scholarly journals Muscle metabolism and meat quality of Pectoralis from turkeys treated with postmortem electrical stimulation

1997 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 1047-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
CM Owens ◽  
AR Sams
Meat Science ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 108664
Author(s):  
Gaiming Zhao ◽  
Xueyuan Bai ◽  
Wei Tian ◽  
Ang Ru ◽  
Jiahui Li ◽  
...  

Meat Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yimin Zhang ◽  
Xiaokai Ji ◽  
Yanwei Mao ◽  
Xin Luo ◽  
Lixian Zhu ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. C. Vincent ◽  
S. D. M. Jones ◽  
L. E. Jeremiah ◽  
J. A. Newman ◽  
M. A. Price

Three groups of once-calved (OCH) heifers were slaughtered following the weaning of their calves at 3 (OCH3, n = 32), 5 (OCH5, n = 33) and 7 (OCH7, n = 31) months postcalving. A fourth group of heifers was fed a silage/grain diet and slaughtered at 15 mo of age (C, n = 32). Alternate sides of each carcass were electrically stimulated (ES) at 475 volts for 1 min (20 pulses m−1, 60 Hz) at 45 min post-stunning. All left sides were dissected into fat, lean and bone and meat quality parameters recorded. Rib eye steaks were evaluated for palatability by a trained panel and for consumer acceptability after an aging period of 6 d. All OCH groups produced heavier carcasses with a higher level of marbling than the C group after adjustment of the data to a constant proportion of carcass fatness, but the proportional yields of lean and bone tissue were similar for all heifer groups. OCH groups produced meat that was darker with a lower drip loss and higher 45 min and 6 d pH than the C group. Consumer acceptability of rib eye steaks was similar for all heifer groups, but the OCH7 (oldest) group had a higher amount of connective tissue when evaluated by a trained panel than other heifer groups. Taste panel evaluations showed that ES increased meat tenderness and overall palatability and reduced the amount of connective tissue when compared to meat from unstimulated carcasses. ES also increased the consumer acceptability of tenderness by 14.3%, flavor by 5.6%, juiciness by 5.2% and overall palatability by 6.7% over meat from unstimulated carcasses. It was concluded that once-calved heifers could produce heavier carcasses of similar composition and meat with similar eating quality to conventionally managed nonpregnant feedlot heifers. Electrical stimulation improved the consumer acceptability of meat primarily through an improvement in meat tenderness. Key words: Beef, carcass, electrical stimulation, meat quality, once-calved heifers


Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1587
Author(s):  
Archana Abhijith ◽  
Frank R. Dunshea ◽  
Robyn D. Warner ◽  
Brian J. Leury ◽  
Minh Ha ◽  
...  

The current study is a meta-analysis of the effects of electrical stimulation (ES, n = 28 papers) with different voltages combined with different ageing periods (0–3, 4–7, and 8–14 days) on the meat quality of small ruminants. A comprehensive search for published studies on meat quality of small ruminants investigating the application of low, medium, and high voltage electrical stimulation, was performed using Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Forest plots, funnel plots, and other statistical tools and tests were used in the study to analyze the results. Electrical stimulation significantly reduced ultimate pH (p < 0.001), Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) (p < 0.001), cooking loss (p < 0.05), and purge loss (p < 0.001). In addition, sarcomere length (p < 0.01), myofibrillar-fragmentation index (MFI) (p < 0.001), and color (L*, a*, b*) (p < 0.001) showed higher values in meat subjected to ES as compared with the control group. In conclusion, the meta-analysis revealed statistical proof of beneficial effects of ES on meat quality of small ruminants in terms of ultimate pH, tenderness, enhanced proteolysis, and higher colorimetric values.


2021 ◽  
pp. 131611
Author(s):  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Lijuan Han ◽  
Shengzhen Hou ◽  
Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza ◽  
Zhiyou Wang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 91 (11) ◽  
pp. 2931-2937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.Y. Zhang ◽  
G.Q. Jia ◽  
J.J. Zuo ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
J. Lei ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document