scholarly journals Health effects of ambient black carbon and ultrafine particles

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 347-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Redaelli M ◽  
Sanchez M ◽  
Fuertes E ◽  
Blanchard M ◽  
Mullot J ◽  
...  
Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 414
Author(s):  
Francesca Costabile ◽  
Maurizio Gualtieri ◽  
Carla Ancona ◽  
Silvia Canepari ◽  
Stefano Decesari

Suspected detrimental health effects associated with ultrafine particles (UFPs) are impressive. However, epidemiological evidence is still limited. This is potentially due to challenges related to UFP exposure assessment and the lack of consensus on a standard methodology for UFPs. It is imperative to focus future health studies on those UFP metrics more likely to represent health effects. This is the purpose of this paper, where we extend the results obtained during the CARE (“Carbonaceous Aerosol in Rome and Environs”) experiment started in 2017 in Rome. The major purpose is to investigate features of airborne UFPs associated with pro-inflammatory and oxidative responses. Aerosol chemical, microphysical, and optical properties were measured, together with the oxidative potential, at temporal scales relevant for UFPs (minutes to hours). The biological responses were obtained using both in-vivo and in-vitro tests carried out directly under environmental conditions. Findings indicate that caution should be taken when assessing health-relevant exposure to UFPs through the conventional metrics like total particle number concentration and PM2.5 and Black Carbon (BC) mass concentration. Conversely, we recommend adding to these, a UFP source apportionment analysis and indicators for both ultrafine black carbon and the size of particles providing most of the total surface area to available toxic molecules.


2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (14) ◽  
pp. 8712-8720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise R. Montagne ◽  
Gerard Hoek ◽  
Jochem O. Klompmaker ◽  
Meng Wang ◽  
Kees Meliefste ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kushwaha ◽  
A. Upadhya ◽  
P. Agrawal ◽  
E. Savio ◽  
J. Gingrich ◽  
...  

F1000Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 376 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B Warheit

Nanotechnology is an emerging, cross-disciplinary technology designed to create and synthesize new materials at the nanoscale (generally defined as a particle size range of ≤10-9 meters) to generate innovative or altered material properties. The particle properties can be modified to promote different and more flexible applications, resulting in consumer benefits, particularly in medical, cosmetic, and industrial applications. As this applied science matures and flourishes, concerns have arisen regarding potential health effects of exposures to untested materials, as many newly developed products have not been adequately evaluated. Indeed, it is necessary to ensure that societal and commercial advantages are not outweighed by potential human health or environmental disadvantages. Therefore, a variety of international planning activities or research efforts have been proposed or implemented, particularly in the European Union and United States, with the expectation that significant advances will be made in understanding potential hazards related to exposures in the occupational and/or consumer environments. One of the first conclusions reached regarding hazardous effects of nanoparticles stemmed from the findings of early pulmonary toxicology studies, suggesting that lung exposures to ultrafine particles were more toxic than those to larger, fine-sized particles of similar chemistry. This review documents some of the conceptual planning efforts, implementation strategies/activities, and research accomplishments over the past 10 years or so. It also highlights (in this author’s opinion) some shortcomings in the research efforts and accomplishments over the same duration. In general, much progress has been made in developing and implementing environmental, health, and safety research-based protocols for addressing nanosafety issues. However, challenges remain in adequately investigating health effects given 1) many different nanomaterial types, 2) various potential routes of exposure, 3) nanomaterial characterization issues, 4) limitations in research methodologies, such as time-course and dose-response issues, and 5) inadequate in vitro methodologies for in vivo standardized, guideline toxicity testing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheol-Heon Jeong ◽  
Alison Traub ◽  
Greg J. Evans

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 4539
Author(s):  
Aurelio Tobias ◽  
Cristina Reche ◽  
Angeliki Karanasiou ◽  
Fulvio Amato ◽  
Jorge Pey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document