TRACHEAL PRESSURE TRIGGERING A DEMAND-FLOW CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE SYSTEM DECREASES WORK OF BREATHING

1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (SUPPLEMENT) ◽  
pp. A273 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Messinger ◽  
M. J. Banner ◽  
A. Gabrielli ◽  
A. J. Layon ◽  
T. J. Gallagher
Lung India ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
MiguelAngel Palomero Rodriguez ◽  
HéctorChozas de Arteaga ◽  
YolandaLaporta Báez ◽  
Jesúsde Vicente Sánchez ◽  
AntonioPérez Ferrer

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1051-1051
Author(s):  
John Kattwinkel

The paper by Goldman et al (Pediatrics 64:160, 1979) comparing the mechanics of breathing in neonates treated with nasal vs mask continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) recommends that, since nasal CPAP appeared to increase the work of breathing, "other methods be considered for the delivery of CDP (continuous distending pressure)." As a strong proponent of nasal CPAP, I would like to express several concerns with the study and its interpretation. First, according to the authors' drawing, the nasal device used for the study had been modified with a PE 20 sampling catheter inserted through one of the prongs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Palomero Rodríguez ◽  
Pascual Sanabria Carretero ◽  
Yolanda Laporta Báez ◽  
Felipe Villar Alvarez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document