Neurologic Injury and Recovery in Patients With Burst Fracture of the Thoracolumbar Spine

Spine ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam-Hyun Kim ◽  
Hwan-Mo Lee ◽  
In-Mo Chun
2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (7) ◽  
pp. 1747-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J Lenarz ◽  
Catherine M Wittgen ◽  
Howard M Place

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyu-Yeol Lee ◽  
Myung-Jin Lee ◽  
Sung-Keun Sohn ◽  
Hyeon-Jun Kim

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan-Jin Park ◽  
Sung-Kyu Kim ◽  
Tae-Min Lee ◽  
Eric T. Park

Abstract In order to enhance the reliability of the application to clinical practice of the TLICS classification, we retrospectively reviewed the patients with thoracolumbar spine injuries who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and analyzed the validity of the TLICS classification and the necessity of MRI. We enrolled 328 patients with thoracolumbar spine injury who underwent MRI. All patients were classified into conservative and operative treatment groups. The TLICS score of each group was analyzed and the degree of consistent with the recommended treatment through the TLICS classification was examined. Of the total 328 patients, 138 patients were treated conservatively and 190 patients were treated by surgery. Of the 138 patients who underwent conservative treatment, 131 patients (94.9%) had a TLICS score of 4 points or less, and matched with the recommendation score for conservative treatment according to the TLICS classification (match rate 94.9%, 131/138). Of the 190 patients who underwent operative treatment, 160 patients (84.2%) had a TLICS score of 4 points or more (match rate 84.2%, 160/190). All of 30 mismatched patients with a TLICS score of 3 points or less (15.8%) had stable burst fracture without neurological deficit. We retrospectively reviewed the validity of the TLICS classification for the injuries of the thoracolumbar spine, based on MRI in a large group of patients. Treatment with TLICS classification showed high validity, especially in conservative group, and MRI should be an essential diagnostic tool for accurate evaluation of posterior ligamentous complex injury.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 437
Author(s):  
Kazunobu Abe ◽  
Naohisa Miyakoshi ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
Michio Hongo ◽  
Yuji Kasukawa ◽  
...  

Background: Due to its rarity, surgical treatments for a complete fifth lumbar osteoporotic vertebral burst fracture (L5 OVBF) have yet to be well documented as compared to that for osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. The current case report discusses details of the surgical outcomes following posterior decompression and fusion for a complete L5 OVBF. Case Description: Three women, ranging in age from 69 years to 82 years, were surgically treated for a complete L5 OVBF. Two of these patients were being treated for rheumatoid arthritis. Surgery was performed using the L5 shortening osteotomy or vertebroplasty, with one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and posterior spinal fixation for the L2 or L3 to the pelvis. Although the spinal alignment parameters, which included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, T1 pelvic angle, and sagittal vertical axis, were better as compared to that observed before the surgery, these worsened at the final follow-up due to clinical fractures that occurred at the adjacent vertebral body and proximal junctional kyphosis. Compared to preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, postoperative JOA scores were improved and maintained at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Posterior surgery of a complete L5 OVBF led to improvement of both the JOA score and spinal alignment after the surgery. Despite a worsening of the spinal alignment parameters, the JOA score was maintained at the final follow-up.


Author(s):  
Halim Rahman Manurung ◽  
Sabri Ibrahim ◽  
Ridha Dharmajaya

Abstract. Spinal fracture and dislocation are among the most feared injuries by patients and physicians alike, as the consequences can be devastating, ranging from mild pain and discomfort to severe paralysis and even death. Spinal trauma is commonly found in patients admitted to level-one trauma centers after serious accidents like traffic, falling, and sports accidents.Injuries of the cervical spine account for one third of spinal fractures and half to two thirds of all spinal cord injuries.In the thoracolumbar spine, the most common unstable fracture is the burst fracture. Altogether, burst fractures have been reported to account for about 15% of spinal injuries.Incidence of burst fractures peaked at the thoracolumbar junction and between levels T5 and T8. In 10% of cases,more than one burst fracture was seen, thereof 53% on noncontiguous levels. Main accident mechanisms were falls, traffic, and sports. Neurological deficit was highest in patients with burst fractures of the cervical spine, independent of accident mechanism, and lowest in thoracolumbar junction fractures. Burst fractures occur frequently in high energy traumas and are most commonly associated with falling and traffic accidents.Multiple burst fractures occur in 10% of cases, half thereof on noncontiguous levels.Access to the anterior thoracic spine via the transthoracic approach (via thoracotomy) can be used for decompression and fusion. To perform adequate decompression and stabilization of the thoracic spine, obtaining good exposure is a must. Preservation and protection of the vascular structures in the thoracic cavity is the key to such an exposure. Preoperative workup should include imaging modalities (plain rontgens, MRI/CT scan) to specifically define the area of decompression. If a tumor is being evaluated, CT angiography and embolization are helpful in preoperative planning. Assistance by a thoracic surgeon for exposure is highly recommended.


Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. e0066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Yu ◽  
Yao Wang ◽  
Xi-Wen Zhang ◽  
Zhen-De Jiang ◽  
Xiu-Jie Zhu ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 622-625
Author(s):  
Keiichiro Shiba ◽  
Masaaki Katsuki ◽  
Takayoshi Ueta ◽  
Kenzo Shirasawa ◽  
Hideki Ohta ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-132
Author(s):  
Barajas Vanegas Raymundo ◽  
Barajas Mota Raymundo ◽  
Villegas Domínguez Josué Eli ◽  
Hernández Álvarez María Betten

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the category of evidence and the strength of recommendation for the conservative treatment of thoracolumbar spine burst fractures. Method: A systematic review was conducted from April 2014 to June 2015, selecting articles according to their prospective design, related to thoracolumbar spine burst fractures and their treatment. These studies were published in the electronic bibliographic databases from January 2009 to January 2015. Results: A total of 9,504 articles were found in a free search, of which 7 met the selection criteria and were included for analysis in a study of a total of 435 patients, of whom 72 underwent surgical treatment and 363 received some type of conservative treatment, showing predominantly level of evidence "1b", with strength of recommendation type "A". Conclusions: According to the evidence obtained, the conservative treatment is a choice for patients with stable burst fracture in a single level of thoracolumbar spine and with no neurological injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document