scholarly journals Effect of within-litter birth weight variation after cross-fostering on piglet pre-weaning growth and mortality

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine D Vande Pol ◽  
Raphael O Bautista ◽  
Heath Harper ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
Catherine B Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Weight Category ◽  
Average Birth Weight ◽  
Growth And Survival ◽  
Weight Variation ◽  
Teat Number ◽  
Kg Medium ◽  
Cross Fostering

Abstract Cross-fostering is commonly used in commercial swine production to equalize litter sizes and/or adjust piglet birth weights within litters. However, there is limited published information on optimum cross-fostering procedures. This study evaluated effects of within-litter birth weight variation after cross-fostering (using litters of 14 piglets) on piglet pre-weaning mortality (PWM) and weaning weight (WW). A RCBD was used (blocking factors were day of farrowing and sow parity, body condition score, and functional teat number) with an incomplete factorial arrangement of the following two treatments: 1) Birth Weight Category (BWC): Light (< 1.0 kg), Medium (1.0 to 1.5 kg), or Heavy (1.5 to 2.0 kg); 2) Litter Composition: Uniform, all piglets in the litter of the same BWC [UNIFORM LIGHT (14 Light piglets); UNIFORM MEDIUM (14 Medium piglets); UNIFORM HEAVY (14 Heavy piglets)]; Mixed, piglets in the litter of two or more BWC [L+M (7 Light and 7 Medium piglets); M+H (7 Medium and 7 Heavy piglets); L+M+H (3 Light, 6 Medium, and 5 Heavy piglets)]. Piglets were weighed at 24 h after birth and randomly allotted to Litter Composition treatment from within BWC; all piglets were cross-fostered. There were 47 blocks of 6 litters (total 282 litters and 3,948 piglets). Weaning weights were collected at 18.7 ± 0.64 d of age; all PWM was recorded. Individual piglet WW and PWM data were analyzed using PROC MIXED and PROC GLIMMIX of SAS, respectively; models included fixed effects of BWC, Litter Composition, and the interaction, and random effects of sow within block. There were Litter Composition by BWC interactions (P ≤ 0.05) for WW and PWM. Within each BWC, WW generally increased and PWM generally decreased as littermate weight decreased. For example, WW were greatest (P ≤ 0.05) for Light piglets in UNIFORM LIGHT litters, for Medium piglets in L+M litters, and for Heavy piglets in L+M+H litters. Pre-weaning mortality was lowest (P ≤ 0.05) for Medium piglets in L+M litters, and for Heavy piglets in L+M+H litters; however, Litter Composition had no effect (P > 0.05) on PWM of Light piglets. In conclusion, increasing the average birth weight of littermates after cross-fostering generally decreased WW and increased PWM for piglets of all birth weight categories. This implies that the optimum approach to cross-fostering that maximizes piglet pre-weaning growth and survival is likely to vary depending on the birth weight distribution of the population.

92 Effect of Rearing Cross-fostered Piglets in Litters of Differing Within-litter Birth Weight Variation on Pre-weaning Growth and Mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Katherine D Vande Pol ◽  
Rafael Ovidio Bautista Rivas ◽  
Heath Harper ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
Katie Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Average Weight ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Opposite Pattern ◽  
Weight Category ◽  
Commercial Practice ◽  
Weight Variation ◽  
Teat Number ◽  
Cross Fostering

Abstract Cross-fostering of piglets is a common commercial practice, however, there is limited information on optimum methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of within-litter birth weight variation after cross-fostering on piglet pre-weaning mortality (PWM) and growth. A RCBD was used with 47 blocks of 6 litters (total 282 litters/3,948 piglets); blocking factors were farrowing day, sow parity, body condition score, and functional teat number. Piglets were allotted at 24 h after birth according to Birth Weight Category (BWC) [L (< 1.0 kg), M (1.0 to 1.5 kg), or H (1.5 to 2.0 kg)] to 6 Litter Composition (LC) treatments with 14 piglets/litter: Uniform (14 L, M or H); Mixed L+M (7 L, 7 M); Mixed M+H (7 M, 7 H); Mixed L+M+H (3 L, 6 M, 5 H). Piglets were weaned at 18.7 ± 0.64 d and PWM was recorded. Piglet birth and weaning weights were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS; PWM were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS; models included BWC, LC, the interaction, and sow within block. There were LC by BWC interactions (P < 0.05) for PWM and weaning weights. For L piglets, there was no effect (P > 0.05) of LC on PWM (22.8, 26.7, and 28.4% for Uniform, Mixed L+M, and Mixed L+M+H treatments, respectively). For H piglets, PWM was lower (P < 0.05) in Mixed L+M+H compared to Uniform or Mixed M+H litters (1.7, 9.6, and 5.8%, respectively). For M piglets, PWM was lower (P < 0.05) in Mixed L+M than Uniform or Mixed M+H litters (7.1, 12.2, and 14.6%, respectively); Mixed L+M+H were intermediate (10.0%; P > 0.05). Weaning weights generally followed a similar but opposite pattern for all BWC. In conclusion, increasing the average weight of littermates generally decreased weaning weights and increased PWM within each BWC.

scholarly journals Effect of rearing cross-fostered piglets in litters of either uniform or mixed birth weights on preweaning growth and mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine D Vande Pol ◽  
Raphael O Bautista ◽  
Heath Harper ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
Catherine B Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Experimental Unit ◽  
Swine Industry ◽  
Weight Category ◽  
Growth And Survival ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Kg Medium ◽  
Cross Fostering

Abstract Cross-fostering is a practice commonly used in the swine industry to equalize litter sizes, however, there is limited understanding of the optimum cross-fostering methods that will maximize piglet preweaning growth and survival. This study evaluated the effects of within-litter variation in birth weight after cross-fostering on piglet preweaning mortality (PWM) and weaning weight (WW) using litters of 15 piglets. A hierarchical incomplete block design was used (blocking factors: day of farrowing and sow parity, body condition score, and number of functional teats) with a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: 1) Birth Weight Category (BWC): Light (<1.0 kg), Medium (1.0 to 1.5 kg), or Heavy (1.5 to 2.0 kg); 2) Litter Composition: UNIFORM (all 15 piglets in each litter of the same BWC), or MIXED (five piglets in each litter from each BWC, i.e., five Light, five Medium, and five Heavy piglets). At 24 h after birth, piglets were weighed and randomly allotted to litter composition treatments from within BWC. The experimental unit was five piglets of the same BWC; there were three experimental units within each Litter Composition treatment litter. There were 17 blocks, each of six litters (one UNIFORM litter of each BWC; three MIXED litters) and 51 replicates (three replicates per block of six litters) for a total of 102 cross-fostered litters and 1,530 piglets. Piglets were weaned at 19.7 ± 0.46 d of age; WW and PWM were measured. PROC GLIMMIX and MIXED of SAS were used to analyze PWM and WW, respectively. Models included BWC, Litter Composition, the interaction, and replicate within the block. There were BWC by Litter Composition treatment interactions (P ≤ 0.05) for PWM and WW. Preweaning mortality was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for Light piglets in MIXED than UNIFORM litters. In contrast, for Heavy piglets, PWM was greater (P ≤ 0.05) and WW was lower (P ≤ 0.05) in UNIFORM than MIXED litters. Medium piglets had similar (P > 0.05) PWM and WW in UNIFORM and MIXED litters. The results of this study, which involved large litter sizes typical of current commercial production, suggested that for piglet survival to weaning, using cross-fostering to form litters of piglets of similar birth weight was beneficial for light piglets, detrimental for heavy piglets, and neutral for medium piglets.

84 Effect of rearing cross-fostered piglets in litters of either uniform or mixed birth weights on pre-weaning performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Katherine Vande Pol ◽  
Ovidio Bautista ◽  
Heath Harper ◽  
Michael Ellis ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Experimental Unit ◽  
Weaning Weight ◽  
Weight Category ◽  
Weight Variation ◽  
Incomplete Block Design ◽  
Blocking Factors ◽  
Kg Medium ◽  
Cross Fostering

Abstract There is limited understanding of optimum cross-fostering methods to use to maximize piglet performance. This study evaluated effects of within-litter birth weight variation after cross-fostering on pre-weaning piglet removals (PR; morbidity and mortality) and ADG. A hierarchical incomplete block design was used (blocking factors day of farrowing and sow parity and structure) with a 3x2 factorial arrangement of treatments: 1) Birth Weight Category (BWC): Light (< 1.0 kg), Medium (1.0-1.5 kg), or Heavy (1.5-2.0 kg); 2) Litter Composition (LC): Uniform (piglets of the same BWC), and Mixed (equal numbers of piglets from each BWC). Piglets were weighed 24 h after birth and allotted to form litters of 15 cross-fostered piglets. The experimental unit was 5 piglets of the same BWC (3 experimental units per litter). A total of 102 litters were allotted to 17 blocks of 6 litters (1 Uniform litter of each BWC; 3 Mixed litters) with 51 replicates (3 replicates/block of 6 litters). Weaning weights and PR were measured. PROC GLIMMIX and MIXED of SAS were used to analyze PR and other data, respectively. Models included BWC, LC, the interaction, and replicate within block. There were treatment interactions (P < 0.05) for all measures except birth weight. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of LC on weaning weight or ADG for Light or Medium piglets; Heavy piglets had greater (P < 0.05) weaning weight and ADG in Mixed than in Uniform litters. PR were greater (P < 0.05) for Light piglets in Mixed than in Uniform litters, and for Heavy piglets in Uniform than in Mixed litters. PR for Medium piglets were similar (P > 0.05) across LC treatments. In conclusion, rearing cross-fostered piglets in Uniform litters reduced PR for Light piglets, but increased PR and reduced ADG of Heavy piglets, with no effect for Medium piglets.

87 Effect of Number of Source Litters Used to Create Cross-fostered Litters on Piglet Pre-weaning Mortality and Weaning Weight

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Katherine D Vande Pol ◽  
Rafael Ovidio Bautista Rivas ◽  
Alicia Olivo Espinal ◽  
Heath Harper ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Single Source ◽  
Weaning Weight ◽  
Teat Number ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Blocking Factors ◽  
Cross Fostering ◽  
Weight Data

Abstract Sow litter sizes have increased over recent decades, increasing the need for cross-fostering. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the number of source litters used to create cross-fostered litters on piglet pre-weaning mortality (PWM) and weaning weight. A RCBD was used with 26 blocks of 5 litters (total 130 litters/1820 piglets), all litters consisted of 14 piglets. Blocking factors were farrowing day, sow parity, body condition score, and functional teat number, and the average and CV of piglet birth weight. Five cross-fostering treatments were compared: 0%, 1 source (all piglets remaining on the birth sow); 100%, 1 source (all piglets moved from birth to a different sow); 100%, 6+ sources (piglets from ≥ 6 birth sows used to form a litter on a different sow); 50%, 2 sources (7 piglets remaining with birth sow, 7 from one other sow); 50%, 4+ sources (7 piglets remaining with the birth sow, 7 from ≥ 3 other sows). The single-source litters were selected from those with > 14 piglets at birth, with excess piglets removed. For other treatments, piglets were selected to meet blocking factors. Piglets were weighed 24 h after birth and at weaning (19.5 ± 0.50 d); all PWM was recorded. Weight data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS; PWM data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS. Models included Treatment and sow within block. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of treatment on weaning weights. Pre-weaning mortality was greater (P < 0.05) for the 0%, 1 source compared to the 50%, 2 source treatment, with the others being intermediate and generally not statistically different (Table 1). In conclusion, cross-fostering and/or mixing litters had no effect on weaning weights, but pre-weaning mortality was highest for the non-fostered treatment.

scholarly journals Effect of rearing cross-fostered piglets in litters of differing size relative to sow functional teat number on preweaning growth and mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine D Vande Pol ◽  
Raphael O Bautista ◽  
Alicia Olivo ◽  
Heath Harper ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Litter Size ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Similar Rate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Teat Number ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Cross Fostering

Abstract Litter sizes of commercial sows have increased considerably over recent decades, and often exceed the number of functional teats on the sow. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of litter size after cross-fostering relative to sow functional teat number on piglet preweaning growth and mortality. A total of 39 litters (561 piglets) were used in a randomized complete block design; blocking factors were farrowing day and sow parity, body condition score, and functional teat number. Three Litter Size treatments were compared (relative to sow functional teat number): Decreased (two piglets less); Control (same number of piglets); Increased (two piglets more). Piglets were randomly allotted to treatment at 24 h after birth to form litters of the appropriate size, with similar mean and CV of birth weight within block. Weaning weights (WW) were collected at 19.5 ± 0.50 d of age; preweaning mortality (PWM) was recorded. Litter sizes were between 11 and 17 piglets, depending on block and treatment. The Decreased treatment had lower (P ≤ 0.05) PWM than the Increased (7.7% and 17.9%, respectively); the Control was intermediate (11.5%) and not different (P > 0.05) from the other treatments. The rate of decline in litter size from birth to weaning was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for the Increased than the Decreased treatment (−0.16 vs. −0.05 piglets per day), with the Control (−0.09 piglets per day) being intermediate and different (P ≤ 0.05) to the other two treatments. Litter sizes at weaning were greater (P ≤ 0.05) for the Increased than the Decreased treatment (13.3 and 11.3, respectively); the Control treatment was intermediate (12.6) and not different (P > 0.05) to the other treatments. The log odds of PWM increased with the decreasing birth weight, at a similar rate (P > 0.05) for all Litter Size treatments. However, the intercept was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for the Increased compared with the Decreased treatment; the Control was intermediate and different (P > 0.05) to the other two treatments. Mean WW tended (P = 0.07) to be greater for the Decreased (6.17 kg) compared to the Control and Increased treatments (5.86 and 5.84 kg, respectively). In conclusion, increasing litter size after cross-fostering relative to the number of functional teats of the sow increased piglet PWM, and tended to decrease WW.

PSIII-1 Effect of Rearing Cross-fostered Piglets in Litters of Differing Size Relative to Sow Functional Teat Number on Pre-weaning Growth and Mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 155-156
Author(s):  
Katherine D Vande Pol ◽  
Rafael Ovidio Bautista Rivas ◽  
Alicia Olivo Espinal ◽  
Heath Harper ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Litter Size ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
The Other ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Gender Ratio ◽  
Teat Number ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Blocking Factors ◽  
Cross Fostering ◽  
Weight Data

Abstract Litter sizes of commercial sows have increased recently, often resulting in the number of piglets exceeding the sow functional teat number. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of litter size after cross-fostering on piglet pre-weaning mortality (PWM) and growth. A RCBD was used with 13 blocks of 3 litters (total 39 litters/561 piglets); blocking factors were farrowing day, sow parity, body condition score, and functional teat number. Three Litter Size treatments (LS) relative to sow functional teat number were compared: Under (2 piglets below); Equal (same number of piglets); Over (2 piglets above). Piglets were weighed 24 h after birth and allotted to LS to create litters with similar gender ratio and average and CV of birth weight. Weaning was at 19.5 ± 0.50 d, weights and PWM were recorded. Piglet weight data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS; PWM data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS. Models included LS and sow within block. Litter sizes averaged 12.1, 14.1, and 16.1 for the Under, Equal, and Over treatments, respectively (P ≤ 0.05). The Under treatment tended (P = 0.07) to have greater weaning weights compared to the Equal and Over treatments (Table 1). The Under treatment had lower (P ≤ 0.05) PWM than the Over treatment, with the Equal treatment being intermediate and not different to the other 2 (P > 0.05; Table 1). In conclusion, reducing litter size after cross-fostering to two piglets below the number of functional teats of the sow decreased PWM and tended to increase weaning weights.

scholarly journals PSII-10 Effect of gilt feeding level and length of increased feeding level in late gestation on piglet birth weight

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 233-233
Author(s):  
James K Quick ◽  
Mark Knauer
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Litter Size ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Dietary Treatment ◽  
Late Gestation ◽  
Feeding Level ◽  
Dietary Treatments ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of increasing gilt feeding level in late gestation, for different durations, on piglet quality. Gilts (n = 472) were allocated to one of five dietary treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial + control design at a commercial farm in eastern North Carolina. Hence gilts were fed 1.82 kg of feeding until farrowing (Control) or feeding level was increased by either 0.68 or 1.36 kg at either day 93 (d93) or 100 (d100) of gestation. Treatments were randomly assigned by pen (5 to 6 gilts per pen). The gestation diet contained 2,979 Kcal/kg ME and 0.58% SID lysine. Gilt body condition score was captured at day 93 of gestation using a sow body condition caliper (thin = < 12, ideal = 12 to 15, fat = > 15). Piglet birth weights were captured within 24 h of farrowing and piglets were ear notched by treatment prior to cross-fostering. Data were analyzed using PROC GLM with fixed effects of dietary treatment, contemporary group and covariates of litter size and sow functional teat number when applicable. Average gilt caliper score at d 93 of gestation was 17.0. Gilt caliper score did not differ (P > 0.05) across dietary treatments. Mean piglet birth weight did not differ (P > 0.05) between the five dietary treatments or the main effects of feeding level or length of feeding level. A one piglet increase in litter size reduced (P < 0.01) mean piglet birth weight by 30 g. An increase of one functional sow teat increased (P < 0.05) litter size at weaning of the biological sow by 0.28 piglets. Results suggest increasing gilt feeding level in late gestation does not impact mean piglet birth weight when gilts are over conditioned.

scholarly journals Effect of drying and warming piglets at birth on preweaning mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine D Vande Pol ◽  
Andres F Tolosa ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
Catherine B Brown ◽  
Stephan A S Alencar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Rectal Temperature ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Experimental Unit ◽  
Predisposing Factor ◽  
Randomized Design ◽  
Intervention Treatment ◽  
Completely Randomized Design ◽  
Kg Medium

Abstract Piglets are susceptible to hypothermia early after birth, which is a major predisposing factor for preweaning mortality (PWM). Drying and warming piglets at birth has been shown to reduce early postnatal temperature decline. This study evaluated the effect of drying and warming piglets at birth on PWM and weaning weight (WW) under commercial conditions. A completely randomized design was used with 802 sows/litters (10,327 piglets); sows/litters were randomly allotted at start of farrowing to one of two Intervention Treatments (applied at birth): Control (no drying or warming); Drying+Warming (dried with a cellulose-based desiccant and placed in a box under a heat lamp for 30 min). Piglets were weighed at birth and weaning; PWM was recorded. Rectal temperature was measured at 0 and 30 min after birth on all piglets in a subsample of 10% of litters. The effect of farrowing pen temperature (FPT) on WW and PWM was evaluated by comparing litters born under COOL (&lt;25°C) to those born under WARM (≥25°C) FPT. The effect of birth weight on WW and PWM was evaluated by comparing three birth weight categories (BWC; Light: &lt;1.0 kg, Medium: 1.0 to 1.5 kg, or Heavy: &gt;1.5 kg). PROC GLIMMIX and MIXED of SAS were used to analyze mortality and other data, respectively. Litter was the experimental unit; piglet was a subsample of litter. The model included fixed effects of Intervention Treatment, and FPT or BWC as appropriate, the interaction, and the random effects of litter. Piglet rectal temperature at 30 min after birth was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for the Drying+Warming than the Control treatment (+2.33°C). Overall, there was no effect (P &gt; 0.05) of Intervention Treatment on PWM or WW, and there were no Intervention Treatment by BWC interactions (P &gt; 0.05) for these measurements. There was an Intervention Treatment by FPT interaction (P ≤ 0.05) for PWM. Drying and warming piglets reduced (P ≤ 0.05) PWM under COOL (by 2.4 percentage units) but not WARM FPT. In addition, WW were lower (P ≤ 0.05) under WARM (by 0.79 kg) than COOL FPT; however, there was no interaction (P &gt; 0.05) with Intervention Treatment. In conclusion, this study suggests that drying and warming piglets at birth increases rectal temperature and may reduce PWM under cooler conditions, which are typically experienced in temperate climates during the majority of the year.

scholarly journals Effect of method of drying piglets at birth on rectal temperature over the first 24 h after birth1

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine D Vande Pol ◽  
Andres F Tolosa ◽  
Caleb M Shull ◽  
Catherine B Brown ◽  
Stephan A S Alencar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Rectal Temperature ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
The Other ◽  
Repeated Measure ◽  
Experimental Unit ◽  
Weight Category ◽  
Paper Towel ◽  
Drying Treatment

Abstract Piglets are born wet, and evaporation of that moisture decreases body temperature, increasing the risk of mortality. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of two commercially applicable methods for drying piglets at birth on piglet rectal temperature over 24 h after birth. The study was carried out in standard commercial farrowing facilities with 52 litters, using a completely randomized design with three Drying Treatments: Control (not dried); Desiccant (dried at birth using a cellulose-based desiccant); Paper Towel (dried at birth using paper towels). Litters were randomly allotted to treatments at the birth of the first piglet. At birth, piglets were individually identified, and the treatment was applied. Rectal temperature was measured at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 120, and 1,440 min (24 h) after birth. Data were analyzed using a repeated measures model with PROC MIXED of SAS, with litter as the experimental unit and piglet a subsample of the litter. The model included the fixed effects of treatment and time (as a repeated measure), and the interaction. There was no effect (P &gt; 0.05) of treatment on temperature at birth, or 10 or 1,440 min after birth. Piglet temperatures between 20 and 120 min after birth were similar (P &gt; 0.05) for the Desiccant and Paper Towel treatments, but were greater (P ≤ 0.05) than the Control. The effect of birth weight on the response to Drying Treatment was evaluated by dividing the data into Light (&lt;1.0 kg), Medium (1.0 to 1.5 kg), or Heavy (&gt;1.5 kg) piglet Birth Weight Categories. Piglet rectal temperature data at each measurement time were analyzed using a model that included the fixed effects of Birth Weight Category, Drying Treatment, and the interaction. Temperatures of Light piglets were lower (P ≤ 0.05) than those of Heavy piglets between 20 and 120 min after birth, with Medium piglets being intermediate and generally different to the other two weight categories at these times. The difference in temperature between Light as compared with Medium or Heavy piglets was greater for the Control than the other two Drying Treatments at 60 min after birth. These results suggest that drying piglets at birth is an effective method to reduce rectal temperature decline in the early postnatal period, especially for low birth weight piglets.

scholarly journals Effects of cross-fostering on performance of piglets

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-148
Author(s):  
Ederson Gomes Camargo ◽  
Joseane Crystina Costa Rego ◽  
Laila Talarico Dias ◽  
Rodrigo de Almeida Teixeira
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Historical Data ◽  
Growth Period ◽  
Weaned Piglets ◽  
Statistical Software ◽  
Midwest Region ◽  
Quadratic Effects ◽  
Cross Fostering

The high number of piglets born alive from hiperprolifics sows increases the variability of weight at birth and made many producers practice cross-fostering management, which consists in standardization of weight and number of piglets according to the sow ability. To evaluate the effect of cross-fostering on performance and mortality occurrence of piglets, historical data were studied from two producers of the Midwest region of Santa Catarina-Brazil. Were weighed 1440 piglets at birth, weaning and 37 days post weaning from 130 commercial sows of Agroceres PIC®. The adjusted weights at 21 and 58 days old and their respective gain were submitted to multiple regression analysis using the GLM procedure of SAS Statistical Software (2005), and occurrence of mortality was studied by GENMOD procedure. For performance traits were considered fixed effects the cross-fostering, contemporary group and covariables the birth weight or weaning, the number of piglets after equalization, number of weaned piglets, linear and quadratic effects of sow parity; the weight at birth were included as covariable for occurrence of mortality. Cross-fostered piglets weighed 207 grams less than biological piglets (P<0.01) and had lesser mortality between lightest piglets. However, the littermate equalization did not promote differences in growth period between cross-fostered and biological piglets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document