Renal Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Study of 180 Patients from a Single Center

Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with a significant genetic predisposition. Recent studies have identified STAT4 (signal transducers and transcription activators 4) as a susceptibility gene for SLE.Objectives:To investigate the hypothesis of the association of STAT4 rs7574865 G/T polymorphism with the predisposition to SLE in children and its relationship with some of SLE manifestations.Methods:The case-control pilot study included 143 children (39 with SLE and 103 healthy unrelated volunteers as a control group). Diagnosis of SLE was based on 2012 SLICC criteria. STAT4 rs7574865 G/T polymorphism was investigated using allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).Results:The group of pts with SLE consisted of 29 girls and 10 boys, with an average age of 11.8±3.7 years (from 3 to 17 years) and an average disease duration of 4.1±2.4 years. 79.5% pts had acute cutaneous lupus at the onset, 46.1% - nonscarring alopecia, 71.8% - arthritis, 23.1% - oral and nasal ulcers, 23.1% - serositis, 43.6% - renal involvement, 35.9% –neuropsychiatric disorders. Leucopenia/lymphopenia was found in 71.8% of pts, thrombocytopenia – in 23,1%. ANA were detected in 100% pts, anti-dsDNA – in 79.5%, anti-Sm – in 31.6%, antiphospholipid antibodies - in 7,3%, hypocomplementemia – in 61.5%, positive direct Coombs test – in 35.9 %. Macrophage activation syndrome at the onset was documented in 15.4 % of pts. The distribution of rs7574865 genotypes in the control group showed no significant deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The distribution of genotype frequencies among pts had statistically significant differences compared to the control (χ2=12.95, p=0.0015): GG-30.8% and 63.1% (p=0.001), GT-56.4% and 33.0% (p=0.018), TT-12.8% and 3.9% (p=0.114), GT+TT - 69.2% and 36.9% (p=0.0005). The frequency of the mutant STAT 4 allele T (polymorphism), was significantly higher in the SLE group than in the control group (41% and 20.4%, respectively; p=0.0007). We identified an association of the T allele with some clinical, laboratory, and immunological disorders in SLE: arthritis (OR 3.9, p=0.0002), acute cutaneous lupus (OR 2.47, p=0.003), nonscarring alopecia (OR 3.12, p=0.002), renal involvement (OR 2.42, p=0.022), leucopenia (OR 2.72, p=0.003), thrombocytopenia (OR 4.88, p=0.002), anti-dsDNA (OR 2.82, p=0.0006), hypocomplementemia (OR 2.34, p=0.012), positive direct Coombs test (OR 3.38, p=0.002).Conclusion:Our pilot study confirmed that the STAT4 rs7574865 G/T polymorphism was associated with the risk of SLE in children and some of SLE manifestations.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

POS0685 MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS: FIVE-YEARS DRUG SURVIVAL IN RENAL AND NON-RENAL INVOLVEMENT

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.925 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 588.2-588

Author(s):

G. Olivieri ◽

F. Ceccarelli ◽

F. Natalucci ◽

F. R. Spinelli ◽

C. Alessandri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Joint Involvement ◽

Systemic Lupus ◽

Median Treatment

Background:The updated EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) underline the use of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of different disease related manifestations (1). Several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of MMF in lupus nephritis (LN) patients but only case series and open-labelled trials have analyzed the use of this drug in other than LN features. Moreover, no data are available about the MMF retention rate in a real-life setting.Objectives:The present study aims at evaluating the 5-years drug retention rate (DRR) of MMF in a large monocentric SLE cohort. Secondly, we investigated the influence of MMF in disease activity changes and chronic damage progression.Methods:We performed a longitudinal study including all the SLE patients (ACR 1997 criteria) starting MMF treatment in our Lupus Clinic. Data about indications, mean dosage, duration of treatment and reasons for drug withdrawal were registered. The DRR was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Disease activity and chronic damage were assessed by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and SLICC Damage Index (SDI), respectively.Results:The present analysis included 162 SLE patients (M/F 22/140, median age at the disease diagnosis 25.5 years, IQR 13). At the beginning of MMF treatment, we registered a median age of 34 months (IQR 21) and a median disease duration of 72 months (IQR 123). The most frequent indications for prescribing MMF were LN (101 patients, 62.3%) and musculoskeletal manifestations (39, 24.1%), followed by neuropsychiatric involvement (10, 6.2%), and others disease related manifestations (12, 7.4%; in particular skin involvement, hematological features, myositis, vasculitis). MMF was administered at a mean daily dosage of 2.1±0.6 grams; no differences in dosage were found between the different indications (p=ns).At the longitudinal analysis, we registered a median treatment duration of 30 months (IQR 55). Figure 1 reported data about DRR: in particular, at 60 months follow-up we observed a DRR of 61.1% for LN patients, which was similar to that registered for patients without renal involvement (NLN) (60.5%; p=ns). Interestingly, the DRR at 60 months was higher in the subgroup of patients treated for joint involvement (75.4%), even without reaching a statistically significant difference. During the observation period, 92 patients (59.2%) discontinued MMF (median treatment duration at discontinuation 25 months, IQR 35). Interestingly, the main cause of withdrawal was the achievement of persistent remission, observed in 20 patients (21.7%), followed by loss of efficacy (19 patients, 20.5%), drug intolerance and pregnancy planning (17 patients for both reasons, 18,4%). Furthermore, our analysis confirmed MMF efficacy, as demonstrated by the significant reduction in SLEDAI-2k values after 4, 12 and 24 months of treatment (p< 0.0001 for all the time-points in comparison with baseline). In addition, MMF resulted able to control chronic damage progression, as demonstrated by the lack of significant increase in SDI values (baseline: 0.6, IQR 1; last observation: 0.93, IQR 1; p=ns).Conclusion:The evaluation of a large SLE cohort demonstrated a good retention rate for MMF. In particular, our results demonstrated that MMF is also a safe and effective drug for SLE manifestation other than LN, in particular for joint involvement. Moreover, it is able to control disease activity and to prevent the progression of chronic damage.References:[1]Fanouriakis A et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):736-745.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

A longitudinal multiethnic study of biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus: Launching the GLADEL 2.0 Study Group

Lupus ◽

10.1177/0961203320988586 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 096120332098858

Author(s):

José A Gómez-Puerta ◽

Guillermo J Pons-Estel ◽

Rosana Quintana ◽

Romina Nieto ◽

Rosa M Serrano Morales ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Renal Disease ◽

Latin American ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Systemic Lupus ◽

Original Cohort ◽

Beneficial Effects ◽

New Generation ◽

Methodological Aspects

Introduction: After more than 20 years of sustained work, the Latin American Group for the Study of Lupus (GLADEL) has made a significant number of contributions to the field of lupus, not only in the differential role that race/ethnicity plays in its course and outcome but also in several other studies including the beneficial effects of using antimalarials in lupus patients and the development of consensus guidelines for the treatment of lupus in our region. Methods: A new generation of “Lupus Investigators” in more than 40 centers throughout Latin America has been constituted in order to continue the legacy of the investigators of the original cohort and to launch a novel study of serum and urinary biomarkers in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Results: So far, we have recruited 807 patients and 631 controls from 42 Latin-American centers including 339 patients with SLE without renal involvement, 202 patients with SLE with prevalent but inactive renal disease, 176 patients with prevalent and active renal disease and 90 patients with incident lupus nephritis. Conclusions: The different methodological aspects of the GLADEL 2.0 cohort are discussed in this manuscript, including the challenges and difficulties of conducting such an ambitious project.

Download Full-text

AB0818 ADVERSE EVENTS UNDER B-CELL DIRECTED THERAPIES IN A LARGE SINGLE-CENTER COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS AND RENAL DISEASES

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1214 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1433.1-1433

Author(s):

J. G. Rademacher ◽

V. Korendovych ◽

P. Korsten

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Adverse Events ◽

B Cell ◽

Clinical Data ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Infectious Complications ◽

Single Center ◽

Systemic Lupus ◽

Anca Associated Vasculitis

Background:The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (RTX) is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). In addition, RTX is used in a wide range of autoimmune diseases. Belimumab (BEL) is an anti-BAFF antibody approved for the treatment of non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Europe. These agents are generally well-tolerated but severe adverse events (AEs) can occur. The frequency of and factors associated with AEs are currently unknown.Objectives:To identify adverse events with the use of B-cell directed therapies in a large population of RA, AAV, and SLE.Methods:This is a single-center retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data over a ten-year period (2010-2020). We recorded epidemiological and clinical data of patients receiving either BEL or RTX. Data included age, gender, type of disease, number and efficacy of infusions, patient-years and concomitant treatment. Patient records were screened for AEs, such as infections, anaphylaxis, occurrence of malignant disease, laboratory abnormalities and immunoglobulin (Ig) deficiency. Between group comparisons were performed.Results:Database screening yielded 445 patients treated with RTX and 23 with BEL. After exclusion of patients with incomplete data, 425 RTX and 23 BEL patients were analyzed.Our preliminary analysis of a sample of 60 of these 448 patients (184 patient-years) resulted in 43 patients (72%) with RA, 8 patients with AAV (13%), 5 patients with a renal disease, and 4 patients with mixed connective tissue disease, as well 23 SLE patients. 46 (77%) were female. In RA, a median of 13 treatments of 1000 mg were administered, corresponding to 3.37 patient-years per patient. Primary non-response occurred in 2 patients, secondary non-response in 13 patients. For AAV, a median of 8.4 treatments were given (3.3 patient-years), no treatment failure was detected. SLE patients received a median of 15 treatments.15 patients had infectious complications during treatment, 11 needed treatment. Herpes zoster infection occurred in 3 patients with RA. Three of the 8 patients with AAV had an infection requiring treatment. In SLE patients, only 2 developed infectious complications, and no Ig-deficiency occurred.Lymphopenia was the most common laboratory abnormality detected in 25 patients with RTX, 19 of whom had RA. Ig deficiency was common in RA, affecting 30% of patients. Deficiency of IgM and IgG was recognized in 5 patients each; 1 patient had low levels IgA.Neither the maintenance prednisolone dosage nor Ig deficiency were associated with risk for infection. However, lymphopenia appeared to be associated with risk for infection.Conclusion:Our preliminary data observe a 184 patient-year period. RTX and BEL were generally associated with few AEs. RA patients frequently had laboratory abnormalities (lymphopenia, Ig-deficiency) which did not necessarily translate to clinical events. Infections were more common in AAV, BEL was the best tolerated B-cell directed agent. Overall, our data are reassuring, but we suggest a more careful vigilance in AAV patients.Disclosure of Interests:Jan-Gerd Rademacher: None declared, Viktor Korendovych: None declared, PETER KORSTEN Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Sanofi Aventis, GSK, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Consultant of: Lilly, Gilead, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK

Download Full-text

UNUSUAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF RENAL INVOLVEMENT IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine ◽

10.1111/j.1445-5994.1985.tb02741.x ◽

1985 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 69-71 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

C. K. YEUNG ◽

M. K. CHAN ◽

K. L. WONG ◽

W. L. NG ◽

W. S. WONG

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Systemic Lupus

Download Full-text

THU0503 Anti-C1Q Antibody as Marker of Renal Involvement in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.5627 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 74 (Suppl 2) ◽

pp. 382.1-382

Author(s):

C. Picard ◽

N. Fabien ◽

B. Ranchin ◽

P. Cochat ◽

A. Belot

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Childhood Onset ◽

Systemic Lupus ◽

Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Download Full-text

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort

Mediators of Inflammation ◽

10.1155/2015/328078 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 2015 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Conti Fabrizio ◽

Ceccarelli Fulvia ◽

Perricone Carlo ◽

Massaro Laura ◽

Marocchi Elisa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Serum Levels ◽

Activity Measurement ◽

Systemic Lupus ◽

Before And After ◽

Dsdna Antibodies

Objectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status.Methods. We identified three groups: anti-dsDNA + (persistent positivity); anti-dsDNA ± (initial positivity and subsequent negativity during disease course); anti-dsDNA − (persistent negativity). Disease activity was assessed by the European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM).Results. We evaluated 393 patients (anti-dsDNA +: 62.3%; anti-dsDNA ±: 13.3%; anti-dsDNA −: 24.4%). The renal involvement was significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA + (30.2%), compared with anti-dsDNA ± and anti-dsDNA − (21.1% and 18.7%, resp.;P=0.001). Serositis resulted significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA − (82.3%) compared to anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (20.8% and 13.4%, resp.;P<0.0001). The reduction of C4 serum levels was identified significantly more frequently in anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (40.0% and 44.2%, resp.) compared with anti-dsDNA − (21.8%,P=0.005). We did not identify significant differences in the mean ECLAM values before and after modification of anti-dsDNA status (P=0.7).Conclusion. Anti-dsDNA status influences the clinical and immunological features of SLE patients. Nonetheless, it does not appear to affect disease activity.

Download Full-text

The impact of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from a single center in Catalonia

Clinical Rheumatology ◽

10.1007/s10067-021-05675-x ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Gerard Espinosa ◽

Sergio Prieto-González ◽

Mireia Llevadot ◽

Javier Marco-Hernández ◽

Antonio Martínez-Artuña ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Single Center ◽

Systemic Lupus ◽

Coronavirus Infection ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Living with systemic lupus erythematosus in 2020: a European patient survey

Lupus Science & Medicine ◽

10.1136/lupus-2020-000469 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. e000469

Author(s):

Alain Cornet ◽

Jeanette Andersen ◽

Kirsi Myllys ◽

Angela Edwards ◽

Laurent Arnaud

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Online Survey ◽

Complex Disease ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Median Number ◽

Sexual Life ◽

Diagnosis Delay ◽

Systemic Lupus ◽

Organ Systems

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to analyse the 2020 burden of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in Europe, from the patients’ perspective.MethodsIn May 2020, Lupus Europe, the European umbrella patient association for SLE, designed and disseminated a multilingual anonymous online survey to individuals with a self-reported physician’s diagnosis of SLE living in Europe.ResultsData from 4375 SLE survey respondents (95.9% women, median age: 45 (IQR: 36–54) years, 70.7% Caucasians) from 35 European countries were analysed. The median age at SLE diagnosis was 30 years (IQR: 22–40) and the median diagnosis delay was 2 years (IQR: 0–6). The most commonly affected organ-systems included the joints (81.8%) and skin (59.4%), with renal involvement in 30%. Another diagnosis was given before that of SLE in 45.0%, including psychological/mental disorders in 9.1% and fibromyalgia in 5.9%. The median number of symptoms reported was 9 (IQR: 6–11) out of 21, with fatigue most common (85.3%) and most bothersome. The median number of SLE-related medications was 5 (IQR: 3–7), including antimalarials (75%), oral glucocorticoids (52.4%), immunosuppressants (39.8%) and biologics (10.9%). Respondents reported significant impact over their studies, career and emotional/sexual life in 50.7%, 57.9% and 38.2%, respectively. Appropriate access to care was highly variable across countries and care component.ConclusionThis survey underlines the 2020 burden and strong heterogeneity in the care of SLE across Europe, from the patient’s perspective. Altogether, these data may prove crucial to physicians, patients and policy-makers to improve the diagnosis and management of this rare and complex disease.

Download Full-text