Making Decisions as A Student: Decision-Making Opportunities

Author(s):  
Deborah Roberts

This chapter introduces the underlying principles of decision making. You will be encouraged to consider decision making as a student in university together with decision making as a student nurse (see Chapter 1 ). In 2010, following a review of pre-registration nursing education, the professional body for nursing in the United Kingdom, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), published new Standards for Pre-Registration Nursing Education , including competencies that all students must achieve to qualify as a registered nurse. These competencies have to be met in four broad areas known as ‘domains’. 1. Professional values 2. Communication and interpersonal skills 3. Nursing practice and decision making 4. Leadership, management, and team working You will find reference to these domains throughout the book, and there will be an opportunity to learn how the competencies in each of these that relate to decision making can be linked to your clinical and university-based learning. There are a number of terms that can be found in the literature that are often used interchangeably; you may see terms such as ‘decision making’, ‘problem solving’, ‘clinical reasoning’ or ‘clinical judgement’, and others used when writers are discussing how and why nurses respond to clinical situations in a particular way (see Chapter 1 for more detail). For example, Levett-Jones et al. (2010: 515) provide a helpful definition of clinical reasoning as ‘the process by which nurses collect cues, process the information, come to an understanding of a patient problem or situation, plan and implement interventions, evaluate outcomes, and reflect on and learn from the process’. They also emphasize that a nurse’s ability to develop these clinical reasoning skills depends on what they term as ‘five rights’—that is, the nurse’s ability ‘to collect the right cues and to take the right action for the right patient at the right time and for the right reason’. In the context of ensuring that any patient receives the best possible care, these ‘five rights’ are very appropriate, and indeed if one were to fail to pick up on the right cues and to take the appropriate actions in many clinical situations, the outcome may have serious repercussions for the nurse and the patient.

Author(s):  
Roger A. Hart ◽  
Michael K. Conn

The task we have been set is to review developmental theory concerning how individuals act in real-world environments. To simplify this difficult task we have emphasized the developmental span of childhood, the area of our professional expertise. Before proceeding with the review, a few comments regarding the framework of this book and, within it, the definition of our task will enable us to illuminate some of the assumptions inherent in the structure of this volume and to explain how this has affected our conceptualization of the problem. The stated goal of this book is to look at the separate areas of human relatedness to the environment that are recognized by “most research in environmental psychology”: environmental cognition, environmental appraisal and decision making, and action in environments (see Table 1.1 in Chapter 1 of this volume). We agree that although such a separation of cognition and evaluation from action is a reflection of the dominant tendency of research, it is true of only some theories. To accept this division and to discuss primarily action would prevent us from emphasizing those theorists who have argued that human relatedness to the environment must be thought of holistically and dynamically. Consequently, although we have tried to emphasize action, this chapter actually deals simultaneously with cognition and appraisal. The question of why more integrative and holistic theories have been largely ignored is itself important. We argue that the answer lies in a fear by psychologists of such research because it cannot easily meet the traditional tenets of what constitutes good theory—building through experimental research design. A second problem in the task definition is the use of the word “space.” We should not simply be addressing “spatial decisions and actions” but environmental decisions and actions. In the field of environmental psychology the terms “space” and “environment” are commonly used synonymously. We think of space as just one characteristic of objects in the environment. Unfortunately, space is the characteristic that most environmental cognition research has addressed. This is somewhat understandable, for environmental psychology finds its distinctiveness in the study of the large-scale environment in which space (spatial relatedness) is the most distinguishing variable.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 612-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Anderson ◽  
Diane E. Spicer ◽  
G. William Henry ◽  
Cynthia Rigsby ◽  
Anthony M. Hlavacek ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground: Disagreement currently exists regarding the definition of aortic dextroposition. It is suggested that the term be used interchangeably with aortic overriding, along with suggestions that the aortic valve overrides in the normal heart. The dextroposed aorta, however, does not always override the crest of the muscular ventricular septum. It is incorrect to argue that the normal aortic valve overrides. It is the cavity of the right aortic valvar sinus, rather than the valvar orifice, that sits above the muscular septum when the septum itself is intact. Therefore, to circumvent these difficulties, those using the term “dextroposition” find it necessary to distinguish “true” as opposed to “false” categories. The problems arise because “dextroposition” is remarkably ill-suited as an alternative term for aortic valvar overriding.Methods and Results:In this review, combining developmental, morphologic, and clinical data, we show how aortic overriding is best considered on the basis of biventricular connection of the aortic root in the setting of deficient ventricular septation. When analysed in this manner, it becomes an easy matter to distinguish between one-to-one and double outlet ventriculo-arterial connections. Appreciation of these features emphasises the different spatial alignments of interventricular communications as opposed to the plane of deficient ventricular septation. The concept of overriding is applicable not only to biventricular connection of the aortic root, but also the pulmonary and common arterial roots.Conclusions:The diagnostic techniques now available to the paediatric cardiologist illustrate the features of arterial valvar overriding with exquisite accuracy, informing the discussions now required for optimal decision making.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Arstein-Kerslake ◽  
Eilionóir Flynn

AbstractArticle 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has created a revolution in legal-capacity law reform. It protects the right to exercise legal agency for people with disabilities with more clarity than any prior human rights instrument. This paper explores what constitutes an exercise of legal agency and what exactly Article 12 protects. It proposes a definition of legal agency and applies it to the lived experience of cognitive disability. It also uses a republican theory of domination to argue that people with cognitive disabilities who are experiencing domination are forced to assert legal agency in even daily decision-making because of the high level of external regulation of their lives and the ever-present threat of others substituting their decision-making. It identifies Article 12 as a tool for protecting such exertions of legal agency and curtailing relationships of domination.


2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1032-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sáskia Sampaio Cipriano de Menezes ◽  
Consuelo Garcia Corrêa ◽  
Rita de Cássia Gengo e Silva ◽  
Diná de Almeida Monteiro Lopes da Cruz

Abstract OBJECTIVE This study aimed at analyzing the current state of knowledge on clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing education. METHODS A systematic scoping review through a search strategy applied to the MEDLINE database, and an analysis of the material recovered by extracting data done by two independent reviewers. The extracted data were analyzed and synthesized in a narrative manner. RESULTS From the 1380 citations retrieved in the search, 23 were kept for review and their contents were summarized into five categories: 1) the experience of developing critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process; 2) teaching strategies related to the development of critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process; 3) measurement of variables related to the critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process; 4) relationship of variables involved in the critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process; and 5) theoretical development models of critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process for students. CONCLUSION The biggest challenge for developing knowledge on teaching clinical reasoning seems to be finding consistency between theoretical perspectives on the development of clinical reasoning and methodologies, methods, and procedures in research initiatives in this field.


2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Maruyama

Abstract In 2008 the Ainu were officially recognized as an indigenous people by the Japanese Government. The recognition arose from the 1997 court’s decision on the Nibutani Dam case which concluded, for the first time in Japanese history, that the Ainu people have the right to enjoy their own culture and that they fit the definition of indigenous people. The plaintiffs were Ainu landowners from the Nibutani Community who claimed the revocation of the expropriation decision. However, the Nibutani Dam was completed before the court’s decision, with the court acknowledging the completion as fait accompli on the grounds that the revocation of the expropriation decision would not be in the public’s interest. This article reveals the flawed legal system in the decision making process for public works as well as a brief history and some cultural background of the Ainu through those plaintiffs’ struggle for justice. Further, the illegitimacy of the Nibutani Dam project is discussed in light of publicness based on the complaint of those plaintiffs, and lastly, publicness of public works is explored in the context of studies on publicness in Japan.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 123-124
Author(s):  
Pollyanna Gomes ◽  
Avila Vidal ◽  
Andrea Brígida de Souza ◽  
Vania Canuto ◽  
Clarice Petramale

INTRODUCTION:The last five years represented an advanced season for the establishment and reinforcement of the Brazilian Ministry of Health's Horizon Scanning System. The recognition of Horizon Scanning (HS) as a tool for evidence- based decision making has been reflected in the requests for information directed to the Horizon Scanning's team. These requests for information about new and emerging technologies come from cabinets offices and thematic departments of the Ministry of Health. The methodology of Horizon Scanning assessments described in EuroScan's toolkit1 has been applied to guarantee that the information reach stakeholders at the right time. The National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) was accepted as a member of EuroScan (1) in 2016, and this represented another important step of Brazil's HS System.METHODS:In order to provide the specific information requested, the assessments of the technologies are done. So, databases on ongoing clinical trials, commercial pharmaceutical database, registration and licensing sites, proceedings and abstracts of scientific conferences and scientific databases are checked to collect the information. The extent and depth of the assessments depends on the stakeholders needs and time available to complete them. However, information as how the technology works, the clinical burden of disease, if there are available technologies in the Brazilian Public Health System to treat the disease, safety and effectiveness data, the regulatory status in the world as well costs, social, ethical and legal concerns are commonly given.RESULTS:The information provided using the HS methodology is used by stakeholders for several purposes as to defend the Ministry of Health in the Courts in the typical Latin American phenomena called “judicialization of health;” in assistance of the decision making of incorporation of technologies by the Brazilian Public Health and to support the definition of which medicines would be more strategic for establishment of Public-private partnerships for development of medicines, the named “Productive Development Partnerships (PDPs)”.CONCLUSIONS:The assessment of the technologies and the prediction of its potential for impact has helped the health policy making process in Brazil.


2018 ◽  
pp. 23-48
Author(s):  
Barry Hoffmaster ◽  
Cliff Hooker

A second kind of formal rationality, complementary to the maximizing expected utility in Chapter 1, is logical inference. In much of moral philosophy and in standard bioethics decision making is applied ethics. Moral theories are taken to be comprised of principles that are applied to the facts of cases to deduce conclusions about what ought to be done. The canonical depiction of bioethics, for instance, consists of the four principles of non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy, and justice. The real examples in this chapter expose the many failings of that applied ethics. Most of the cases are about when to die and how to die, but the term ‘euthanasia’ is indeterminate. The crucial notion of ‘autonomy’ also is indeterminate. Both need to be clarified and specified. But how is this to be done? Similarly, when principles and rules conflict, as they often do, how is the one that prevails to be determined? There are no higher principles or rules that can be applied to get the right answer in any of these cases. More broadly, what makes a problem a moral problem, and what does being a moral problem mean? These issues require non-formal rational deliberation, not the formal rationality of deduction.


Author(s):  
Ruth Chadwick

This is the first chapter in the part of the book exploring each of the four domains comprising the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) Standards for Pre-Registration Nursing Education (NMC 2010) in which the student nurse in the United Kingdom has to demonstrate attainment of the specific competencies to achieve registration as a nurse. In keeping with the overall aims of the book, the aim of this chapter is to help you to develop your decision-making skills in the domain of ‘professional values’. It will offer real-life case studies to illustrate key issues and how you, as a student, can learn to make effective decisions in your journey to becoming a registered nurse. Because this book is written by registered nurses, many of whom work in education, you will probably not be very surprised to learn that we think your decision to become a nurse could be one of the best decisions that you have made to date—but do you really understand what lies before you? Before you begin to be concerned about the ‘right-ness’ of your decision to become a nurse, it is important to remember that there are many individuals who are there to help you on your professional journey, including your personal tutors, mentors and other practitioners in practice, lecturers, other students, and most importantly the patients and clients for whom you will be caring and with whom you will be working. In addition, you will have friends and family who offer a different kind of support to you, as well as those organizations that can offer professional support to you as a student nurse and subsequently to you as a qualified nurse. This chapter also intends to help you to appreciate the significance of the NMC’s Guidance on Professional Conduct for Nursing and Midwifery Students (NMC 2011) as you embark on your professional and personal journey to become a registered practitioner who is able to demonstrate the required standards of conduct, performance, and ethics, as expressed in The Code: Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives (NMC 2008).


2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronny Swain

The paper describes the development of the 1998 revision of the Psychological Society of Ireland's Code of Professional Ethics. The Code incorporates the European Meta-Code of Ethics and an ethical decision-making procedure borrowed from the Canadian Psychological Association. An example using the procedure is presented. To aid decision making, a classification of different kinds of stakeholder (i.e., interested party) affected by ethical decisions is offered. The author contends (1) that psychologists should assert the right, which is an important aspect of professional autonomy, to make discretionary judgments, (2) that to be justified in doing so they need to educate themselves in sound and deliberative judgment, and (3) that the process is facilitated by a code such as the Irish one, which emphasizes ethical awareness and decision making. The need for awareness and judgment is underlined by the variability in the ethical codes of different organizations and different European states: in such a context, codes should be used as broad yardsticks, rather than precise templates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
VLADIMIR TROYAN ◽  

The relevance of the interpretation of constitutional and legal guarantees of the right to vote is mediated by isolated scientific research in this area, as well as the lack of a universal approach to legal guarantees. In this regard, the purpose of the article is to argue and disclose the author’s definitive aspect of the claimed guarantees. In the work, the author named and characterized the normative (based exclusively on legal means) with the perspective of a branch of legal and technical; regulatory and institutional (combines the formal aspect with the activities of authorized entities) and associated legal (including a set of legal and other aspects) approaches to the definition of legal guarantees. Based on the second approach, as well as combining the guarantees of the right to vote directly guarantees of the subjective right itself and guarantees of its implementation, the author offers a definition of constitutional and legal guarantees of the right to vote.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document