Introduction

Author(s):  
Brian Walters

The Introduction briefly sets out the ubiquity and importance of bodily imagery in late republican political discourse and argues for its conventional nature. A case is made for situating the uses of Cicero, our best surviving source, alongside those of his forebears and peers. An emphasis on persuasion is stressed and theoretical approaches to imagery, both ancient and modern, are concisely discussed. Likewise, an overview of subsequent chapters is provided, with justification for the work’s arrangement and a quick review of related scholarship. Arguments are addressed primarily to classicists interested in the literature and politics of republican Rome, but the continued centrality of bodily imagery (especially in areas such as contemporary biopolitics and the like) may find a wider audience.

Author(s):  
Matthew Cobb

‘Smell in culture’ explores the social, political, and historical significance of smell, including smells in literature and politics. Since prehistory, humans have manufactured scents and often associated them with the supernatural. Originally used in worship and against infection or evil spirits, perfume is now commonly used. Smell has been used as a weapon in political discourse to enforce divisions between ethnic groups or social classes. Different cultures perceive smells in different ways. Much of how we feel about smells depends on our own cultural conditioning. Can smells be used in urban planning? How might the planet Mars smell?


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-118
Author(s):  
Josef Schmied

This contribution looks at modern discourse from two perspectives. It tries to show that the term ‘discourse’ has been expanded over the last few decades to include more phenomena and more disciplines that use it as a basis for their analyses. But it also tries to show that discourse in the sense of effective interaction has met its limits. The fundamental question is: When is discourse real discourse, i.e. more than a series of unrelated utterances and when is it coherent interactive communication? This paper does not intend to provide a new overall theoretical-methodological model, it uses examples from political discourse to demonstrate that popular discourse is often unfortunately less interactive than seems necessary, examples from academic discourse to illustrate that community conventions are being standardised more and more, and from humanoid-human discourse to argue that it is still difficult to construct agents that are recognised as discourse partners by human beings. Theoretical approaches to discuss these limits of discourse include coherence andintentionality. They can be applied to show where lack of cohesion in discourse indicates lack of cohesion in society.


Author(s):  
Claudia Moatti ◽  
Janet Lloyd ◽  
Malcolm Schofield

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document