Ground Realities

2021 ◽  
pp. 74-96
Author(s):  
Debasish Roy Chowdhury ◽  
John Keane

This chapter investigates the widespread and unchecked environmental abuse in India. Nearly a third of India’s land area has been degraded through deforestation, over-cultivation, soil erosion, and depletion of wetlands. Reckless industrialization, mining, and urbanization, as well as deeply flawed agricultural policies and skewed land distribution have reaped a bitter harvest of dislocation and deprivation. This dispossession adds to India’s historically unequal land holdings. Along with the poisoning of life-giving water and air, land alienation and destruction create a hierarchy of citizens suffering unequal access to the fundamental ingredients of social life. The destruction of the elements by the entanglement of the state and big business, and the priority given to private profit over public good, have contributed to the systematic evisceration of democracy-defining social equality. The chapter raises the important question of whether people can be said to have the same right to vote and enjoy equal social dignity if they don’t have the same right to breathe or have equal access to water.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Daniel Alfredo Revollo-Fernández ◽  
Lilia Rodríguez-Tapia

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Longden ◽  
Charles Bélanger
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Shipley ◽  
Fernando Leal ◽  

2003 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helge E. Lundekvam ◽  
Eirik Romstad ◽  
Lillian Øygarden

2021 ◽  
pp. 143-160
Author(s):  
Fulvia Staiano

The achievement of ‘universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all’ is among the goals set by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This objective is related to the recognition of water as a human right, and to the qualification of water as a vital resource to preserve. This chapter reflects on the possibility of qualifying water as a global public good (albeit an impure one). To this end, and without any pretence of exhaustiveness, the chapter examines significant examples from international and domestic jurisprudence that show an emerging judicial awareness of the broader collective impact of questions related to the preservation of and access to water. In this context, specific attention is paid to the role played by environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in fostering such awareness, thanks to the recognition of procedural rights before international and domestic courts.


Antichthon ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
R. Develin

Agrarian legislation in the immediate aftermath of the Gracchi is the subject of continuing debate. Appian (BC i 27) records three laws, the last two of which are specified as being tribunician: the first removed the inalienability of land holdings; the second was perhaps the measure of Sp. Thorius, mentioned also by Cicero, which stopped land distribution, confirmed possession rights on the land and imposed a rent, the proceeds of which were to help the poor; the third abolished this rent. Appian provides chronological clues of a sort: the first measure came ‘not long after’ the death of C. Gracchus, the third ‘not long after’ Thorius’ law, and the whole business was perhaps finished within fifteen years άπò τῆς Γράκχου νομοϑεσίας. I say ‘perhaps’ because it remains arguable whether the point of reference for these fifteen years is Tiberius or Gaius Gracchus. I intend to argue elsewhere that Tiberius is meant, but as such an argument cannot be regarded as conclusive, there is still a point in this respect in examining the lex agraria which is the inscription CIL i2 585. The law is naturally important in its own right. It is dated internally to 111 B.C. and attempts have been made to equate it with either the second or third of Appian’s laws. If it was the second, this allows a retention of the fifteen years and the placing of the third law in 109 or 108. But if Appian has accurately reported the second law, it imposed a rent, while the first part of the inscriptional law talks of removing rent.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Rosenman

The global financial and anti-poverty industries are embracing an investment philosophy called social finance, which claims that private profit-making can create positive benefits for society. Attempting to resolve the problems of capitalism from within the system, social finance reframes finance as a force for engendering, rather than disrupting, the public good. This article argues that social finance raises theoretical concerns for geographical research on finance, poverty, and neoliberalizing capitalism. I outline a typology of social finance’s forms and propose a geographical research agenda, arguing that social finance practitioners’ simplistic framings of geography belie many other geographies that constitute what is both an emerging financial marketplace and a logic of poverty regulation.


Author(s):  
Ifeanyi Nnadi Henry, Esq. ◽  
◽  
◽  

Pro bono legal services are professional services rendered by lawyers or other legal experts1 to indigent and disadvantaged litigants in the society for the public good id est, in order to promote a just and equitable society. It is a subset of the principle of equal access to justice and is based on the assumption that the poor requires but cannot access justice because they lack the financial means. Using the doctrinal approach, this discourse assesses the existing legal and administrative framework for pro bono engagement by lawyers in Nigeria with a view to identifying areas of improvement. Having identified possible areas of improvement, recommendations are proffered on legislative and administrative measures towards improving the level of engagement in pro bono legal services by legal practitioners in the country.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document