Exercise and Weight Loss Reduce Blood Pressure in Men and Women with Mild Hypertension

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
J A Blumenthal ◽  
A Sherwood ◽  
E CD Gullette ◽  
M Babyak ◽  
R Waugh ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 160 (13) ◽  
pp. 1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Blumenthal ◽  
Andrew Sherwood ◽  
Elizabeth C. D. Gullette ◽  
Michael Babyak ◽  
Robert Waugh ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 770-771
Author(s):  
Frans H. H. Leenen

In recent years antihypertensive therapy has evolved from treatment for a relatively small number of patients with severe hypertension to treatment for millions of people with mild to severe hypertension. We now treat not only patients at high risk for future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, of whom nearly all are benefitting from antihypertensive therapy, but also much larger groups of patients each individually at low risk. In this latter group only a small percentage actually benefits from antihypertensive therapy. For example, in the Australian trial in subjects with mild hypertension and no other evidence of cardiovascular disease, only two excess deaths were prevented at the expense of 1000 patient-years of drug treatment (Australian Therapeutic Trial 1980). For most individual members of this group normalizing their mild blood pressure elevation appears to offer no benefit, yet all of them are exposed to antihypertensive therapy and its side effects. When instituting antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in patients with mild hypertension one has to be concerned about these side effects, not just the objective ones (e.g., effects on plasma lipoproteins or glucose which may offset any gains to be obtained by lowering blood pressure), but also subjective ones (e.g., fatigue, impotence) which may markedly affect the quality of life.Nonpharmacologic, in particular nutritional, management of mild hypertension has intuitively major appeal for "lowering blood pressure without side effects." Many studies have evaluated the effects of dietary changes on blood pressure. Several recent symposia have addressed the issue of nutrition and hypertension. Despite this, the report from the first Consensus Development Conference of the Canadian Hypertension Society ("on the management of mild hypertension in Canada") states "Because of conflicting evidence and problems with patient compliance, the conference had difficulty reaching consensus on the effectiveness of salt restriction and, for the obese, of weight reduction in lowering blood pressure" (Logan 1984).This issue of the Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology contains the proceedings of a workshop "Nutritional Management of Hypertension: Controversies and Frontiers," held in Harrison Hot Springs, British Columbia, September 6–7, 1985. This workshop was organized under the auspices of the Canadian Hypertension Society and made possible by generous financial support from ICI Pharma, Canada (general sponsorship) as well as from the National Institute of Nutrition for the obesity session, and from the Dairy Bureau of Canada for the sodium–calcium session.To define more clearly the controversies and uncertainties, this workshop was organized in a different way than previous meetings dealing with this issue. A clinical scientist working in a particular area was invited to outline the evidence in favour of a given dietary manipulation for the treatment of hypertension, and another one to outline the evidence against. This evaluation would particularly concern evidence regarding "efficacy" and "effectiveness". A discussant then presented an evaluation of the two position papers, followed by a general discussion and a summary by the session chairman. This type of scrutiny of our current knowledge was done for sodium restriction, calcium supplementation, and weight loss. As part of this evaluation two speakers addressed the closely related issues of practical aspects of diet management (e.g. compliance) and the consequences–risks of weight loss in relation to the pathophysiology of obesity.In the last part of the workshop possible future developments in nutrition and hypertension were reviewed, such as "nutrition in the young, early intervention?," vegetarian approach to hypertension, role of dietary fats, and proteins and precursors.The organizing committee very much appreciated that Dr. David Sackett was willing to serve as the scientific chairman of this workshop, to summarize the present "state of the art" on diet modulation in the management of hypertension as well as to propose recommendations for treatment of hypertension in clinical practice and for future research directions.It was a pleasure for me to serve as chairman of the organizing committee. As President of the Canadian Hypertension Society I would like to thank all session chairmen, speakers, discussants, and participants for their enthusiasm and eagerness to explore the topic of nutrition and hypertension. I hope that the scientific information and insight that the proceedings of this workshop offer will convey their commitment.


1982 ◽  
Vol 63 (s8) ◽  
pp. 407s-409s ◽  
Author(s):  
T. O. Morgan

1. A group of eight patients with mild hypertension, sensitive to sodium intake, were studied. 2. Sodium chloride (70 mmol daily) caused their blood pressure to rise by 19/14 mmHg. 3. Sodium bicarbonate (70 mmol daily) caused their blood pressure to rise by 12/5 mmHg. 4. Sodium chloride given together with potassium chloride (70 mmol of each daily) caused their blood pressure to rise by 9.6 mmHg. 5. These results suggest that sodium bicarbonate causes a smaller rise in blood pressure than sodium chloride does and that potassium chloride reduces the blood pressure raising effect of sodium chloride. 6. A low sodium, high potassium and an alkaline diet may therefore be a more effective dietary method to reduce blood pressure than a diet low in sodium alone.


2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Ian Shrier ◽  
Oded Bar-Or

1961 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Brouha ◽  
P. E. Smith ◽  
R. De Lanne ◽  
M. E. Maxfield

Men and women performing a standard exercise were studied in three environments. Pulmonary ventilation, O2 consumption, CO2 elimination, heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature and weight loss were recorded. Pulmonary ventilation was usually decreased in the warm-dry environment and increased in the warm-humid. Oxygen consumption was significantly lower in the warm-dry environment than at room temperature. The pattern of changes of these two functions was similar for both sexes. Respiratory exchange ratios were not influenced by sex, but were higher in the warm-dry environment. Increase in body temperature was found only in the warm-humid environment, with a smaller weight loss than in warm-dry conditions. Systolic blood pressure was influenced by work load but not by environments. Diastolic pressure varied little for both sexes under all conditions. Heart rate was significantly influenced by sex and environment, being highest for the women in the warm-humid conditions. Cardiac cost increased and cardiac efficiency decreased in both warm surroundings, more so for women than for men. Submitted on May 16, 1960


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro de Oliveira Carpes ◽  
Lucas Betti Domingues ◽  
Renato Schimitt ◽  
Sandra C. Fuchs ◽  
Taha Alhalimi ◽  
...  

Background: The efficacy of power training (PT) to acutely reduce blood pressure (BP) in participants with hypertension is controversial, and no studies have assessed the influence of sex on post-exercise hypotension and its mechanisms in older adults.Purpose: The aims of this secondary, exploratory analysis were to compare the effects of a single bout of PT on post-exercise hypotension, BP variability, and endothelial function between older men and women with hypertension.Methods: Twenty-four participants with hypertension (12 men and 12 women aged to >60 years old) took part in this crossover study and randomly performed two experimental sessions: power exercise training (PT) and non-exercising control session (Con). The PT protocol was composed of 3 sets of 8–10 repetitions of five exercises performed in the following order: leg press, bench press, knee extension, upright row, and knee flexion, using an intensity corresponding to 50% of one repetition maximal test (1RM) and 2-min intervals between sets and exercises. The concentric phase of exercises during each repetition was performed “as fast as possible,” while the eccentric phase lasted 1 to 2 s. During Con, the participants remained at seated rest on the same exercise machines, but without any exercise. Each protocol lasted 40 min. Office BP, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), 24-h ambulatory BP, and the average real variability (ARV) of systolic and diastolic BP were assessed before and after experimental sessions.Results: Comparing PT with Con, a reduced office BP after exercise was found in men (systolic BP—average post 1 h: −14 mmHg, p < 0.001; diastolic BP—average post 1 h: −8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and only a reduced systolic BP in women (average post 1 h: −7 mmHg, p = 0.04). Comparing men and women, a reduced systolic BP (post 60': −15 mmHg, p = 0.048; average post 1 h: −7 mmHg, p = 0.046) and diastolic BP (post 60': −9 mmHg, p = 0.049) after the first hour were found in men. In relation to 24-h ambulatory BP, ARV, and FMD, no statistically significant differences were found between men and women.Conclusion: In older adults with hypertension, the office BP response after the experimental sessions was different in men and women, showing that the PT protocol is more effective to acutely reduce BP in men. Additionally, the mechanisms behind this reduction remain unclear. This finding suggests that sex cannot be combined to analyze post-exercise hypotension.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03615625.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document