The impact on drug mass flow rate of interrupting and resuming carrier fluid flow: an in vitro study on a multi-lumen infusion device

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 184
Author(s):  
A. Foinard ◽  
B. Décaudin ◽  
C. Barthélémy ◽  
B. Debaene ◽  
P. Odou
2012 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Lannoy ◽  
Bertrand Decaudin ◽  
Nicolas Simon ◽  
Christine Barthelemy ◽  
Bertrand Debaene ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 312-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monticha Rangcharoen ◽  
Varisara Sirimaharaj ◽  
Sitthichai Wanachantararak ◽  
Noppakun Vongsavan ◽  
Bruce Matthews

2006 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 1362-1368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge H. Jimenez ◽  
Joseph Forbess ◽  
Laura R. Croft ◽  
Lisa Small ◽  
Zhaoming He ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 655-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Young Lee ◽  
Seong-Ho Park ◽  
Chang-Hyun Kim ◽  
Goetz Benndorf

Author(s):  
Xingyun Jia ◽  
Liguo Wang ◽  
Qun Zheng ◽  
Hai Zhang ◽  
Yuting Jiang

Performance of generic rim seal configurations, axial-clearance rim seal (ACS), radial-clearance rim seal (RCS), radial-axial clearance rim seal (RACS) are compared under realistic working conditions. Conjugate heat transfer analysis on rim seal is performed in this paper to understand the impact of ingestion on disc temperature. Results show that seal effectiveness and cooling effectiveness of RACS are the best when compared with ACS and RCS, the minimum mass flow rate for seal of RACS is 75% of that of RCS, and 34.6% of ACS. Authors compare the disc temperature distribution between different generic rim seal configurations where the RACS seems to be favorable in terms of low disc temperature. In addition, RACS has higher air-cooled aerodynamic efficiency, minimizing the mainstream performance penalty when compared with ACS and RCS. Corresponding to the respective minimum mass flow rate for seal, the air-cooled aerodynamic efficiency of RACS is 23.71% higher than that of ACS, and 12.79% higher than the RCS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 3691-3702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Mara ◽  
Monika Clausen ◽  
Suphalak Khachonkham ◽  
Simon Deycmar ◽  
Clara Pessy ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 506-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emidio M. Sivieri ◽  
Jeffrey S. Gerdes ◽  
Soraya Abbasi

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford K. Ho ◽  
Joshua M. Christian ◽  
Julius E. Yellowhair ◽  
Kenneth Armijo ◽  
William J. Kolb ◽  
...  

This paper evaluates the on-sun performance of a 1 MW falling particle receiver. Two particle receiver designs were investigated: obstructed flow particle receiver versus free-falling particle receiver. The intent of the tests was to investigate the impact of particle mass flow rate, irradiance, and particle temperature on the particle temperature rise and thermal efficiency of the receiver for each design. Results indicate that the obstructed flow design increased the residence time of the particles in the concentrated flux, thereby increasing the particle temperature and thermal efficiency for a given mass flow rate. The obstructions, a staggered array of chevron-shaped mesh structures, also provided more stability to the falling particles, which were prone to instabilities caused by convective currents in the free-fall design. Challenges encountered during the tests included nonuniform mass flow rates, wind impacts, and oxidation/deterioration of the mesh structures. Alternative materials, designs, and methods are presented to overcome these challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document