Persistent Hiccup Associated with Thoracic Epidural Injection

2001 ◽  
Vol 80 (8) ◽  
pp. 618-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis W. Slipman ◽  
Carl H. Shin ◽  
Rajeev K. Patel ◽  
Debra L. Braverman ◽  
David A. Lenrow ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4;15 (4;8) ◽  
pp. E497-E514
Author(s):  
Ramsin M. Benyamin

Background: There is a paucity of literature on the use of epidural injections for the treatment of chronic mid and upper back pain due to disc herniation and radiculitis, axial or discogenic pain, spinal stenosis, post surgery syndrome, and post thoracotomy pain syndrome. Study Design: A systematic review of therapeutic thoracic epidural injection therapy for chronic mid and upper back pain. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to determine the effects of thoracic interlaminar epidural injections with or without steroids, with or without fluoroscopy, and for various conditions including disc herniation and radiculitis, axial or discogenic pain, spinal stenosis, post thoracic surgery syndrome, and post thoracotomy pain syndrome. Methods: The available literature on thoracic interlaminar epidural injections with or without steroids in managing various types of chronic mid and upper back pain was reviewed. The quality assessment and clinical relevance criteria utilized were the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group criteria as utilized for interventional techniques for randomized trials and the criteria developed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria for observational studies. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, or limited (or poor) based on the quality of evidence developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to March 2012, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was pain relief (short-term relief = up to 6 months and long-term > 6 months). Secondary outcome measures were improvement in functional status, psychological status, return to work, and reduction in opioid intake. Results: For this review, 17 studies were identified, including studies examining adverse reactions. Only 2 studies were included: one randomized trial and one non-randomized or observational study. The results of this systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of thoracic epidural injections with or without steroids in managing chronic thoracic pain shows fair evidence with one randomized trial in patients with various causes; whereas the evidence is limited based on one non-randomized study evaluating chronic pain in post thoracotomy syndrome. Limitations: The limitations of this study include paucity of evidence. Conclusion: The evidence based on this systematic review for thoracic epidural injection in treating chronic thoracic pain is considered fair and limited for post thoracotomy pain. Key words: Spinal pain, chronic mid back pain, chronic upper back pain, post-thoracotomy pain, thoracic epidural injection, radiculopathy, herniation, steroids, local anesthetic, epidural steroid


2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byoung Ho Kim ◽  
Min Young No ◽  
Sang Ju Han ◽  
Cheol Hwan Park ◽  
Jae Hun Kim

2017 ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti

While interlaminar and caudal epidural injections are frequently performed for chronic spinal pain, thoracic epidural injections are uncommon; constituting less than 5%. As a result, reports of complications related to thoracic epidural injections are rare including epidural hematoma leading to surgical decompression. Multiple strategies to prevent epidural hematoma in any region of the spine exist and include cessation of therapy with antithrombotics and anticoagulants, fi sh oil, and other drugs with a potential effect on coagulation. Thus far, multiple guidelines have recommended continuation of nonsteroidal antiinfl ammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low dose aspirin. Some guidelines also have recommended continuation of antithrombotic therapy because of the increased risk of thromboembolic phenomenon in these patients. We report a case of thoracic epidural hematoma requiring surgical decompression without resultant residual dysfunction. It involves a thoracic epidural injection following which the patient developed left leg paresis over a 2-hour postinjection period. She was receiving low dose (81 mg) aspirin. She underwent surgical decompression with rapid recovery. This case report of acute thoracic epidural hematoma following interlaminar epidural steroid injection in a patient without antithrombotic therapy is rare, that could have been fatal without appropriate diagnosis and intervention. This case report shows that various commonly considered factors and precautions undertaken to avoid epidural hematoma formation are ineffective. This case report also illustrates the importance of prompt diagnosis, and emphasizes increasing levels of axial pain as most signifi cant features for the diagnosis. Key words: Interventional techniques, thoracic epidural injections, thoracic epidural hematoma, bleeding disorders, aspirin, antithrombotic agents, anticoagulants, nonsteroidal antiinfl ammatory drugs


2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 403
Author(s):  
In Sang Yoo ◽  
Si Young Ok ◽  
Kyu Young Choi ◽  
Soon Im Kim ◽  
Sun Chong Kim

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (22;4) ◽  
pp. E325-E332
Author(s):  
Ji Hee Hong

Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) is affected after epidural saline solution or local anesthetic injection. Both ICP and epidural pressures have been shown to reach peak pressure just after epidural injection and begin decline thereafter. Measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) through ultrasonography is one of the noninvasive methods used for ICP assessment. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the speed of epidural saline injection on the ONSD under awake conditions. Study Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: An interventional pain management practice in South Korea. Methods: This study included 40 patients receiving thoracic epidural catheterization for pain management after upper abdominal or thoracic surgery. Following successful epidural space confirmation, patients were randomized to receive epidural saline infusion with a speed of either 1 mL/second (slow speed, A group) or 3 mL/second (rapid speed, B group), respectively. For the measurement of ONSD, transorbital sonography was performed and ONSD was measured at 3 mm posterior to the optic nerve head. Results: The A and B groups showed significant increases in ONSD according to time. Post hoc analysis of this result revealed that ONSD at T10 and T30 were significantly increased from baseline values (T0) (*P < 0.05 vs. T0; +P < 0.001 vs. T0). The mean values at any of the time points and degree of changes (T1-T0, T10-T0, and T30-T0) in ONSD between groups A and B did not show any significance. Limitations: We could not confirm the time of normalization of ONSD after the end of epidural injection of normal saline. Conclusions: Thoracic epidural injection of 10 mL of normal saline solution resulted in a significant increase of ONSD compared to baseline, however, the speed of injection did not affect the increase of ONSD. Key words: Epidural, saline, optic nerve, diameter


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document