scholarly journals Pain Medicine Ethics Forum: Key Opinion Leaders with Industry Conflicts of Interest Should Be Able to Hold Leadership Positions in Professional Medical Associations

Pain Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. pnv041_1
Author(s):  
Mark S. Wallace
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Clinckemaille ◽  
Alexandre Scanff ◽  
Florian Naudet ◽  
Adriaan BARBAROUX

Objective To investigate the nature, extent and evolution of financial relationships between key opinion leaders (KOL) or non-KOL physicians and pharmaceutical and device companies in France. Design Retrospective and descriptive study Setting All doctors practicing in France, with a focus on 548 KOL defined as board members of all the professional medical associations having published clinical practice guidelines in 2018 or 2019. These 99 associations were identified by the cross-checking of 3 databases. Main outcome measures The number and the amount of gifts (year by year since 2014), remunerations and agreements (year by year since 2017). Results Physicians had 818m Euros (936m dollars, 741m pounds) of gifts declared from 2014 to 2019. 83% of KOL had such links of interest. The 548 identified KOL represented 0.24% of physicians in France but received 1.5% of the total amount of gifts, i.e. 12.3m euros (14m dollars or 11m pounds / 3,700K euros per capita per year). Physicians had 125m Euros (143m dollars and 114m pounds) of agreements declared from 2017 to 2019. The 548 KOL received 0.72% of the agreements and 2.5% of the value of the agreements, i.e. 3.1m Euros (3.6m dollars, 2.8m pounds) or 1 900 euros per capita per year. Physicians had 156m Euros of remunerations declared from 2017 to 2019. The 548 identified KOL received 4.4% of the total value of remunerations to physicians, i.e. 6.8m Euros or 4 100 Euros per capita per year. Almost every professional medical associations (99%) had in their board at least one KOL with a financial tie. Conclusion Financial relationships between KOL and the industry in France are extensive, KOL have much more financial ties than non-KOL practitioners. The main limit of this study arises from the quality of information provided on the French Transparency in Healthcare database. Pre-registration: osf.io/m8syh


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 717-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Zhonglei Gu ◽  
Tobey H. Ko ◽  
Jiming Liu

BMJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. k5207
Author(s):  
Adam Hartley ◽  
Mit Shah ◽  
Alexandra N Nowbar ◽  
Christopher Rajkumar ◽  
James P Howard ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 336 (7658) ◽  
pp. 1405-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni A Fava

JAMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 317 (17) ◽  
pp. 1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Nissen

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Figlin

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed fundamental disparities in the provision of health care across our nation and exacerbated the differences in health outcomes associated with race, socioeconomic and other demographic factors. A silver lining however is that pandemic precarity has inspired tremendous scientific collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and key opinion leaders. In this line, this year’s Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO21) which was kicked off virtually on June 4 through June 8, not only celebrated latest breakthroughs in cancer research, treatment and patient care, but also focused on health equity in cancer care. ASCO21’s fitting theme - Health equity “doing right by the patients for whom we care” reflected addressing complex forces and systems that have created disparities in cancer care, treatment, and research and identifying ways to ensure that all patients have access to and benefit from the latest cancer advances and high-quality cancer care.


2021 ◽  
pp. 139-162
Author(s):  
Edward Shorter

This chapter considers the physicians who advised the pharmaceutical industry in the interest of bringing an effective compound to the attention of the profession. It mentions Roland Kuhn, the Swiss asylum psychiatrist who in 1957 discovered the effectiveness of imipramine in depression and advised about marketing strategies to use to sell the drug. It also highlights the true nature of the testimonials of physicians, which is well known to the industry. The industry’s contempt for them is shown by its vernacular term for sources, which are called “stables.” The chapter focuses on the “stables” of the 1980s that later became Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs). It points out that the sardonic term KOL first appeared in industry correspondence as an insider expression for academics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document