scholarly journals Development and preliminary examination of the predictive validity of the Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) for use in primary care

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nandy ◽  
S. Parsons ◽  
C. Cryer ◽  
M. Underwood ◽  
E. Rashbrook ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Barber ◽  
Aron Shlonsky ◽  
Tara Black ◽  
Deborah Goodman ◽  
Nico Trocmé

2021 ◽  
pp. 353-363
Author(s):  
Ciarán D. McInerney ◽  
Beverly C. Scott ◽  
Owen A. Johnson

PURPOSE Informatics solutions to early diagnosis of cancer in primary care are increasingly prevalent, but it is not clear whether existing and planned standards and regulations sufficiently address patients' safety nor whether these standards are fit for purpose. We use a patient safety perspective to reflect on the development of a computerized cancer risk assessment tool embedded within a UK primary care electronic health record system. METHODS We developed a computerized version of the CAncer Prevention in ExetER studies risk assessment tool, in compliance with the European Union's Medical Device Regulations. The process of building this tool afforded an opportunity to reflect on clinical concerns and whether current regulations for medical devices are fit for purpose. We identified concerns for patient safety and developed nine practical recommendations to mitigate these concerns. RESULTS We noted that medical device regulations (1) were initially created for hardware devices rather than software, (2) offer one-shot approval rather than supporting iterative innovation and learning, (3) are biased toward loss-transfer approaches that attempt to manage the fallout of harm instead of mitigating hazards becoming harmful, and (4) are biased toward known hazards, despite unknown hazards being an expected consequence of health care as a complex adaptive system. Our nine recommendations focus on embedding less-reductionist and stronger system perspectives into regulations and standards. CONCLUSION Our intention is to share our experience to support research-led collaborative development of health informatics solutions in cancer. We argue that regulations in the European Union do not sufficiently address the complexity of healthcare information systems with consequences for patient safety. Future standards and regulations should continue to follow a system-based approach to risk, safety, and accident avoidance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-354
Author(s):  
Allison Infinger ◽  
Patricia Dowbiggin ◽  
Rachel Seymour ◽  
Meghan Wally ◽  
Madhav Karunakar ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. P116-P116
Author(s):  
Deborah Barnes ◽  
Alexa Beiser ◽  
Anna Lee ◽  
Kenneth Langa ◽  
Kristine Yaffe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document