three global agendas. Results Fragmentation of health system primarily manifested as inequities in access to health services, low health workforce and limited capacity to implementation guidelines. Donor driven vertical programs, multiple modalities of health financing, and inadequate multisectoral collaborations were also found to be key features of fragmentation. Several approaches were found to be instrumental in fostering synergies within the global health agenda. These included strong political and technical leadership within the government, transparent coordination, and engagement of stakeholders in the process of priority setting and annual resource mapping. Furthermore, harmonization and alignment of the national strategic plan with international commitments, joint financial arrangements with stakeholders and standing partnership platforms facilitated efforts for synergy. Conclusions Ethiopia has implemented multiple approaches to overcome fragmentation. Such synergistic efforts of the primary global health agendas have made significant contributions to the improvement of the country’s health indicators and may promote sustained functionality of the health system.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 251-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Marchildon

AbstractAt present, the professional skills of the historian are rarely relied upon when health policies are being formulated. There are numerous reasons for this, one of which is the natural desire of decision-makers to break with the past when enacting big bang policy change. This article identifies the strengths professional historians bring to bear on policy development using the establishment and subsequent reform of universal health coverage as an example. Historians provide pertinent and historically informed context; isolate the forces that have historically allowed for major reform; and separate the truly novel reforms from those attempted or implemented in the past. In addition, the historian’s use of primary sources allows potentially new and highly salient facts to guide the framing of the policy problem and its solution. This paper argues that historians are critical for constructing a viable narrative of the establishment and evolution of universal health coverage policies. The lack of this narrative makes it difficult to achieve an accurate assessment of systemic gaps in coverage and access, and the design or redesign of universal health coverage that can successfully close these gaps.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-120
Author(s):  
Ema Nur Fitriana ◽  
Ari Natalia Probandari ◽  
Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari ◽  
Tonang Dwi Ardyanto ◽  
Rizky Amalia Puspitaningrum

The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 390 (10095) ◽  
pp. 712-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedict Rumbold ◽  
Rachel Baker ◽  
Octavio Ferraz ◽  
Sarah Hawkes ◽  
Carleigh Krubiner ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soter Ameh ◽  
Bolarinwa Oladimeji Akeem ◽  
Caleb Ochimana ◽  
Abayomi Olabayo Oluwasanu ◽  
Shukri F Mohamed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Universal health coverage is one of the Sustainable Development Goal targets known to improve population health and reduce financial burden. There is little qualitative data on access to and quality of primary healthcare in West and East Africa. We elicited in-depth viewpoints of healthcare users and providers, and other stakeholders regarding access to and quality of healthcare.Methods: A qualitative case study was conducted in four communities in Nigeria, and one community each in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania in 2018. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 155 participants for 24 focus group discussions, 24 in-depth interviews, and 12 key informant interviews. The conceptual framework in this study combined elements of the Health Belief Model, Health Care Utilisation Model, four ‘As’ of access to care, and pathway model to better understand health-seeking behaviours of the study participants. The data were analysed with MAXQDA 2018 qualitative software to identify three themes identified a priori and one emerging theme.Results: Access to primary healthcare in the seven communities was limited. Quality of care was perceived to be unacceptable in public facilities whereas cost of care was unaffordable in private facilities. Patients and health providers and stakeholders highlighted shortage of equipment, frequent drug stock-outs and long waiting times as major issues, but had varying opinions on satisfaction with care. Use of herbal medicines and other traditional treatments delayed or deterred seeking modern healthcare in Nigerian sites. Conclusions: There was a substantial gap in primary healthcare coverage and quality in the selected communities in rural and urban East and West Africa. Alternative models of healthcare delivery should be used to fill this gap and facilitate achieving universal health coverage.


2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 462-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalipso Chalkidou ◽  
Amanda Glassman ◽  
Robert Marten ◽  
Jeanette Vega ◽  
Yot Teerawattananon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document