Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Knee Cartilage Repair

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 377???392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garry E. Gold ◽  
A. Gahrielle Bergman ◽  
John M. Pauly ◽  
Philipp Lang ◽  
R. Kim Butts ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 228-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Ramappa ◽  
Thomas Gill ◽  
Catharine Bradford ◽  
Charles Ho ◽  
J. Steadman

Cartilage ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daichi Hayashi ◽  
Xinning Li ◽  
Akira M. Murakami ◽  
Frank W. Roemer ◽  
Siegfried Trattnig ◽  
...  

The aims of this review article are (a) to describe the principles of morphologic and compositional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques relevant for the imaging of knee cartilage repair surgery and their application to longitudinal studies and (b) to illustrate the clinical relevance of pre- and postsurgical MRI with correlation to intraoperative images. First, MRI sequences that can be applied for imaging of cartilage repair tissue in the knee are described, focusing on comparison of 2D and 3D fast spin echo and gradient recalled echo sequences. Imaging features of cartilage repair tissue are then discussed, including conventional (morphologic) MRI and compositional MRI techniques. More specifically, imaging techniques for specific cartilage repair surgery techniques as described above, as well as MRI-based semiquantitative scoring systems for the knee cartilage repair tissue—MR Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue and Cartilage Repair OA Knee Score—are explained. Then, currently available surgical techniques are reviewed, including marrow stimulation, osteochondral autograft, osteochondral allograft, particulate cartilage allograft, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and others. Finally, ongoing research efforts and future direction of cartilage repair tissue imaging are discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. NP48-NP50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommy S. de Windt ◽  
Goetz H. Welsch ◽  
Mats Brittberg ◽  
Lucienne Vonk ◽  
Stefan Marlovits ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
IDA K. HAUGEN ◽  
SEBASTIAN COTOFANA ◽  
MARTIN ENGLUND ◽  
TORE K. KVIEN ◽  
DONATUS DREHER ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate whether features of radiographic hand osteoarthritis (OA) are associated with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined knee cartilage thickness, radiographic knee OA, and 1-year structural progression.Methods.A total of 765 participants in Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI; 455 women, mean age 62.5 yrs, SD 9.4) obtained hand radiographs (at baseline), knee radiographs (baseline and Year 1), and knee MRI (baseline and Year 1). Hand radiographs were scored for presence of osteophytes and joint space narrowing (JSN). Knee radiographs were scored according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale. Cartilage thickness in the medial and lateral femorotibial compartments was measured quantitatively from coronal FLASHwe images. We examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between features of hand OA (total osteophyte and JSN scores) and knee cartilage thickness, 1-year knee cartilage thinning (above smallest detectable change), presence of knee OA (KL grade ≥ 3), and progression of knee OA (KL change ≥ 1) by linear and logistic regression. Both hand OA features were included in a multivariate model (if p ≤ 0.25) adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI).Results.Hand JSN was associated with reduced knee cartilage thickness (ß = −0.02, 95% CI −0.03, −0.01) in the medial femorotibial compartment, while hand osteophytes were associated with the presence of radiographic knee OA (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03–1.18; multivariate models) with both hand OA features as independent variables adjusted for age, sex, and BMI). Radiographic features of hand OA were not associated with 1-year cartilage thinning or radiographic knee OA progression.Conclusion.Our results support a systemic OA susceptibility and possibly different mechanisms for osteophyte formation and cartilage thinning.


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 850-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Kornaat ◽  
Joost Doornbos ◽  
Aart J. van der Molen ◽  
Margreet Kloppenburg ◽  
Rob G. Nelissen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 096368972094358
Author(s):  
Dong Jin Ryu ◽  
Yoon Sang Jeon ◽  
Jun Sung Park ◽  
Gi Cheol Bae ◽  
Jeong-seok Kim ◽  
...  

Biological repair of cartilage lesions remains a significant clinical challenge. A wide variety of methods involving mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been introduced. Because of the limitation of the results, most of the treatment methods have not yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and human umbilical cord blood derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) implantation were approved by Korea FDA. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes after two different types of MSCs implantation in knee osteoarthritis. Fifty-two patients (52 knees) who underwent cartilage repair surgery using the BMAC (25 knees) and hUCB-MSCs (27 knees) were retrospectively evaluated for 2 years after surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the score of visual analogue scale (VAS), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Cartilage repair was assessed according to the modified Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (M-MOCART) score and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) cartilage repair scoring system. At 2-year follow-up, clinical outcomes including VAS, IKDC, and KOOS significantly improved ( P < 0.05) in both groups; however, there were no differences between two groups. There was no significant difference in M-MOCART [1-year ( P = 0.261), 2-year ( P = 0.351)] and ICRS repair score ( P = 0.655) between two groups. Both groups showed satisfactory clinical and MRI outcomes. Implantation of MSCs from BMAC or hUCB-MSCs is safe and effective for repairing cartilage lesion. However, large cases and a well-controlled prospective design with long-term follow-up studies are needed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1695-1702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommy S. de Windt ◽  
Goetz H. Welsch ◽  
Mats Brittberg ◽  
Lucienne A. Vonk ◽  
Stefan Marlovits ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 2009-2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. I. Khan ◽  
D. Aitken ◽  
G. Zhai ◽  
C. Ding ◽  
J.-P. Pelletier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document