scholarly journals Assessment of Activity Monitor Placement During Free‐Living Conditions

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monroe J. Molesky ◽  
John Vusich ◽  
Alexander HK. Montoye
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 706-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weimo Zhu ◽  
Miyoung Lee

Background:The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability evidences of the Omron BI pedometer, which could count steps taken even when worn at different locations on the body.Methods:Forty (20 males and 20 females) adults were recruited to walk wearing 5 sets, 1 set at a time, of 10 BI pedometers during testing, 1 each at 10 different locations. For comparison, they also wore 2 Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometers and a Dynastream AMP 331 activity monitor. The subjects walked in 3 free-living conditions: a fat sidewalk, stairs, and mixed conditions.Results:Except for a slight decrease in accuracy in the pant pocket locations, Omron BI pedometers counted steps accurately across other locations when subjects walked on the fat sidewalk, and the performance was consistent across devices and trials. When the subjects climbed up stairs, however, the absolute error % of the pant pocket locations increased significantly (P < .05) and similar or higher error rates were found in the AMP 331 and SW-200s.Conclusions:The Omron BI pedometer can accurately count steps when worn at various locations on the body in free-living conditions except for front pant pocket locations, especially when climbing stairs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
Wonwoo Byun ◽  
Nicklaus Redenius ◽  
Youngwon Kim

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S208
Author(s):  
James C. Hannon ◽  
Mark G. Abel ◽  
Tia Lillie ◽  
Katie Sell ◽  
David Anderson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haydn Jarrett ◽  
Liam Fitzgerald ◽  
Ash C. Routen

Background:Currently, no studies have investigated interinstrument reliability of the ActiGraph (AG) GT3X+ in free-living conditions.Methods:Nineteen adults (11 males, 8 females; aged 36.8 ± 11.9 years) wore a pair of AG’s (one on each hip), during all waking hours for 1 day. Raw outputs were generated for total counts, steps, wear time and mean counts per minute. Intensity outputs were derived for time (minutes) spent in <moderate, moderate, vigorous, very vigorous and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Intraclass correlation (ICC), absolute percent difference (APD), coefficient of variation (CV), Bland-Altman plots, and paired t tests were used to evaluate reliability.Results:Interinstrument reliability was high (CV < 5%) for raw count and derived intensity outputs, except vigorous and very vigorous activity. ICC, CV, and APD values for vigorous and very vigorous were .97, 12.28, 17.36% and .98, 18.15, 25.67%, respectively. Amalgamating moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous into a single MVPA category reduced the CV and APD values to 2.85 and 4.02%, and increased the ICC value to .99. No significant differences were found between contralateral units for any outputs (P > .05).Conclusion:Reliability decreases beyond moderate intensities. MVPA displays superior interinstrument reliability than individual intensity categories. Research question permitting, reporting time in MVPA may maximize reliability.


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1376-P
Author(s):  
GREGORY P. FORLENZA ◽  
BRUCE BUCKINGHAM ◽  
JENNIFER SHERR ◽  
THOMAS A. PEYSER ◽  
JOON BOK LEE ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 207-OR
Author(s):  
BRUCE A. BUCKINGHAM ◽  
JENNIFER SHERR ◽  
GREGORY P. FORLENZA ◽  
THOMAS A. PEYSER ◽  
JOON BOK LEE ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jari Lipsanen ◽  
Liisa Kuula ◽  
Marko Elovainio ◽  
Timo Partonen ◽  
Anu-Katriina Pesonen

AbstractThe individual variation in the circadian rhythms at the physiological level is not well understood. Albeit self-reported circadian preference profiles have been consolidated, their premises are grounded on human experience, not on physiology. We used data-driven, unsupervised time series modelling to characterize distinct profiles of the circadian rhythm measured from skin surface temperature in free-living conditions. We demonstrate the existence of three distinct clusters of individuals which differed in their circadian temperature profiles. The cluster with the highest temperature amplitude and the lowest midline estimating statistic of rhythm, or rhythm-adjusted mean, had the most regular and early-timed sleep–wake rhythm, and was the least probable for those with a concurrent delayed sleep phase, or eveningness chronotype. While the clusters associated with the observed sleep and circadian preference patterns, the entirely unsupervised modelling of physiological data provides a novel basis for modelling and understanding the human circadian functions in free-living conditions.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 4154
Author(s):  
Emily Bell ◽  
Sabrina Binkowski ◽  
Elaine Sanderson ◽  
Barbara Keating ◽  
Grant Smith ◽  
...  

The optimal time to bolus insulin for meals is challenging for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Current guidelines to control glucose excursions do not account for individual differences in glycaemic responses to meals. This study aimed to examine the within- and between-person variability in time to peak (TTP) glycaemic responses after consuming meals under controlled and free-living conditions. Participants aged 8–15 years with T1D ≥ 1 year and using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) were recruited. Participants consumed a standardised breakfast for six controlled days and maintained their usual daily routine for 14 free-living days. CGM traces were collected after eating. Linear mixed models were used to identify within- and between-person variability in the TTP after each of the controlled breakfasts, free-living breakfasts (FLB), and free-living dinners (FLD) conditions. Thirty participants completed the study (16 females; mean age and standard deviation (SD) 10.5 (1.9)). The TTP variability was greater within a person than the variability between people for all three meal types (between-person vs within-person SD; controlled breakfast 18.5 vs 38.9 minutes; FLB 14.1 vs 49.6 minutes; FLD 5.7 vs 64.5 minutes). For the first time, the study showed that within-person variability in TTP glycaemic responses is even greater than between-person variability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document