Volumetric bone mineral density derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements

SummaryThin slices of the proximal femora of twelve immature dogs were examined with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, after surgical creation and repair of proximal femoral physeal fractures. A protocol for the subtraction of microvascular barium sulphate was used to eliminate interference from the barium with the determination of bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD) and volumetric bone mineral density (VBMD). The results showed there was a significant decrease in the BMC (four and eight weeks) and BMD (eight weeks) for the entire proximal femora of the operated side when compared to the non-operated side. Significant decreases were also seen for the BMC of the physeal region at week eight and the VBMD of the metaphyseal area in the two week femora. The findings with DEXA support the clinical findings of femoral neck thinning in proximal femoral physeal fractures that are surgically repaired. The DEXA findings suggest that the quality of the bone of the femoral neck is less as shown by the decreased BMC, BMD and VBMD. Postoperative complications may occur at a higher frequency when such quality changes occur.Dog proximal femora were examined with DEXA after surgical creation and repair of proximal femoral physeal fractures. DEXA findings support clinical findings of femoral neck thining after fracture repair.

Download Full-text

Inverse Correlation at the Hip Between Areal Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Cortical Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography

Journal of Clinical Densitometry ◽

10.1016/j.jocd.2015.01.002 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 19 (2) ◽

pp. 226-233 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Anne Kristine Amstrup ◽

Niels Frederik Breum Jakobsen ◽

Søren Lomholt ◽

Tanja Sikjaer ◽

Leif Mosekilde ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Quantitative Computed Tomography ◽

Inverse Correlation ◽

Dual Energy ◽

Areal Bone Mineral Density ◽

Volumetric Bone Mineral Density ◽

Mineral Density ◽

X Ray

Download Full-text

Bone health index by hand X-ray compared with bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Bone Abstracts ◽

10.1530/boneabs.7.p91 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Jonathan J Bowden ◽

Ramkumar Krishnamurthy ◽

Houchun Hu ◽

Brent Adler ◽

Rajesh Krishnamurthy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy ◽

Muscular Dystrophy ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Bone Health ◽

Dual Energy ◽

Health Index ◽

Mineral Density ◽

X Ray ◽

Bone Health Index

Download Full-text

POS0045 LEAST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN BONE DENSITOMETRY IN PATIENTS WITH OBESITY

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.3819 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 227.2-228

Author(s):

D. Claire ◽

M. Geoffroy ◽

L. Kanagaratnam ◽

C. Isabelle ◽

A. Hittinger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

General Population ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Bone Densitometry ◽

Dual Energy ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Least Significant Change ◽

X Ray ◽

Significant Change

Background:Dual energy X-ray absoprtiometry is the reference method to mesure bone mineral density (1). Loss of bone mineral density is significant if it exceeds the least significant change. The threshold value used in general population is 0,03 g/cm2 (2). Patients with obesity are known for having a higher bone mineral density due to metabolism and physiopathology characteristics (3,4).Objectives:The aim of our study was to determine the least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity.Methods:We conducted an interventionnal study in 120 patients with obesity who performed a bone densitometry. We measured twice the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck and the total hip in the same time (5,6). We determined the least significant change in bone densitometry from each pair of measurements, using the Bland and Altman method. We also determined the least significant change in bone densitometry according to each stage of obesity.Results:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is 0,046g/cm2 at the lumbar spine, 0.069 g/cm2 at the femoral neck and 0.06 g/cm2 at the total hip.Conclusion:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is higher than in general population. These results may improve DXA interpretation in this specific population, and may personnalize their medical care.References:[1]Lees B, Stevenson JC. An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. mai 1992;2(3):146-52.[2]Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, Blain H, Buchon D, Chapurlat R, et al. Actualisation 2018 des recommandations françaises du traitement de l’ostéoporose post-ménopausique. Rev Rhum. oct 2018;85(5):428-40.[3]Shapses SA, Pop LC, Wang Y. Obesity is a concern for bone health with aging. Nutr Res N Y N. mars 2017;39:1-13.[4]Savvidis C, Tournis S, Dede AD. Obesity and bone metabolism. Hormones. juin 2018;17(2):205-17.[5]Roux C, Garnero P, Thomas T, Sabatier J-P, Orcel P, Audran M, et al. Recommendations for monitoring antiresorptive therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum. janv 2005;72(1):26-31.[6]Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C. Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res. août 1999;14(8):1449-56.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

Download Full-text